ML102640428

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:38, 21 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Indian Point, Unit 2 - Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML102640428
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/01/2010
From: Ferrick J
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To: Caruso J G
Operations Branch I
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML092470061 List:
References
TAC U01787
Download: ML102640428 (15)
v • d • e


Text

Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Date of Examination:

tJl'ukbJJ, Developed by: Written -Facility RNRC II Operating

-Facility 9{ NRC U rAJA-I Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference)

Examiner's Initials -180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and 'XlA -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; "'loll ,-120 Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) -120 Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) [-90] Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] V . {-75} Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1f2, ES-401-3, ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; {-70} Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-4S} Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-S, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; '1l -30 Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; (1\'ES-202) -14 Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; -14 Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; -14 Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) q II -7 Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC (C.2.i; V-7 Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to qualifications f eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) -7 Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines with facility licensee -7 Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and distributed to NRC examiners t

  • Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case basis in coordination with the facility

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the ES-201, Page 25 of 28 I Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. Verify that the outline(s)

Iit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. rn w I'.Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared In accordance with R , fh1 J\Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. T J3(j T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic d. Assess whether the justlficatlons for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

  • rWa. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required of normal evolutions.

Instrument and component failures, technical 1YJ afJ S and major U\b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam Integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested ai?L at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated A from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. To the extent possible.

assess whether the outllne(s) conform(s) with the qualitative 0 f}t R and quantitative criteria speCified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 3. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria speCified on Form ES-301-2:

IU'(1 ) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and In-plant W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the ,l).\fl Irfl I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form the number of alternate path. low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1 the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form at least one task Is new or significantly modified no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix (};II as of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 4. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE inSights) are covered 62-1 )\ in the appropriate exam

(\ G E Assess whether the 1 0 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant*specific priorities) are at least 2.5. .CW,,'" R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. L Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. . Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). !t1t..t{: '" IJ""

a. 1J...". :SC1-...J{Jt-.)l

\.!

n

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Hl<'\ f"=).

.1>21........ c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

r;;:

0 "-:-:-¥ K-rf//../ ) d. NRC Supervisor

'Sa""", I4.lI\f*"/( / <::;??Zi..

.09 Y J/!!!AV Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not applicable for NRC*prepared examination outlines ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons een authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the t{fining or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in thilJacility procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any suggestions that examination security may have been

2. Post-Examination

..,/t.;z" .,0'"U;

To best of my knowledQM.l did not divulge to any pers?ns any, informatipn

... c..

ing the NR,C licensing dUring the weekes) of nil-W,<.;From the date that I entered Into this te completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who licensing examinations.

except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

'\

(1) DATE , -3//z/to---,"'

V..l) 11:.1 '7! . n.. ,,-, (" _":1'1 -. <';?' (J -./ VviAIL...V\,') *

  • N,""" r -. '" ,;: "l....L ......{..8,.. n =' ,,=/n

__ _____ fc::;;;o;r

    • !

\t>t ES-201, Page 27 of 28 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-l 1. Pre-Examination . rtill/Ie;;

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of iTi I(lltC as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I wit! immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of 7Jt"..

the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

---0 / -<

TItA..'.t\

II'!1 . . tl\e,,::OS t' , ... ..J "&-""-4 ! 9l."""c;..t"'VlJ r...... 0 ,IJ?XUtpJ tcN?JQ.

Jot Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit : Date of Examination:

Test Number: 1. General Criteria a Initials b* c# a. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination. The 0 eratin test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test s). (see Section D.1.a.) Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. . It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desi nated license level. 2. Walk-Through Criteria Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if a licable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a cop is attached.

Date 1/1 a. Author b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 7' 07/i. //C>d. NRC Supervisor
  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

___ __ ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist II Facilty: ::I:'P-Date of Numbers: l/lJ '3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Form ES-301-4 Operating Test No.: Initials a b* c# ___

1L-1_,___T_h_e_i_n_iti_a_1 c_o_n_d_it_io_n_s_a_re_re_a_li_st_ic_'_in.:.-th_a_t_s_om_e_e_q_u.;,.iP_m_e_n_t_a_n_d_/o_r_in_s_tru_m_e_n_ta_t_io_n_m_a_y_be_o_ut I, of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. I 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 'lMif .1 3. Each event description consists of V'

  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable) No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics, Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time Cues are The simulator modeling is not altered. The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 55,46(d), any open performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form (submit the form along with the simulator Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes Total malfunctions (5-8) 1 I" /b "" C[)"Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2.. I l. / 2.. "

__----------------

__

__' 4. Major transients i I I / I c::z8 < 1r-5_.____

_____________________EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) I Ii/ I Critical tasks (2-3) '-l I '3 I 3 'f&\lIC.tD m v Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 f.-Z-Date of Numbers: t-J/ I Operating Test No.: t QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* C# The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out aj3 QfV'of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. Each event description consists of"J

  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the
  • the expected operator actions (by shift rh." (the event termination point (if applicable) No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event (t!/I'\l The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

a2 Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario a&<,HI Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are AThe simulator modeling is not altered. OJ;, The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned fA Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

\ All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form (submit the form along with the simulator

, arfi Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator I * \; Wf \.....The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per ScenariO; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 I I (/'.2-> l")(lMalfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1-/ I '0Jf Cl.:c?c Abnormal events (2-4) 3 / I .&: Major transients (1-2) I / QD, I h 1-icbEOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) I I EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) I / / 8U\ Critical tasks (2-3) Z-/ I a2< 8 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:

IP-2 Date of Exam: 7/12/10 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 2 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 3 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 4 CREW POSITION S B A R T 0 0 C P T 0 T A L M I N I M U M(*) R U E 0 SRO-I 1 #1 5 4 4 2 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 SRO-I #2 I/C 2 5 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 2 TS 2 0 2 2 RX 0 SRO-I NOR #3 IIC 4 2 5 MAJ 1 TS 2 2 RX 1 SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 #4 IIC 2 5 5 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 TS 2 2 0 2 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for -1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 IP-2 Date of Exam: 7/12/10 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 2 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 3 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 4 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P T 0 T A L M I N I M U M(*) R U E RX 0 RO NOR 1 #1 I/C 4 5 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RX 0 RO NOR 1 #2 I/C 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RX 1 0 RO NOR 1 1 #3 I/C 2 3 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RX 1 RO NOR #4 I/C 2 4 5 MAJ 1 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the A TC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under norma! or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 IP-2 Date of Exam: 7/12/10 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P P L I C A N T V E N T T Y P 1 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 2 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 3 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P 4 CREW POSITION S A B R T 0 0 C P T 0 T A L R M I N I M U M(*) U E RX 0 RO NOR #5 I/C 4 5 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:

IP-2 Date of Examination:

7/12/10 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS SRO-I #1 SRO-I #2 SRO-I #3 SRO-I #4 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 .:<:' !. I nterpretlDiagnose 1 1 <+ 2 1 1 2 ****** Events and Conditions Comply With and 5 1 6 1 5 .. ? ::: i<<> 5 1 6 .,;' 1 5 6 ' .,: Use Procedures (1) ::i:'l .., '.... Operate Control 4 4 . ;. *.

4 4 :......* !i Boards (2) Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) 7 7 4 6 6 J

!! 6 7 7 7 7 4 6 6 *.Ii ir 6 I.. 7 7 .... ;; 6 :****:,;f Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 2 2

'. 2 2 2 Iii'!:' 2 2 Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:

IP-2 Date of Examination:

7/12/10 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO#1 RO#2 RO#3 RO#4 Competencies 1 I nterpretiDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and 2 Use Procedures Operate Control 3 Boards Communicate 6 and Interact Comply With and Use Tech. Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:

IP-2 Date of Examination:

7/12/10 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO#5 Competencies I nterpretlDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures Operate Control Boards Communicate and Interact Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility:

rf'e L Date of Exam: .." I 0 Exam level: RO SRO Initial Item Oescri a 1 Questions and answers are technicall accurate and a licable to the tacili a. NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions.

b. Faci!" leamin ob'actives are referenced as available. SRO The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO were re eated from the last 2 NRC ficensin exams, consult the NRR Ol ro ram office Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears

_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; _ the examinations were developed independently; )t... the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; _ other Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the new or modified); enter the actual RO /

uestion distribution s at r" ht. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the exam are written at the comprehension/

analysis the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO uestion distribution s at ri Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away or aid in the elimination of Question content conforms with specifIC KIA statements in the previously examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are deviations are ndix B. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice the total is correct and a rees with the value on the cover {j-;-Date " a. !J/II/IO b. Facility Reviewer (*) c. NRC Chief Examiner Vb ") /)d. NRC Regional Supervisor

  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

n# Inde endent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c; chief examiner concurrence r uired.

c Written Examination Grading Form ES*403*1 Quality Checklist Date of Exam: 7/;)d/.;010 Initials Item Descn a b 1. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s at check> 25% of examinations Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Date a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML102640428&oldid=960482"