ML102950164

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:40, 20 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - Email Request for Additional Information Regarding Decommissioning Funding Assurance for the Rpi Reactor License Renewal (TAC No ME1591)
ML102950164
Person / Time
Site: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Issue date: 10/22/2010
From: Kennedy W B
Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch
To: Proskine S
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
References
TAC ME1591
Download: ML102950164 (1)


Text

From: Kennedy, William Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 9:28 AM To: Proskine, Sue Cc: Trumbull, Timothy H.

Subject:

Request for revision of the self-guarantee for decommissioning funding assurance

Dear Ms. Proskine,

As discussed during our telephone conversation on October 7, 2010, the information dated August 31, 2010, regarding decommissioning funding assurance for the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) Critical Experiments Facility (RCF) requires revision. Please address the following issues and submit a revised copy of the self-guarantee agreement and Chief Financial Officer's (CFO) letter.

1. There are numerous references in the CFO's letter and the self-guarantee agreement to Title 10, Chapter I of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 30. The regulations in 10 CFR Part 30 apply only to domestic licensing of byproduct materials (although the appendices contain financial tests for decommissioning funding that are incorporated by reference into regulations for other types of NRC licenses). With the exception of the second reference in Recital 4 of the self-guarantee agreement, revise the references to reflect that the RCF is licensed under 10 CFR Part 50. 2. Provide numbering for all Recitals in the self-guarantee agreement. 3. Revise Recital 2 of the self-guarantee agreement to reflect that RPI has a facility license for the RCF, and not a materials license. 4. Recitals 6 and 14 of the self-guarantee agreement refer to "facilities," whereas the CFO's letter only lists one facility (i.e., the RCF). Revise the Recitals to be consistent with the CFO's letter. 5. Consider deleting Recital 10 of the self-guarantee as it is redundant with the regulations for transfer of a facility license.

If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at 301-415-2784 or by electronic mail at William.Kennedy@nrc.gov.

William B. Kennedy Project Manager Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-2784 William.Kennedy@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Request for revision of the self-guarantee for decommissioning funding assurance

Sent Date: 10/22/2010 9:32:32 AM Received Date: 10/22/2010 9:27:00 AM From: Kennedy, William

Created By: William.Kennedy@nrc.gov

Recipients:

PROSKS@rpi.edu (Proskine, Sue)

Tracking Status: None trumbt2@rpi.edu (Trumbull, Timothy H.)

Tracking Status: None

Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time

MESSAGE 6463 10/22/2010

Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False

Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: