ML13308B382
| ML13308B382 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/2013 |
| From: | Turk S E NRC/OGC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS 25301 | |
| Download: ML13308B382 (8) | |
Text
November 1, 20 1 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
) Docket Nos. 50
-247-LR/286-LR ) (Indian Point Nuclear Generating
) Units 2 and 3)
) NRC STAFF'S 2 1 ST STATUS REPORT IN RESPONSE TO THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD'S ORDER OF FEBRUARY 16, 2012 In accordance with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's ("Board") "Order (Granting NRC Staff's Unopposed Time Extension Motion and Directing Filing of Status Updates)
" ("Order"), issued on February 16, 2012, the N RC Staff ("Staff") herewith provides its 2 1 st monthly status report to the Board. 1. Contention RK
-EC-8. As stated in the Staff's previous status report
, 1 Contention RK-EC-8 challenges the Staff's issuance of its Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ("FSEIS") related to license renewal of Indian Point Units 2 and 3 ("IP2" and "IP3")
, 2 prior to completin g its consultations with the National Marine Fisheries Service ("NMFS")
under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"). On January 30, 2013, NMFS issued a final Biological Opinion for endangered species in the vicinity of IP2 and IP 3, and in June 2013, the Staff issued a Supplement (Volume 4) to the FSEIS, in which it described the completion of its consultation process with NMFS and incorporated NMFS's views in its evaluation of the impacts
1 "NRC Staff's 20th Status Report in Response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Order of February 16, 2012" (Oct. 1, 2013) ("
20 th Status Report"), at 1. 2 "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units Nos. 2 and 3," NUREG
-1437, Supp.
38, Vol. 4 (June 2013).
of license renewal on endangered and threatened species under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ("NEPA").
On July 17, 2013, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy" or "Applicant")
filed a motion to dismiss Contention RK
-EC-8 as moot;3 answers to the Applicant's motion were filed by the Staff and Riverkeeper on August 6 and August 20, 2013
, respectively. A Board decision on the Applicant's motion is pending.
- 2. Amended Contention RK-EC-8 A. On August 20, 2013, Riverkeeper filed a motion seeking to amend Contention RK
-EC-8.4 Answers to Riverkeeper's motion and its proposed amended contention were filed by the Staff and Applicant o n October 1, 2013, to which Riverkeeper replied on October 8, 2013. A Board decision on the admissibility of Riverkeeper's mended Contention RK
-EC-8 A is pending
. 3. SER Supplement 2. As stated previously, 5 the Staff plan s to issue Supplement 2 to i t s Safety Evaluation Report ("SER")
related to license renewal of IP2/IP3
, in which it will address information provid ed in the Applicant
's responses to Staff requests for additional information ("RAIs") following the issuance of SER Supplement 1
- this will include information concerning the Applicant's Reactor Vessel Internals ("RVI") Aging Management Program and Inspection Plan
("AMP"), as well as changes made to the LRA since the issuance of SER Supplement 1.6 The Staff currently expect s to issue additional RAIs concerning RVI
3 "Entergy Motion to Dismiss Riverkeeper Contention RK
-EC-8 (Endangered and Threatened Aquatic Species
) as Moot" (July 17. 2013).
4 "Riverkeeper, Inc. Consolidated Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention RK
-EC-8A and Amended Contention RK
-EC-8A" (Aug. 20, 2013).
5 20 th Status Report, at 2. 6 Following the Staff's issuance of SER Supplement 1, the Applicant revised its LRA and/or RAI responses in various areas, including (a) the One
-Time Inspection and Selective Leaching programs; (b) the Metal Enclosed Bus Inspection program; (c) the IP2 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Fire Event; (d) the Buried and Underground Piping and Tanks Inspection program; (e) RVI issues
- and (f) other matters identified in the Applicant's annual LRA updates.
and other issues this fall, and to issue the SER Supplement in early
- to mid-2014. The Staff will provide further information to the Board regarding this matter as it becomes available.
- 4. Track 2 Safety Issues. As stated previously, 7 the Staff believe s that hearings on Track 2 safety issues related to the Applicant's RVI aging management program (Contentions NYS-25 and portions of NYS
-38/ RK-TC-5) should be deferred until the Staff has completed its evaluation of this matter. In addition, to promote efficiency and conservation of resources, and to assure there is no overlap in the issues or testimony, the Staff believes that evidentiary hearings on the remaining Track 2 safety issues (Contentions NYS
-26B/RK-TC-1B and remaining portions of NYS
-38/RK-TC-5) should be deferred to coincide with hearings on Contention NYS
-25 and RVI-related portions of Contention NYS
-38/RK-TC-5. 5. Waste Confidence. As the Staff noted previously, 8 the Commission has undertaken further consideration of its "
Waste Confidence Decision," and has stated that it "will not issue licenses dependent upon the Waste Confidence Decision or the Temporary Storage Rule until the court's remand [in State o f New York v. NRC, 681 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir.
2012)] is appropriately addressed." 9 Following issuance of the Court of Appeals' decision, t he Intervenors in this proceeding filed new contentions related to waste storage and/or disposal, to which the Applicant and Staff responded on August 2 and 3, 2012 , respectively. O n August 8, 2012, the Board ordered that all other pleadings concerning these proposed contentions be held in abeyance
, pending further order
.10 7 See, e.g., 20th Status Report, at 3. 8 Id. 9 Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, LL C and Unistar Nuclear Operating Services, LLC (Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3), CLI 16, 76 NRC 63 , 67 (Aug. 7, 2012).
10 "Order (Holding Contentions NYS
-39/RK-EC-9/CW-EC-10 and CW-SC-4 in Abeyance)" (Aug. 8, 2012). The Commission has similarly held such contentions in abeyance in other proceedings. See Calvert Cliffs, supra
, 76 NRC at 68
-69. On August 5, 2013, the Commission issued a Staff Requirements Memorandum ("SRM"), directing the Staff to publish a proposed rule and draft environmental impact statement ("EIS") on waste confidence issues. In accordance with that SRM, on September 13, 2013, the Staff published a proposed rule and notice of availability of a draft EIS on waste confidence issues.11 As stated in the Federal Register Notice s, comments on the proposed rule and draft EIS are due to be filed by November 27, 2013.
A public meeting concerning th e s e matters was held, as scheduled, in Tarrytown, NY , on October 30, 2013.12 The Staff will provide further information concerning this matter when available.
- 6. CZMA Issues. On June 12, 2013, the Board denied the Applicant's and New York's motion s seeking the entry of a declaratory order regarding the need for a review of the IP2/IP3 LRA to determine its consistency with the New York State Coastal Management Program pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act ("CZMA").13 As noted in the Board's decision, no consultation ha d yet been held between the Staff, New York and Entergy, pursuant to 15 C.F.R. § 930.51(e); the Board left open the possibility that the motions might be re
-filed after such consultation occurs. As stated previously,14 t he Staff expects to initiate consultations with New York and Entergy this fall, and will provide further information to the Board regarding this issue as it becomes availabl
- e.
11 See (1) Proposed Rule, "Waste Confidence
- Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel,"
78 Fed. Reg. 56,776 (Sept.
13, 2013); (2) "Draft Waste Confidence Generic Environmental Impact Statement," 78 Fed. Reg. 56,621 (Sept. 13, 2013).
12 See Public Meetings, "Proposed Waste Confidence Rule and Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement," 78 Fed. Reg. 57,538 (Sept. 19, 2013).
13 "Order (Granting New York's Motions, Denying Clearwater's Motion, and Denying CZMA Motions)" (June 12, 2013).
In its Order, the Board ruled that its "denial of Entergy's and New York's motions does not trigger the time for filing new contentions."
Id. at 4 n.16, citing "Order (Granting State of New York Motion for Extension of Time to File New Contentions)" (Aug. 31, 2012) (requiring the filing of new contentions on Entergy's LRA amendment regarding the need for a CZMA consistency determination within 30 days after the Board rules on Entergy's motion). 14 20th Status Report, at 5. 7. Contention NYS
-35/36. As also stated previously,15 on May 7, 2013, the Applicant notified the Board that it had submitted to the Staff the results of its completed engineering project cost estimates for Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives ("SAMAs") which it had previously identified as potentially cost
-beneficial
.16 In its Board notification, the Applicant noted , inter ali a , that it was submitting the new information "to support resolution of certain issues identified by the Board in its July 14, 2011 decision granting New York's motion for summary disposition of Consolidated Contention NYS
-35/36 [LBP-11-17, 74 NRC 11 (2011
)]."17 The Applicant's submittal thus has the potential to affect litigation of Contention NYS 35/36.
On July 9, 2013, the Board ruled that "adjudicatory submissions based on NL-13-075 [Entergy's letter of May 6, 2013
] are due no later than 60 days after the Staff issues its draft FSEIS supplement or an equivalent document discussing its review of NL 075, or alternatively, no later than 60 days after the NRC Staff notifies the parties that it will not issue a written evaluation of NL 075 in any form
."18 As stated previously
,19 the Staff expects to commence a review of the Applicant's new cost-benefit information this fall, and to complete its evaluation in spring 2014; the Staff has not yet decided whether it will present its evaluation of that information i n a n FSEIS Supplement. The Staff will provide further information to the Board regarding this issue as it becomes available.
- 8. Track 1 Contentions. As the Board is aware, the parties have filed proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on all nine safety and environmental Track1 contentions
.
15 See, e.g., 20 th Status Report, at 5. 16 See Letter from Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq., et al., to the Board (May 7, 2013), attaching Letter from Fred Dacimo (Entergy) to the NRC Document Control Desk, NL 075 (May 6, 2013)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13142A014).
17 Id. at 1 and 2.
18 "Order (Granting Entergy's Motion [for] Clarification)" (July 9, 2013), at 2.
19 20th Status Report, at
- 6. The record on those contentions is currently under review by the Board.
On October 8, 2013, the Board issued an Order directing the parties to file suggested revisions to the Board's proposed "Official Exhibit List for Track One Contentions"; in accordance with the Board's Order (as extended by the Commission), suggested revisions to the Board's proposed Official Exhibit List were filed by the Staff, Entergy, Riverkeeper and New York on October 29, 2013.
- 9. License Renewal Inspection
- s. As stated in the Staff's previous report,20 the Staff has completed its license renewal inspection at Indian Point Unit 2, as discussed in a n inspection report issued on September 19, 2013
.21 This information may be relevant to various portions of t h e parties' testimony during evidentiary hearings on Track One Contentions.
- 10. UFSAR Revision and LRA Update. As sta ted previously,22 Indian Point Unit 2 ("IP2") entered the period of "timely renewal" on September 29, 2013, during which the facility is continuing to operate under its existing license pending issuance of the NRC's determination on the license renewal application ("LRA").23 In connection with IP2's anticipated entry into the period of timely renewal, o n September 26, 2013, the Applicant submitted a letter to the NRC, in which it revis ed the IP2 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report ("UFSAR")
to incorporate provisions contained in Appendix A (UFSAR Supplement
) of the IP2 LRA , in accordance with
20 20th Status Report, at 6
-7. 21 See Letter from James M. Trapp, NRC, to John Ventosa, Entergy (Sept. 19, 2013) and attached Inspection Report 05000247/2013010 (ADMAS Accession No. ML13263A020).
The letter of transmittal stated as follows: "No findings were identified during this inspection. The NRC determined that the commitments reviewed associated with the license renewal application had been appropriately implemented."
22 20th Status Report, at
- 7. 23 The Staff had previously informed the Board and parties of the potential that Indian Point Unit 2 may enter the period of timely renewal, and of Entergy's commitment to undertake certain actions prior t o entering that period. See letter from Sherwin Turk, Esq. to the Board (May 6, 2013), and attached letter from F. Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Document Control Desk, "Entergy Actions Required Prior to Entry into Period of Extended Operation Associated with [LRA] for Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2," NL 071 (May 1, 2013).
the commitment stated in Entergy's letter of May 1, 2013 (NL 071).24 Also on September 26, 2013, the Applicant submitted Amendment No. 14 to its LRA, amending certain aspects of its LRA for IP2
.25 That information is currently being reviewed by the Staff.
1 1. The Staff is not currently aware of any other matter that has the potential to impact the schedule for hearings in this proceeding.
In accordance with the Board's direction (Order, at 2), the Staff will notify the Board as soon as any other event with potential to alter the hearing schedule arises. Respectfully submitted, /Signed (electronically) by/
Sherwin E. Turk Counsel for NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop
- O-15D21 Washington, DC 20555 Telephone: (301) 415
-1533 E-mail: sherwin.turk@nrc.gov
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 1st day of Novem be r 20 1 3 24 See Letter from F. Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Document Control Desk, "Indian Point Energy Center Letters to NRC, License Renewal Application, dated April 23, 2007,"
NL-13-130 (Sept. 26, 2013) (ADAMS Accession No. ML13269A452). 25 See Letter from F. Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Document Control Desk, "Amendment 14 to License Renewal Application," NL-13-131 (Sept. 26, 2013)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13269A452).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. )
Docket Nos. 50
-247/286-LR ) (Indian Point Nuclear Generating
) Units 2 and 3)
) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R § 2.305 (as revised), I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing "NRC STAFF'S 2 1 ST STATUS REPORT IN RESPONSE TO THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD'S ORDER OF FEBRUARY 16, 2012," dated Novem be r 1, 201 3 , have been served upon the Electronic Information Exchange (the NRC's E
-Filing System
), in the above
- captioned proceeding, this 1 st day of Novem b er, 201 3. /Signed (electronically) by/
Sherwin E. Turk Counsel for NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop
- O-15D21 Washington, DC 20555 Telephone: (301) 415
-1533 E-mail: sherwin.turk@nrc.gov