RS-12-173, Report No. MPR-3812, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-310 Through Page C-371

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:25, 11 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Report No. MPR-3812, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-310 Through Page C-371
ML13003A038
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom 
Issue date: 11/16/2012
From: Schlaseman C
MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3812, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A038 (62)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet 1 of 2 Status'N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0AC097 Equip. Class"2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Diesel Generator OAG12 Control Panel Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y)NE

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y] NEI UE N/A[

Y[O ND UED N/Al]

YP4 NEl UO N/AD Y$ NE UE] N/AU Y3NEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

.nrr*.nnnndi.nr, Nn* R.9-19-171 C-310

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment IoD No.

AC097 Equip. Class" (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Diesel Generator OA G12 Control Panel Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yo NEI UEI N/A[3 YKJ] NIl U-N/AL-YK NEl UOI N/AU Y

NO UU1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YW NEI U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C-C S..n2et-

+LcZ Evaluated by:.

Date:

?,5"//-..

461-1 !!ý 4 41--

V

/2.5 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (fnrrP.nnndpnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-311

'-U 0

a.-

0)

0. o
  • 0 0

c m

-3 CD C) 0 C-)

CC) 4I

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OAGO12 Equip. Class'2 (17) Engine Generators Equipment Description El Standby Diesel Generator Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[& NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidati'on?

YPI NE UD N/AD YO NEI UD-N/AD3

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YO ND UDI N/A'-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YeN U"] N/AD3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y$ NO UD3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 C-313 f.nrrs nnnHPdnn.P. Nn

  • RR-19-171

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OAGO12 Equip. Class12 (17) Engine Generators Equipment Description El Standby Diesel Generator Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[.

NEI U-' N/All

8. re vereadequpmet, istibuionsysems celin ties nd ighing
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

A'e ceU, 1

/,i oes or rnti tnr>. 6 IoWe,$,.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YJ2 NOI Urn N/Al]

YA NEI Ul] N/Al]

YQý NEI UF Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YPO NOI U--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5e75,,c re-e/,-,A

& V-eenp aVV /6 Me #uv

,4

//-e e,/

V

~~~

~1F4~l.4e;< / Av i4e il,

/'~

Evaluated by:

Date;

)-?/

'000Y

,;ý/zq &

of -

< C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPmsnnnr1iP.ln Nn

  • RRA-1-17 C-314

cl, 03

'3 z

0n CA c

m 30 CD C)

G)

C)

'D

  • ý 0 CD 0

z '

m

.0

-*0 CD 53

-3 0

  • 0 (A

m CD 2*

CD

K -0C O D

~CD 0 3u C.) C 0

m 30 CD

-. 15-

Dý

-0 0

3) 0 M "

m 3o CD C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OAP060 Equip. Class"2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description El DIG Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El.

,2aoIi/ia..Room, Area D/G-3 Building 2"- t78,r-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional'but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage.

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YONM Y1A NO UOI-N/AE Yf NEI UO N/AE

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YI* NEI' UE N/AE 1V0 rh~..~

otm c-vcre-e-,

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UE N/AI YNLIuEl 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >.

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

(.nrrP.nnndlnr.P. Nn RR-1 9-173 C-320

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OAP060 Equip. Class" (05) Horizontal Pu s

Equipment Description El DIG Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
  • %.")

oe~bttr Or 4OvSCtr(

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y4 NE UD N/AO Y[INUI UI N/Al Y$ NE UO N/AD YP NO U[-]

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could.

YN NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added, as necessary)

_____M___

ft Evaluated by:

L**#4EEZ Date:

'1.Z)

/2-

< C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 CnrrP.-nnnr-nr*. Nn

  • RR-19-17.T C-321

u 0

  • 0 0~C cn CD 3

()

0 0

0

Sheet Iof 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0AP163 Equip. Class 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Service Water Booster Pump A Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El.

ik211z_

p1 iWRoom, Area DIG-i Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record theresults of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NJ9 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIr NE UE N/AO YE4 NEI Ul N/AL Ypa NEI UL N/AL YE NEI UE N/AI9 YN NEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnr1Pnrn Nn - RR-19-171 C-323

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AP163 Equip. Class12 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Service Water Booster Pump A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y, NO UO N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YW NEI UL N/AD and masonry block walls not. likely to collapse onto the equipment?

tL(? Al, tFq1 ct/eSsV ev ecvre,/y 4tfida6

/VO Me-cet/,r11 AD

,~C49e o-, Hkib~'~

ri not-ec~4 c&v-~

t~4e-It( i4:)

0/b f-a l /.

4 "--./S 'Ni -e 'entL, bio cei/at lh.o o*

.. son1

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

P4 NEI U!

N/A1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

ANEIUO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YR NEI U-adversely affect the safety. functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

9

'2 -

Q=ýAb V

<C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnndPneP Nn

  • R,-19-17.

C-324

~~U)fl 0

D D CD,

-4 0

3.

C/

m

.0 c

-4.

3 CD C)

o

0 0

-~C:

m 3o CD 0)

-.0

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

OA-TO010 Equipment ID No. 4AT-W IA T

  • /;i/i 2-Equip. Class". (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description E1 Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Tank Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area. D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist fordocumenting other comments.

Anchorage

  • 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y[

NEI Y[9 NEI UI N/A-Y[K NEI U-N/ADl YK NEI UD-N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YJK NEI U-- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for, which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) 3 i/40-4n~4c~'(~~tf~v~ei 4

'~-Irs

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y)NU 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnndn1n'.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-327

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OAT40 Equip. Class12 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description El Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Tank Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM NE Ur N/AEl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YP4 NE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

,0o 0qAf5bnPX 0.,415 r~ ct-i7

,e UD N/AD

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YVI NO UO N/AU YX NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y, NO UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

M 5t

-r,*.

Date: A"/ zaY/4-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

.nrri-nnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17R C-328

z U) 0 m

30 CD

Sheet 1 of 2

\\

~Status:@xY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)U Equipment ID No. 0AT096 Equip. Class"2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Horizontal)

Equipment Description El Diesel Generator Lube Oil Storage Tank Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YDN)

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I

/7'

.1 A

e."r~~

21

~

,i Y;

NEI U-' N/ADl YJI NDI-UD N/AED Ypk NDI UD-N/ADl:

YDI NDI UD-N/As4.

ND UD A I L - ftv' AtOf e 60 n h PVP

-0'0 0 " W. el 7

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrmqnnndrnr.P.* Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-330

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AT096 Equip. Class12 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Horizontal)

Equipment Description El Diesel Generator Lube Oil Storage Tank Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX* NO UO N/AU

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[M Nol UOi. N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yo NEI UO N/AU Y5 NE UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA NOl UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 44~z Date:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rTnrrP.AnnnrlAnr.

Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-331

-~0 z

  • 0
  • 0

'33cn m

n CD co 0)

Sh t1of2 Status N U Seismic WalkdownClieck1ist-(SWC)

Equipment ID No.

A 030 Equip. Classt (P) F-.*

Equipment Description C.go vfr.e 60h

  • '*_Vi,*

.t t7,/z Lcto:Bldg. 18 Floor El.

S 1Z (0

Rot'-A'ra Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This chekdlist. may-,be uised tp document the results of the Seismic Walkdownof an item Of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the folloviing 4ueistlns may'be used to recordtthe results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for docudtlenting -other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YANI-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

44ý I'd PVJr 0 (o 2,00'V"-5"-

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YKQNI UF N/AO t-5k 4AA44

10.

t 4

ic f/t

3. Is the ancShorage free of codrosion that is more than mild surface Y_.NI" UDI N/AD' oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?-

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y A'[3IUQI N/AQ Yý N[3 UF3 N/A[r YXN[

UQ 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

% C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

(-nrr~mnnnrfP.nrýn Nn* R-19-171 C-333

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No..(

Equipment Description Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free. frn-immpactý by nearby equipmejit or structures?.

Yg NO3 UQ N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[O NQ3 U[3 NIAOI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto t e equip ent?
9. Do attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

yZ 41i U-I N/AO q

1.0. based on the aboveseismic interaction evaluatioos, is'equiplnent free.

NO UOi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

I..

S,.

Mk

'1

,'--.'z I,

.

  • t'i( i

.".')

Other Adverne Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJI'-NO UOI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

I

( C4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrr(mnnndPnr.P Nn RR-19-17C-C-334

'- 0 z 'o 0

. cn m

"0° 3CD CA)

C 0

0 0

-~0 z

  • 0 Z ;a

-3 CD 0 cn C.)

"0 m

3CD C

2 0

0*

0

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0AV036 Equip. Class"2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Battery Room Exhaust Fan A Location: Bldg. Radwaste Floor El. 165 Room, Area R/W-32 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YJMNEI

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

COi-(,tR4eamna tr~ae-Me t>,46 62ý'O-s-q-eO,IZLV.6

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NO ULI N/All YXNO U!] N/Al]

NO U! N/Al-YV NO" ULI N/AL]

YENO UO 32 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<KC-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnndn-nrP Nn" RR-19-173 C-337

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AV036 Equip. Class12 (09) Fans Equipment Description Battery Room Exhaust Fan A Interaction Effects

7. Are softt by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

YNearAY 6048cI'l-olejidte ly Vlo4A.

A0t499tO urn+

b'aO vOmr-£.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YXND UQ N/AD YtKND U-N/AD Y)(NL-UD N/AE`

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YX ND Ur Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y

NEI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?O Ie' or*.eac4 V'i ofpw viesul u ent 1

7T M-Comments.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

o._I /

I- '0X

! 3-/

IZ

< C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrinnnrPnr.P NKn* R-1 9-171 C-338

-~0 z 0 3

0

~~T-S CCD 00

CD z ~

3 0

c m

-5" 3

CD

-C C) 0 0

0)

-ý 02 z 0 CD 0 si >

0. 3 on, R.

5 0

m 30 CD 0)

D3 3

CD 0

c m

30 CD CA 0)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0AV064 Equip. Class12 (09) Fans Equipment Description DIG Building Vent Supply Fan Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 151 Room, Area D/G-P g

Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Amtifl, OLOW1aR
  • T*N 13L Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YT(NE YZIND YE(NE]

UE" N/AD UD N/AD Y[f NDI UD' N/ADl Ye/ND-UEI N/AD Y~dN[D ULI 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

'C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm..qnnnHP-nr.ý- Nn " RR-19-171 C-343

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AV064 Equip. Class12 (09) Fans Equipment Description DIG Building Vent Supply Fan Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

A)O, Mr-v TARO67,TS.

YdfN5 UE] N/Al]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yff NEl UL-N/Al]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

kIO 0v~

V6ZML2'OMC l 6i5'

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y[N'NOI UI0 N/Al]

Y[aNEI UE" Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[A' NEl U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

V I A Evaluated by:.

Date: AbOW

-1IZ8f/ 261 -

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (lnrrm.*nnndHnr.P Nn - RR=19-171 C-344

j3 0

z o~

0 0

c m

CD

.0

OgD

-. 0 0

C'.

Z:-

m

.0 C

2 CD

~0.

0 00)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:

) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0BK032 Equip. Class12 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergenc Cooling Tower Fan B Location: Bldg. Emergency Floor El. 195 Room, Area ECT-6 Cooling Towers Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y4 NEI

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YRj NEI U' N/AEl

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[K NEI UI] N/Al]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y/9] NEIl UI' N/ALl

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI/"NOl UI-N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchora econfiguration verification is required.)

r4otr A nrtvra Iv~

-oA~

M4

~ /r-

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y1.

NEI UEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

"C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Cnrrqnnnr1PnrP. Nn ' Rq-19-173 C-347

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0BK032 Equip. Class'2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergenc Cooling Tower Fan B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by, nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

C.

LC.ceA 6ý,.. L ldO E rT. Tlvvm'Cýrt, no ove, 44Se"le--6'4 J

t4 1 b te Syst-,C4

.L"40 Vti -S Xt ý-Z3-A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YMNEI Yý(NO Y7(NEI Ur-N/AEl U-1 N/AU Ur' N/A[l YpqNEIUUO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YL NO Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Moa'1,~r ynot'W/ (e,(fryv

/D L6M/t4~

L41A4ý 0, l-.y g

~

t Evaluated by:

&- ?,j a C-k1or Date:

2-/2-Jr Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnndrInri. Nn" R,-19-17.1 C-348

S~0 3

z o*

0 3)0~

0S c) m CD CI

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:

)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0BP057 Equip. Class12 (06) Vertical Pumps P.niiinmr~iit Th

~rint~nn Rmi~rcpnri, S'orui,'o Wator Pmnn R A A.( A/%(IAAI~A Location: Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-*

Vg.--

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIIN5 Y '

NE UD N/AE YXNO UO N/Aii YW NE UE N/AD YNEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<ý C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 C.nrrP.nnndlPnrP. Nn - R.-19-17.1 C-350

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0BP057 Equip. Class 12 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Service Water Pump B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

,No 5'~

OnA

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines.have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y<NLI-UFII N/Af YR NEI U[t N/Al YX Nil U-1 N/All YX NO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yd ND U' adversely affect the safety functions of the equýipment?,

N

,U" Comments.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

IC-C G

,-P F poop Evaluated by:. I"r

- -4 Date:

q/11 /

qlidiorz

< C-4>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm-nnndr.nr.P. Nn

  • PS-19-171 C-351

I z

oD 0~ 0

  • 0M cD m

.M C.

-D CD 0

-4

CO 0 3 0

c)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status.*1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OBV030 Equip. Class"2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Control Room Emergeny Ventilation Supply Fan B Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El.

liJf Room, Area"?f2.- Fi-It Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment. on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yý§NEj Y,% NEI UE N/A[l YýO NEI UO N/Af]

YIN NEI UO N/AEJ Ypn NEI UEI N/AE]

a nd toraqe 6,sx/'oo'

/b 5-- ~779--0 5k/-J eef

/taA--

0

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI E 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (ThrrPýnnnrinýnp-Nn

  • R.q-12-17.*l C-354

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OBV030 Equip. Class"2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Control Room Emergency Ventilation Supply Fan B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

AID' 60F&- kuyelt

/ZNEI UEJ N/AEI

-8. Are-overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NJ--

N] UEi N/A[ -'

and masonry block walls not likely to collaps onto the equipment?

/-

,t~~~~~o~~~4,>,~~~)

"Iv1

/~4 VV

~

coJ~

D~,~~~e d/ue 7')Gdýr

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility. to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,. is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y$M N[l UrI N/AEI YM NINUUE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[X NEI UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

.rj, 4..r_/

r' far Flow, 5

/uv F5-*

,4-OA f"

dy

/e

'/,'

ai 4k Fa.

0-

?~k 91 eead,,61/f fv-yesWO~

4 61-es t'e/

-mA-

-~/

Date:

?12h-

/0 P//

V Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm'qnnn'in.P Nn

  • RR-19-1773 C-355

w

!.0

'3-

-J cn m-o 23 CD C,,

0

w

~

~ CA

,~

~

~

z ~* ~

~

CA

~

-u CD

'3 Lw

-J

~r

~

0 C

=

CA m

.0C CD

~6-5 0w 0C,,

0

A

=r z ~

3

  • m 3

CD C) 0 0

-. 0 0

< >u 0

CA m

-D 0

w*

0

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0BV035 Equip. Class12 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergenc Switchgear Ventilation Exhaust Fan B Location: Bldg. Radwaste Floor El. 165 Room, Area R/W-32 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

eOJJFi6'4UA'noN M-1-CHes I)YC 62 ý6 - -ý q7S&-d izt>,/. d

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YI4NO Y)'ND UD N/AD Y

NI-UEI N/AD.

NA NEUI DN/A[1 Y*f NEI UEI N/AE.

Y~f NEI UED 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

  • C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrmqnnndPnc. In

  • R-12-17.

C-360

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0BV035 Equip. Class12 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergenc Switchgear Ventilation Exhaust Fan B Interaction Effects.

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.: Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

  • . 5 ::..J~45 i~~r~ be+

ol w/

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

XjNEI U" N/AU YX NEl U-N/AUl Y)NI-UEJ N/AU Y)*N U..

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP(NE U

adversely affiet the safety. functions of the equipment?

%I le3O~

I9Ydwn Ov'ej 5

sWcoc f/-O

,,,'(n

.5 0/

.A

  • olj TbreotleA J~

~~A r-e~

.yA~

Ao* VI"OJ Ve

'Q Af Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4l/A Evaluated by:

Date:

(_6/ N_ 1WI__

4-301-zo(z Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

(.nrrA-nnnriP.nr. Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-361

OD j3 0 0

~ 3 z

0 M

-0 0

-4 L43 m

.0-,

3C)

C) w 0C,

StatttýJYN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).

A Equipment ID No.

C, / VO 3 A, Equip. Class'2 (4

Equipment Description 6

t9'414(

ROO&

P A!2,,-f

07) 15014ývlr Location: Bldg.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (op Floor El.

L&T Room, Area

'FA,' Oe0A (A.

a/s coss'e,'/

h tional but recommended)

/ /*//:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additionil space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorawe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y

NiNO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Isthanc4 5gea C49 YJANO UI-N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YRNO UCr N/A-YANOI YAjNC UCI N/Ar-UI-N/A['

V4ýNO UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPfqnnnlAinr.f Nn ' RR-19-A7.

C-363

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.

Equipment Descript t?6V OS Equip. Classi2W

.L+/-

ion F4c-t, Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by Rearby equipment or structures?

NO Y%9-r[l U-N/ACI

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yr-NOI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No~Pi 604'

,le.

UO Is N/ACI hoo 0.6

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Baseo on the above seismic 'interaction evaluations, is'eqtuipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y5E4O UQI N/ACI Y~fNC Urj Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y5,,N-J Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date:

q//( 2-Evaluated 21& 1 ZZ L -- -

,< C-4 )>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnnrI~nr.P n Rn.-1-9-171-C-364

-0w 0

z 0g 0

CD 0,

m 1.0

-o 3

CD 2(D

'-4 5*

fl jý 0~

z 04!

0T-m mC CD 0

C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

  • Equipment ID No. 0DE377 Equip. Class"2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers L

t (I4r, o'20,-0 Equipment Description E4 Diesel Generator Lube Oil Cooler Location: Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El.

127 Room, Area.

()/6 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YI?1'N-ULI N/AD Y[E/NI-UED N/AD

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YENI-U00 N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y1 NDI Ui N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verificatin required.)

dw%, cv1 1

>1-. colcu(&o-w Alo. 6

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NDI UD-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 CnrrmP.nnndPnr'.P Nn" PW-R -17.

C-367

Sheet 2 of 2 EquipmentI No. 0DE377 Equip. Class12 (21) Tanks or Heat Exehangers!

(

,0 Equipment Description E4 Diesel Generator Lube Oil Cooler Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YIE1'NO UO N/AO 00

,'919OT,

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution.systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, -YE 4 U UI" N/A5.

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

U f qlA36n.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YE3"NE] UD N/AEl Yg NE ULI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R(NU UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NAl/

Evaluated by:

Date:

9(h*hQ)1-fUlva Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP.nnndi-nrP Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-368

a)

.-3 0

z

  • 0 0

5.

m

-DC 2

CD

=

.- 4.

0 m

('3

-4

-.1

o C',

00 Cý a.-

m 3a CD C) 0 m

-.4

0 0

0 cn a

0O m

-4

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=RS-12-173,_Report_No._MPR-3812,_Rev._3,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_in_Response_to_the_50.54(f)_Information_Request_Regarding_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Page_C-310_Through_Page_C-371&oldid=5244633"