ML16154A363

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:47, 9 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Package Consisting of Attachment to Employee Concerns Programs
ML16154A363
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/1993
From:
NRC
To:
References
NUDOCS 9312290045
Download: ML16154A363 (6)


Text

__

FORD 2 REGULORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIW SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9312290045 DOC.DATE: 93/09/10 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET #

FACIL:50-269 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Duke Power Co.

05000269 50-270 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Duke Power Co.

05000270 50-287 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Duke Power Co.

05000287 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION NRC -

No Detailed Affiliation Given RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION R

SUBJECT:

Package consisting of attachment to employee concerns programs.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: DFO1D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR O ENCL I SIZE:

D TITLE: Direct Flow Distribution: 50 Docket (PDR Avail)

S NOTES:

/

F RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL 0

INTERNAL: NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1

FILE 01 1

R EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1

NSIC 1

D 2

D 0

C U

E N

T NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE' CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK.

ROOM P1-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

0 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR

.4 ENCL 4

  • 09-21-1993 10:10AM M USNRC RII DRP 83015043431 P.02 Attaehn*ent EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAS PLANT NANE: £e)v LICENSEE:

DOCKET ~

~-~~

NOTE:

Please circle yes or no if applicable and add comments in the space provided.

A.

PROGRAM

1. Do the licehsee have an employee concerns program?

gE No/Coments)

2. Has NRC inspected the program?

Report #

a.

SCOPE: (Circle all that apply)

1. Is it for:
a. Technical?

No/Comments)

b. Administrative?e(4 No/Comments)
c. Personhel issues?

2 No/Comments)

2.

it cover safety as well as non-safety issues?

es r No/Coments)

3. Is It designed for:
a. Nuclear safety?

e o/Comnts)

b.

Personal safety?

7 o/Coents) 2001 5

c.

el issues -

Including union grievances?

s NO/Comments)

4. Dn"s the program apply to all licensee employees?

No/Comments)

S. Cont (Ye No/Comments) 9312290045 930910 jPDR ADOCK 05000269 P

PDR

E;:8 SBN0jO3 0 38N WOd~

6. Does the licensee require its gentractors and their subs to have a similar sat (Yes o/C nts)
7. Does the licensee conduct an.-exit interview upon terminating 7 Do ssee asking if they have any safety concerns?

es l No/Comments)

C.

INDEPENDENCE:

1. What is the title of the person in charge?

[O ts

2. Who do they report to?

eorpor&

3. Are they independent of line management?
4. Does the ECP use third party consultants?

5 How is a concern about a manager or vice president follo d up?

04 RESOURCES Wh is the size of the staff devoted to this program?

2.

at ar ECP staff qualifications (technical training,

' i e

ewing training, investigator training, other)?

A 44*

Lk.aA, j2ps Q

orc.ej AreA.

E.

REFERRALS:

1.

Who has followup on concerns (ECP staff, line management, other)?

g 9trreS 9e F.

CONFIDSMTIALITY

1.

Ara the reports confidential?

No/Comments)

09-21-1993 10:11AM ROM USNRC RI DRP

.TO 83015043431 P.03 j..j-

2. Who is the identity of the alleger made known to (senior management, ECP staff, line management, other)?

(Circle, if other explain)

3. Can employees be:
a. Anonymous? ci16No/Coaments)
b. Report by phone?( n

)No/Coments) as FEEDBACK:

1. I edback given to the alleger upon completion of NoO-If so, how?)

2..

Does program reward good ideas?

3. Who, or at what level, makes the final decision of resolution?

jJo

-P Peldc

/eav~

4. Are the resolutions of anonymous concerns dissemsnated?
5. Are resolutions of valid concerns publicized (newsletter, bulletin board, all hands meeting other)?

H.

EFFECTIVENESS:

1. How does the licensee measure the effectiveness of the program?
2. Are concerns:
a.

Trended?

gr No/Coennts)

b. Used?

jor No/Coments)

3. In the last three years how many concerns were raised?0 -vk cA Of the concersn raised, how many were closed?

What percentage were substantiated?

1s I I of ILI Ai

09-1-1j

1 12H rNUM USNRc r<

DRFP TO 83015043431 P.04

4. How are followup techniques used to measure effectiveness (random survey, interviews, ther)7 S. How frequently are internal audits of the ECP conducted and by whom?
1.

ADNINISTRATIOMITRAINING:

1. Is ECP prescribed by a procedure?

gt No/Coments)

2. Now are employees, as well as contractors, made aware of this program (training, newsletter, bulletin board, other)?

ADDITIONAL COlENTS: (Including characteristics which make the program especially effective, if any.)

TITLE:

POE b // 8 sa DATE COPLETED:

//

to) 88-bf77 2S00/028 Attachment A-4 Issue Date: 07/29/93

09-21-1993 10:10AM M USNRC RII DRP 83015043431 P.01 FA IMLE U*S. NRC - RH ATLANTA, GA TO:

S,

o go CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX:

£

- 3 9/953-7549 3011492-

[

301/492-=110 D

W=~T FLufr WOODMONT m

PAYROLL 3011504-220

=

301/4M7n6 L.J3011492,4371 TRAINNG RI CTL 615 S215/337.24 708/790-566 RVRV iRSET 184821 51097-O ST (See Reverse)

Z OTER:

ijvrLWoCAToN FAX NO.:-

VMCATION:

NO. OF PAGES

+ M SMMT FROM: Z3A.

'i FAX #404/331..4449 VERIFICATION 404