ML16154A363
| ML16154A363 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee |
| Issue date: | 09/10/1993 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9312290045 | |
| Download: ML16154A363 (6) | |
Text
__
FORD 2 REGULORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIW SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9312290045 DOC.DATE: 93/09/10 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET #
FACIL:50-269 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Duke Power Co.
05000269 50-270 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Duke Power Co.
05000270 50-287 Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Duke Power Co.
05000287 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION NRC -
No Detailed Affiliation Given RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION R
SUBJECT:
Package consisting of attachment to employee concerns programs.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: DFO1D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR O ENCL I SIZE:
D TITLE: Direct Flow Distribution: 50 Docket (PDR Avail)
S NOTES:
/
F RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL 0
INTERNAL: NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1
FILE 01 1
R EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1
NSIC 1
D 2
D 0
C U
E N
T NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE' CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK.
ROOM P1-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
0 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR
.4 ENCL 4
- 09-21-1993 10:10AM M USNRC RII DRP 83015043431 P.02 Attaehn*ent EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAS PLANT NANE: £e)v LICENSEE:
DOCKET ~
~-~~
NOTE:
Please circle yes or no if applicable and add comments in the space provided.
A.
PROGRAM
- 1. Do the licehsee have an employee concerns program?
gE No/Coments)
- 2. Has NRC inspected the program?
Report #
- a.
SCOPE: (Circle all that apply)
- 1. Is it for:
- a. Technical?
No/Comments)
- b. Administrative?e(4 No/Comments)
- c. Personhel issues?
2 No/Comments)
- 2.
it cover safety as well as non-safety issues?
es r No/Coments)
- 3. Is It designed for:
- a. Nuclear safety?
e o/Comnts)
- b.
Personal safety?
7 o/Coents) 2001 5
- c.
el issues -
Including union grievances?
s NO/Comments)
- 4. Dn"s the program apply to all licensee employees?
No/Comments)
S. Cont (Ye No/Comments) 9312290045 930910 jPDR ADOCK 05000269 P
E;:8 SBN0jO3 0 38N WOd~
- 6. Does the licensee require its gentractors and their subs to have a similar sat (Yes o/C nts)
- 7. Does the licensee conduct an.-exit interview upon terminating 7 Do ssee asking if they have any safety concerns?
es l No/Comments)
C.
INDEPENDENCE:
- 1. What is the title of the person in charge?
[O ts
- 2. Who do they report to?
eorpor&
- 3. Are they independent of line management?
- 4. Does the ECP use third party consultants?
5 How is a concern about a manager or vice president follo d up?
04 RESOURCES Wh is the size of the staff devoted to this program?
- 2.
at ar ECP staff qualifications (technical training,
' i e
ewing training, investigator training, other)?
A 44*
Lk.aA, j2ps Q
orc.ej AreA.
E.
REFERRALS:
- 1.
Who has followup on concerns (ECP staff, line management, other)?
g 9trreS 9e F.
CONFIDSMTIALITY
- 1.
Ara the reports confidential?
No/Comments)
09-21-1993 10:11AM ROM USNRC RI DRP
.TO 83015043431 P.03 j..j-
- 2. Who is the identity of the alleger made known to (senior management, ECP staff, line management, other)?
(Circle, if other explain)
- 3. Can employees be:
- a. Anonymous? ci16No/Coaments)
- b. Report by phone?( n
)No/Coments) as FEEDBACK:
- 1. I edback given to the alleger upon completion of NoO-If so, how?)
2..
Does program reward good ideas?
- 3. Who, or at what level, makes the final decision of resolution?
jJo
-P Peldc
/eav~
- 4. Are the resolutions of anonymous concerns dissemsnated?
- 5. Are resolutions of valid concerns publicized (newsletter, bulletin board, all hands meeting other)?
H.
EFFECTIVENESS:
- 1. How does the licensee measure the effectiveness of the program?
- 2. Are concerns:
- a.
Trended?
gr No/Coennts)
- b. Used?
jor No/Coments)
- 3. In the last three years how many concerns were raised?0 -vk cA Of the concersn raised, how many were closed?
What percentage were substantiated?
1s I I of ILI Ai
09-1-1j
- 1 12H rNUM USNRc r<
DRFP TO 83015043431 P.04
- 4. How are followup techniques used to measure effectiveness (random survey, interviews, ther)7 S. How frequently are internal audits of the ECP conducted and by whom?
- 1.
ADNINISTRATIOMITRAINING:
- 1. Is ECP prescribed by a procedure?
gt No/Coments)
- 2. Now are employees, as well as contractors, made aware of this program (training, newsletter, bulletin board, other)?
ADDITIONAL COlENTS: (Including characteristics which make the program especially effective, if any.)
TITLE:
POE b // 8 sa DATE COPLETED:
//
to) 88-bf77 2S00/028 Attachment A-4 Issue Date: 07/29/93
09-21-1993 10:10AM M USNRC RII DRP 83015043431 P.01 FA IMLE U*S. NRC - RH ATLANTA, GA TO:
S,
o go CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX:
£
- 3 9/953-7549 3011492-
[
301/492-=110 D
W=~T FLufr WOODMONT m
PAYROLL 3011504-220
=
301/4M7n6 L.J3011492,4371 TRAINNG RI CTL 615 S215/337.24 708/790-566 RVRV iRSET 184821 51097-O ST (See Reverse)
Z OTER:
ijvrLWoCAToN FAX NO.:-
VMCATION:
NO. OF PAGES
+ M SMMT FROM: Z3A.
'i FAX #404/331..4449 VERIFICATION 404