ML17277B034

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:27, 8 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Procedure to Ensure Operability of ESF Sys Following Removal from Svc Per NUREG-0737,Items II.K.1.10 & II.K.1.5.Confirmatory Issue 22 Considered Closed
ML17277B034
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 11/11/1983
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17277B035 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.K.1, TASK-TM GO-83-1044, NUDOCS 8311210258
Download: ML17277B034 (5)


Text

/

REGULATORY I MATION DISTRIBUTION SYST (RIDS) c ACCESSION NOR;8311210258 DOC ~ DATE! 83/11/11 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET ¹ FACIL:50 397 ISPPSS Nuclear Pr ojectp Uni t 2i Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH BYNAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN~G<C, Nashington Public Power Supply System

'EC IP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION SCHNENCERpA ~

Licensing Br anch 2

SUBJECT:

Forwards proce u

t censure operability of ESF sys" fol lowing removal from svc per NUREG 0737iltems 'll+K,1-,10 It II~ K ~ 1+5 ~ Confirmatory Issue 22 considered closed.

DISTRIBUTION CODE ~

800 1 S COPIES RECEIVED $ LTR << 'NCL <<<<SIZE e<<

r.8 T?TLE: Licensing 'Submittal:

PSAR/FSAR Amdts L Related<< Correspondence NOTES; RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DL/ADL NRR L82 L'A INTERNALS ELD/HOS2 IE/DEPER/EPB 36 IE/DEQA/QAB 21 NRR/DK/CEB NRR/DE/EQB 13 NRR/DE/MEB 18 NRA/DK/SAB 24 NRR/DHFS/HFE840 NRA/DHFS/PSRB NRR/DS I/AEB 26 NRR/DSI/CPB 10 NRR/DSI/ICSB 16 NRR/DSI/PSB 19 NRR/DSI/RSB 23 RGN5 EXTERNAL: ACRS 41 DMB/DSS (AMDTS)

LPDR 03 NSIC 05 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

0 0

1 0

3 3

1 1

1 2

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 3

3 6

1 1

1 1

1 1

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR LB2 BC

AULUCKpR, Oi IE F ILK IE/DEPER/IRB 35 NRR/DE/AEAB NRR/DE/EHEB NRR/OE/GB 28 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SGEB 25 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 NRR/OL/SSPB NRR/DS I/ASB NRR/DS I/CSB 09 NRR/DSI/METB 12 N

RAB 22 KG F ILK 04 AMI/MIB BNL(AMDTS ONI Y)

FKMA<<RKP DIV 39 NRC PDR 02 NTIS COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

0 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 1

1 2

2.

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 1

1 1

1 1

1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED!

LTTR 53 ENCL 46

f I

l Ii I

r

~ 7>>'C 7

I

>>I r>>Rgb)

Lrx r>> <<f I Wyh>>"P,.h 1'1

> )

h ~

~

Y l (

hi<<) ~

,Ill') I "i>>3$

) I.>>

')

l 'hi

, <<J

,ll lr,,

lh'>> kfI Ii fhi>>

IN

<<k+

hk<< ll ),I 7 'I IA h<)g>>I f l ">I >>l.)

~

i f7~

hg f hi ll l>>1 I '

4

) ~ )

>> j

)

7 I

J<<',

~'f)>>k 0 f f l f>>$

ling<<)

I lg>>>>>>+A ghlhfh g h)'>>,,)7 f>>)<<4>>k l 7/ f>>)h, g

~

k I

r $

~ l 1 lh 8 k 9 gJ 3 )irk

  • Il I'$

,") Q <<7

,A ) Ik f,, y h ~ ) >><<

hh<<<<fh r I p r f y k

)94 f +f>>+0:0 Ih 9k)ih<<>>7 I

<<hh'$Q$ f'>

~ '>> r }>>)<<<<

~ e>>

iq J J 7l k 3 ~ (r Ph>> k i l l fl

<<>> jj'>>Ilg 8 r k) k,h>>'l') >'I, f r,ihi f < )l 8

w 'l 0)'Tl 5 l

3 $

Ih c

" f I, 'l ) P g lg),.,',

hh

, t

~ <<

)k>> I.3

~ Tr l f,h)

<1 a> >Z,k I )k l>>h

~ 7>>q>>hi l lh

>> li ih

.l l h>>T>>

fI hhf jr=>>

$ I",<<l Il<<<<h

/

k k

I' I>>

I

'lr C'l ll 3 3

k>>h,

< "l>>h, I

~

i %$ 4)Q Ch l "1 y 3 I-

'>1fcn >X

~

k i k " <>Qll>><<>>

I

/<>,

4% 1 'f<<'i~-

I>>

s

,<< l

~ l f

,) )

\\

1 N

hl hf<<

>>Iihl 4 'hh.

~I hi X >,l I

Ii h'hh l 7)

) /Q I

'I

>><<I, >>j I) l h'l, k

k I,>>'ll ff/k)

J

>> l<<l Il k)("f l Ig fh>>

<<I lr.'

Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509) 372-5000 November ll, 1983 G02-83-1044 Docket No. 50-397 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:

Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No.

2 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Schwencer:

Subject:

II.K.1.10 NUCLEAR PROJECT NO.

2 NUREG-0737, TMI-2 ACTION PLAN, ITEMS II.K.1.10 AND II.K.1.5, CONFIRMATORY ISSUE 22 TMI-2 Action*Plan Item II.K.1.10 is concerned with ensuring operability of an Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) system following its removal from service.

At WNP-2, there exists four procedures (attached) which may affect the oper-ability of ESF systems.

They are:

1)

PPM 1.3.7 - Work Request 2)

PPM 1.3.8 - Equipment Clearance and Tagging 3)

PPM 1.3.9 - Control of Jumpers, Lifted Leads and Mechanical Jumpers 4)

PPM 1.5. 1 - Technical Specification Surveillance Testing Program All four of these procedures require the Shift Manager's review and approval prior to the execution of the work on an ESF system or component and also prior to returning the component or system to operable status.

In executing this review, the Shift Manager is assuring that all program and technical require-ments for the removal of and the return to operable status are met.

Procedures 1.3.8, 1.3.9, and 1.5.1 provide for the additional controls of independent verification.

8311210258 83iiii PDR ADOCK 05000397 A

PDR

A. Schwencer Page Two There are three additional administrative procedures which address the issue of system operability.

They deal primarily with keeping the operating shift informed of system operability.

These procedures are also attached and include:

1)

PPM 1.3. 1 - Standing Orders/Night Orders 2

PPM 1.3.4 - Operating Data and Logs 3

PPM 1.3.6 - Shift Turnover A WNP-2 design feature includes an inoperative status panel which will automatically display the inoperative status of primary ESF components.

These procedures and programs provide adequate controls of safety related equipment at WNP-2.

II.K.1.5 The full procedure and program controls outlined for item II.K.1.10 also apply to TMI-2 Item II.K.1.5.

Additional clarification concerning this i tem is that all ESF systems are aligned and are operated as outlined in their respective Volume 2 Plant Procedures Manual.

These system alignments are initially independently verified.

Our program also requires independent verification following each major outage.

In addition, the principle ESF components have direct control board status indication to alert the operator and ensure their proper alignment.

Critical manual valves are locked in their required position.

These valves require Shift Manager approval prior to deviating from their required position.

In addition, independent verifi-cation is required when they are returned to their normal position.

These procedures and programs provide adequate controls of ESF equipment at WNP-2.

We feel that concerns to these items are resolved and the issue is closed.

Should you have any further questions, please contact Mr. P. L. Powell,

Manager, WNP-2 Licensing.

Very truly yours, 44~~ e6 G.

C. Sorensen, Manager Regulatory Programs JWB/tmh Attachment cc:

R Auluck -

NRC WS Chin

- BPA AD Toth NRC Site

r,

~

/

1 i.