:on 981128,no Analysis for NSR Sc Manual Loader for Tdafwp Could Be Found in Original Design.Cause Due to All Failure Modes Not Considered When Compressed Air Sys Originally Designed.Performed Review of Components| ML17335A492 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Cook  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
01/19/1999 |
|---|
| From: |
Gebbie J INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. |
|---|
| To: |
|
|---|
| Shared Package |
|---|
| ML17335A491 |
List: |
|---|
| References |
|---|
| LER-98-052, LER-98-52, NUDOCS 9901260365 |
| Download: ML17335A492 (6) |
|
Similar Documents at Cook |
|---|
|
text
NRC Form 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-1998)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
(See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block)
APPROVED BY OMB No. 3150-0104 EXP)RES 06/30/2001 ESTSAATEO BURDEN PER RESONSE TO COMPLY WITH TISS MAIE5ATORY INFORMATIONCOLLECTINREOVEST: 50 0 NRS. REPORTED lESSONS LEARNGIARE INCORPCRATEO WTO THE UCENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK TO OIDVSTRY.
FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BVRDEN ESTIMATE TO TNE INFORMATIONAND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T4 FSSI.
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGIAATORY COMIBSSERL WASHINGTON. DC 2o5554co1. AIEITO THE PAPERWOIK EDUCIION PROJECT (55504IOI), OFACE OF MANAGEMENT AND BVDGET, WASISNGTON, OC 205O5 FACIUTYNAME(5)
TITLE(5)
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 DOCKET NUMBER(2) 05000-315 PAGE (2) 1 of4 Potential Failure Mode for AirOperated Components Not Considered in Original Design MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (6)
SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER REPORT DATE (7)
MONTH DAY YEAR A IU NAM DC Cook Unit 2 TNU 05000-316 OTHER FACILITIESINVOLVED(8) 11 28 1998 1998 052 01 01 19 1999 A ILI NAM 0
NV OPERATING MODE (9)
POWER LEVEL(10) 000 20.2201 (b) 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) 73.71 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTEDPURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR (): (Check one or more) (11) 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.36(c)(1) 50.36(c)(2)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(vii)
OTHER Speci/r FI Abstract below or o NRC Forot 366A NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER(Iodude Area Code)
Mr. Joel Gebbie, Safety Related Mechanical Engineering Supervisor 616/465-5901 x1543 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
V
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO EPIX
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO EPIX SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 14 X
YES (IfYes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)
NO EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (15)
MONTH 06 DAY 01 1999 Abstract (Limitto 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (1 6)
During a Safety System Functional Inspection (SSFI) self-assessment of the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System, no analysis for a failure of the non-safety related remote speed controller manual loader for the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps (TDAFP) could be found. Engineering analysis of the condition resulted in the conclusion that a failure of the non-safety related manual loader output could result in the TDAFP operating at a minimum speed of 1900 rpm with only one Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (MDAFP) in operation when Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) is required to mitigate the consequences of an accident.
On November 28, 1998, this was determined to be reportable.
Therefore, this LER is being submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(B) as a condition outside the design basis of the plant.
To prevent recurrence of this issue in the future, a training course willbe provided to the Plant Engineering staff to ensure that the design requirements for non-safety related systems that interface with safety related systems are met. Potential modifications to the Auxiliary Feedwater System are being evaluated as an additional corrective action. When the course of action is decided, this LER willbe updated to reflect that information.
The safety significance of this condition was evaluated considering that the AFWsystem would be required to satisfy the accident analyses assumptions with the TDAFP operating at 1900 rpm in addition to a single active failure of a MDAFP.
Under these conditions, the AFWsystem would not be able to produce AFWflow rates assumed in the accident analyses.
However, the capability exists to cross-tie the AFWsystems between units and provide an alternate source ofAFWto the affected unit. Therefore, although this condition would result in the AFWsystem being outside the design bases, it would not pose a threat to the health and safety of the public.
In December 1998 and January 1999 additional components were identified that could experience the same failure. After the investigations for those components are completed, a supplemental report to this LER willbe submitted.
That submittal is expected to occur by June 1, 1999.
9901260365 99013.9 PDR ADQCK 050003i5 S
PDRU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-1998)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITYNAME (1)
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 OOCKET NUMBER(2) 05000-315 YEAR LER NUMBER (6)
SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER PAGE (3) 2of4 TEXT (ifmore space is required, use addh'Iional copies ofNRC Form (366A) (17)
Conditions Prior to Event
Unit 1 was in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown Unit 2 was in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown 1998 052 01 Descri tlon of Event On September 21, 1998, a Safety System Function Inspection (SSFI) self-assessment of the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) system began, using SSFI techniques in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 93801, "Safety System Functional Inspection". The inspection team utilized a vertical slice review in the functional areas of engineering design and configuration control, operations, maintenance, surveillance and testing, and quality assurance and corrective actions.
The self-assessment concluded on October 23, 1998.
During the SSFI, it was identified that no analysis for a failure of the non-safety related remote speed controller manual loader for the Turbine Driven AuxiliaryFeedwater Pumps (TDAFP) existed.
Engineering analysis of the condition resulted in the conclusion that a failure of the non-safety related manual loader output could result in the TDAFP operating at a minimum speed of 1900 rpm with only one Motor Driven AuxiliaryFeedwater Pump (MDAFP) in operation when Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) is required.
On November 28, 1998, this was determined to be reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(B) as a condition outside the design basis of the plant.
The steam supply to the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (TDAFP) is regulated by a Woodward governor valve.
Depending upon the position of the governor valve, the speed of the TDAFP can vary from 1900 rpm to 4350 rpm. The governor valve is a pneumatically controlled device. The position of the governor valve may be remotely adjusted from the Control Room by using the speed control manual loader. The pneumatic input to the speed control manual loader is supplied from the 20 psig compressed air header.
The loader output can vary from 3 psig to 15 psig. Loader output of 3 psig corresponds to maximum pump speed of 4350 rpm, while loader output of 15 psig corresponds to minimum pump speed of 1900 rpm.
Upon a loss of control air pressure to the loader, either due to loss of the compressed air system or a failure of the speed control manual loader, the TDAFP speed willautomatically go to its design speed of 4350 rpm. This condition has been previously evaluated.
However, ifthe speed control manual loader fails such that the TDAFP governor valve receives the compressed air header pressure of 20 psig, the TDAFP speed willautomatically go to its minimum speed setting of 1900 rpm. No evaluation of the failure mode where the TDAFP governor receives full compressed air system pressure of 20 psig had been performed.
The TDAFP speed control manual loader is a non-safety related component.
As such, failure of the loader cannot be considered as the single active/passive failure of the AFWsystem.
Therefore, the AFWsystem would have to satisfy the accident analyses assumptions with the TDAFP operating at 1900 rpm in addition to the single active failure of a MDAFP.
Under these conditions, the AFWsystem would not be able to produce AFWflow rates assumed in the accident analyses.
In December 1998 it was identified that the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) heat exchanger air operated outlet valves would experience a similar failure to that identified for the TDAFP governor valve.
In January 1999 it was identified that the Centrifugal Charging Pumps (CCP) discharge flow control valve was also susceptible to this failure mode.
Information on these additional components willbe provided after the investigations are completed.
Cause of Event
The root cause of this condition is that not all failure modes were considered when the compressed air system was originally designed.
The plant was designed in accordance with General Design Criterion 26, "Protection Systems Fail-U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-1998)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITYNAME (1)
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 DOCKET NUMBER(2) 05000-315 YEAR LER NUMBER (6)
SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER PAGE (3) 3of4 1998
052 01 TEXT (IImore space is required, use additional copies ofNRC Form (366A) (17)
Safe Design." The design criterion specifically refers to loss of air as a failure mode; however, it does not specify over-pressurization.
Review of components installed in the plant has revealed that a number of the components which utilize controllers are also designed with a dump solenoid.
The dump solenoid ensures that the component (e.g., valve) willfail to its safe position. Ifa component was credited with an active safety function, it was fitted with a dump solenoid.
However, ifthe component did not have an active safety function (such as the TDAFP speed controller manual loader), itwas not designed with a dump solenoid.
Anal sls of Event This LER is submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B) as a condition outside the design bases of the plant.
The AFW'system provides water to the Steam Generators (SG) when main feedwater is unavailable because of a loss of main feedwater, unit trip, feedwater or steam line break, toss of off-site power, or small break Loss of Coolant Accident (SBLOCA). This water removes core residual heat to prevent the release of primary water through the pressurizer safety or powerwperated relief valves and allows the plant to cool down to the point at which Residual Heat Removal (RHR) can be placed in service.
Each unit is equipped with one turbine driven AFWpump and two motor driven AFW pumps.
For each unit, the TDAFP serves all four steam generators and each MDAFWpump serves two steam generators.
The steam to the AFW pump turbine is supplied from two of the steam generators.
The preferred source of water for the AFWsystem is the non-safety related CST..Each unit's CST is cross-tied by a normally closed air operated valve to provide condensate to the opposite unit's AFW. Ifboth CSTs are unavailable, water is supplied from Lake Michigan via the safety related ESW system, which is connected upstream of the AFWpump suction strainers.
A minimum of 175,000 gallons is required to maintain the unit at hot shutdown for nine hours.
The TDAFP speed control manual loader is a non-safety related component.
As such, failure of the loader cannot be considered as the single active/passive failure of the AFWsystem.
Therefore, the AFWsystem would be required to satisfy the accident analyses assumptions with the TDAFP operating at 1900 rpm in addition to the single active failure of a MDAFP. Under these conditions, the AFWsystem would not be able to produce AFWflow rates assumed in the accident
'nalyses.
However, thecapabilityexiststocross-tietheAFWsystemsbetweenunits.
Proceduresareinplaceand operators are trained to perform this evolution. Should this condition occur and since Cook is not designed for simultaneous design basis accidents in both units, supplemental AFWcould be provided from the opposite unit. Therefore, although this condition would result in the AFWsystem being outside the design bases, it would not pose a threat to the health and safety of the public.
Corrective Actions
To ensure that this condition does not affect other components in the plant, a review has been performed to identify those components that utilize a similar controller. Several components with similar controllers have been identified. Those components are the CCP discharge flow control valve, the RHR heat exchanger outlet valves, and the SG PORVs (MRV-213, 223, 233,243).
The CCP and RHR valves were evaluated for the impact of the failure mode, and it was determined that corrective actions should be implemented.
Additional information regarding corrective actions willbe provided once the investigations for these components are completed.
The PORVs were also evaluated and it was determined that the potential failure mode was adequately addressed by actions taken in the Emergency Operating Procedures.
This condition occurred because the effect of non-safety related components on the operation of safety related systems was not properly evaluated.
To prevent recurrence of this condition, a training course willbe provided to the Plant
s II vt
~U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-1998)
~ LICEASEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITYNAME(1)
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 DOCKET NUMBER(2) 05000-315 YEAR LER NUMBER (6)
SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER PAGE (3) 4of4 1998 052 01 TEXT (ifmore space is required, use additional copies ofNRC Form (366A) (17)
Engineering staff to ensure that the design requirements for non-safety related systems, structures or components (SSCs) that interface with safety related SSCs are met. This training willbe completed prior to restart.
The current design change process has been verified to address requirements to design against single failures. The current procedure provides a significant improvement in the design change process over the process that was in place at the time of the original design for DC Cook Potential modifications to the AuxiliaryFeedwater System are being evaluated as an additional corrective action. When the course of action is decided, this LER willbe updated to reflect that information.
Previous Similar Events
315/97-023-00 315/97-026-00 R
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000315/LER-1998-001, :on 980104,containment Air Recirculation Sys Flow Testing Results Indicated Condition Outside Design Basis.Caused by Mispositioned Valve Actuator.Corrected Actuator to Valve Orientation |
- on 980104,containment Air Recirculation Sys Flow Testing Results Indicated Condition Outside Design Basis.Caused by Mispositioned Valve Actuator.Corrected Actuator to Valve Orientation
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-002, :on 980108,discovered Several Broken Master Relay (MR) Covers Inside Ssps Logic Cabinet.Caused by Past Practice of Removing MR Covers to Perform Time Response Testing.Replaced All Unnacceptable Ssps MRs |
- on 980108,discovered Several Broken Master Relay (MR) Covers Inside Ssps Logic Cabinet.Caused by Past Practice of Removing MR Covers to Perform Time Response Testing.Replaced All Unnacceptable Ssps MRs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000316/LER-1998-002-01, :on 980224,determined That PORV Inoperability Resulted in Condition Outside Design Basis.Caused by Communication Failure.Procedures Revised |
- on 980224,determined That PORV Inoperability Resulted in Condition Outside Design Basis.Caused by Communication Failure.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000316/LER-1998-003, :on 980304,two Pressurizer Safety Valves Failed to Lift within Setpoint Tolerance.Caused by Setpoint Drift.Valves Were Retested & Adjustments Were Made to Lower Setpoints |
- on 980304,two Pressurizer Safety Valves Failed to Lift within Setpoint Tolerance.Caused by Setpoint Drift.Valves Were Retested & Adjustments Were Made to Lower Setpoints
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-003, :on 980107,missed Procedure Step Resulted in Esfa & RPS Actuation Occurring.Caused by Personnel Error. Work on Ssps Stopped & High Priority Job Order Initiated to Restore Ssps to Normal |
- on 980107,missed Procedure Step Resulted in Esfa & RPS Actuation Occurring.Caused by Personnel Error. Work on Ssps Stopped & High Priority Job Order Initiated to Restore Ssps to Normal
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1998-004-01, :on 990422,determined That Ice Condenser Bypass Leakage Exceeds Design Basis Limit.Caused by Pressure Seal Required by Revised W Design Not Incorporated Into Aep Design.Numerous Matl Condition Walkdowns & Assessments Made |
- on 990422,determined That Ice Condenser Bypass Leakage Exceeds Design Basis Limit.Caused by Pressure Seal Required by Revised W Design Not Incorporated Into Aep Design.Numerous Matl Condition Walkdowns & Assessments Made
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000316/LER-1998-004, :on 980319,determined That Ice Condenser Bypass Was Potentially in Excess of Design Basis Limit.Caused by Lack of Understanding.Known Degraded Conditions Resulting in Divider Barrier Pass Being Corrected |
- on 980319,determined That Ice Condenser Bypass Was Potentially in Excess of Design Basis Limit.Caused by Lack of Understanding.Known Degraded Conditions Resulting in Divider Barrier Pass Being Corrected
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-004, :on 980122,discovered That One of Ice Condenser Flow Passages Contained Large Amount of Frost & Ice.Caused by Inadequate Maint & Surveillance Practices.Completed Detailed Mapping & Quantification of Flow Passage Blockage |
- on 980122,discovered That One of Ice Condenser Flow Passages Contained Large Amount of Frost & Ice.Caused by Inadequate Maint & Surveillance Practices.Completed Detailed Mapping & Quantification of Flow Passage Blockage
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-004-02, Forwards LER 98-004-02,providing Results of Analyses Performed by W.Ler Is Being Reduced from 7 Pages to 6 Due to Transferring Details of Root Cause Section to Cause of Event, Section | Forwards LER 98-004-02,providing Results of Analyses Performed by W.Ler Is Being Reduced from 7 Pages to 6 Due to Transferring Details of Root Cause Section to Cause of Event, Section | | | 05000315/LER-1998-005, :on 980122,missing Screws from Ice Condenser Ice Basket Coupling Rings Resulted in Potentially Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Failure in Shear Due to Overload During Basket Weighing Process.Melted Out Condensers |
- on 980122,missing Screws from Ice Condenser Ice Basket Coupling Rings Resulted in Potentially Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Failure in Shear Due to Overload During Basket Weighing Process.Melted Out Condensers
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000316/LER-1998-005-01, :on 980715,potential for HELB to Degrade Component Cooling Water Sys Was Noted.Investigation & Analysis of Signficance of Event Is Continuing.Method May Be Developed to Protect CCW Pump Area |
- on 980715,potential for HELB to Degrade Component Cooling Water Sys Was Noted.Investigation & Analysis of Signficance of Event Is Continuing.Method May Be Developed to Protect CCW Pump Area
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-006, :on 980225,ice Basket Weighing Option Resulted in Potential Unanalyzed Condition Due to Lack of Technical Basis for Option.Caused by Failure to Maintain Design Basis for Ice Condenser.Revised Plant Procedure |
- on 980225,ice Basket Weighing Option Resulted in Potential Unanalyzed Condition Due to Lack of Technical Basis for Option.Caused by Failure to Maintain Design Basis for Ice Condenser.Revised Plant Procedure
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(b)(2)(ii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-007, :on 980211,ice Condenser Weights Used to Determine TS Compliance Were Not Representative.Caused by Mgt Methods.Ice Condensers for Both Units Will Be Melted Out & Reloaded W/Fresh Ice |
- on 980211,ice Condenser Weights Used to Determine TS Compliance Were Not Representative.Caused by Mgt Methods.Ice Condensers for Both Units Will Be Melted Out & Reloaded W/Fresh Ice
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1998-007-01, :on 981106,high Energy Line Break Effects in Auxiliary FW Sys Was Noted.Cause of Event Is Under Investigation & Will Be Completed by 990220.Updated LER Will Be Submitted by 990310.With |
- on 981106,high Energy Line Break Effects in Auxiliary FW Sys Was Noted.Cause of Event Is Under Investigation & Will Be Completed by 990220.Updated LER Will Be Submitted by 990310.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000315/LER-1998-008, :on 980112,inadequate Contractor Control During Maint & Surveillance Activities Resulted in Ice Basket Damage.Procedures Used to Guide Maint & Surveillance Activities Have Been Upgraded & Rewritten |
- on 980112,inadequate Contractor Control During Maint & Surveillance Activities Resulted in Ice Basket Damage.Procedures Used to Guide Maint & Surveillance Activities Have Been Upgraded & Rewritten
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000316/LER-1998-008, :on 980112,damaged Ice Condenser Ice Basket Removed from Unit 1 Ice Condenser.Caused by Inadequate Control of Contractors & Inappropriate Maint.Damage Beyond Threshold Will Be Repaired & Replaced |
- on 980112,damaged Ice Condenser Ice Basket Removed from Unit 1 Ice Condenser.Caused by Inadequate Control of Contractors & Inappropriate Maint.Damage Beyond Threshold Will Be Repaired & Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000315/LER-1998-009, :on 980217,HR SR Not Being Met Resulted in Condition Prohibited by Ts.Caused by Inadequate Surveillance Procedure.Procedures Revised |
- on 980217,HR SR Not Being Met Resulted in Condition Prohibited by Ts.Caused by Inadequate Surveillance Procedure.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000315/LER-1998-010, :on 980303,ice Condenser Intermediate Deck Doors Structural Discrepancies Were Noted.Caused by Failure to Follow Procedures.Removed All Intermediate Deck Door Frames & Support Beams & Reassembling Parts |
- on 980303,ice Condenser Intermediate Deck Doors Structural Discrepancies Were Noted.Caused by Failure to Follow Procedures.Removed All Intermediate Deck Door Frames & Support Beams & Reassembling Parts
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-011, :on 980305,steel Containment Liner Pitting Was Is Excess of Design.Caused by Lack of Procedural Controls. Seals Were Removed,Containment Liner Plate Was Prepared & Coated & New Seals Applied |
- on 980305,steel Containment Liner Pitting Was Is Excess of Design.Caused by Lack of Procedural Controls. Seals Were Removed,Containment Liner Plate Was Prepared & Coated & New Seals Applied
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-012, :on 980305,discovered That 1/4 Inch Particulate Retention Requirement Had Not Been Maintained in Containment Recirculation Pump.Caused by Incompleted Design Change.Will Correct Condition Under New Design Change |
- on 980305,discovered That 1/4 Inch Particulate Retention Requirement Had Not Been Maintained in Containment Recirculation Pump.Caused by Incompleted Design Change.Will Correct Condition Under New Design Change
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-013, :on 980306,improper Splice Configurations for Power Operated Relief Valve Limit Switches Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Guidance in Installation Documents.Evaluation Performed |
- on 980306,improper Splice Configurations for Power Operated Relief Valve Limit Switches Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Guidance in Installation Documents.Evaluation Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-014, :on 980310,determined That Plant Had Operated in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Interface with W Re Assumptions Used in Safety Analysis.Will Revise Functional Restoration Procedure FRZ-1.With |
- on 980310,determined That Plant Had Operated in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Interface with W Re Assumptions Used in Safety Analysis.Will Revise Functional Restoration Procedure FRZ-1.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | | 05000315/LER-1998-014-03, Forwards LER 98-014-03, Response to High-High Containment Pressure Procedure Not Consistent with Analysis of Record. Revised Info Marked by Sidebars in Right Hand Margin. Commitments Made by Util,Listed | Forwards LER 98-014-03, Response to High-High Containment Pressure Procedure Not Consistent with Analysis of Record. Revised Info Marked by Sidebars in Right Hand Margin. Commitments Made by Util,Listed | | | 05000315/LER-1998-015, :on 980312,ice Weight Requirements Potentially Were Not Met Due to Nonconservative Assumption in Software Program.Update to Interim LER Will Be Issued by 980513 |
- on 980312,ice Weight Requirements Potentially Were Not Met Due to Nonconservative Assumption in Software Program.Update to Interim LER Will Be Issued by 980513
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2) | | 05000315/LER-1998-016, :on 980323,re non-safety Related Cables Routed to Safety Related Equipment.Lers 98-016-00 & 98-016-01 Retracted |
- on 980323,re non-safety Related Cables Routed to Safety Related Equipment.Lers 98-016-00 & 98-016-01 Retracted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-017, :on 980327,debris Was Found in Sample Ice from Ice Condenser Sys.Caused by Poor Work Practices.Ice Condenser Has Been Completely Thawed & Inspection,Repair & Refurbishment Activities Have Begun |
- on 980327,debris Was Found in Sample Ice from Ice Condenser Sys.Caused by Poor Work Practices.Ice Condenser Has Been Completely Thawed & Inspection,Repair & Refurbishment Activities Have Begun
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-018, :on 980505,use of RCP Seals as Alternate Boron Injection Flow Path Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Maintaining Temp Above Recommended Max Temp.Westinghouse Has Provided Technical Input on Issue |
- on 980505,use of RCP Seals as Alternate Boron Injection Flow Path Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Maintaining Temp Above Recommended Max Temp.Westinghouse Has Provided Technical Input on Issue
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-019-02, Forwards LER 98-019-02,which Provides Plant Test Data Gathered to Determine Error Associated W/Electric H Recombiner Temp Measurement Circuits.Changes to LER Are Marked W/Sidebar | Forwards LER 98-019-02,which Provides Plant Test Data Gathered to Determine Error Associated W/Electric H Recombiner Temp Measurement Circuits.Changes to LER Are Marked W/Sidebar | | | 05000315/LER-1998-019, :on 980320,determined That Electric Hydrogen Recombiner TS Surveillance Requirement 4.6.4.2.b.1 Was Not Met.Caused by Design Deficiency Due to Inadequate Design Change Mgt.Revised Procedures |
- on 980320,determined That Electric Hydrogen Recombiner TS Surveillance Requirement 4.6.4.2.b.1 Was Not Met.Caused by Design Deficiency Due to Inadequate Design Change Mgt.Revised Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-020, :on 980408,noted Failure to Include Sodium Hydroxide in W Border Computer Program Used to Determine Ph in Containment Sump.Cause Indeterminate.Updated LER Will Be Submitted by 981001 |
- on 980408,noted Failure to Include Sodium Hydroxide in W Border Computer Program Used to Determine Ph in Containment Sump.Cause Indeterminate.Updated LER Will Be Submitted by 981001
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-021, :on 980311,determined That Oil Pans Not Installed on RCP Motors Resulted in App R Noncompliance. Caused by Failure to Fully Implement App R Requirements.Will Updgrade Oil Leak Collection Sys |
- on 980311,determined That Oil Pans Not Installed on RCP Motors Resulted in App R Noncompliance. Caused by Failure to Fully Implement App R Requirements.Will Updgrade Oil Leak Collection Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-022, :on 980415,postulated Failure of SAT N Regulator Was Noted.Caused by Failure to Perform Adequate SE for Procedure rev.10CFR50.59 Program Has Been Upgraded to Meet Current Industry Standards.With |
- on 980415,postulated Failure of SAT N Regulator Was Noted.Caused by Failure to Perform Adequate SE for Procedure rev.10CFR50.59 Program Has Been Upgraded to Meet Current Industry Standards.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-023, :on 980416,potential Failure Due to Cross Train Routing of non-safety Related Cables Was Noted.Ler 98-023-00 & 98-023-01,retracted |
- on 980416,potential Failure Due to Cross Train Routing of non-safety Related Cables Was Noted.Ler 98-023-00 & 98-023-01,retracted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-024, :on 980417,allegation Concerning Accuracy of Ice Basket Weights Occurred.Allegation Has Been Investigated & Results of Investigation Will Be Provided to NRC by 980522 |
- on 980417,allegation Concerning Accuracy of Ice Basket Weights Occurred.Allegation Has Been Investigated & Results of Investigation Will Be Provided to NRC by 980522
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-025, :on 980424,plant Personnel Determined That Surveillance Requirements of Tech Specs 4.6.5.1.b.3 Were Not Met.Caused by Lack of Attention to Detail.Procedures Revised |
- on 980424,plant Personnel Determined That Surveillance Requirements of Tech Specs 4.6.5.1.b.3 Were Not Met.Caused by Lack of Attention to Detail.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-026, :on 980430,TS SR 4.6.5.1.b.2 Was Not Met.Caused by Failure to Accurately Transfer SR Into Plant Procedures. Software Used to Support Ice Condenser Surveillance Program Will Either Be Revised or Replaced |
- on 980430,TS SR 4.6.5.1.b.2 Was Not Met.Caused by Failure to Accurately Transfer SR Into Plant Procedures. Software Used to Support Ice Condenser Surveillance Program Will Either Be Revised or Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000315/LER-1998-027, :on 980505,discovered Debris of Unknown Origin in West Containment Spray Header.Cause Indeterminate. Evaluation of Condition in Progress & Updated LER Will Be Submitted |
- on 980505,discovered Debris of Unknown Origin in West Containment Spray Header.Cause Indeterminate. Evaluation of Condition in Progress & Updated LER Will Be Submitted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-028, :on 980513,determined That TS Surveillance Requirements Not Met Due to Lack of Understanding of Staggered Test Basis. Caused by Lack of Specific Training. Periodic Change of Nuclear Plant Maint Sys |
- on 980513,determined That TS Surveillance Requirements Not Met Due to Lack of Understanding of Staggered Test Basis. Caused by Lack of Specific Training. Periodic Change of Nuclear Plant Maint Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1998-029, :on 980422,SFP Ventilation Sys Was Noted Inoperable.Caused by Design Deficiency.Safety Evaluation Successfully Performed & Appropriate Surveillance Testing Completed |
- on 980422,SFP Ventilation Sys Was Noted Inoperable.Caused by Design Deficiency.Safety Evaluation Successfully Performed & Appropriate Surveillance Testing Completed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-029-01, Forwards LER 98-029-01, Fuel Handling Area Ventilation Sys Inoperable Due to Original Design Deficiency. Supplemental Rept Represents Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replaces Rept in Entirely.Commitment Listed | Forwards LER 98-029-01, Fuel Handling Area Ventilation Sys Inoperable Due to Original Design Deficiency. Supplemental Rept Represents Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replaces Rept in Entirely.Commitment Listed | | | 05000315/LER-1998-030, Re Incorrect Installation of Containment Spray Heat Exchanger.Ler 98-030-00 Retracted. with | Re Incorrect Installation of Containment Spray Heat Exchanger.Ler 98-030-00 Retracted. with | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-031, :on 980610,potential Common Mode Failure of RHR Pumps Were Noted.Caused by Inaccurate Values.Accurate Miniflow Numbers Have Been Determined by Flow Testing |
- on 980610,potential Common Mode Failure of RHR Pumps Were Noted.Caused by Inaccurate Values.Accurate Miniflow Numbers Have Been Determined by Flow Testing
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-031-01, Forwards LER 98-031-01,re Potential Common Mode Failure of RHR Pumps Due to Use of Inaccurate Values.Commitment Made by Util,Listed | Forwards LER 98-031-01,re Potential Common Mode Failure of RHR Pumps Due to Use of Inaccurate Values.Commitment Made by Util,Listed | | | 05000315/LER-1998-032, Forwards LER 98-032-00,originally Due on 980723.Additional Seven Days to Submit LER Was Granted by B Burgess of Region III | Forwards LER 98-032-00,originally Due on 980723.Additional Seven Days to Submit LER Was Granted by B Burgess of Region III | 10 CFR 21.21(c)(3)(ii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-033, :on 980611,H Recombiner Wattmeter Circuit TS SR Was Not Met.Caused by Inadequate TS SR Work Practices. Lessons Learned Document Was Issued to All Maint Personnel Involved W/Writing Surveillance Procedures |
- on 980611,H Recombiner Wattmeter Circuit TS SR Was Not Met.Caused by Inadequate TS SR Work Practices. Lessons Learned Document Was Issued to All Maint Personnel Involved W/Writing Surveillance Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000315/LER-1998-034, :on 980623,flow Rates to Containment Spray Headers Were Potentially Lower than Design Basis Values. Declared Containment Spray Sys,Inoperable.Update Will Be Submitted by 981015 |
- on 980623,flow Rates to Containment Spray Headers Were Potentially Lower than Design Basis Values. Declared Containment Spray Sys,Inoperable.Update Will Be Submitted by 981015
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-035, :on 980702,identified That Potentially Impacted Ability of Shock Absorbing Bumpers to Perform Intended Functions.Caused by Poor Work Practices.Bumpers Will Be Replaced by Newer Design Shock Absorber |
- on 980702,identified That Potentially Impacted Ability of Shock Absorbing Bumpers to Perform Intended Functions.Caused by Poor Work Practices.Bumpers Will Be Replaced by Newer Design Shock Absorber
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-036, :on 980723,discovered That Flow Indicator Had Not Been Calibr at TS Required Frequency.Caused by Inadequate Work Practices.Action Request Has Been Written to Calibr Component on Refueling Outage Basis |
- on 980723,discovered That Flow Indicator Had Not Been Calibr at TS Required Frequency.Caused by Inadequate Work Practices.Action Request Has Been Written to Calibr Component on Refueling Outage Basis
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000315/LER-1998-037-01, Forwards LER 98-037-01,representing Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replacing Rept in Entirety.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal | Forwards LER 98-037-01,representing Extensive Rev to Original LER & Replacing Rept in Entirety.Listed Commitments Identified in Submittal | | | 05000315/LER-1998-037, :on 980812,ice Condenser Bypass Leakage Exceeds Design Basis Limit of 5 Square Feet Occurred.Caused by Lack of Understanding of Design Basis of Containment as Sys. Procedure Will Be Developed to Guide Insp.With |
- on 980812,ice Condenser Bypass Leakage Exceeds Design Basis Limit of 5 Square Feet Occurred.Caused by Lack of Understanding of Design Basis of Containment as Sys. Procedure Will Be Developed to Guide Insp.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) |
|