ML18139B186

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:12, 5 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-280/80-43 & 50-281/80-47.Corrective Actions:Leaks in Unit 2 Safeguards Bldg Roof Repaired,Electrical Cables Dried & U Bolts Replaced or Tightened
ML18139B186
Person / Time
Site: Surry  
Issue date: 03/03/1981
From: Sylvia B
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18139B185 List:
References
112, NUDOCS 8103240322
Download: ML18139B186 (5)
v • d • e


Text

r -

. ~- *...

VIRGINIA. *ELECT'R.IC -~D POWER COMPANY R:rCHM.OND,VJ:RG:tNXA 23261 March 3, 1981 Serial No. 112 NO/RMT:ms Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 We have reviewed your letter of February 6, 1981 in reference to the inspection conducted. at Surry Power Station on November 12-26, 1980 and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/80-43 and. 50-281/80-47...Our

  • r~~ponses to. the=- s"p*ecff{c""1nfracfi6ris 'are att~checi:"
  • We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the reports.

Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objec-tion to these inspection reports being made a matter of public disclosure.

Pursuant to Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, this material is being submitted under oath.

~

~.

  • *** *.> /;,; ~fff,{(ff{fe,**.

Ope1;.ations and Matntenance.

cc:

Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing

... :.. -~.

.* '.*'c

~... *, ** :-... -... :.. ;,~*.';.

:
  • 1 ** * ; *
  • ***. : *** ~

. *....:* :* ~-..:. *.. :...... :. :::....

... :....*..... ~.-.**-.:::-,:

:-':.**.-.* ::.(*.. **-.

~;

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF RICHMOND

)

) s. s.

)

.:B~~:Or/:~*~:~**=:t*,:*~~t:a~/ Pri~ii},*<;r**dn~**- £6:~*. *~he' -City* and.. ~;~~~w~~lth ***~f6~~saic('

today personally appeared J. T. Rhodes, who being duly sworn, made oath and said (1) that he is Manager - Nuclear Technical Services, of. the Virginia Electric and Power Company:, (2) that he is duly authorized to execute and file

the* foregoing response* iil **behalf *of that Company, and (3) that the statements*

in.the response are. true to the best of. his knowledge and belief..

Given under my hand and notarial seal this 3r:A day of JJ\\ Q,x(!.J\\

1qg1.

  • . :. ~ '..::... **.. :.. *.

... ~.~*. :.

(SEAL)

. *..... ~-

SURRY POWER STATION RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION APPENDED TO INSPECTION REPORT 50-280/80-43 AND 50-281/80-47 Attachment Page 1 NRG COMMENT A.

Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, required that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to_quality, such as fail-

ures, malfunctions, deficiencies, and nonconf6rmances are promptly identified and corrected.

Section 16 (Corrective Action) of the Vepco NPS QA. Manµal. establish.es the measures. and provides procedures for.

. iAii;i..Hfy:iP.&*,...,co~i:e~ting, *, azj.a. *ai>pro'p:r.iately._. :r.:ei>9tt:iri&; *.coi;ididmi~ aaver,s¢ _ -:- ;.. _

~ :.'>*:,*"to*: q1.1a'i1ty'*>. - :,*:... *;... *-:.:.. *:'*.:',**O; : *.,*:,:.',*.... :_.'*.... *:. *.. _:.':-:.:::

Contrary to the above, adequate identification and corrective actions were not taken on the following conditions adverse to quality:*

1.
  • Rainwater leaked, throu,gh the, Unit.2 Safeguards Building (valve pit)

. roof -~nd roof piugs on November 24 ~ 1980 onto the. Low Head Safety.

Injection (LHSI) and Outside Recirculation Spray (ORS) *pump motors and electrical components (conduit and junction boxes).

The pump motors and power cables were electrically tested and the power cable to LHSI pump 2-SI-P-lA was found wet and electrically shorted.

The roof leaks, which led to the conditions adverse to quality have

.. e:ic.i:sJ.ecl.- _sinc.e. :Uni_t 2>:r;estar.t :i.n-..,AugJ1s.t; 1980 < *

2.

The

  • six-.inch Residual Heat Removal piping from the containment penetration area in the Unit 2 Safeguards Building (valve pit) had a broken floor support_ on November 24, 1980.
>3*:.. -:°'. Se~eri'r':lbos*~(riii*s:~irig~* **6;. br6~e~:*u..:bol'~**pipe**s*tippo*rts'*o~ *'th~ *:U~it. :2**::*:.-..---......

charging pump service water* and component cooling water systems in

  • the area. of* the. 2.-SW-E.-IB heat exchanger and flow indicators were observ.ed on November 24,. 1980.

,-::.,.*_. --.:,:*,;:*.::*.. _:..:*:_.-:::**~.:/-.,..

  • ~. :.:,.:.* ***-~*::..-*.:..'~";.:.-*1:..-.,.._::-.':*'::.<,.,:*."-***;---~.i*'-i'

._:-.**. *.. ~... **

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I.D. 3.).

B.

VEPCO RESPONSE

.1..

  • Th.e _: item-as stated -is. correct. *..

.*.*.,.~*.*.. :*..... :. ~..... :. :*. :. :.. ;..-.

2.. : REASONS.FOR VIOLATION"

a.

The leaking safeguards building roof has been identified to the maintenance department by the operating staff.

The maint-enance report requesting the roof to be repaired was not coded for urgent action and was therefore scheduled to be accomp-lished in a

normal manner.

This unfortunately was not completed prior to: the. heavy rains of late November.

'\\

  • J
b.

Attachment Page 2 The six inch Residual Heat Removal p1p1ng support was* first modified by the Architect-Engineer as part of the 79-14 efftirt.

This placed the support in the configuration observed by the Resident NRC Inspector.

The "as-built" effort in January, 1980 failed to note the one-half inch gap between the fixed and moveable base plates.

c.

The several loose, missing or broken "U" bolts resulted from a design change to install new valves in the service water system.

In order to facilitate valve installation, the hangers were relaxed and not returned to their proper configuration following ~he valve installation.

. >*.,:*i:*':_;,_* *:--,>:Y;: '.*.:3 ?:: ;c_:,'coruu:ciiw'.. STEP:s wiircH *iAvt.:*BEEN*:TAKEN.. :ANif*RE°sut.Ts~*AcmEVED:, :-*-.:>.*
a.

The leaks in Unit #2 safeguards building roof were repaired on November 25, 1980.

The. electrical cables connecting to LHSI

..." *P.~P. 2".".SI-~:--1~. were* dried and*. :the pump. returned_.to operable.

  • status*.*
b.

The broken floor support on the six inch RHR line

  • has been analyzed and a resultant modification installed on December 17, 1980.
c.

The several loose, missing and broken "U" bolts on the charging p-qmp.. ~at:er. servi~e sy~tem have._ been tightened or replaced.

. *~.*- *,**,.,; *,* -.*.*

.. :_',:.:*=.:.-.*.. :~.. 1-.-:-:-::.. -:

4.

CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS:

The importance of prompt identification of deficiencies on safety related. equipment. and systems is.. being. emphasized to. station*

  • *... *,., *. * *.... :.:.. ;_.*. :*.**,.. :' ****: '-"f-*p~rso.nn~L... *T.hrougl!:*. this.j.ncreased.- *awarene:ss.';-:a:dequ.ate identifica-:

.. tion. and correction. of conditions adverse to. quality. can be achieved.

. *.-,*.., '"-"'._.;:, **._:,,.:,,:_..,_.5;'.,:'., _DATE.. WHEN*-*.FULL.COMP.L.IANCK... WILL_, BE.ACHIEVED:**.:.,.::.<*._ -". :,..,..

.... *,: **. :;.. _.*:..-. _i**-:*:.:...

Full compliance has been achieved.

NRC COMMENT

  • A.-.'.*.. T~~linica.L.Sp~cificati.<>~. 6.*4~A'. 7: -~:n_i*. 6 /4.D
  • re4li:i~es. *_that.. the det~_ii~d.
  • ""*writteii piocedu'd;~*. 'p"rovide'.d. '!~i:"** 'i,reveritive *.or.* co"rrective*. maiiit.eri.ai1e:e.*.

-operations: which* would have an effect on the safety. of the reactor must be followed.

Contrary to the above, the detailed written corrective maintenance procedures EMP-C-HT-20 and MMP-C-017 were not followed in that, on November 24, 1980, several feet of the Unit 2 heat traced Boron Injection

. **: _Tank:*:.{~IT) recil'cu:l~*tio0: _line. (.l"

  • C:H-:23,0-152, upstream* of rv~~884C,. was...
  • no*t insulated.. *. The pro*cedures. *. require reinstallatiori. of* insulation
  • removed during maintenance.

Attachment Page 3 This is a Severity Level V Violation. (Suppelment I.E.).

A similar item was identified in our letter dated January 22, 1980.

B.

VEPCO RESPONSE

1.

ADMISSION OR DENIAL OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION The item as stated is correct.

2.

REASONS FOR THE VIOLATION The insulation was removed from the p1p1ng system to perform maint-enance _on the heat. traci.ng,. This activity was c9mpleted late in_.the.*

... :..,." ;;.. >,*:,-;,w<?rk:ii~g,:.d~y;:-~fi.<;i.-*.. *:i;~~u.1~_tor~,1:.wer:e:: ~ayailal?l~::-*tp~.i::~pi'c~ :the_*. ~nsula-:.. /**.

. 'tion; **Through*a'iack*of-communfrations the.lagging was not**replace*d *.

on the following work day.

3..

CORRECTIVE STEPS AND RESULTS ACHIEVED Up~n.*di~covery -*.of. the*. _discrepant : conditi.on,'. -the. line-. was*: properly reinsulated.

A second shift insulation crew has been assigned and proper emphasis placed on completing lagging activities on safety related piping.

4.

CORRECTIVE STEPS w1IICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS:

.. **/*..... :..

  • * **** ::*.:-,* ***'The *.*importanc-e***of.:"j>rompt* identif.icat:i.oii. of* *deficiencies-.. on. safety related equipment and systems is being emphasized to station person-

_nel.

,..,.,...... :.. **.5... DATE,WHEN. FULL COMPLIANCE.; WILL BE.ACHIEVED.*.... *

.: : :. *. -:*~.... *.. :.

... *.... **~..*

~,*

Full compliance has been achieved.

~*... -*.;* *, **\\....

-:* *.** i:-

. :. -~- : *.

.... **

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18139B186&oldid=4992047"