ML19331D296
| ML19331D296 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1980 |
| From: | Robert Lewis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Ferguson J VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19331D297 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008280235 | |
| Download: ML19331D296 (1) | |
See also: IR 05000338/1980022
Text
),,
UNITED STATES
/
8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
'
o
'.
-
E
REGION ll
101 MARIETTA ST
N.W.. SUITE 3100
hy
- g
8
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
,
%,
,e
.....
In Reply Refer To:
'
RII:EJF
50-338/80-22
50-339/80-13
.
Virginia Electric and Power Company
ATTN:
J. H. Ferguson
Executive Vice President-Power
P. O. Box 26666
Richmond, VA 23261
Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of July 2,1980 informing us of ateps you have taken
to correct the item of noncompliance concerning activities under NRC License No.
NPF-4 brought to your attention in our letter of June 5, 1980. We will examine
your corrective actions and plans during subsequent inspections.
We appreciate your cooperation with us.
.
Sincerely,
e
f.c.
R. C.
ewis, Acting Chief
Reactor Operations and Nuclear
Support Branch
cc w/ encl:
W. R. Cartwright, Station Manager
P. G. Perry, Senior Resident Engineer
.
.8008280 gg g
. - 7-
- . . _
-.
.
.
. . . _ . . . - . .
_
-
_ _ _ _
'
n,
.
,
.
. < .
.
..r.3.e n g e nt % .
.
VIRGINIA EI.scrRIC AND PowgpoMyANY ' . <
o
Rrenuoxn,VamonwzA 202s1
l
July 2,1980)3t' ') I-
0
.
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director
Serial No. 522
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
N0/RMT:ms
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Docket Nos. 50-338
Region II
50-339
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100
License Nos. NPF-4
Atlanta, Georgia
30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
We have reviewed your letter of June 5,
1980, in reference to the inspection
conducted at North Anna Power Station on May 12 through 16, 1980, and reported
in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-338/80-22 and 50-339/80-13.
Our response to
the specific infraction is attached.
-
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the
reports.
Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objec-
tion to these inspection reports being made a matter of public disclosure.
Very truly yours,
4)
B. R. Sylvia
Manager - Nuclear
Operations and Maintenance
Attachment
i
l
cc:
Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief
l
l
D VF
OFFICIAL COPY
i
gooyo702T3
j
. - .
.
. .
.__
_
.
..
_
.
___
+
Attachment
.
.
.,'
Pag 1
-
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION
ITEM REPORTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NO.
.
50-338/80-22 AND 50-339/80-13
NRC COMMENT
,
As required by Technical Specificatins 4.0.2.a and 4.8.2.3.2.a, the
125-volt battery bank and charger shall be demonstrated operable at
least once per 7 days with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed
25% of the surveillance interval by verifying electrolyte level,
specific gravity cell voltage and overall battery voltage are within
stated specifications.
Contrary to the above, periodic test procedure 1-PT-85 (D.C. Distri-
bution Systems) was performed on April 3, 1980 and April 13, 1980. This
interval is in excess of Technical Specification requirements.
This is an infraction.
A similar item was brought to your attention in
our letter dated January 29, 1980.
'
RESPONSE
The above infraction is correct as stated.
Specifically pursuant to Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice",
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information
is submitted.
.
1.
Corrective steps taken and results achieved:
A review of our test control program was made and it was
determined that the periodic testing programs described in the
Nuclear Power Station Quality Assurance Manual,Section II,-
paragraph 5.3 is adequate.
Since the test control program is adequate, station management
will reemphasize the requirements of periodic test scheduling.
The reemphasis will include the requirements of technical specification 4.0.2,
the allowable extension period for
surveillance requirements.
.
2.
Corrective action taken to avoid further non-compliance:
To ensure established procedures are followed correctly,
station management will distribute a letter reemphasizing the
requirements of periodic test scheduling to station supervi-
sors.
Station supervisors "ill then discuss this letter with
their personnel.
3.
'Date when full compliance will be achieved:
Full compliance
will be achieved by July 15, 1980.
-
. . - . .
.-
- ... . - . _ .. . - . - .- - ... -
. . . . . . . . .
- . .
-
-
. _ .