ML20004D812
| ML20004D812 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 05/22/1981 |
| From: | Sylvia B VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004D808 | List: |
| References | |
| 280, NUDOCS 8106100081 | |
| Download: ML20004D812 (3) | |
Text
/- @y @q:,M N h.4,N $ M $g@ M@ k d % Q/7 M,~.e 3.M..y[yWG'M x..
,w a
,; y
,..x:.y.x.y y.C.,"y m. g:(g;y.c %m u Q...f
- v. p,
g
,.: n.tt-s. 6 :. p3.'+-
..g n s.
.r.,
g
.p a n =; m., ;;..m.,3.,y &, fw'v..
.? e L~/6>
1e 1
e
,3 1 v. m..
U S N R C R E dio 1 i, a~ O, ' ~ ~.. aMT
- .' MMU "
.... q m
. < @.e.v6, 6,,.
VinoINIA Er;zcrInp q-w.m-oWan Courwr F
.m.
9 ' O ^
j
~~
[W"-
RIcaworn,Vrmerw rA coast T a. p.v.ww+
q"t 31 MAY 27 A 848139, e
..s-e(. y ai1 Wm& M.,J m.g
~
May 22, 19...,,,. - -. "
n..
.. p-
, e v
- g.....y.
.9 g o y 9.
f d,
~ ~,,
[
' f geg-y{;gy.;.
pM w
n m
,'m. 4 w y?,?,u n?.y a m m-v. + Serial No. 280'....,,.*k., s.g 4.y..;.
- y.:..,
'" W -?.:N0/RMT:ms :
. !P
- .4:' Mer James P. O'Reilly, Director
.... ~.
'; 5 ' Office-of; Inspection and Enforcemenc
~ !'M}; b' A 3.d ~ ' M Docket. Nos. 50
.~
'i
'.Md%
' 2' $ 'U S.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mi
.U M 7?~
7..
' 4 3 '/, T, C W G N J50-3394
%gv
~ ' Region II-
.Lic'ense Nos. NPF-4
~
q.g[>i s 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100
.. g _;t.Jd g.NPE-7
[ .
- Atlanta,. Georgia ; 30303
..,n.
.w.,q%
,. : e
~
~-
- k. b,[. ' ik[/ k.
. +
3.
sear-Mr. O'R'eilly$
- n ph4
(
, 7((.
~..
w' x%y>.
- w. Me.. s.m..A, w.n. m.w.. M. ~n mt We have reviewed your letter of April 28 11981-in reference to the inspection
+
~
v u.
North Anna Power Station between. March 23-27,198Fand reported mMv "
dN,. conducted at
^'
T%WWE'%'.Mf9M. Our response-tP$N 50-338/81-10 ~ and '50-339/81-06.
~
h in. IE~. Inspection Report. Nos..
h,;5z.y M.Ap.bs;m.plo @,4r ~
- fr9fthe ipecific i.nfraction is attached.
Mir ~
1
':na.
tW:.Vq'K,%* information
. m.~ u a.,,
,m
. ~
s,..'
' >.h.
l
& + x W .f Pg@
- I W,-
ll*, D Q.
' W D.f:have determined
'y, that no Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company' has ino objec-?y 4.,~
is contained 'in the
~ %.We..
proprietary WM l
.- : reports.
- tion. to these inspection reports being made a. matter. of public disclosure.'?"If The information. contained in the attached pages is true and accurate tos the'"T'I.17M N
2 5 $ w g # %. a best. of my knowledge 'and belief.
o y 20 m O 7 a. h g. w.
q, g et.
s o w;,.,
.w
, c -
- r-
. 64
...v s
- ge %
27.;O! y;N Very truly yours,..c, g 'W.84 ;.p!#,,
1 w.
s.
v_..... nm.,%'n -
y
.;%':n b,.p,Q.'Q)j c..
, x ~.;. _,
hM Q,.,..
' J * *: f:S - - J.f4 WM u
9
' ' p.,?. ;w.s,-
,,q
.p rf::;h p y p g g Q
N 5.t;h, y
?
p 9 Q4
- - MGQf a,lh-M,s Q.
~
x.
., s y7:yfnQ
'^_.,.
y y,; y, g g,5,: W9,..q, Qg% Myk
_.,g y g g g{A Ct L
. t y q.;g%y ;., s n. -;w a.p_,
y (fy; g-, gg Q
" $) 4
'#~,@.....M.. :M. n., Manager - Nuclear '.. ' f,!y$. p g16
d 9 [ 7 " Y ' E
..,. 9
.....s. -
,. q 4.p,y.4 Operations and Maintenanc
' M.9 y k
-,y $%'yf1 1
n
- g g g,.,x n q u..e,...;
y g,.*f. s.y..
1 mz,:
,w n.
.m
+-
- ~
- . 3 q,,,4 s,v
.p.
+ W y $. m p
' Attachment
' g y'- $ f ~
p
- w ;. n y.
y w /.
Cit 7 of Richmond
, N.-..
I.a.5Me rD M+Wg@f Y.... N.. s.'.
2.w 1.
Co.nmenwealth of Virginia
~
7,f5
-g.*2'
. Acknowledged before me this ?'.L,.sday of M, 19I/
. ?. M. -.:.
' N..':d,#. ~.
n :, ; s m s t
2.~
. f_:n..,
n.i M W:.o
.m y %,. r
.. 4..
h C["PleM
' Q fl.pf, g. gy'{fg,,.
p 4
< ~
S Notary Publie 4G
'y'
..' 4 M 2 I
>,., p q..p-:.nn z
y 7-
.....s.# &
g.
.. My Commission expires:
.:2 - M 19ps,,i g'
s
.A
^c
' M, 4 -
SEAI.
.i, Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief
^
Operating Reactors Branch No. 3
.h iQ J. n f.,-
$ $' AM cc-
' -71l '
0 L
Division of Licensing
.m 7 l
l a
l l
l.l8 106100 d(
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS v
POOR QUAUTY.PAGES i
7 l
c s.
.v
,4 p
ee!
g_
g y
.;.p) gjg.
_t z,
n
=
yuxa n, x n..m m.x
=q p s-w..; a. ~, Q. y -
.. m.. " ' -
i b, ? W G. W a-
_ ~-y 7.;...u
'* ^
- Attcchment'
~
. - y 1
\\s 2
~
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION
~
- . c.. m
-ITEMS REPORTED DURING NRC INSPECTION CONDUCTED FROM MARCH 23-27, 1981 Sc r..
- f. p:,,
, c :x,... s 7
.m l _ Qg&-
,h NRC COMMENT
-y w ;y
_t g ;
y that an audit of the-
,s J TAppendir B. Technical specification 5.3.2.2.a requires conformance of facility operation to the provisions contained within the-9
^
Rnvironmental Technical Specifications -and applicable license-conditionsi _.._&
a.
shall be completed at least once per 12 months.
,,.94t;l%
.,, c.
m.
s ' Contrary to the above, inspection of audits conducted during calendar year f
7 1979 and 1980 disclosed the findings listed below.
- Q. ;.;f. )g;&.
w wt Audit of the conformance of facility operation to the provisions contain a k.".
w
'?
' 1.
t J a.+C.
ed. within Environmental Technical Specification 3.2, which defines the TM D
was not. completed..
.~
M. 4 W @ y W f g (, @y %
environmental monitoring requirements,
,fMp.g%.Eradiological QQ,hq%g Q2@
.. f m@ ' M,;
i_.
s during-calendar year 1980.
e
- gy+-
.; - 2 s-Audit N'o N-79-38 of the radiological Environmental Technical Specifica-,
,4 tion 3.2 was inadequate based upon failure of the audit to include radio-chemical analyses of environmental samples required by the subject,
~
3 g
' " "., " P C'
specification provisions.
A This is~ a Severity Level V Violation -(Supplement VII.E.).
,,g/
m q, e-o e
y,7 1..r+
G. s. g q
~
... %~j -y RESPONSE-r
_+3 y~. a ;
y.,
e
-y-O glg -
~ - 1.
Admission or Denial of the Alleged Violation
^
,, ; g o
Jg g +
W,..-
.., _ n o. 9 The-Notice of Violation for Item one (1) is correct as stated.
j { gge
_ya e-w w j.. y na
. ymy.
The Notice of Violation ~ for Item two (2) is correct as stated.
The i
radiochemical analysis, as completed by Teledyne Isotopes, Inc., was f
verified by a corporate Quality Assurance. Vendor's Surveillance Audit in September of 1978, nine months prior to coaducting Audit No. N-79-38.
However, this audit (N-79-38) and its refecence to the service of Teledyne Isotopes was not subsequently validater' in a 1979 annual audit of the contractors' analytical Quality Assurance / Quality Control proce-
'dures and program.
2 Reasons for the Violation 2
l Item one (1) of this infraction was [hle to administrative error.
Neither the Station nor corporate Quality Assurance groups wne aware that the radiological portion of the-Environmental Monitoring Audit had not been completed for the 1980 year.
Item two (2) of this infraction was due to scheduling of the corporate Quality Assurance Vendor Surveillance Audit of Teledyne Isotopes, Inc.
every three years instead of annually as required by Environmental Technical Specification 5.3.2.2.a.
The requirement for an annual audit of the contractor's services had apparently been misinterpreted.
. r.,...:.
o-
~
Attachment Paga 2 3.
Corrective Steps Taken and Results Achieved For item one (1) of the infraction an audit of the radiological and non-
~
radiological environmental monitoring requirements has been initiated.
?
[-
For ites two (2) an audit of the contractor's services.will be scheduled
"~
to be completed in 1981.
4.
Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations With reference to item one (1) of the infraction, an Environmental Monitoring Audit is to be scheduled annually to include both radiological and non-radiological aspects of the Environmental Technical Specifica-tions.
The audit schedule issued by the Quality Assurance Department will further ine re that the referenced audit is completed.
For ites two (2) of the infraction, an audit of the contractor's (Tele-
~ dvne Isotopes, Inc.) services will, in the future, be scheduled and completed on.an annual basis.
In addition, the term " periodic basis" as used in. section 3.3 of procedure-H.P.-REMM-9 (Quality Assurance) in reference to conformance of Teledyne's analysis of environmental samples to applicable standards will be changed to conform to the minimal annual audit condition imposed by Environmental Technical Specifications 5.3.2.2.a.
5.
Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance for item 'one (1) of the infraction will be achieved on or about June-1, 1981.
Full compliance for ites two (2) of the infraction, as redefined in sec-tion one of the response, will be completed on or about December 31, 1981.
i 1
I l
l l
l l
.