ML20009B432
| ML20009B432 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1981 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009B431 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-333-81-04, 50-333-81-4, NUDOCS 8107150438 | |
| Download: ML20009B432 (2) | |
Text
,
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATI.ON Power Authority of the State of New York Docket No. 50-333 FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant As a result of the inspection on January 26-30, 198), and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following viola-
.tions were identified:
A.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, states in part, " Measures shall be e'stablished to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as...non-conformances are promptly fdentified and corrected.
In the case of signifi-cant conditions adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition...".
The Quality Assurance Program, Section 16, Paragraph 2.1, states in part,
" Major and recurring conditions, adverse to quality, such as... deficiencies
...shall be identified, the main causes determined, and prompt corrective action taken to preclude repetition.
These conditions include failures of the quality system."
Contrary to *.'s above, the following discrepancies were identified between FM and OP draw,.:7 which were identical in nature to those brought to the licensee's attent).t in a letter dated December 11, 1979 (Item D).
OP-14-1, Revision 4, shows valves 409 A and B, 411 A and B closed with the pipe beyond the 409 and 411 valves capped.
FM-23A, Revision 13, shows th same valves open with the pipe beyond valves 409 and 411 uncapped.
OP-37-1A, Revision 2, shows valves AHB 190 and 191 open while FM-18A, Revision 20, shows them closed.
The above examples collectively constitute a Severity Level IV Violation (Supolement I.D).
B.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V,,iates in part, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures...of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accord-ance with these instructions, procedures...".
The Quality Assurance Program, Section 5: Paragraph 2.2, states in part,
" Quality affecting activities shall be conducted in accordance with appro-priate procedures, instructions...as applicable."
8107150438 810325
'PDR ADOCK 05000333 0
Appendix A 2
Plant Standing Order Po. 5, Control of Drawings and Technical Manuals, Revision 0, Paragraph 7.1 states in part, "The master drawing file...shall be maintained...to reflect the as-built condition of the plant...This file may consist of nicrofilm aperture cards and/or hard copy prints...Upon completion of an addition, modification or correction to the plant requiring changes in drawings...shall stamp the affected drawings with the following:
' Drawing is pending revision. This drawing has been changed. See modiff-cation coordinator'."
Contrary to the above, the following discrepancies with respect to drawing annotation were identified:
Drawing ESK-6 MAG, Revision 4 had neither the Aperture Card nor Con-trolled Copy No. 2 annotated that any modification affected it.
Yet modification package 78-30 contained two copies of the drawing that depicted "as-built" conditions in differing areas.
The Aperture Card of Drawing FM-18A, Revision 20, was annotated that modification 76-61 affected the drawing but Controlled Copy No. 2 of the drawing had no such annotation.
Controlled Copy No. 2 of Drawi/g FM-16B, Revision 12, was annotated that modification 75-142 affected the drawing.
This annotation was crossed out, initialed and dated (January 26,1979).
Howevar, the drawing Aperture Card was still so annotated.
The above examples collectively constitute a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Power Authcrity of the State of New York is hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violation; (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (3) corrective steps which will be tiken to avoid further violations; and, (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
.3 A W fl
$5
~
Dated r
vs Thomas T. Martin, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection
.