ML20009B430
| ML20009B430 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1981 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Pasternak P POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009B431 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8107150436 | |
| Download: ML20009B430 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000333/1981004
Text
r.
- _ _
, ' dB '
,t'
g
'
g
UNITE 3 STATE 0
+
I
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
o
g
a
REGIONI
631 PARK AVENUE
4's, * * * ..
'
KING OF PRUS$1A, PENNSYLVANIA 19406
Docket No. 50-333
IdAn 2 5193;
7
Power Authority of the State of New York
~ James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
ATTN: Mr. R. J. Pasternak
Resident Manager
P. O. Box 41
Lycoming, New York 13093
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Inspection 50-333/81-04-
This refers to the safety inspection conducted by Mr. G. Napuda of this office
on January 26-30, 1981 at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, Scriba,
dew York of activities authorized by NRC License No. DPR-59 and to the dis ussions
of our findings held by Mr. Napuda with Messrs B. Deist, R. Pasternak and other
members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the Office of Inspection
'
and Enforcement Inspection Report which is enclosed with this letter. Within
these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the
inspector.
Our inspector also verified the steps you have taken to correct the items of
noncompliance brought to your attention in the enclosure to our letter dated
December 31, 1979. We have no further questions regarding the steps you took to
correct items A, B, and C.
With regard to item D, this item has recurred.
Based on tne results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your activi-
ties were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set forth
in the Noticc of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
These items of
noncompliance have c.een categorized into the levels described in the Federal
Register Notice (45 FR 66754) dated October 7, 1980.
You are required to respond
to this letter and in preparing your response, you should follow the instructions
in Appendix A.
Item A in the Notice of Violation en:losed with this letter was identified
during a previous inspection of your licensed activities on September 10-14,
1979, and was documented in the enclosure to our letter dated December 11, 1979.
Your letter to this office dated January 7,1980 stated that the drawings had
been corrected.
From our current inspection, it appears that your corrective
action was not adequate in that similar conditions were identified with respect
to other drawings.
Recurrent and uncorrected items of noncompliance are given
'
8107150436 810325
PDR ADOCK 05000333
Q
-
o
.
.
.
.
Power Authority of the State
of New York
2
additional weight in the consideratien and selection of approriate enforcement
action. Therefore, in your response to 1;is letter, you should give particular
attention to those actions taken or planned to ensure that identified items of
noncompliance will be completely corrected and will not recur.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title
10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosures will
be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any infor-
mation that you (or your contractor) believe to be proprietary, it is necessary
that you make a written application within 20 days to this office to withhold
such information from public disclosure. Any such appitcation must be accompanied
by an affidavit exacuted by the owner of the information, which identifies the
document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a statement of reasons
which addresses with specificity the items which will be considerad by the
Commission as listed in subparagraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790. The information
sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate
part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the
specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased
to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
-
.
N
Thomas T. Martin, Chief, Engineering
Inspt: tion Branch, Division of
Engineering and Technical Inspection
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
2.
Office of Inspection and Enforcement Inspection
Report Number 50-333/81-04
cc w/encis:
George T. Berry, President ano 6 'ef Operating Officer
J. P. Bayne, Senior Vice President-Nuclear Generation
A. Klausmann, Director, Quality Assurance
M. C. Cosgrove. Site Quality Assurance Engineer
J. F. Davis, Ltairman, Safety Review Committee
C. M. Pratt, Assistant General Counsel
G. M. Wilverding, Manager-Nuclear Licensing
'
.
-we