ML20009D306
| ML20009D306 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Byron, Braidwood, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/1981 |
| From: | Haass W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tramm T COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8107230358 | |
| Download: ML20009D306 (2) | |
Text
.
9 gn.
(.
g j
f M,131981 Q
s DISTRIBUTION:
J.,1 U
\\
(7.PDR[*
gk JUL 151981* "
UAg,[ p NSIC Mr. T. R. Tram QAB Projects 9
Nuclear Licensing Administrator QAB Chron. File
/
Pressurized Water Reactors g
WJohnston, DE N
Commonwealth Edison Company VWilson, MAB P.O. Box 7
RDiggs, LFMB Chicago, u.
60690 JSpraul, QAB
Dear Mr. Tram:
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCEPTANCE OF REVISIONS TO QA TOPICAL REPORT We have completed our review of Revision 17 dated June 25 (revised June 26), 1981 to the Comonwealth Edison Company (CECO) Topical Report No. CE-1-A, " Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assuranco Program for Nuclear Generating Stations." This revision incorporates recent organizational changes.
You indicated in your transmittal letter that the topical report and this revision are intended to be applicable to nuclear units identified by Docket Numbers 50-10, 50-237, 50-249, 50-254, 50-265, 50-295, 50-304, 50-373, 50-374, 50-454, 50-455, 50-456, and 50-457.
Based on our evaluation of the proposed changes described in Revision 17, we find that your revised topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and is therefore acceptable with the exception of certain potential changes currently under evaluation as noted below. To use the topical report in future license l
applications, CECO need only reference this topical report in Section 17 of the Safety Analysis Rep nt. We do not intend to repeat our review of this topical report when it is referenced in an application unless changes occur in our acceptance criteria.
l Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions about this topical report are invalidated, we will notify you.
You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire. As noted above, should you desire to reference this topical report in support of quality assurance programs for new nuclear power projects, the basis of our evaluation will be.the acceptance criteria included in the latest revision to SRP Sections 17.1 and 17.2 (currently Revision 1).
Appropriate changes may, therefore, be necessary.
Programmatic changes by CECO to this topical report are to be submitted to the NRC l
for review prior to implementation. Organizational changes are to be submitted no later than 30 days after announcement.
As a result of the TMI-2 accident, please note that staff re-evaluation of the quality assurance program for Zion Units 1 and 2 in accordance with an action plan for plants located at relatively high population density sites may result in future changes to this topical report. Therefore, staff approval of Revision 17 is contingent upon the final resolution of this separate review activity.
Please replace our letter of April 3,1981 with this letter, renumber the report as CC-1-A, Revisicr.17, cc,d submit 30 copies-to-the-NRC.
Your-transmittal-letter-should mc' >. i. den ti.fy, thq, nuclear.unjM,,to which th is revised topical will app, y,.
sum ark 8107230358 810714 DR ADOCK 05000
.p.
NRC FORM 318 HO 80l NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
- * " -32n 24
PS
~
s ff
- 1) -
JUL 141981
-c Should you have any questions regarc'ing our review or if we can provide assistance, please feel free to contact me or Mr. Jack Spraul at (301) 492-7741.
Sincerely, Original signed by Waltar P. Haass Walter P. Haass, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Division of Engineering l
i i
n f.
,,, kE h l*~ "*"c' E
!, ^
'I M PIAVl! 9..
.. P L.b. 3,s,,,
om>
- 7. /,M, /.8.1........ 7./.7"./. 8.1..
INRCFORM 318110/807 NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
- e m-32n24