ML20052C062

Forwards Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Evaluation Rept for Appraisal Period Sept 1980-June 1981. Rept Modified to Reflect New Evaluation Criteria

ML20052C062
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	04/29/1982
From:	Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:	Leddick R WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Shared Package
ML20052C063	List: ML20052C062 ML20052C066
References
NUDOCS 8205040320
Download: ML20052C062 (2)

Text

-

r g

+

Ag g

j g

p p

g

\\%

i APR 29 M2 DESIGUATEDORIGINA}

c4 Docket ilos. 50-508, 50-509 gg,

q

\\

l l

p: CGS 619825*

Washington Public Power Supply System t[M ragg[. J_

P. O. Box 1223

{

pNNc Elma, Washington 98541 s

b iV Attention: Mr. R. S. Leddick, Program Director, WNP-3/5 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSME:lT OF LICENSEE PERFOR:1A: ICE FOR Tile PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 1980 THROUGH JU'lE 1981 In 1980, the NRC instituted a program for Systematic Assessment of LicenseePerformance(SALP). The ilRC staff began collecting available observations and, based on thosn observations, evaluating the performance of power reactor licensees (including construction permit holders) with respect to nuclear safety. During the first annual cycle of this program, licensee performance was evaluated in two steps:

first, by a SALP Board in the appropriate NRC Regional Office; and then by a SALP Review Group at flRC Headquarters. The SALP Review Group produced a single report summarizing its assessments for power reactors throughout the U.S.

This report was issued in November 1981 (f(VREG-0834. " Final Report, NRC Licensee Assessments").

Subsequently, a number of changes were made to the program. The new program was published in the Federal Register on !! arch 22, 1982, and includes the following principal changes:

(1) Adoption of regional level evaluations. This eliminates review by the SALP Review Group at liRC Headquarters with its attendant national report while improving the timeliness of providing evalua-tion results.

(2) Establishment of new evaluation criteria which are not dependent upon the average performance level.

(3) Establishment of a process for taking licensee coments into account.

The second annual cycle of the SALP program for the W:4P-3/S projects covered the period of September 1980 through June 1981 and used a R205040MO Edl

...... RV,kh,,6,,, k

..g., GEN

,f..,,,.,..,,

Er E

-+

..BiSH0efmn

=>

4/g/8a,,

4////82

• " " -32"25 nac eanu ma nom uncu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

.c

~ - -.. _ _ _

F5

\\

Si

^

2 Washington'Public Power Supply System YE 4 9 E i

i.;

r combination of old and new assessment-process.- The results of the.

second cycle assessment were discussed with you and members of your

_ i

staff in meetings on September 16-17, 1931.

Enclosure (1) to this-

'_ ~;

letter contains the final report for second cycle assessoent. This

,' 4

~

report has been modified to reflect the new evaluation criteria.

a' Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed report, we wil'1 be

. -[

glad to discuss' them with you.

originsi signe3 h R. H. Engelken

.R.11. Engelken MX Regional Administrator

'~

p.

1

Enclosure:

(

-SALP Evaluation Report

~

for Appraisal Period 9/80-6/81 cc w/ encl:

D. E. Dobson,' Project Manager, UPPSS i_

R. B. Glasscock, Quality Assurance

Director, WPPSS.

i I; ~

bec: DMB'/ Document Control Desk (RIDS) 5

' Distributed by RV:.

Re t i spec r

^

-State of'WA (Lewis) i

'I t

s o

i.<

• I, 9

i

^

("1 s

v

,I

[f i

1

\\'

t 1

o

=

=

{

L.,

k Y

p-

% ) fl a

. p -i.l I

' A.h

,1

.n _,

,__,E

. J

_c_,

.