05000331/LER-1985-001, :on 850123,reactor Water Cleanup Sys Isolated Twice as Result of Momentary Spurious Signals from Reactor Water Cleanup Leak Detection Instrumentation.Cause Not Stated.Sys Will Be Tested in Refuel Outage

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:09, 13 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
:on 850123,reactor Water Cleanup Sys Isolated Twice as Result of Momentary Spurious Signals from Reactor Water Cleanup Leak Detection Instrumentation.Cause Not Stated.Sys Will Be Tested in Refuel Outage
ML20107F914
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold 
Issue date: 02/22/1985
From: Mineck D, Putnam K
IES UTILITIES INC., (FORMERLY IOWA ELECTRIC LIGHT
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
DAEC-85-158, LER-85-001, LER-85-1, NUDOCS 8502260231
Download: ML20107F914 (4)


LER-1985-001, on 850123,reactor Water Cleanup Sys Isolated Twice as Result of Momentary Spurious Signals from Reactor Water Cleanup Leak Detection Instrumentation.Cause Not Stated.Sys Will Be Tested in Refuel Outage
Event date:
Report date:
3311985001R00 - NRC Website

text

esRC Fermi ans U.S. NUCLEAN 5;EtuLATOWY COMMIS$10N

"'833

' APPROVED OMS NO. 3150-4104 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

FACILITY NARAE (1)

DOCKET NUMBER (2)

PAJE (El Duane Arnold Enerav Center o Is I o lo I o 131311 1lOFIOl3 TITLE 446 l

Unplanned RWCU Isolation SVSNT DATE (S)

LER NURSER (el REPORT DATE 17)

OTHER F AC;;.ITIES INVOLVED (St 8EO MONTH QAY YEAR YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR FActLITv NAMES DOCKET NUMPEnts) gu N

None o1510IoIoI I i 0l 1 2l3 85 8l 5

- 0l0l1 0l0 0l 2 2l2 8l 5 o isio ic io i i THet RSPORT IS SUShetTTED PUReUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR $: IChece one er more of the foneempf {111 OPERATHet N

Se.4 2mi m. me J

m.7mH2Hw 13.71m>

i ei 0i 81 0 30.454eH1HG 90.35(eHil so.73(eH2Het 73.71tel R

mm*HiMa u.=eim m.7m HmH n OT,at gse 7, g *p;e;,

7 30.4084eH1Hii0 to.73teH2HQ 00.73(eH2Hve41HA)

JfSAf 30.4854sH1HM 00.734sH2Hal 00.73deH2HviaHS) 38.4E84sH11M so.734eH2Hiin 80.73(eH2Hal LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER liti NAME TELEPHONE NUMSER AREA CODE Kenneth S. Putnam, Technical Support Engineer 31119 815 il 1 -i 714 l 5l6 CoasPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT F AILURE DESCRISED IN THIS REPORT 113)

"'* N C

R fA LE

"^ggf kAy' Nh R

CAu$$

$YSTEM COMPONENT yy pn g

CAUSE

SYSTEM COMPONENT S.Ws

~

X C iE I I I i i i No e

i i i i i i m

i I I l l l 1 m

I i ! I I l 1 m

SUPPLEteENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 1948 WONTH DAY YBAR

} YEs tof ree. eemeeee txpectro sveeross On oA rts

} NO l

l l

A= TRACT, - M,4 ee e. -. ~,. ee -.a

,ii.,

On January 23, 1985 during normal power operation, the Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) System (CE) isolated twice as a result of momentary spurious signals in the Reactor Water Cleanup Leak Detection instrumentation (CE/JM). On January 25, 1985 the system also isolated in an identical manner. In each event the RWCU system was verified to be free of actual leakage conditions and returned to normal operation.

This event is a repetition of events reported in LER's84-019, 84-022,84-036 and 84-039.

Maintenance personnel inspected the system and found no apparent cause for the spurious signals. The system will be extensively tested during the present refuel outage (consnenced February 1,1985) in an effort to eliminate spurious actuations.

8502260231 850222 p

PDR ADOCK 05000331 p

s eDR p

lf.. " "

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ar.aovao ous =o uso-oio4 EXP'RES 8/3185 F.CMTV me su DOCKET muassam Q) g g

na-

. "t"l:;r L

ten:

Duane Arnold Energy Center o is lo jo io l3 l3l1 8; 5

--. 01011 010 0l2 CF 0 13 rixr.

e, At 1817 hours0.021 days <br />0.505 hours <br />0.003 weeks <br />6.913685e-4 months <br /> on January 23, 1985 the Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) system isolated in response to a momentary spurious signal from the RWCU steam leak detection system. The plant was in normal operation at approximately 80% power at the time of the event. Operators immediately inspected the RWCU room and found no actual leakage condition existed. The system was restored to normal status at 1833 hours0.0212 days <br />0.509 hours <br />0.00303 weeks <br />6.974565e-4 months <br />. The system reisolated at 1935 hours0.0224 days <br />0.538 hours <br />0.0032 weeks <br />7.362675e-4 months <br />. The RWCU room was again inspected and maintenance personnel were instructed to perform a functional test of the RWCU steam leak detection system. An instrumentation and controls engineer was called in to aid instrument technicians in troubleshootir.g the system. The system tested satisfactorily with no problems found that would cause the isolation signal. The system was returned to normal status at 2213 hours0.0256 days <br />0.615 hours <br />0.00366 weeks <br />8.420465e-4 months <br />.

The same event recurred on January 25,1985 at 0848 hours0.00981 days <br />0.236 hours <br />0.0014 weeks <br />3.22664e-4 months <br />. Once again inspection of the system found it free of leakage with no detectable equipment problem. The system was restored to normal service with no further problems at 0927 hours0.0107 days <br />0.258 hours <br />0.00153 weeks <br />3.527235e-4 months <br />.

In each event the isolation originated on the "B"

train of the system isolation logic and the associated isolation valves (CE-ISV-2701 and CE-ISV-2740) closed per design.

The spurious isolation of the RWCU system has been a recurrent problem (see LER 84-039). Diagnosis of the root cause of these isolations and determination of corrective actions has been. hampered by the random and instantaneous nature of the spurious isolation signals. The isolations occur in various modes of plant operation and at various times of day. They do not appear to be related to any specific surveillance testing, plant evolutions, maintenance activity or plant conditions. When the isolations occur the isolation signal appears to be of extremely short duration ending without leaving any specific evidence of the original source of the signal.

Maintenance has done special inspections of the system and has not found any problems with the system which would cause the spurious-isolations.

In addition, the system is functionally tested routinely under surveillance test procedures and has performed satisfactorily. A portion of the system has not'been inspected because of its location in a relatively high radiation area.

Included in this portion of the system are thermocouples, cabling, and flow elements.

Inspection of this portion-of.the system will be performed during the current refuel outage as radiation levels in the area are expected to be significantly lower. Several actions _ are planned to detect possible sources of the spurious signal. All associated thermocouple elements, wiring and cable shields will be inspected for possible loose or corroded connections or improper cable ' shielding. Cable continuity checks will be performed for related circuitry.

,.g......

u

gmC Per* 388A u 5 NUCLEam mEGULafomy Comuissiom LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION amovie ows =o uso-oio4 ERPintS 8/31'85 P ACluTV Naaet its 00CMST NUMSEm 42)

Lgg gugggg,g,

,ngg t3,

'iaa

- "tv;r T.;;

Duane Arnold Energy Center 015 lo l o l o l 31311 815 010l1 01 0 0l3 0F 013 rnn -- -

. :.ac - m..,,m One possible cause of the problem that is being investigated further is the relatively low differential voltage setpoint between the inlet vent air thermocouples and the outlet air thermocouples that is designed to initiate a system isolation on high differential temperatures. The associated differential temperature setpoint is 14*. For one pair of thermocouples the voltage differential is only 0.324 mV. A voltage bias of this low magnitude could make the system susceptible to isolations caused by momentary voltage fluctuations or electrical noise. Steam leak detection systems associated with the HPCI and RCIC systems that contain identical components but with a higher differential temperature setting (and consequently a significantly higher differential voltage setpoint) have not experienced similar problems.

The isolation of the reactor water cleanup system is reportable as actuation of an engineered safety feature (containment isolation). The isolation components performed their function as designed. However, the unnecessary challenge of an engineered safety feature and spurious actuations are undesirable.

O

  • a,c,Pc a * **

p y

lowa Electric Light and Ibwer Company

/

February 22, 1985 DAEC-85-158 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.

20555

Subject:

Duane Arnold Energy Center Docket No. 50-331

.0p. License DPR-49 Licensee Event Report No.85-001 Gentlemen:

- In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 please find. attached a copy of the subject Licensee Event Report.

'.Very truly yours, L

/A~/

~~

. Daniel L.-Mineck.

' P1 ant Superintendent:- Nuclear -

Duane, Arnold Energy Center:

DLM/KSP/kp'

- attachment -

~

cc: Mr.: James GEKeppler

-, ~,;i 3'

a-I_

Regional Administrator-

. Region'III

- U..S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

799 Roosevelt Road s

H-

'a Gl.en Ellyn;;IL 60137-l

' NRC: Resident Inspector - DAEC

- File'A-118at 1a/

j g

'0#

[

E Guess AmstiEnery Cuseere P.E apr 352 e Osder@ Asere ANf8e 333e83 7512 "

g