ML23130A062

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:03, 22 May 2023 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
M230516: Slides/Supporting Presentation Material - D. True - Update on 10 C.F.R. Part 53 Licensing and Regulation of Advanced Nuclear Reactors
ML23130A062
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/16/2023
From:
NRC/OCM
To:
Shared Package
ML23067A030 List:
References
M230516, 10 CFR Part 53, NRC-2019-0062, RIN 3150-AK31
Download: ML23130A062 (8)


Text

Part 53:

A Generational Opportunity Presented to:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 16, 2023

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute l 1

Main Points Draft proposed Part 53:

1. Too complex
2. Overly burdensome
3. Fails to meet the moment Industrys Key Issues Unchanged From 18 Months Ago

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 2

Too Complex 1,300 pages Including guidance level detail in the rule Two frameworks - prescribing methods

  • QHOs and specific uses of PRA in the rule New terminology/programs
  • e.g., replacing reasonable assurance of adequate protection with new legal standards

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 3

Overly Burdensome Some, but relatively little modernization

  • Technology inclusive safety characteristics (Framework A)
  • Some performance-based approaches for security and fitness for duty Aggregated Regulatory Analysis hides regulatory burdens Unjustified additional burden
  • Facility Safety Program
  • Design for the Beyond Design Basis

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 4

Key Issues Unchanged No Need for Two Frameworks Remove QHOs as Performance Criteria in Rule Remove ALARA as a Design Requirement Remove Requirements to Design to Protect Against and Withstand BDBEs Remove Facility Safety Program Reconcile New Programs and Terminology November 2021 Letter: ML21309A578 August 2022 Letter: ML22243A257 ©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 5

Fails to Meet the Moment NEI/USNIC survey of industry

  • 18 of 21 do not plan to use rule in current form Efficiency must become a priority Significant areas did not receive updates
  • Siting
  • Manufacturing licenses (removed in proposed rule)
  • Improvements to process efficiencies

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 6

Path Forward Issuing proposed rule as-is for comment not efficient

  • NRC has the information it needs to resolve stakeholder concerns Industry committed to a successful Part 53
  • NEI will continue to remain fully engaged
  • Member interest has waned due to frustrations Re-Direction Needed

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 7

Acronyms ALARA - As Low As Reasonably Achievable BDBE - Beyond Design Basis Event NEI - Nuclear Energy Institute PRA - Probabilistic Risk Assessment QHO - Quantitative Health Objective USNIC - United States Nuclear Industry Council

©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 8