ML20205D768

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:22, 7 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Commissioners Roberts & Zech Do Not Believe ACRS Technical Review Required Prior to Restart Decision.No Comments Offered by Commissioner Bernthal.Comments Encl.W/O Encl
ML20205D768
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/1984
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Palladino
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20205D636 List:
References
FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8510170086
Download: ML20205D768 (1)


Text

_ - _ _ _ _ , _ - - _ _ _ -

f "f . 4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY CON SSION g

. w AsHiN oTCN, D.C. 20555

,7 e.y OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY November 16, 1984 COMNP-84-4.7

(

MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladinc I

FROM: Samuel J. Chilk, Secretar b

SUBJECT:

SAN ONOFRE, UNIT 1 -- NEEE FdR ACRS TECHNICAL VIEWS (COMNP-84-(47)

At your request, Commissioners have been polled on whether or not they wish to have ACRS technical views before a restart decision for San Onofre, Unit 1.

Commissioners Roberts and Zech have responded in the negative.

Commissioner Bernthal's comments are attached. Commissioner Asselstine replies that he had 60- preference in the matter.

This completes action on COMNP-84-47. ~

cc: Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech W. Dircks, EDO ACRS I

7 ,

D 8510170086 850926 PDR FOIA '

BELL 84-885 PDR ,

hl