ML20211D165

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:56, 1 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commission Voting Record on SECY-99-202, Final Rule:Changes to Requirements for Environmental Review for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant OLs (10CFR51)
ML20211D165
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/24/1999
From: Vietticook A
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:
Shared Package
ML20211D168 List:
References
REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-99-202-C, NUDOCS 9908260188
Download: ML20211D165 (4)


Text

__ _ _ _ _ __

  • uo***60*.Oo-o RELEASED TO THE PDR

. _f__.S _,

p UNITED STATES * -

U" N

$ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ' ' ' ,

$ $ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20S55-0001

%, . . . . . #* August 24,1999 COMMISSION VOTING RECORD DECISION ITEM: SECY-99-202 TITLE: FINAL RULE " CHANGES TO REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR RENEWAL OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OPERATING LICENSES (10 CFR PART 51)"

The Commission (with all Commissioners agreeing) approved the subject paper as recorded in the Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) of August 24,1999.

This Record contains a summary of voting on this matter together with the individual vote sheets, views and comments of the Commission, and the SRM of August 24,1999.

EW" Annette L. Vietti-Cook Secretary of the Commission Attachments:

1. Voting Summary
2. Commissioner Vote Sheets
3. Final SRM cc: Chairman Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Merrifield L,f OGC EDO PDR

/ , () y DCS \

,g ij (>39 k 9900260188 990824 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR f

l

.a ,

{

l I

i

. VOTING

SUMMARY

- SECY-99-202 RECORDED VOTES NOT-i APRVD DISAPRVD ABSTAIN PARTICIP COMMENTS DATE

CHRM. DICUS . X- X 8/20/99

. COMR. DIAZ X X 8/19/99 COMR. McGAFFIGAN X' X 8/20/99 COMR. MERRIFIELD X X 8/10/99 COMMENT RESOLUTION

.' In'their vote sheets, all Commissioners approved the staffs recommendation and provided some additional comments. Subsequently, the comments of the Commission were incorporated into the guidance to staff as reflected in the SRM issued on August 24,1999.

1 I

9 t

p 1

Commissioner Comments on SECY-ti9-202 Chairman Dieus I approve publishing the final rule as proposed by staff and release of the supporting addendum to the GEIS, subject to the attached changes to the FRN, draft press release, and letters to Congress.

Commissioner Diaz To ensure that the public and the Congress are clearly informed that this action has no bearing on the potential for licensing a repository at Yucca Mountain, the press release, the summary section of the Federa/ Register notice, and the Congressional letters should be revised to reflect this fact.

Commissioner McGaffican I approve publication of the final rule amending 10 CFR Part 51 environmental protection requirements for nuclear power plant license renewal and tne release of NUREG-1437, Volume 1 Addendum i subject to the following comments and edits.

The following text should be inserted at the bottom of page 41 of the Federal Reoister notice (FRN) and at the bottom of page 50 of the Addendum (it should appear as the last paragraph to the response on the sabotage comment):

"On June 22,1999, the Nevada Attomey General filed a petition with the Commission which requested the NRC to amend regulations governing safeguards for shipments of spent nuclear fuel against sabotage and terrorism and to initiate a comprehensive assessment. In particular, the petition indicated that NRC should factor into its regulations the changing nature of threats posed by domestic terrorists, the increased availability of advanced weaponry and the greater vulnerability of larger shipping casks traveling across the country, if, as a result of reviewing this petition, the NRC reaches conclusions that are inconsistent with the results or assumptions in the present rulemaking, the Commission will need to revisit the analysis presented here."

The discussion in the first full paragraph on page 26 of the Addendum regarding the "5-year cooling period" for spent fuel should be enhanced to point out that 5 years is an extremely conservative estimate. For example, there is almost 40,000 tons of spent fuel in storage now, some of which has been in storage for decades. At the earliest, if Yucca Mountain were found suitable and if DOE were successful in obtaining an NRC license, it will be at least 11 years from now until Yucca Mountain would be ready to accept spent fuel for storage. It would take many years to work off the backlog of stored spent fuel much less the spent fuel that will be generated in the intervening years.

Additional suggested edits to the FRNs, Addendum, and the draft press release are indicated on the attached pages. I also concur with Commissioner Merrifield's suggested edits to the Congressionalletters. Where I have suggested edits to either the FRN or Addendum, the staff should ensure that conforming changes are made to ensure consistency between the

r l

i documents, particularly the " comment and response" sections.

l Commissioner Merrifield i

I approve the staff's proposal to (1) publish the final rule amending environmental protection requirements for the license renewal process and (2) release the supporting addendum to the generic environmental impact statement subject to the following commente:

(1) The staff should revise the Federal Register Notice (p13) to reflect that the Department of Energy's draft EIS for a repository has been published and is out for comment.

Although not essential, the staff should similarly revise NUREG 1437, addendum 1 if practical. '

(2) While the staff adequately explained in the Federal Register Notice that this rulemaking and the supporting addendum to the generic environmental impact statement are not related to a decision regarding licensing of Yucca Mountain as a repository, the letters to Congress should be revised to reflect the same sensitivity. The staff should revise the letters in a manner consistent with the attached markups.

< - -_