ML20247Q784
| ML20247Q784 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/01/1989 |
| From: | Blaha J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| WIR-890526, NUDOCS 8906070047 | |
| Download: ML20247Q784 (33) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ .
j'S d
c June 1, 1989 i For: The Commissioners From: James L. Blaha, Assistant for Operations, Office of the EDO
Subject:
WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT - WEEK ENDING MAY 26, 1989 A summary of key events is included as a convenience to those Commissioners who may prefer a condensed version of this report.
Contents Enclosure Nuclear Reactor Regulation A Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards B Nuclear Regulatory Research C Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data D Governmental & Public Affairs E General Counsel F*
Administration G Information Resources Management H Co:4ro11er I*
Personnel J Small & Disadvantaged Business Utilization & Civil Rights K*
Enforcement L Consolidation M*
Regional Offices N Executive Director for Operations 0*
Items Addressed by the Commission P Meeting Notices Q Proprietary or Other Sensitive Information (Not for R externaldistribution)
- No input this week.
8906070047 890601 f 47/ht/g fu s L. Blaha, Assistant for Operations a--
Q$fyyjc p9 -
J fice of the Executive Director for Operations
Contact:
gg g James L. Blaha, OEDO 492-1703
0
- HIGHLIGHTS OF WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT WEEK ENDING MAY 26, 1989 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. Unit 2 As a result of an NRC staff inspection, it was discovered that an. updated analytical model used by General Electric for a recent seismic reanalysis of the control rod drive (CRD) housings at Browns Ferry, Unit 2,' incorrectly assumed the existence of seismic restraints on the CRD housings. It was learned that the CRD seismic restraints were not used at Brovns Ferry, Unit 2 (and possibly other earlier BWRs) but were added to later Bhts (e.g. Vermont-Yankee, GESSAR 11 plants). General Electric currently is parfoming an evaluation )
under 10 CFR Part 21 to determine the generic impact of the modeling error.
States Seek To Negotiate Memoranda of Understanding The NRC has received requests from Ohio, Massachusetts and Virginia to renewnegotiationsformemorandaofunderstanding(MOU)withtheNRC under the recently approved Comission policy on cooperation with States.
The State officials were informed that negotiations can resume once the Commission has approved implementing guidance. The staff is presently developing implementing guidance for Comission review and approval.
Illinois Reopens Operator Contract Negotiations -
The Illinois Department of Nuclea. Safety (IDNS) has reopened its search for a developer / operator of the Central Midwest Com)act Low-Level waste facility because IDNS failed to reach agreement witi Westinghouse on liability issues. Westinghouse had previously been selected as the prime candidate for the contract. At present, Illinois has also entered into discussions with Chem-Nuclear.
Division of Operational Assessment On May 25, the Director, AE0D, and other NRC staff members met with representatives of NUMARC to discuss their draft report on " Methodology for the Development of Emergency Action Levels." The draft report evidences substantial industry effort in an area NRC could not justify expending resources. Potential implementation via consensus standard or topical report appears to be the preferred avenue.
Office of Nuc1e'ar Reactor Regulation Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 Beaver Valley Unit 1 The unit experienced a trip.from 89% power at 2:35 a.m. on May 18, 1989.
-Since safety ' injection was actuated as a result of ..the trip, the licensee L declared an Unusual Event, which was terminated shortly when the safety
' injection. system was. reset and the unit was stabilized.
While, investigating the' cause of the reactor trip, operators found that the ATWS Mitigating System Actuation Circuitry (AMSAC) panel was de-energized. When the panel was re-energized,one of the auxiliary feedwater pumps auto-started and a
. load rejection signal was generated. These should not have happened since the AMSAC is supposedly automatically bypassed at 40% or less power.
As of 3:30 p.m. May 18, 1989, the licensee has not identified the root cause of these events, though the licensee suspects that a problem with the AMSAC
.may have caused all the events. NRR Events Assessment Branch and Instrument l and Control. System Branch are closely following this incident. 'The two resident inspectors are closely monitoring the licensee's followup activities.
Seabrook Unit I
-On May 22, 1989, the' interveners filed a motion for reconsideration of CLI-89-08 and a renewed motion for a stay of the issuance of a low power license. The interveners state that there is a present and ongoing litigation in the full power proceeding titled " MASS AG Exercise contention EX-19" that alleges that there is a fundamental flaw in the onsite plan. Specifically, the contention alleged that the PARS made to the various offsite response organizations by the Applicants' onsite personnel were inappropriate because the Applicants' method or system for assessing the offsite consequences of a radiological accident (HETPAC computer model) was itself flawed. Thus, the interveners state that this-contention put at issue in the offsite proceeding the adequacy of a particular offsite aspect of the Applicants' onsite plan that the Commission has itself identified as material and relevant to the issuance of a low power license.
With regards to the timeliness of this renewed motion, the interveners stated that they did not recognize until the Commission indicated in CLI-89-08 that this " low power" issue could be litigated before the " full power" licensing Board. The interveners stated that when they learned this they filed immediately the motion for reconsideration and for renewing the stay request.
The interveners requested a stay until a decision has been reached on all contested M 9s relevant to the issuance of a low power license.
Antitrust Activities Recently NRC has received a number of requests for antitrust action.
These include:
1 MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE A
- 1) A petition under 10 CFR 2.206(a) from Cap Rock Electric Cooperative to enforce antitrust license conditions on Comanche Peak.
- 2) A filing of an informal complaint by North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency for enforcement of antitrust license conditions on Shearon Harris.
- 3) Action on an outstanding 2.206 petition filed by the Northern California Power Agency to enforce antitrust license conditions attached to the Diablo Canyon plant.
- 4) A request from Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric for corporate merger. These two companies own San Onofre and SCE is a co-owner of Palo Verde. The change in ownership of nuclear plant ifcensees requires an antitrust review of the new owner (s). Although each of these entitities was reviewed separately in prior CP and OL antitrust reviews of SONGS (and SCE for Palo Verde), the proposed combined entity has not been reviewed.
- 5) A request from Oglethorpe Power to enforce antitrust license conditions attached to the Plant Vogtle licenses.
- 6) Two separate requests from Ohio Edison Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company to suspend the antitrust license conditions on the Perry and Davis Besse plants. (Both the OE and CE requests were recently turned down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The application is now before the NRC for action.)
- 7) A request from SERI to remove license conditions attached to its Grand Gulf licenses.
- 8) License amendment requests involving new owners or operators of nuclear power facilities include:
- b. SERI amendment request involving transfer of operations of Waterford 3 f rom LP&L to SERI
- c. Proposed sale and leaseback involving LP&L and certain proposed unnamed equity investors in Waterford 3
- d. A corporate reorganization that would place operating responsibility for all of the nuclear plants owned by the Southern Company under a newly created corporate entity called SON 0PCO.
1
- Significant possibility of antitrust hearing
- Possibility of antitrust hearing l
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE A
p, l
- l In addition, prior to the issuance of an o]erating license, an antitrust review must be done to determine whether tiere have been significant I changes.in the licensee's activities since the issuance of the CP or the most recent antitrust review. Although the parameters and focus of the OL. review are much more limited than the review conducted at the CP stage, the " standard" of review is the same, i.e., activities that are. ..
inconsistent with the antitrust laws. The staff applies this standard to determine if an antitrust hearing is required. The remaining plants in the licensing pipeline, including the TVA plants, must undergo OL reviews.
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 1 As a result of an NRC staff inspection, it was discovered that an updated
- analytica1'model used by General Electric for a recent seismic reanalysis of the control rod drive (CRD) housings at Browns Ferry, Unit 2, incorrectly l assumed the existence of seismic restraints on the CRD housings. It was learned that-the CRD seismic restraints were not used at Browns Ferry, Unit 2 (and possibly other earlier BWRs) but were added to later BWRs (e.g. Vermont-Yankee, GESSAR II plants). General Electric currently is performing an evaluation under 10 CFR Part 21 to determine the generic impact of the modeling error.
' Vermont Yankee In July 1988 the licensee applied for a license amendment to provide for alternate surveillance requirements, which would have increased surveillance intervals of certain engineered safety features instruments. Both the State of Vermont and Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed petitions to intervene and requested a hearing as cointervenors. They entered a contention bearing on the adequacy of the licensee's proposed surveillance intervals. The NRC staff in discussions with the parties suggested they negotiate a compromise and avoid the hearing process if possible.
As a result, the parties reached an agreement and filed a motion to the Board on May 4, 1989 requesting withdrawal of the contention and for dismissal of the proceeding. The Board responded by an Order dated May 23, 1989 that implemented the motion. However, the Board requested that the staff serve the board with a copy of the SER when we issue the License Amendment.
ENCLOSURE A MAY 26, 1989
W- ,,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Items'of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 SAFEGUARDS-L International Annual Meeting of the Working Group on Accounting and Reporting TheWorkingGrouponAccountingandReporting(WGAR),whichincludesrepresent-atives from the Department of State-(DOS), Department of Energy (DOE), Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency'(IAEA),
met.in Washington, D.C. on May 22-24, 1989. The purpose of the WGAR is to resolve issues related to the reporting and accounting of nuclear materials.
Principal topics of discussion during this. meeting were revision of the Sub-sidiary Arrangements (Code 10) to the US/IAEA Safeguards Agreement, transit-matching involving international transfers, and reporting of U.S. facility-accounting' data to the IAEA.
Transportation
' Shipment of Pathfinder Reactor-Vessel On May.18, 1989, Transportation Branch staff met with Northern States Power (NSP) concerning shipment of the Pathfinder reactor vessel. NSP proposes to
. ship the reactor vessel as a low specific activity (LSA) Type A package. The reactor vessel, as shipped, would weight approximately 400 tons and would contain about 3,026 curies of activation products. The vessel would be shipped by rail to Hanford, Washington during mid-1990. An application for package certification is expected by August-September 1989.
LOW-LEVEL WASTE MANAGEMENT
'Hanford Agreement and Consent Order Executed On May 15,.1989, the Department of Energy (DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Washington State Department of Ecology executed an agreement and consent order regarding cleanup of contamination at the Hanford Site. The proposed agreement had been noticed for public comment on February 27, 1989.
The general purposes of the agreement are to: (1) ensure that environmental impacts associated with past and present Hanford Site activities are investi~-
gated and that appropriate response actions are taken; (2) provide a framework
.for permitting of treatment, storage and disposal units for hazardous wastes; and .(3) ensure compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and the Washington Hazardous Waste Management Act The agreement provides that DOE will treat LLW stored in double shell tanks by 1994,. initiate operation of the HLW Vitrification Plant by 1999 and complete closure and removal of required waste from the 149 single-shell tanks by 2018. A supplemental EIS will be prepared regarding disposition of the waste in single-shell tanks. These schedules are consistent with current NRC
-planning assumptions.
MAY 26,'1989 ENCLOSURE B
. Workshop on Cement Solidification of Low-Level Radioactive Waste The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, in cooperation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, will host a workshop on Cement Solidification of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW). The purpose of this workshop is to provide an improved understanding of the technical concerns in cement solidification of LLW and develop initiatives which will lead to regulatory resolution of those concerns. Waste generators, reactor operators, cement solidification vendors, industry consultants, laboratory reser.rchers, disposal site designers and operators, and regulators will participate in this workshop. The three-day workshop will be held at Gaithersburg Marriott Hotel from May 31, 1989 to June 2, 1989.
INDUSTRIAL AND MEDICAL NUCLEAR SAFETY Fuel Cycle Safety Allied-Signal, Inc. Inspection A Safety Assessment Team Inspection was conducted during May 15-19, 1989, of.
the uranium hexafluoride (UF g ) production facility of Allied-Signal, Inc., at Metropolis, Illinois. The inspection, conducted by Region III of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), included support by NRC headquarters staff in the areas of management controls, quality assurance, and fire protection. Addi-tionally, representatives from the Occupational Safety & Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, and an engineering consultant with expertise in UF, handling and processing, also participated in the inspection effort. A report cn the inspection effort will be published within 45 days of completion of the inspection.
i l
MAY 26, 1999 ENCLOSURE B
L Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 Confirming the Safety of High Level and Low Level Waste Disposal Control of Water Infiltration Through LLW Level Waste Disposal The recent heavy rains provided a severe test for LLW disposal unit cover designs being evaluated at Beltsville, MD. One design, called bioengineering water management, proved to be particularly effective not only in controlling water movement through covers but also in dewatering flooded disposal units.
The research to support these evaluations is being funded by the Waste Management Branch, Division of Engineering and the work is being performed cooperatively by the University of Califernia, Berkeley and the University of Mar Four designs are being assessed in large test cells (45' x 60' x 12')yland. which are instrumented to measure infiltration and to collect a complete water balance.
They consist of a: (1) resistive layer barrier system (i.e. a compacted earthen.
material such as clay) beneath a rock cover.such as used in uranium mill tailings covers in one test cell and beneath a vegetated cover in another test cell; (2) conductive layer barrier system which combines a conductive layer such as a . fine sandy loam over a capillary break to wick water around waste: (3)a combination of (1) and (2) in which the conductive layer barrier is placed below the resistive layer barrier to wick away the small amounts of water which will pass through it; and (4) bioengineering water management which employs a surface cover of impermeable material to enhance run-off in conjunction with vegetation placed in gaps between panels to remove the small amounts of water that might leak through them. In effect, the vegetation acts as a pump powered by solar radiation. Since the amount of water passing through the cover is smallsthe vegetation is in an environmentally stressed condition, that is, an overdraft condition. The vegetation actively scavenges the small amount of water i available in the soil below the cover. Pfizer juniper, a drought resistant evergreen is uced because of its hardiness and tolerance of wet and dry conditions. Designs (1) through (3) will fail if there is appreciable subsidence whereas bioengineering water management is designed to accommodate subsidence.
Preliminary results are available only for bioengineering and they are most encouraging. The two Beltsville test cells with bioengineering initially partially filled with water (artificial water table)g covers in 1987 were to simulate flooded disposal units. One test cell had 2 meters of water and since data collection began the water level has been lowered to 30 cm. The recent heavy rains of April and May 1989 resulted in a rise of only I cm in that test cell.
The other test cell began with 1 meter of water and it was completely dewatered by the combination of enhanced run-off and stressed vegetation. There has been no rise of the water level in that test cell following the recent heavy rain.
The soil beneath that cover has been dewatered to such a degree that the soil beneath the cover remains in an unsaturated condition. The decline of the water table in the bioengineering test cells shows that bioengineering water management could be used for remedial action (" drying out") of existing water-logged disposal sites.
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE C
2 Other Items Nuclear Safety Research Review Committee Meeting The Nuclear Safety Research Review Committee (NSRRC) held its first full committee meeting for the 1989 Fiscal Year. The meeting was held May 23-24, 1989, at the Guest Quarters Hotel in Bethesda, Maryland.
The meeting objectives were to review: (1)theNRCdispositionofthe recommendations made by the National Academy of Sciences, (2) RES' response to the two NSRRC reports, and (3) developments since the last full committee meeting held in June 1988.
The meeting was very successful in that it accomplished all of its objectives.
A transcript of the meeting will be placed in the Public Document Room (PDR) within the next week to ten days. NSRRC expects to have a report of the meeting to Mr. Eric S. Beckjord, Director of RES, by mid-to-late August 1989.
i MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE C
Office' for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 Division of Operational Assessment On May 25, the Director, AE00, and other NRC staff members met with representatives.
of~NUMARC to discuss their draft report on " Methodology for the Development of Emergency Action Levels." The draft report evidences substantial industry effort in an area NRC could not justify expending resources. Potential implementation via consensus standard or topical report appears to be the preferred avenue.
L Preliminary Notifications
- a. PNS-I-89-06, Seabrook Nuclear Station (Public Service Company of New Hampshire), Bomb Threat,
- b. PNS-I-89-07, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (Philadelphia Electric Company), Yehicle Bomb Threat.
- c. PNO-I-89-36, Philadelphia Electric Company (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station),PeachBottomUnit2 Scram,
Personal Items with Low Level Contamination Found Offsite.
- e. .PNO-I-89-38, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant), Confirmatory Action Letter.
- f. PN0-II-89-38, Presnell and Associates (Louisville, Kentucky), Stolen Troxler Moisture Density Gauge.
- g. PNO-II-89-39, NASA /EG&G(KennedySpaceCenter, Florida), Contaminated i Smoke Detectors.
- h. PNO-III-89-36,CommonwealthEdisonCompany(QuadCitiesUnit1), Shutdown to Repair Leaking Weld.
i.- PN0-IV-89-35,GeneralAtomicsCorporation(SequoyahfuelsFacility),
Hydrogen Fluoride Gas Release.
J. PNO-Y-89-30, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station), Airborne Process Effluent Monitors not Operable.
- k. PNO-V-89-31, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Units I and 2),
Unusual Event Due to Grass Fire on Owner-Controlled Area.
- 1. PNO-ADSP-89-04, Tennessee Valley Authority (Watts Bar Unit 1), Watts Bar Welding Team Inspection.
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE D
4 Office of Governmental and Public Affairs Items of Interest-Week Ending May 26, 1989 STATE, LOCAL'AND INDIAN TRIBE PROGRAMS Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors Annual Meeting Carlton Kammerer, Director, SLITP, Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, State Agreements, Lloyd Bolling, SLITP, and the Regional State Agreements
' Officers (RSAO) attended the 21st Annual National Conference on Radiation Control sponsored by the. Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. on May 22-25, 1989 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
The theme of this year's_ conference was " Radiation Risk Management."
Commissioner James Curtiss gave the keynote address entitled " Risk Management and Nuclear Regulations." Robert Bernero, Director, NMSS, spoke on radiation' sources without disposal sites and Harold Peterson, RES, gave an. update on Part 20.. An RSA0 counterpart meeting was also held during.the conference.
Midwest LLW Compact Commission Meeting James Foster, Acting Chief, Region III State and Government Affairs, attended the Midwest LLW Compact Commission meeting on May 22, 1969 in Detroit, Michigan. The Comission received a briefing from the Michigan LLW Authority on the status.of site development in the State. The Authority issued final site selection criteria on May 16, 1989.
St. Lucie Emergency Planning Exercise Robert Trojanowski, Director, Region II State and Government Affairs Staff, participated in an emergency planning exercise at the St. Lucie Plant on May 24, 1989 on Hutchinson Island, Florida. The exercise included State and local government participation. FEMA's observation and evaluation of the exercise did not result in the identification of any major deficiencies.
States Seek To Negotiate Memoranda of Understanding The NRC has received requests from Ohio, Massachusetts and Virginia to renew negotiations for memoranda of understanding (MOU) with the NRC under the recently approved Comission policy on cooperation with States.
The State officials were informed that negotiations can resume once the i Comission has approved implementing guidance. The staff is presently developing implementing guidance for Comission review and approval.
Illinois House Passes Nuclear Safety Legislation The Illinois House passed House Bill 2310, the Illinois Facility Safety Act, on May 22, 1989. The measure will be referred to the Illinois Senate for its consideration. H.B. 2310 provides the Illinois HAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE E
=
l i
Department of Nuclear Safety with greater regulatory )owers to reduce the possibility of nuclear accident and to minimize t1e severity of such accidents at nuclear facilities.
Illinois Reopens Operator Contract Negotiations !
The Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (IDNS) has reopened its search for a developer / operator of the Central Midwest Compact Low-Level waste facility because IDNS failed to reach agreement with Westinghouse on liability issues. Westinghouse had previously been selected as the prime candidate for the contract. At present, Illinois has also entered into discussions with Chem-Nuclear.
l l
I 1
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE E
_f Office of Administration Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 Division of Contracts and Property Management The Division of Contracts and Property Management conducted a successful fire drill at_0WFN on Wednesday, May 24. The drill, involving a complete building evacuation, was coordinated with the Montgomery County Fire Marshal and the agency Health and Safety Officer.
Division of Security A white noise masking system has been installed outside the first floor hearing room and the 18th floor executive conference room at OWFN to enhance the security of' sensitive discussions conducted in these facilities.
Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services-
'A revised version of the Citizen's Guide to NRC Information has been printed for broad public distribution. This guide was developed to provide the public with information regarding the many types of NRC documents. Copies of the guide.may'be obtained through the Public Document Room, LPDRs, NRC distribution service and GPO sales.
Significant~FOIA Recuests Received by the NRC for 5-Day Period May 19 - May 25. 19E9 Request for' copies of (1) drafts of " Final Open Item Transmittal" letters for
" Final Open Item Transmittal". letters for all plants Comanche licensed sincePeak 1984.and (2)(Ophelia Williams, J/R/A Associates, FOIA-89-226)
Request for a copy of the 1969 AEC Internal Study Group document referenced in 36 FR 12247 regarding criteria for emergency core cooling systems. (Kathryn Kalowsky of Hopkins, Sutter, Hamel.& Park, FOIA-89-230)
Request for' copies of tests and related studies at the Burroughs plant in-Warren, New Jersey, with regard to air quality within the facility. (James Pivirotto,GreatAmericanInsuranceCompanies,FOIA-89-232)
Request for four. categories of records regarding NRC's procurement of verbatim court reporting and transcription services since August 1, 1988. (Grant Clark of Rivkin, Radler, Dunne & Bayh, FOIA-89-233)
Request for records regarding the ED0's April 27, 1989 letter regarding notification of the NRC of employees' potential safety issues. (Linda Bauman, LawOfficesofBillieGarde,FOIA-89-235)
, Request for records regarding the U.S. Senate hearing held May 4, 1989,
~
I regardingSection210casesettlementagreements.(LindaBauman,LawOfficesof BillieGarde,FOIA-89-236)
MAY-26, 1989 ENCLOSURE G r- - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
Office of Information Resources Management Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989
- 1. WorkloadInformationandSchedulingProgram(WISP)
The development of the shared data-based WISP prototype is progressing as expected. 0n May 23, 1989, a Cullinet. technical representative. met with the SINET/ WISP prototype team to discuss system design. The discussions were fruitful. A weekly status meeting with NRR and the IRM development team has been scheduled for Thursdays at 1:30.p.m.
- 2. Master Inspection Planning System - Phase II The physical database design for this portion of the Inspection System is underway. A walkthrough of the design is scheduled for May 25, 1989.
f .'
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE H
Office of Personnel Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 c Arrivals .
NicoleMoore,TechnicalIntern(OPFT),NMSS Sally Adams, Secretary (PFT), NRR RichardLaufer,ReactorEngineer(PFT),NRR LawrenceVick,ReactorEngineer(PFT),NRR NeilKeller, Auditor (PFT),0IG i
Departures Rachel.Stackstill, Computer Assistant (PFT), NMSS
' Shirley Comegys, Secretary, (PFT), NRR 1
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE J
Office of Enforcement Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 Significant Enforcement Actions A Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $75,000 was issued on May 19, 1989 to Duke Power Company (Catawba Unit 2).
The action was based on violations involving an inoperable Unit 2 Containment Air Return and Hydrogen Skimmer System Train caused by a design modification wiring error and the licensee's failure to report a condition prohibited by plant technical specifications. (EN89-53)
A Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $20,000 was issued on May 23, 1989 to Professional Service Industries, Lombard, Illinois. The action was based on failure to secure or maintain continuous surveillance over an unsecured moisture-density gauge in the back of an open bed pickup truck parked in an unrestricted area. (EN89-55)
A Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount 24, 1989 to Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron of$50}000wasissuedonMay Unit 1 . The action was based on a loss of one train of the residual heat removal system while the reactor coolant system water level was being lowered on September 1988. (EN89-56)
Civil Penalties Paid Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (Millstone Units I and 2) paid the civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The action was based on a violation of the equipment qualification requirements of 10 CFR 50.49. (EA 88-254)
Virginia Electric and Power Company (North Anna) paid the civil penalty in the amount of $25,000. The action was based on the licensee's failure to take corrective actions for identified deficiencies in the control room ventilation and instrument air systems. The base civil penalty was mitigated l 50% in recognition of the extensive corrective actions the licensee took once l it was aware that these deficiencies had not previously been properly addressed.
l (EA88-311) l MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE L 1
l
i e
Region I Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989 1.- U.S. Testing Company, Inc.
Region I supported Region V in an inspection of U.S. Testing Company, Inc.
at their Hoboken, New Jersey offices and field sites. This inspection is being conducted to assure adherence to the 1987 Order to U.S. Testing. In addition, the licensee has requested a license amendment to administer the license from one location, Hoboken, New Jersey (rather than the current San Leandro, California location), since the corporate officers and Radiation Safety Director are located there. Regions I and Y are discussing the transfer of this license.
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE N
l.
j .
i
)
l Region II Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989
- 1. Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Due to high vibrations in the "B" recirculation pump, the plant shut down on May 16, 1989 to investigate the cause of the vibration. They found the shaft to have a through-wall crack which extends approximately 320 degrees around the shaft near the shaft-to-impeller weld. Both "A" and "B" pumps ;
and motors will be replaced by spares from Unit 2. Similar problems with :
the Byron-Jackson pumps have been identified in the KKL (Leibstalt) facility which hadetG0,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of operation. Grand Gulf has had N25,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of operation. Licensee activities have been followed by the Resi-dent and Regional staffs. The Vendor Inspector Branch has been contacted regarding generic followup.
- 2. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 2 completed the 100-hour warranty run at 2:10 p.m. (CST) on May 19, 1989} and20,the (CST on May 1989.licensee declared the unit to be commercial at
- 3. Small-Scale Emergency Exercise at Brunswick A small-scale annual emergency exercise was held at the Brunswick Nuclear Plant on May 23. The exercise provided only a minimum challenge to the licensee's staff, but was sufficient to fulfill the exercise objectives.
- 4. Emergency Exercise at St. Lucie A full-scale annual emergency exercise was held at the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant on May 24. A. Cunningham was the team leader for the team observing the exercise. The Director of State and Government Affairs participated as a member of the FEMA Regional Assistance Committee observing the State and local governments' actions. The licensee's performance during the exercise was good and principal exercise objectives met.
- 5. Robinson Steam Electric Generating Plant CP&L and NRC staffs met in Headquarters on May 24, 1989, to discuss PRA application with respect to H. B. Robinson's design basis reconstitution (DBR) project. This meeting was requested by CP&L due to a recognized need for a process to provide more structure to DBR discrepancy resolu-tion. The use of PRA was presented as a reasonable means to complement engineering judgment to add to this structure.
- 6. Duke Power Company On May 25th, Duke Power Company management was in the Region II Office per their request to discuss their Nuclear Plant Design Basis Documentation program. This program would be adapted for all three plants with a projected completion in 1995. The project will be accomplished using Duke engineering resources.
ENCLOSURE N MAY 26, 1989
- 2 l.
- 7. Annual Southeastern Nuclear Plant Managers' Association Meeting On May 26, the Deputy Regional Administrator spoke at the Annual South-l eastern Nuclear Plant Managers' Association Meeting held in Williamsburg, Virginia. The subject was items of current and future regional and national regulatory interest.
i
- 8. North Anna Power Station Representatives of the Virginia Electric and Power Company were in the Region II Office for an Enforcement Conference involving service water flow and reactor water level control at their North Anna Nuclear Power Station. The service water issue involved improper setting of throttle valves resulting in less than design basis cooling flow to the recircu-lation spray heat exchangers. The reactor water level control issue involved the loss of inventory with the vessel in a partial drain down condition.
- 9. Surry Power Station The Regional Administrator, accompanied by the Deputy Directors of DRP and DRS and the NRR Project Director, visited the Surry Nuclear Power Station to discuss the status of restart issues with representatives of the Virginia Electric and Power Company. The licensee anticipates bringing Unit 1 online on June 15. Critical path issues for restart involve motor-operated valve repair and a component cooling water system oper-ability review / repair. Both Region II and NRR are closely monitoring restart preparation.
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE N
. Region III Items of Interest L.' Week Ending May 26, 1989 I. Clinton Power Station .
On Friday, May 26; 1989, A. B. Davis and R. C. Knop will be interviewed by a Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the' Illinois Power-Company regarding the construction and licensing of the Clinton Power Station. -The Special Committee was formed to investigate requests by
.two shareholders that the company initiate litigation for alleged
. mismanagement in connection with the construction and licensing of.
Clinton. . In addition, one of.the shareholders has filed a lawsuit against eleven directors and one director emeritus. Counsel for the Special Committee and the Region III Regional Counsel will also attend
-the meeting.
- 2. Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Station On Friday, May 26, 1989 A. B. Davis and members of the regional staff will meet in the Regional Office with representatives of Detroit Edison Company for the monthly review of the status of the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power. Station.
- 3. Quad Cities On May 24,1989, Unit 2 experienced an unidentified leak in the drywell in excess of the maximum of 5 gallons-per-minute (GPM) allowed by the technical specifications. The licensee declared an unusual event in accordance with their emergency plan. . After access could be gained to the drywell, the source of the leak was identified as a failed packing on the Reactor Core. Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system steam supply valve. The maximum leakage rate during the event was 5.9 gpm. The licensee placed the unit in cold shutdown to complete repairs. Plant restart on May 25th was normal after the valve' packing was replaced.
Because the NRC resident inspectors were offsite at a Region III Resident Seminar, the Senior Resident Inspector and Projects Section Chief established a regular status briefing counterpart call with licensee personnel. Regional Management also contacted Commonwealth Edison Company
' management to emphasize the importance of adequacy of communications during the event. The Senior Resident was back on site on May 25th in the control room evaluating plant operations over.the previous three days.
- 4. Resident. Inspector Seminar Region III held its-second Resident Inspector Seminar for FY 89 from May 23-25. Highlights of the seminar included: OSHA training; mid-loop operational problems; use of plant aging studies for inspection activities; Plant Hatch lessons learned; Event V; and Clinton EQ problems.
The annual Resident Site Clerical Aide seminar was conducted in Region III May 23-25, 1989.
MAY 26, 1989- ENCLOSURE N l
7-u
.f Region IV Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989
- 1. Commissioner Curtiss Visits Region IV Facilities Commissioner Curtiss spoke at a conference of radiation control program directors in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on May 22, 1989. After the meeting he toured River Bend Station.- On May 23, he toured Waterford-3. He was accompanied by his Technical Assistant and the Region IV Director of Reactor Projects.
- 2. Texas Nuclear Corporation Enforcement Conference An enforcement conference was conducted with the licensee on May 22, 1989, at the Region IV office. This conference was related to the findings from a.special inspection into a possible overexposure incident that occurred in Butler, Pennsylvania. The inspection identified violations arising.from inadequate control of licensee activities involving sealed source removals from fixed gauges.
~3 . Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation The Vice President, Engineering and Technical Services, and other members of the Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS) staff met on May 24, 1989,- with members of the Region IV staff in the Region IV office at the request of WCGS to discuss general operating matters at WCGS.
.4. Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P)
Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) reached the 50 percent reactor power plateau on May 26, 1989, in the startup program for South Texas Project, Unit 2 (STP-2). STP-2 was licensed for full power operation on March 28, 1989. HL&P anticipates placing STP-2 in commercial operation by July. South Texas Project, Unit 1, is operating at 100 percent reactor power and is scheduled for a refueling. outage in August.
- 5. Deaconess Hospital Enforcement Conference Region IV held an enforcement conference on May 26, 1989, with Deaconess Hospital. The conference was the result of an NRC inspection conducted on April 11, 1989, that identified an apparent record discrepancy related to constancy checks on the dose calibrator. 1 MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE N i
Region V Items of Interest Week Ending May 26, 1989
- 1. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station The Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards and the Regional Attorney conducted a special site visit to Palo Verde to review recent licensee management actions which may discourage licensee or-contractor employees from raising perceived safety concerns.
- 2. Washington Public Power Supply System The WNP-2 SSOMI team will exit on May 26, 1989. The inspection has reviewed the licensee's refueling outage activities in the areas of procurement, engineering, work activities, and testing. The Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects, and the Project Section Chief are representing Region V management at the exit.
Representatives ~from the NRR Project Directorate and the Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards are also attending the team exit. A management meeting will be held following the team exit to discuss subjects of mutual interest to the NRC and the licensee.
l MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE N
- ITEMS ADDRESSED BY THE COMMISSION - WEEK ENDING MAY 26, 1989 A. STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFING ON INTERIM REPORT ON ACCIDENT STUDY FOR PLUTONIUM AIR TRANSPORT PACKAGES, 2:00 P.M., MONDAY, MAY 15, 1989, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, UNE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) - SECY to V. Stello, Jr., EDO dated 5/23/89 The Commission
- was briefed by the staff on the status and future schedule of the accident study for plutonium air transport packages.
The Commission understands that the staff will periodically advise the Commission of further progress on the accident study
?>y:
- 1. Submitting a report which provides early identification of parameters for the drop test and for the aircraft crash test including recommended altitude, velocity, vertical impact, and hardness of the impact surface, and estimated cost figures for the remaining three phases of the study.
- 2. Submitting an interim progress report once a decision is made by the Japanese government whether to transport plutonium by air and a credible aircraft is identified.
- 3. Submitting a final report on the Phase I activities.
Chairman Zech also encouraged the staff to continue to cooperate with other involved federal agencies and with the Japanese government.
B. STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION AND V0TE, 3:30 P.M., THURSDAY, MAY 18, 1989, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBIC ATTENDANCE) SECY to V. Stello, Jr., EDO and W. Parler, GC dated 5/25/89 I. SECY-89-120 - 10 CFR 61 -- Land DisDosal of Radioactive Waste The Commission, by a 5-0 vote,* approved publication in the Federal Register final amendments to 10 CFR 61 which requires disposal of greater-than-class-C radioactive waste in the nation's high level radioactive waste repository, unless an alternative means of disposal has been approved by the Commission.
l
- Commissioners Carr and Rogers were not present.
- Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 5841, provides that action of the commission shall be deter-mined by a " majority vote of the members present." Commissioner Rogers was not present when this item was affirmed. Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 4-0 in favor of the I decision. Commissioner Rogers, however, had previously indicated that he would approve and had he been present, he would have affirmed his prior vote.
MAY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE P t ,
.I i
2-II. SECY-89-146 - Issuance of a Final Rule on Financial .
Protection Requirements and Indemnity Acreements The Commission, by a 4-0 vote, approved issuance by the Executive _ Director for Operations a final rule implementing the Price Anderson Amendments Act of 1988 and to reflect the increase in the amount of primary financial protection being l made available by the nuclear insurance pools.
Accordingly, you may transmit the final rule to the Federal Register.
Commissioner Rogers was on foreign travel and was unavailable to participate in this decision.
III. SECY-89-158 -' Decision on Stav Aeolications in Seabrook The Commission, by a 4-0 vote,* approved an order which:
- a. Denies three separate motions to stay authorization for issuance of a license to Public Gervice Company of New Hampshire.to conduct low-power testing at.the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station; and
- b. Provides a brief housekeeping stay to allow the Court of
. Appeals for the-D.C. Circuit an opportunity to review stay claims filed with the Court and any opposition that may be filed. Consequently, a license authorizing low-power testing for Seabrook will not be issued before 4 p.m. EDT, May 25,.1989, or such earlier date if the Court denies the stay requests now before it.
Commissioner Curtiss did not participate in this decision.
4 Accordingly, the staff should issue a low-power license to Public Service Company of New Hampshire when the above prerequisites have been met.
- Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 5841, provides that action of the Commission shall be deter-mined by a " majority vote of the members present." Commissioner Rogers was not present when this item was affirmed. Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 3-0 in favor of the decision. Commissioner Rogers, however, had previously indicated that he would approve and had he been present, he would have affirmed his prior vote.
PRY 26, 1989 ENCLOSURE P
A n e i T k o s f N r y u t O a n a C l e l k
e C K C R c R . . . o N R T M 'd e
v i
t a c io e p
hC
/ s TS p- G NE l c O I' e AE ei W S r CD dr 8 N I N at B A e LE /l c / / h PT Cie C C t PT Rhl R R AA NPE i r N n i
~
d e
l e d c h 2 eh r - o- a t o s st i itr l s nh d o p icd n w no eh otfesf cai Vt i ore d n
si t i tf cin gr1 c rw aoncro a nt c . o m oaoi tt e i csis tcap m. rei tetfm osteaa l elii e aru ego f uahrc n ct oi b
a 4
2 eEnct m Ues ror iei bf l 4 7
- a py rG hfdai i a
S gi k s s eP eti nlt E nhc h s g ta r v 2 C i pi l n t yr ngr f e a 9 I 9 ml rao te anesoc y 4
T 8 E oeecm sin srw hict cd cne l g O 9 S cdmim u gO xryuoh . c n N 1 O haino P tlLhc ce eatditA grot H i
l i
l G , R ri c stW b l N 6 U ohnen in& oearaoS a I 2 P FPoto DIB T r p pt d O p
u c
T .
E y e y E a n d b M M o a
_i R t m d R na e N ec e n t o b i ll
'. a u l s t h m l m b co io o
. So .
g
. wor e g r g d s b d l d gt l
l rd l nn n B an B B Ca i e a t t t3 tm c n l s n1 n1 eu i - ec s N
~ i l
l e at i1 l - l B mo d O F ca F8 F0 d 6 1 e i I
T e d e e sc t l e t m t m ei A t i o io hl C i uh tb O h ot h o ho L W h WR WR u fp sn ol i i .
t sas sa et g ibn /// ec
/ toi /723 io r t 9801 rl R 23 a E 55 aoe 6233 md 2///
M B 33 pt e m - 0926 mn ua h U 0 d) 07814 s t N 5 e2d 52233 C t9e fR f s1t e1 c oN re se E e2j 0 eh M e t9o 0 it i I l - n4 r :
p t T pl i p 92 9 on
/ ii) 1 8 - 80 Ci i E tre y0 r /0 /0 l l pn n3o 10 1 :
T /0 A uAu A(f /:
- A D M(J ' 69 61 EPyo]
[* $' $El
A r a L T s e s s n N r m r e o .
O a o a y D W C e r e a c .
G D G H M R
R . . . . .
N G A G J D
/
I R
P
/ n . E TS .
G oo / e N tC C ge NE 8 AE A U A E s Rynt CD V P V C on Ntit IN T G T S Bo i ri LE / / / / /s l em PT C C C C Ci iem PT R R R R Rd tto AA M N N N NE USC -
s d :
s e
e d -
c e tn er -
yo r t vycg sea ar o n ireirsvr l p f e m ttl seuoe n
c f f . rl a useetc R os l e os rar cusdasme wiag : cts fQ e al e ut g ed oA si cb si cto xnno dr gnnam C ut i a ut ir Eiott g ti nT ti fmp heoeo nd av h . av ob . R r s g gb r gi s s v ti cs) ti uTn Raeni potis in risa l a st . en1 st ssSo Nevil o S d ck To5 c u Ii lit TRdna E ns eAe i2 ea t m t fctad W y gb C ae h e ot h .
aaea oual e Lhi I hu t gr t aS t g trrt ntec . A s nC cT n sgun g nrns - )d gt r T 9 .
ot e nye arI2ni - a O E ss si si( si 8
wrum N 9 S si ssr ef ss ibssvoR eedtP
,aseh -
O u une gi un e pf e f G
1 P ce cet nc A. ce i l emruacEwndr) .a eo N , R sp scs ae7 sc v Td p i aps I 6 U ii iiy h p ii eSnm reesf e)i i) o T 2 P Dp DLO CS3 Dl RI ai BTrior1 vt3s&
E .
E y M a M
R R
N .
m
~
R r
a e en c . . . .
l o .
g ci n J.
e g g g d
g d ut rN d d d l Na e l l l B
l B
B t f , B B kS2nr t t e 1 oe t t t3 n1 n7 n1 eg .Cv n1 n9 i1 rn i i1 i- i-l B i1 l -
N l - C i o gR l - l B O FB tNn FB F4 F4 FF I 8 ra id 6 1 1 2 T e er .ne e e e e A t m t e gi k t m t m t m t m C i o sndar io io io io O h o yel ro ho ho ho ho L WR OGBTF WR WR WR WR
/6 /6 R 99 9 99 5 9 E 52 1 52 9 3 8 2/ 2 2/ 3 2 t 0 - 0 - -
U 06 0 06 0 0 N 52 5 52 5 5 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 M 0 : 0 3 0 I : 3 9: 9 9*, 9 :
T 94 9 - 84 8 83 85
/ 8 - 80 / - /0 /- /-
E /0 /3 50 10 20 20 20 T
A 60
/:
7 :
/0 61 13
/ :
68 2:
/1 61
/0 2
68
/:
61 D 62 5'
4* "m 4$ 9P85"
, l'
K9 O a E8 C l E9 F W1 C R .
E , N E H6 T2 Ry Oa FM F
U M
I
/
ST ,
EN k EA c DC a NI l EL F Y TP T TP .
E AA E F -
A S
g R n A i E r L a C e U H N
s L e A i S C r E I o C D t I E a T M r O o N D b N a G A L N
I L' r T A E e E I S l E R O g M T P n S R a S U U r S D P W M N N I F
O N
O h I a S t I N U V O ,
I I D T o A v C o O r L P TR EE KB CM OU DN 4
1 E 2 T 1 A /
D 6 a3>
g f' !
i e s d e v T s r t o C i a s c A h e s n 1 T c W s i 1 N e e p
e o O Z e W J C i S y n c n C r r e i h R a e e r o N G B L E J l
a r
e e e 9 l , d , t e 8 f ay e I a s 9 o nr f I t n S 1 ot R Sl e I G e is , ac E N , ty gul s , ,ci E I 6 ar edae R R
Eol d
E 2 tt Rncv Ol E Ss I oi N D ,d n M y u d t n a a / ,d n .l a , ,aa A M ST An afdt O Ad ,
T EN MI fnns D Mis M A EA E Qaaee E Ere R D DC F , Ht si Foi I L
g EI EL ,a s ,seec t rn DL
,lFn c ,
A n TP Cx BCape O& C e B N i TP Re RRteg EP Rfg R O d AA NT INSra AC Noa I I n T E A .
R k l p E e ao e P e ch h O W i s gk t
l g l n F or oar . n ni l g O l o dtcey i i oW n
'a d g n n it c t e
ow s e
N i i O d) roee e tr d .
I aP e alC g M ar m T RE sgo .r pa ea A R ref te t iC rr U I( urdnm i c ag L V o eee x i r wo A s chRm E) t e t r V ns t sl c rn fp E oe gil sa ci ao o in gd nwaec rsi il tb pi s
ss D
D i N ee neesg su l s tR A Rr isdAo oP li aE a aie l n um m S Ap rcFdo ge fm re I Me tr ni ah o oh S Er efad it aC ft Y FP axo a D L e gr o t tr A d 'y d nn kt c . co N nc npoia c ue uf A E en eoir id ds . d S te tttog we ss nid ocn nw oe R O t g teatn O P ar al rii no cre ci F R e benr ul et v U om oapou rC oxt Tea oe Tr E P TE Tt oMd B(
C I
F F
0 rt en va s X il l T RP l N a O , l r F I n aa T i te o A t sl h C s L F yc a O u N W ru d L A B O CN I 9 9
_ 8 8
/ /
9 4 9
_ 8 9 9
_ 0 1
- - / 8 8 6 3 6 / /
_ 1 6 E 0 1 1 T / / / 2 2
- / /
- A 6 6 6 6
_ D 0 0 0 6
- $8 B $B ?RR e
T C n '^
A o e T s b N n a
_ O h C C o c J M C
R . .
N J E
/
ST O EN C C EA P L DC M I NI N L EL / /
n i r m t e r ,t ee d eso ee lSttn sM oP n n h N g el et o eSnml cn tdr odi ie nael nw Lm gahh( e
~ e fg n
is st kan ms oan tnnfr a eaoooel S ta el p Ysp E nM mpue n C e l weg I m) dmeaecn sP ercsNii T l n O sL ten N eA staef o sS e ihori G s( utlt qrp os) ejsd N E A I S e eomftaie T O cc rhooamms E P in sc lS t,ou ms E R ta e M U P
am mr esea sssvenes scc I eo nunohodi d
R tf ecerti sr cscp td ye iii p o c n e SP Ldl ataab k
r o
Y e N c O
I w
e i
f T N f A O C ,
O a I L b R i
r c
S TR 00 2 EE 21 2 KB 24 3 CM - - -
OU 00 0 DN 55 5 E m.
N 9 m. 9 I 8a 8a T / /
/ 70 00 E 00 20 T /: /:
A 60 60 D 01 01 3< M 'Gg EPO mC l!ll: ,
l
! :I-
, . :iI,Ii1 iia 9
= 8 T
- 9. C 1 A T
, N 6, O 2 C r h _
y- C o a R t M. N S -
d e
ts cQ eH l s edr Sne
/
.DC sn NI nof EL eif _
e v
i E yR C c I nl T ea O
N rt es gy G
EC nr N
I z T e-E l E ao cs _
M E S Si I O c I P l r R R l e U ux P FE L
F r
e v
i R
N O l I
t a _
T A s C
O L C y
r _
TR EE _
KB _
CM OU DN 9
8 E /
M 2 I 2 T -
/
E T
1 2
/
A D
6 0 _
5< % * %eo E1EA e
- l ,l!
' ! I >' lI illJ g[g n n n s n n a a a o u i a a m
m m n
a n
'l s
i l m n s n n s l l l e e e I e' i e e e i e i e
I e v e e i v r i e v IT r a r r r a o r r a r C G' D' G G e D N e G D G p p NA a . . a . . .
OT . . . .
P B E P G B G IN G B G G GO EC . . .
C C E A E R E A E E C A y
t
- i l t
) i ) n P b P g a L a L n l p fA r fA i P o s e
oS e oS t h en e n
( ep ( es tr s cr c o t
a t co t ce ie k ne ne nn ne nT sw r o ec nfi R -
ec eI ec e io eot ge mn sa r
ey mn sa rd en vP W rn eo r
enr a f o nc sm fa nr sm er fa n
or y fC c n fob nii s in ta er op so on ta e a os otl t en so sf cg hl m Cc Caa cn ee sf CS cc r lCs eo Mt Ar Ar i i n
e tt e ts eu a ts ny to t fi ti cP nn t cP ne ZN h P eh nitn eVne fs ei na ee eD i
te mm i
x i
te m s nn mP m em c eM E ae en E ae eym ao r e el me cuur se m ee S ms ci ra ms en cre mi rZ a
e ch rt rfri sd u gg
- O en T rel ol oltu ce aa P te ot R te otb i l c ss nt R sc fn A sc fto ae fa fl sq au U yi no S yi nar hh u ne nine ia MO P SL EC O SL EBP Ct N EH EWIR DC S
E C
I t T n t O a n C N l a D P n l G o P ,
N e i o t I I I n I I s I t I n I o I T s I a l I a
I I I I t I E N e I t l I I g
E. O B S e l n n n n n M I - n c n P o o o T s o~ n i o o i hN I A i i o t i n i i i g
i g
C v g r n g o g g sF aW e I
O a e y o e i e e e R
I L D R B M R Z R R R W0 N
O I
G_
E R 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 1 1 9 9 9 9 9 . 9 . .
1 . 1 1 1 1 . 1 .
E 1 . 1 . 1
- m. , m. , m.
M , m. , m. , , m. ,a , , , m. , m. 2 4 I 7p 8p 1 p 1p T 0p 1p 1 2p 2 6 7
/ 3 3 0 e0 E 0 0 e e0 e0 e e e0 e0 e0 n3 n0 T y0 y0 n n0 n: n n n0 n0 u: u:
A a: a: u u: u0 u u u: u:
J J J1 J1 J3 J1 D M1 M2 J J1 J1 5 4 5 0 4 3
/ /
3 6 5 0 1 1 5 TR 6 5 4 6 5 5 6 6 9 4 6 EE 4 9 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 KB 3 2 4 - - - - -
CM -
0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 OU 0 0 5 - 5 5 5 5 DN 5 5 5 5 5 e h s o c s l a k Y e l e n n c T B e B o o o I - c y t t R L s n i t n r n n I i n o t n o r i g C v o r n i e
i l i A a i y o o i -
P l
C C B F D Z B M P Z - -
- $ y2jpm[ l l
NA p OT a .
IN P G GO EC . .
R C E n
i o
t a
ec ci
- nf ei
. rl g ea n fu i nQ t o e Cl e as M tte nni t eec n E
mmn ene e
m S coi e O rrc g P oii a R f vf n U nne a P EED M S
E C
I T
O N
G e N t i
I I T I S E N I E O n M I n o T o t I A i n I C g i I O e l
~
L R C N
O I
G E
R -
9 9 8 8 9 9 1 1 E . .
M , m. , m.
I 4 6 T 1 p 1 p
/
E e0 e0 T n0 n0 A u: u:
D J1 J2 TR 1 1 EE 6 6 KB 4 4 CM - -
OU 0 0 DN 5 5 Y
T n n I o o L t t I n n C i i A l l F C C
}* 8 oh 1D
C w l w
,. o o o Y
I P. H. H.
R D E A C
R
/ N TS /
NE l C C AE a R R CD t N N IN i / /
LE p P L PT s & &
e s c s i u l p
s c s s s s e i s n d udd o cee c o stg a t iar D e die cm E D g L / n oob
- U w i t
tsu ss D .
E er e ea H co e c f .
C E nt m nsos S S ea en e O rr d roll S P et e eiab G R fs t ftua N U ni s naqc I P on e ol T ci u cold E m q . iae E td es tvt g M nA rR n nr e E el ee V
I ml ea eL e .
mamm einb R ct st ctou ri nn rnrs op ee oei fs cc ftvd no i e nonn EH Lr Epea e e e c c c N i i i O f f f I f f f T O O O A
C V V V O I I I L R R R 6 &
7 TR 7 89 2 EE 9 99 8 KB 1 44 3 CM - - - -
OU 0 00 0 DN 3 55 5
- 9
- 8 9
- 1
, 9 9 6 8 8 9 2 /0 /0 80 E 60 00 /0 y T 2: 3: 1 :
a A /1 /0 /0
- M D 51 51 61 l 3 ,h a5m D