ML20133J037

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:55, 4 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Concurs W/Proposed Revs to 10CFR70 & 73 Re Safeguards Reporting Requirements Based on NMSS Compliance W/Encl marked-up Rev.W/O Encl
ML20133J037
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/05/1985
From: Felton J
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Dwyer P
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20132B800 List:
References
FRN-50FR34708, RULE-PR-73 AB46-1-11, NUDOCS 8510180237
Download: ML20133J037 (2)


Text

  • *

$3 EtC d "o", UNITED STATES l' w NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

~

s i WASHINCTO N, D. C. 20555 h

%, **"*/  !

FEB 5 1985 i

MEMORANDUM FOR: Priscilla Dwyer I Office of Nuclear Material Safety & Safeguards  !

FROM: J. M. Felton, Director i Division of Rules and Records [

Office of Administration [

SUBJECT:

DRR REVIEW 0F PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 10 CFR PARTS 70 f AND 73, CHANGES TO SAFEGUARDS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Ths Division of Rules and Records (DRR) has reviewed the above proposed rule-  !

making, revised to respond to CRGR comments, and concurs, based on your  !

compliance with the coments in paragraphs two and three below and your  !

consideration of our remaining coments. A DRR-marked copy is enclosed for i your information.

(

On page 4 of the Federal Register notice (FRN), paragraph one mentions that the rulemaking is responsive to a portion of a petition for rulemaking (PRM) sub- ,

mitted by NUBARG. The discussion regarding the response to PRM-50-36 should be  !

expanded somewhat to include (1) what the petitioner originally wanted and why ,

and (2) a description of how this rulemaking responds to that part of the petitioner's request. A FRN which discusses the resolution of PRM-34-3 is  !

enclosed as an example. Also enclosed is the original PRM-50-36 for your  !

information.

The Regulatory Analysis on.page 5 of the FRN has been revised to show the i

significant savings to the industry and NRC by indicating the current and the proposed figures. i We recomend that you make a cross reference to Appendix A in Part 73 when  !

mentioning the telephonic notification. This will enable the licensee to know  ;

quickly where the telephone number for the Emergency Response Center is  !

located.

This is to alert you that where you have made reference to a two-year record  !

retention period (as in 973.71(c)(1)) may be subject to change. As you may f know, there is an agency-wide effort to standardize record retention periods. i Previously, the acceptable standards were 2, 5,10 years, or life of plant.

Currently, there is an effdrt underway to revise the lower figure to 3 years.

If you decide nbt to change the figure for the proposed rulemaking, it may be j subject to change when this rule is prepared for publication as a final rule.

1 In addition, we have made other minor corrections and/or coments, as noted in the margins.  !

I I

8510180237 851009 PDR l

PR 73 50FR34708 PDR

_ . - - . . - - _ . _ __ . _ . _ . . . _ _ . _ _ ~ --

AB%-L FEB 5 1385 PDL Priscilla Dwyer 2 If you have any questions.regarding this review, please contact John Philips, Chief, Rules and Procedures Branch, DRR, ADM, on extension 27086, or Sarah Wigginton of his staff on extension 27752.

^

,JK J. M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration

Enclosures:

'As stated cc: Patricia Norry l

l t I