SVP-02-057, Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report

Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report

ML022060464
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	07/16/2002
From:	Tulon T Exelon Generation Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SVP-02-057
Download: ML022060464 (2)

Text

Exelokn Exelon Generation Company, LLC www.exeloncorp.com Nuclear Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206" Avenue North Cordova, IL 61242-9740 July 16, 2002 SVP-02-057 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265

Subject:

Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report Please find enclosed the "Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report," for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. This report contains summary information from June 1, 2001, through May 31, 2002. Revisions to docketed correspondence were processed using the Nuclear Energy Institute's (NEI) 99-04, Revision 0, "Guidelines for Managing NRC Commitment Changes," dated July 1999 and applicable station procedures.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. W. J. Beck at (309) 227-2800.

Respectfully, T' ~hy J. Tulon e Vice President uad Cities Nuclear Power Station Attachment cc: Regional Administrator - NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report for June 1, 2001 through May 31, 2002 Page 1 of 1 Tracking Date of Original Original Commitment Revised Commitment Basis For Revision No. Commitment Document Revision 01-002a 06/11/01 LER 254/90-008 Provide changes to the Have review and Although it was appropriate at the time of the Updated Fire Hazards approval of changes to commitment to have UFHA changes reviewed and Analysis (UFHA) to the the UFHA performed by approved at the Corporate level, the roles of site and Corporate Fire Protection station personnel. corporate fire protection engineer have evolved such Group for review and that the site has primary responsibility for maintaining approval, the UFHA. Direction is provided in Exelon-wide procedures, which are reviewed and approved at the Corporate level.

01 -002b 06/11/01 LER 254/90-032 Proceduralize the Discontinue the There are sufficient procedural requirements and requirement to notify the Fire requirement to notify the managerial expectations in place to minimize the time Marshal when the diesel fire Fire Marshal when the that the Fire Pumps are unavailable. Examples include pump is taken out of service, diesel fire pump is taken the tracking of Fire Pump status in the Plan of the Day out of service, meetings, and monitoring of the Fire Pump as a 10CFR50.65 Maintenance Rule component.01-004 12/14/01 LER 254/99-001 Perform a review of Discontinue the monthly Since the reviews have been in place, no significant recurrent surveillances, as performance of this discrepancies have been noted. Also, all of the entered in the surveillance review in the Instrument Instrument Maintenance Procedures were reviewed as tracking database, against Maintenance Department. part of the recent implementation of Improved Technical Technical Specification Specifications. Finally, station procedures and requirements. processes involve a review against Technical Specifications, when appropriate, when changes are made to procedures or when modifications are implemented.01-005 10/19/01 Letter from Quad Provide, as part of long term Remove reference to the The FME program, procedures, and philosophy have Cities Station to corrective actions for the commitment letter been institutionalized throughout Exelon Nuclear and NRC, ESK 94-060 phased FME program, a (ESK 94-060) from the are in line with industry practices. Therefore, it is not new FME procedure. company-wide FME necessary to maintain reference to the 1994 letter.

procedure.02-001 01/18/02 SLER 254/90-001 Provide one-on-one As an optional approach There is a substantial dose reduction associated with escorting for visitors in to providing one-on-one having one escort for a crew of five visitors. The contaminated areas. escorting for visitors in requirement that the visitors be easily identifiable contaminated areas, improves the escort's ability to monitor the visitors.

allow up to five visitors per escort, and require that the visitors be easily identifiable.