ML030710018
ML030710018 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Limerick ![]() |
Issue date: | 03/11/2003 |
From: | Scott Wall NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1 |
To: | Skolds J Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
Wall, S. NRR/DLPM 415-2855 | |
References | |
TAC MB6884 | |
Download: ML030710018 (10) | |
Text
March 11, 2003 Mr. John L. Skolds, President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear Exelon Generation Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way, KSA 3-E Kennett Square, PA 19348
SUBJECT:
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: REVISION TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO FOR CYCLE 8 OPERATION (TAC NO. MB6884)
Dear Mr. Skolds:
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 127 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-85 for the Limerick Generating Station, Unit 2. This amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 21, 2002, as supplemented by letter dated February 25, 2003.
This amendment revises the TSs for the safety limit for the minimum critical power ratio from its current value of 1.09 to 1.07 for two recirculation-loop operation, and from 1.11 to 1.09 for single recirculation-loop operation.
A copy of the safety evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions Biweekly Federal Register Notice.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Scott P. Wall, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-353
Enclosures:
- 1. Amendment No. 127 to License No. NPF-85
- 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 cc:
Vice President, General Counsel and Chief-Division of Nuclear Safety Secretary PA Dept. of Environmental Resources Exelon Generation Company, LLC P.O. Box 8469 300 Exelon Way Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Kennett Square, PA 19348 Library Manager Licensing-Limerick and Peach U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bottom Region I Exelon Generation Company, LLC 475 Allendale Road Nuclear Group Headquarters King of Prussia, PA 19406 Correspondence Control P.O. Box 160 Dr. Judith Johnsrud Kennett Square, PA 19348 National Energy Committee Sierra Club Site Vice President 433 Orlando Avenue Limerick Generating Station State College, PA 16803 Exelon Generation Company, LLC P.O. Box 2300 Vice President, Licensing and Regulatory Sanatoga, PA 19464 Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC Plant Manager 4300 Winfield Road Limerick Generating Station Warrenville, IL 60555 Exelon Generation Company, LLC P.O. Box 2300 Director-Licensing Sanatoga, PA 19464 Mid-Atlantic Regional Operating Group Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regional Administrator, Region I Nuclear Group Headquarters U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Correspondence Control 475 Allendale Road P. O. Box 160 King of Prussia, PA 19406 Kennett Square, PA 19348 Senior Resident Inspector Correspondence Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Exelon Generation Company, LLC Limerick Generating Station 200 Exelon Way, KSA 1-N-1 P.O. Box 596 Kennett Square, PA 19348 Pottstown, PA 19464 Chief Operating Officer Chairman Exelon Generation Company, LLC Board of Supervisors 4300 Winfield Road of Limerick Township Warrenville, IL 60555 646 West Ridge Pike Linfield, PA 19468 Senior Vice President, Nuclear Services Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 cc:
Vice President, Mid-Atlantic Operations Support Exelon Generation Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way, KSA 3-N Kennett Square, PA 19348 Senior Vice President Mid-Atlantic Regional Operating Group Exelon Generation Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way, KSA 3-N Kennett Square, PA 19348 Regulatory Assurance Manager Limerick Generating Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC P.O. Box 2300 Sanatoga, PA 19464
March 11, 2003 Mr. John L. Skolds, President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear Exelon Generation Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way, KSA 3-E Kennett Square, PA 19348
SUBJECT:
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: REVISION TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO FOR CYCLE 8 OPERATION (TAC NO. MB6884)
Dear Mr. Skolds:
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 127 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-85 for the Limerick Generating Station, Unit 2. This amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 21, 2002, as supplemented by letter dated February 25, 2003.
This amendment revises the TSs for the safety limit for the minimum critical power ratio from its current value of 1.09 to 1.07 for two recirculation-loop operation, and from 1.11 to 1.09 for single recirculation-loop operation.
A copy of the safety evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions Biweekly Federal Register Notice.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Scott P. Wall, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-353
Enclosures:
- 1. Amendment No. 127 to License No. NPF-85
- 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC PDI-2 R/F JClifford SWall MOBrien ACRS RCaruso THuang RDennig GHill (2) OGC BPlatchek, RI
- SE input provided - no major changes made ACCESSION NO. ML030710018 ** See previous concurrence OFFICE PD1-2/PM PD1-2/LA SRXB/BC* OGC** PDI-2/SC NAME SWall MOBrien/ CRaynor RCaruso RWeisman SRichards for JClifford DATE 3/10/03 3/11/03/ SE dated 02/28/03 03/10/03 3-11-03 CR 3/5/03 SE Official Record Copy
EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NO. 50-353 LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 127 License No. NPF-85
- 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A. The application for amendment by Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), dated November 21, 2002, as supplemented by letter dated February 25, 2003, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I.
B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-85 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, as revised through Amendment No. 127, are hereby incorporated into this license. Exelon Generation Company, LLC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
- 3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented prior to startup for Cycle 8 operations, scheduled for March 2003.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/RA by SRichards for/
James W. Clifford, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: March 11, 2003
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 127 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-85 DOCKET NO. 50-353 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert 2-1 2-1 B 2-1 B 2-1
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 127 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-85 EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-353
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated November 21, 2002 (Reference 1), as supplemented by letter dated February 25, 2003 (Reference 2), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Unit 2, Technical Specifications (TSs) for Cycle 8 operation. The requested change would incorporate revised safety limit minimum critical power ratios (SLMCPRs) in TS 2.1.2 due to the cycle-specific analysis performed by Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas (GNF-A). The February 25, 2003, letter provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staffs original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on January 7, 2003 (68 FR 802).
2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION
Section 50.36 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 50.36) provides that nuclear plant TSs will be derived from the analyses and evaluations included in the safety analysis report, and amendments thereto, submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.34 (which addresses, among other things, contents of the Final Safety Analysis Report). The existing TS requirements, as well as the licensees proposed amendment, are based on such analyses and evaluations.
General Design Criterion (GDC) 10 of Appendix A, 10 CFR Part 50, requires that the reactor core and associated coolant, control, and protection systems be designed with appropriate margin to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during any condition of normal operation, including the effects of anticipated operational occurrences. The SLMCPR is developed to assure compliance with GDC 10 for fuel cladding integrity. The SLMCPR ensures sufficient margin to the onset of transition boiling (a departure from nucleate boiling, MCPR=1.00) so that, during normal operation and in the event of an anticipated operational occurrence, at least 99.9 percent of the fuel rods in the core do not experience transition boiling. At every refueling, the SLMCPR is recalculated due to fuel replacement.
The licensee requested the amendment in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90.
The NRC staffs evaluation is set forth below.
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
The licensee requested a change to the LGS Unit 2 TSs for Cycle 8 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90. Specifically, the licensee proposed to change the SLMCPR values in TS 2.1.2 from 1.09 to 1.07 for two recirculation-loop operation and from 1.11 to 1.09 for single recirculation-loop operation with the reactor vessel steam dome pressure greater than 785 psig and core flow greater than 10 percent of rated core flow.
The licensee described the approved methodologies used to calculate the SLMCPR value for the proposed TS change in the submittal. The Cycle 8 SLMCPR analysis was performed by GNF-A using plant- and cycle-specific fuel and core parameters, and NRC-approved methodologies including NEDC-32505P, Revision 1 (R-Factor Calculation Method for GE11, GE12 and GE13 Fuel), NEDE-10958-A (GETAB), NEDC-32601P(Methodology and Uncertainties for Safety Limit MCPR Evaluations), NEDC-32694P (Power Distribution Uncertainties for Safety Limit MCPR Evaluation), and Amendment 25 to NEDE-24011-P-A (GESTAR II).
The NRC staff reviewed the licensees application dated November 21, 2002, and the response to the NRC staffs request for additional information dated February 25, 2003, including the detailed summary results of the analysis for LGS, Unit 2, Cycle 8 operation in Tables 1 and 2 of (Reference 1) to determine whether the proposed changes to LGS, Unit 2, Cycle 8 SLMCPR values were justified.
The staff has reviewed the justification for the changes to the SLMCPR from 1.09 to 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation and from 1.11 to 1.09 for single recirculation loop operation using the approach stated in Amendment 25 to GESTAR II. The staff has also reviewed: (1) a possible impact on SLMCPR values due to particular axial power shapes during LGS, Unit 2, Cycle 8 operation; and (2) the cause for the large decrease of the SLMCPR values as a result of major core design differences between Cycle 7 and Cycle 8. The licensee explained in Reference 2 that: (1) the axial power shapes were properly considered in the calculations; and (2) the proposed SLMCPR values are based on the results of an actual Monte Carlo calculation using an NRC-approved methodology for LGS, Unit 2, Cycle 8 operation. The staff finds the justification for the proposed Cycle 8 SLMCPR values acceptable because NRC approved methodologies (Reference 3) are used to perform the calculation for the SLMCPR values.
Based on the results of the review, the staff finds that the SLMCPR analysis for LGS, Unit 2, Cycle 8 operation using the plant- and cycle-specific values of input parameters in conjunction with the approved method is acceptable. The proposed Cycle 8 SLMCPR values will ensure that 99.9 percent of the fuel rods in the core will not experience boiling transition, which satisfies the requirements of GDC 10 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 regarding acceptable fuel design limits. The staff has also concluded that the justification for analyzing and determining the SLMCPR value of 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation and of 1.09 for single recirculation loop operation is acceptable for LGS, Unit 2, Cycle 8 since approved methodologies are used.
We have reviewed the request by Exelon to revise the TSs for LGS, Unit 2, Cycle 8 operation.
For the reasons set forth above, we conclude that the proposed changes are acceptable.
Since the Bases are not a part of the TSs, the NRC staff reviewed the Bases change only to ensure consistency with the proposed TS change. The NRC staff is not approving the Bases change, but is including the revised Bases page for completeness.
4.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commissions regulations, the Pennsylvania State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (68 FR 802). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
7.0 REFERENCES
- 1. Letter from Michael P. Gallagher, Exelon, to NRC, License Amendment Request 02-00643 Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio (SLMCPR) Change, dated November 21, 2002.
- 2. Letter from Michael P. Gallagher, Exelon, to NRC, License Amendment Request 02-00643 Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio (SLMCPR) Change, dated February 25, 2003.
- 3. NEDC-32601P-A, Methodology and Uncertainties for Safety Limit MCPR Evaluations, August 1999.
Principal Contributor: T. Huang Date: March 11, 2003