ML040930488
| ML040930488 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | West Valley Demonstration Project, P00M-032 |
| Issue date: | 03/23/2004 |
| From: | Glenn C NRC/NMSS/DWM |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML040960593 | List: |
| References | |
| +KBR1SISP20050613 | |
| Download: ML040930488 (34) | |
Text
I AFAR REG&L 0
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Decommissioning Process for the U.S. Department of Energy under the West Valley Demonstration Project Act Chad Glenn NRC West Valley Project Manager 301-415-6722 CJG1 @nrc.gov March 23, 2004
NRC Decomnmissioning Process for DOE under WVDP Act
- NRC prescribes decommissioning criteria
- DOE submits decommissioning plan (DP)
- NRC performs acceptance review
- if information not sufficient, inform DOE
- if information sufficient, publish Federal Register Notice (FRN) to:
(1) acknowledge receipt of DP for review (2) request public comment on DP March 23, 2004 1
Decommissioning Plan Review
- NRC performs detailed review of DP
- approve as submitted, or
- identify requests for additional information (RAIs), consider DOE responses, and determine if RAIs resolved
- NRC completes safety and environmental review March 23, 2004 2
Steps After NRC Approval of DP
- DOE conducts remediation per approved DP
- NRC conducts in-process monitoring inspections
- DOE submits Final Status Survey Report (FSSR) to show Derived Concentration Guideline Levels met
- NRC reviews FSSR and conducts confirmatory survey, if needed
- NRC reinstates NYSERDA license
- NYSERDA follows decommissioning process/license termination under the Atomic Energy Act March 23, 2004 3
Opportunities for Public Participation
- During development of the DP
- Upon NRC receipt of the DP
- During public NRC meetings regarding the DP
- Upon publication of the Draft Decommissioning Environmental Impact Statement
- During NYSERDA's decommissioning process 4
March 23, 2004
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Qverview - PI.6.'bP-)', g:,;
Pin tQ- Dcomnmissioning Plant
- --. Coordination with Decormmissioning EIS..-;.
, .Regulatr-Fraew~rafor.VWVDP.
o Decomnmissioning. .
.WVDP
- Act%zi-g -; . ;
';. .- DE/NRC
-^: MOU XiCmpie,,entatio'n Plan 2'
- ppidbiiity ofNUREG-1757 -guidance s C 446~~1:6~~'eelpigthe ,WVDPDP ;~t 1 I
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework
-NRG Rqquest.forDOE DP-I!- 4.":.
o NRC letr rom-LrrCampertoAiceWilliam;s .date
-' F.ebrua'iy:3,'20Q3%->@);$ 4s ;;1i9> ,;, -;
,'; ,' .':' .iam.writing'to request that DOE submit a Decommissionig
,.;', TheDP.wi'prov'ide the basis for NRC'sdetermination of
.;hether.
M the-p'r'eferred aite'ri'dve wi mIe'i't the decormi sioning
'*.~: ' critera naccor~dance~with the WVDPA~ct~._. - +, ,
RC requ'ests that the DPIbesubmnted ata'pproximately the -,-
-,sameimeas the:Draft EIS forDecommissioningcandor l6o .
, ' ermT Stewardpshi 'attie West i Deyemonstration Project and
- 4-Wster
~~ Ne Yrk'Nqdea~rService'CUntet..5-his will allow--
,;2..paralele treview of thenor'atio icneth~e EIS~ anT,,d DePM~l I,~o, ; g X
. -7* --
!i< ' ,- :M ;- . 4Y 1 4
'.' 1F1IIEWAnl------ Decommissioning 5445 *~Process-I
,ifst*
.. 445 5
- 1 I
fo, WVDP. -.
- iF .UnderWVDPAct f5gEim u,'irYs1 2 9 _ ax -t _
'L~ . , NYSUP9)C5 11.3 >i - _*,,.r Alfl MOOI Df IA5141. 1 Lr.
I 44,W4 I NrtI4 MV "A-ILT~1+/- _11
,.. .,. *A 51( 45p 14( -
-i- in-'
2
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework st
^-/V'se arag'eme~n'A i ' ;,
t'._,;l .1/4 --
tvte
'o DOE issued theWVDP Waste' Management FEIS in
- -'The pre eredalteative' es hipping osite fdisposal all
> :..;LLW. nd TRU wasteI'storage as well as waste that will b T:
, -gene6ate durin n6qg pdi!ity deat iation`., -.
A f thee ageentactivities areoute the-scbpeofP.. the 'eommissionibgBElS-'and are assumedd to.-
3
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework
-!,`Facility Deactivation 4Y. 4 o Th-eProess>fluilnitnadithVitrificaion Faie6.ityar
-' cuue ntl' bWdeati'ated by removing'eXCess..' t i>'-s'radioactive'piping;^n'dtequipme'nt A
-s.; ---'-- '...,- ;
,.oTh'ewast& ',genatedgfrorig Qtinfacli;ty'cels/roomsS
jS ... .,nlb U. eshipŽed b~ftiite~fodi~sp'Ioals part of the WasteHi-
>8 i ° t- e gj ayo~vte > a 9 ,',s~opof the D~eco'mm oin 1 ES~andhareasuried to- .'~
.-. .occur porio'tdecomtnissioningr
-.. ocr, 6G un ,
?lr~ocess Bufl~ding ;Dea~ctivation,
- 6. 1 1 H Py . . . S , WA 4n 4
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework P.rces.s .Building Deactivation.(cont'd)
.y', ;H
S 3-..
.-ProcessBt lidig .Deactivation .(cont'd).
a.^q;,.
o; . . -. ; -,. -.. * *-
o *A areas of Pl .r .....
6.bBiil!di ng'tO'bee.utted gProce ingtobe c h
,, -exceUf; A . <twalls, floors and 6eilings
- Chemical Process Cell ;2. C, CPrane Room',
Systems and -services L required for contamition
, .contro
. and HLW canisr s-m:
,Stofag6; Co aniejm oval I niSCEL I- XI Pi~
'A A "
5
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework r~,tI Build' bo'/Fcility', Reim~oval -:::.--.-
.:. -'.Cooperatbngilnvolved Agn iedated March 9:2004,.;
Identf istetf eix'cels budidings that will e reme in the .
l<,*-t' Contt 'copeof WokŽ: .^;,- ' ,
iifieithe~prbposed NE A-coverage4 .&I 9..-, indicates that building'footp'r-ints'will,be 6ceaned up to meet-LTR
> $-<nresriced
< releas6eDCGLs,,,E*.. ^8';'5'*
.o mTh'esefacility b'utside the scope of rbvl'ativities~are
, ,the,cbmmissioning EIS nda 5 a 's'd oto r'. '
?'
L' -9 6
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Building/Facility Removal (cont'd) 01-14 luildhig,jcirculation .nt SystEm ulding, Hittman auliding, Laun-ry f _ :-
02 u1Wuing, Testi and toragai Bu Vit Teai Facilty,.
oaintt"Akc°..$op f" -v ' I Tpi Buildig t r, ST Building, Vit Facility, Cold Chemical, HLW Tianasf XInc, r Con 1lding RHWF, Lag Storage Buildig ag Storaie AddtWin (LSA) 3, LSA 4, CPC WSA, H,-ardoJs WaAst Storage Locker8 Oi,,ld Warhouse, bat-Qi&hd PetrolieuiH anks, Coolhig Site Diagram
,= f< --
ALO To be removed during deactivation
- OM Within Scope of DP 7
CII)
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework
..-Site . hoto .. .... .
S. .,.,t ,,
S 41I Cr '
Reg ulatory. Framework for WVDP ttb-s~gcmnissljoning ^-#'.-'.'~~~~I -
,QWVDP ACt i 2- .,.<..- -;
E DOEANRCjMOU~t>7t .-
'oNRC Irplemieo'aonPlan.w -;
-A; .,. ,
,' ' ,rS X . . , , - ( ;we' *' $,A'. . S, .c 1 \
8
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework
-iDOE/N C O
- uSection ion TheD.epartment hasn
. {iresponsibility for:the public health and sfet shis prqje 7 7,-~ V. V:
9
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework
^ 11FG:~mpemetqtion :Plan-:
-.<7' i.-'t'is':imp'o6rtanit to note-that DOEtis not-a R.6 L..;
' ';;^. iiensettvhe6i
-' 'va'il -.site -D .DE s- .'} Ii"
. '.:6.-, -:eommissio ring eacti es' f6'r the V&D WVP.are~ .'-
ii'; T;onducte'-UdUner..-th'e',.M .t:,-,as 'opp'o'sed ..o the'A
- w.'in'formnatio~n pormrallytontdihned,-n'h-a.'stbandard D..<--.
->+:^ oevr,.the-DOE Calrfr.oitrilDOE :
r>@.@re'g'ultioris'nahd DOE-OrpefsA6 p6Mie~some' of thb ..t:, *
'-i,'i-,inftrmaio t4, uitrei'ed,-bY"NRC to',6eIn4aD~ At ag- T-
- , tatement:¢ :-iZ*^- z;:
>; '".-.-..nder'th'a'uth~otitysf.the'VDP.'A~cS'-the Commissos
>'.:.'.:~, precrii'n NC'sLTRas'hedecommlissioninqgcrtiafrhe.:
i;!'.f Undertih6euthornty'pthie wbP.4.,twthe C omiso§issuisd~-,-
- ';cri -,'5' iteria fo-rthe cla3ssificeation-of,rep~roce~ssinjWastes, itatnhMlklikely-',w
- ; emai ;n he tnks-tite steafter the HLW is vitrified Te."t "
- \ Commisvsion criteri'a that'shiould -b'eaapplied';toinciderptal w.-a'se. -;.
f<<iR etrirnin'tion'5a're.^L.(1?'.ailate p boce'ssed ud~ tr env'ek'ey- ....
>-'iradio'nudlide.sto the'-maxirnu.rp.~xen'htl e~i.ial.ad' .'
.. :,~.
z,,.;.: '.economically pratic~al;- and'(2j,.w~as'te.s~hou' be rraaeds ha'>
S',-'.>' ety -sarequ'irernents c'6rompa'rbefo thepe'rfo~rma'n'c6'e',obj'ectives of ';
,,64 R-
'S ',^.@" ',p 6rt ar e' Iia.t sii e'-
C ar;?t i6<T,`;p 1
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework
.-AppIicab1e Sexctionspof Standard DP-- -
.- o The fundarmental purpose of the W\/DP DP is to "provide the basis6for.NRC's.'determirination 6ofwhethe'the
'>' preferredatternativewi!I meet thedecotmmissioning .
6<5 criteria irn'accordaic&With theWDPAct.'; -
'-o.The'reforei 0, nm'Ph'a is'wilibeI.placed orn'.those.sectiorisof f
'--NU REG-14757'that -cotain' inf6rritil6n thatlis .r6Ieva' t t6<>^
.asses'sng wheth er.,'h6'LTR has been met " ELF .;
b < . -Aivities (End-State)
-Plarnned:Decommissioning Aadio6Ig-ic.al Statusibacir t-_, .
.- loge Modeing - -.. -
P~~' ~2iaI Saus Survey:(FSS) ,Q**
-e k 5 11
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Non.-A'pplcable Sections ofStandard DP
-o Pammaticsection.tatae under DOE, atory
~authob ityt ..
.'alt' -and'Safetj g 'ring Decommsonin
.. uogrmD
- ; Environmenia1'Mdhit6rng-andControl Program' - '..,o-5 -
' Radioactive WastMag entaProgra,'.'
, a i yPAss'rrodgram ?.a.*-" (Erxceptnis FSS) .i '
.. Project Management and Organization (Exception isFSS)- -
<1ni6'De r'd ata'-ronsaid
'6 -fotrde'rmsfwillbe W .
refereriid `ip7,hd attemptoiII bbad6 -'
I ~. .. gVrmnaece~
>.>:informationhNotlNormallyContained in a..DR..7
'.' add toress thie.aais of iride'ntal .waste' es -- -aY O ihdei6
-' vL~4 -J 1.12 12
WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework
.; ;-'- ' W. '-'*.'-
A.
i .o The starting point WVDP Dis Aforthe morethane-
,- four.years In rthe future and d'e':not include, i'-near-trfcilitydeciation/remoaand '-..'.
-wastermanagement activities ,
-The:stbandard DPs checklisthiNUREG-' 7R5
i)nee-d A61~mdified f6o-ref1&btt'tha't,;hbe>'¢¢ PDemr istratiow'
_rqojehct`isz.be-,deco U'h~e _DP, dqoiheAEA.
13
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning r ,. - ' ', , I ; ' .-. .
.. The West Valley Demonstration'Project Decommissioning Plan,,:,-.
iecommissioning
'A opprach-.and S ope;
- > ; A.e. .
- l to y -*~ -'
iA Bqefing for the US NuclearARegulatory s 'n`ss.on Fr6 6 &
- .~.4f:~March 23- 2004;
,Objectiv~e-. .* . .-..- -.,,---~
' .. To -generally.describe the .WVDP. decommissioning approach and s'cop'ethat will implement.,DOE's'..'Yl:,,'
' preferred alternativeforsthe'Decommissioning EIS The presentaon will cover.;
Radiological status
-ecommrisslonin'gPlan content r - .
. The per ormance assessmnent':.'
'.', ' These il be address separately. y . .,
- 1. .* .. .1- .- /,- *,;_'.-. ZM;.;;; *- .
1
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Key points -.
A'phased decommissioning approach tailored to the complex site o The Decommissioning Plan will provide for a phased decommissioning approach "- -.
o Phase 1 will maintain the deactivated Process Building capable to safely store and remove the HLW canisters and will decommission the:'
':remainder of the WVDP'facilities.,
o 'Phase 2 wil safelyse the HLW canisters in the deactivated process unildn
-.. until
-building*
the~ such thatha the they'cancanyma be maintained bygovFemment agenc .;
the repository isav'aliabletod ivrethe'> '-'
.o 'Phase 3 will remove and ship HLW,canisters, decontaminate and decommissiohcth Proce'Building and support areas and complete firal status surveys and final'preparations of 'WVDP project premises
' 'forsurrender to'NYSERDA'under NRC license such that LTR can be m et. ......
7 ,,
~. -,.,s..i.
.~t ¢i...... ,.-,. ......,
s ew. .. . -,.- _-.......t<r Key points
. - A iecommissioning approach that meets NRC's LTR
'o The becommissioning Plan Will decommission faciities used in 'the WVDP to achieve residual radioactivity
':criteria prescribed by NRC's Lic'ense-Temination Rule
'for retri6t6 d release . . - .,
o A performance. assessment wilibe used to predict.
' potential future radiation expos'ure from residual <-'-K>
radioaty ..
o 'DCGLs will be established for decontamination fctera o inal status surveys using MARSSiM protocols will confirm th'at decontaminati'onhas been successful to
- meet the LTR "
2
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Key points Adecommissioning approach that will reflect changes in deactivation and inthe EIS o The Decommissioning Plan will be maintained as a living document with NRC approval of canges as appropriate, such as.
- Changes related to completin ofdeacivation activities Changes related to the EIS Record of Decision The DP will be "goverinent neutral" -
Where responsibility-for adtivities underth pln is tyt resolved, the DP assunes thatresponsibity wil liewith the Conceptual schedule Re- ecing te genral sequencefotdecommissloning approach I I Deactivation Phase (not covered by DP)----
WtMStabilize k heelsduringDeactivation Phase (if practicable)
.- *--~ EiS Record of Decision Scheduledetail to be worked out Phase I (to start after EIS ROD)
Repositry available for WVDP HLW -
Phase 2- SAFSTOR
-_t _ rS4JIMM hase'3 t
3 c11uz:
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 __
o Phase I activities under the DP fall within
- WMA tProcs.ts8udifg Ptateau South
- WMA 2 LLWTF/lagoons Pl./teau WMA 3HLW tanks
- WMA 7.NDA .stabilizationf--
- WMA 11testswelts _DA .0
- WMA12and 12~
A Phase1-WMAI1
- o The deactivated process building will be: maintained.
capable to safely store and rem-ove the HL-W caniser o Remaining operational until Phase 3 V
- Plant Office Building
- Fire Pump House and Water Storage Tank
- Electrical Substation \ \
a Other systems required for ' Tank HLW canister storage/remo'al u House -%
and contamination control .OUNj >
- C ' ';
4
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 - WMA 1 Phase 1 - WMA 2
- o Lagoonstoi be
- deontamina and decommissionWd*
oi Facikies to be removed
> LLW2,Building
- Neutralizer Pit
- Interceptors
- After stabilizing the NDA as discussd in WMA 7 5
CoLr
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 - WMA 2 H Lagoons 2,3,4, and 5will be pumped dry. The lineri will be removed from Lagoons 'i and 5(2 and 3 are unlinea)., Residual radioctivity will .
be exhumed ind the soil In'th'e areas-i remediated to DCGLs, surveys pformned and
, .,,_ _S3}_1 *.' indeipendently verified, and the ca'ities fied
-ith earth;!t' , i.
Lagoon a I contains contaminated". J :
, ,debnis -.asphalt trees, stumpsta'n~d _~iC
.weeds- covered with'clay and' earth.* ._,-
'N> The~radioactive~debnisynllbe .+'t ,,j ,,
.-removed and the soil remediated to .. ~ a =i ,
, .DCGIssurveys performed and ;.^ ;; E~
';independently venified, and the cavity'.: ,
.nfilledwith earth M B ., .' -' .. Lagdbo4
- >.7,*- 7 .Z Phase 1 WMA 2 .-
_t The Interceptors and the
.'l Neutralizer Pit will be
____ removed and any contaminated soil Intheir:-.
footpnints remediated to soil. .
DCG~s,-surveys'pe6rformed_
Z iandindependentlyvenified
-' - CA-. and the cavte filled with The Inecposwereused to ~ol~kia~ste Vtefo, sapigbfor transfer to Lagoon 2 The Old Interdeptoriwas an open unlined concrete.
tank; the 2 New Interceptors'are lined with stainless steel. £. ..
,':-,The Neutralizer Pit is'a smnaller concrete tank used to colled waste from '
proessareas . - " r
- pUoc i as 6
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning o The HLW tanks will be closed inplace
- Tanks and vaults filled with reducing grout and sorbents 24 Topped with high strength
'grout intrusion barriers Capped with fill and a C
multilayer cap
- Surrounded bya HLW tank closure concept l Grade level, 101-ft elevation IMulti-ayer cap I I I, .. >,, . .1 "I. I ; I-8ft Intrusion barrier (strong grout)
_~iwe11 ws.l,,xn. If -u~~xEu 7
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning
' Phase 1- WMA 7 Stabilkiation of NDA to allow decommissioning of WMA 2 o Interceptor Trench to be InterceptorTrendh Liquid Pretreatment System grouted o3 Liquid, Perament,
. System to b; re'moved '
o Leachate Transfer' Line to '-. Lachate Lne be groute'd oND tobsrruie by
-aslu'rryv",ia1land coVer-ed', '-.
with ageomembrane cap DA.
- .N Phase -WMA 1 rN o Hydrofracture test well area - -
.to b groutede f - 4 --
ORNL nslidthese 5 wfelfiki1969 hi connectbonwlhi ipilot studyZ,95 was seusas a tracer.
- . -- >>. . > et~ls
,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J,4.-'.
',,'..,':'.-',.,9'.
/'
8
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase I - WMA 12
-. : . ;. , z , .- 4 .............
o To be'surveyed and eft in
-,-p'lac'e ","_ -* v,,.',';
,, * -,xSchool;House4f .. , t Choof-SchoolhousL O,radioactivecontaminatlon ...:r'
.-- Phase 1---all-areas....
Contaminated subs'urface and embedded piping
'Co ~ i -te.*.i "' .-- :6 u : eii'W lb 0 oCohtanminated underground piping and equipment will be.
re'moved, except ln cases where source terms were :
considered'in the perfor~rnanc assessfi ent-and found to.
'.,thbe u earup criteria Subsurface Uo piping .a rid....
'evaluated
- ecommissioning Pan wilireflect dethails *
- 4 9
a DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning At the end of Phase I LLW lagonsSIDA (not in DP scopey~=x deconned and decommissioned NDA HLWtanks NAsurrounded by closWed slurry wall, covered
-~ with geomembrane itProcess Building deactivated and ~ Romairding after deactivation capable to sately store Decommissioned inPhase I HLW canisters
/AZ Phase 2 - SAFSTOR AfterPhas 1, nd during Phase.2, the, 277 HLW canisters will reminIn heCPO until the repository becomes available
~Systemns required for saf stoage and contamlnaolon control to remain operational.
10 CO(9
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase-3
. - Final phase will include removal and shipping HLW and
.--preparing facilities for surrender to'NYSERDA
-o Removing HLW canisters and shipping them to repository.
-o Deco'ntaminating and decommissioning processbuilding o Decommissioning remaining support areas
- o Comnleting r~emaining final status 'surveys to confirm LTR J'o Fooatuhver,o6f.WVDP projct premises t6oNYSERDA;
- ~~ ,. .,,..,... ,_ .. t-k . . . . . . .. -.
.Phase 3
- Transporting the HLW canisters to the repository ou The canisters will be Moved thru the EDR into the Load-In/Load-Out Area-
- Placed in their transport containers - ' ,
- And transported to the repository, by rail or by truck
- - -j- 7 -1 N- :i.....
w Q wUEr^ , o^ , . o^ .tt _
r i5 1 11
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 3 - WMA 1 o Remaining Process Building rocs Buldn systems will be removed Q ProcessBuilding will be decontaminated,'Sbtto decommissioned and left O Also to be decommissioned Fire Pump House
, +Jandleft standing are Fire Pump.House and Water-,- \
Storage Tankh i
Phase 3 - WMA I -S.
Reun~ ontaminatedl piping Fuel Pool Process Building interior surfaces, including the fuel pools, are to bedecontaminated to DCGLs based on performance l
. assessment
_ - 111 40 p i p m "oeln#for mlantewnc worker occupancy under restrictioes and foi intruder if institutional controls w~ereto fail' 12
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Process Building Areas where significant decontamination will be necessary In the CPC:
19i94` flordse rates averaged 2
.83R~/hlbefore final decon and
-,sumps were reading 4.6 R/h and
- 155R/h 4~ ~
- Contamination was painted over*,
L' before canister racks were instalelnped...
- There has been no personnel access' ;
9 - he Tin't CC s.ince te plant g6 -- -
er he last deotaninatira effortsradiation ,-, 74 f e s neaohe a ' tYia were iy in heK&3=5OmR hirane,'~with';1 ~5R/h. in"the um"'
-:.,Process Building--,
-*,>L.;
.Load ln/Load Out Area to be removed
- 13
,:'fj~~~ 'S i;;
Plant
- Equalization Basin-:
- Equalization Tank -
RalSur aX~~~ -' g XN' ~ ~-~ ..- -- -' ~ ' , Phase 3-WMA IO I a: To be surveyed and left, in -place dAdmin Bldg .dm*inisti Buildin Gate House Gate House o To be removed
- the Meteorological Tower WMA 14 C-n%
DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 3 - WMA 12 o To be left in place .-- .; ." 'LieFire Range' ,.' -'Dams and reservoirs ' .: K. e .- ' -r~ \ No rdocvecon'tamfi-nabtion-~ 'In thee facilities Iis eect .v :, .a *%.!, ',..s -T ia- .Final status surveys . .. Wll be o__=lined in the Decommissioning Plan
- o Surveys will follow MARSSIM protocols
.. I ,:. : -; ; -d ;oA phased approah; is planned - Final characterization surveys performed at the end of. -'--,,'.'. - deactivation will be considered forendorsemient' er ra ar o rn ' Where areasarconpeteil'dec'ontaminated and can be .,'t effectively isolated, surveysywill be done area b'y area "- -..* .lConfiratioin surveys byan iridependent DOE subcontractor wili be include oSurveys will ensure DCGLshave beenachieved aand q .-.that residual raaiodtivityineetsV.LTR requirementS for', ' liense' termination cunder restriction in DOE ia'reas- !Xs- j.,2.s' ,,'a > a',' */~~**. * -g -'.*z,b<-, Vr 15 DOEs Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning At the end of Phase 3 LLWTFlgoons dnand$ 4 deommmone lHL~nb1X 1S;A e INDAsflmde W by l 0 ~DOCOMamissond In~Ilgse I
- 'OW", -m Io nPhase 3 In summary The major poits that have been addressed o The DPRwill describe how DOE's prerr altemative for the Dicommissioning EIS will be implemntetd o The PF will prvide,for a phased decommisioing approach oheDP will ~enable~q mintenalc of high level waste canisters during SAFSTOR by an appropriate government agency o The DP will assure NRC's LTR for restricted release is met O The.DP will enable eventual surrender of the project premises to NYSERDA for maintenance under NRC license with LTR met o The DP will be maintained as a lving documn with appropriate NRCpproval changes and will tan a from deactivaton andtheaEIS.
1 6 C00(