ML040930488

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
West Valley Presentation - Slides
ML040930488
Person / Time
Site: West Valley Demonstration Project, P00M-032
Issue date: 03/23/2004
From: Glenn C
NRC/NMSS/DWM
To:
Shared Package
ML040960593 List:
References
+KBR1SISP20050613
Download: ML040930488 (34)
v • d • e


Text

I AFAR REG&L 0

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Decommissioning Process for the U.S. Department of Energy under the West Valley Demonstration Project Act Chad Glenn NRC West Valley Project Manager 301-415-6722 CJG1 @nrc.gov March 23, 2004

NRC Decomnmissioning Process for DOE under WVDP Act

  • NRC prescribes decommissioning criteria
  • DOE submits decommissioning plan (DP)

- if information not sufficient, inform DOE

- if information sufficient, publish Federal Register Notice (FRN) to:

(1) acknowledge receipt of DP for review (2) request public comment on DP March 23, 2004 1

Decommissioning Plan Review

  • NRC performs detailed review of DP

- approve as submitted, or

- identify requests for additional information (RAIs), consider DOE responses, and determine if RAIs resolved

  • NRC completes safety and environmental review March 23, 2004 2

Steps After NRC Approval of DP

  • DOE conducts remediation per approved DP
  • NRC conducts in-process monitoring inspections
  • DOE submits Final Status Survey Report (FSSR) to show Derived Concentration Guideline Levels met
  • NRC reviews FSSR and conducts confirmatory survey, if needed
  • NYSERDA follows decommissioning process/license termination under the Atomic Energy Act March 23, 2004 3

Opportunities for Public Participation

  • During development of the DP
  • Upon NRC receipt of the DP
  • During public NRC meetings regarding the DP
  • Upon publication of the Draft Decommissioning Environmental Impact Statement
  • During NYSERDA's decommissioning process 4

March 23, 2004

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Qverview - PI.6.'bP-)', g:,;

Pin tQ- Dcomnmissioning Plant

- --. Coordination with Decormmissioning EIS..-;.

, .Regulatr-Fraew~rafor.VWVDP.

o Decomnmissioning. .

.WVDP

- Act%zi-g -; .  ;

';. .- DE/NRC

-^: MOU XiCmpie,,entatio'n Plan 2'

- ppidbiiity ofNUREG-1757 -guidance s C 446~~1:6~~'eelpigthe ,WVDPDP  ;~t 1 I

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

-NRG Rqquest.forDOE DP-I!- 4.":.

o NRC letr rom-LrrCampertoAiceWilliam;s .date

-' F.ebrua'iy:3,'20Q3%->@);$ 4s  ;;1i9> ,;, -;

,'; ,' .':' .iam.writing'to request that DOE submit a Decommissionig

,.;', TheDP.wi'prov'ide the basis for NRC'sdetermination of

.;hether.

M the-p'r'eferred aite'ri'dve wi mIe'i't the decormi sioning

'*.~: ' critera naccor~dance~with the WVDPA~ct~._. - +, ,

RC requ'ests that the DPIbesubmnted ata'pproximately the -,-

-,sameimeas the:Draft EIS forDecommissioningcandor l6o .

, ' ermT Stewardpshi 'attie West i Deyemonstration Project and

  • 4-Wster

~~ Ne Yrk'Nqdea~rService'CUntet..5-his will allow--

,;2..paralele treview of thenor'atio icneth~e EIS~ anT,,d DePM~l I,~o, ; g X

. -7* --

!i< ' ,- :M  ;- . 4Y 1 4

'.' 1F1IIEWAnl------ Decommissioning 5445 *~Process-I

,ifst*

.. 445 5

  • 1 I

fo, WVDP. -.

iF .UnderWVDPAct f5gEim u,'irYs1 2 9 _ ax -t _

'L~ . , NYSUP9)C5 11.3 >i - _*,,.r Alfl MOOI Df IA5141. 1 Lr.

I 44,W4 I NrtI4 MV "A-ILT~1+/- _11

,.. .,. *A 51( 45p 14( -

-i- in-'

2

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework st

^-/V'se arag'eme~n'A i ' ;,

t'._,;l .1/4 --

tvte

'o DOE issued theWVDP Waste' Management FEIS in

- -'The pre eredalteative' es hipping osite fdisposal all

> :..;LLW. nd TRU wasteI'storage as well as waste that will b T:

, -gene6ate durin n6qg pdi!ity deat iation`., -.

A f thee ageentactivities areoute the-scbpeofP.. the 'eommissionibgBElS-'and are assumedd to.-

3

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

-!,`Facility Deactivation 4Y. 4 o Th-eProess>fluilnitnadithVitrificaion Faie6.ityar

-' cuue ntl' bWdeati'ated by removing'eXCess..' t i>'-s'radioactive'piping;^n'dtequipme'nt A

-s.; ---'-- '...,-  ;

,.oTh'ewast& ',genatedgfrorig Qtinfacli;ty'cels/roomsS

jS ... .,nlb U. eshipŽed b~ftiite~fodi~sp'Ioals part of the WasteHi-

>8 i ° t- e gj ayo~vte > a 9 ,',s~opof the D~eco'mm oin 1 ES~andhareasuried to- .'~

.-. .occur porio'tdecomtnissioningr

-.. ocr, 6G un ,

?lr~ocess Bufl~ding ;Dea~ctivation,

6. 1 1 H Py . . . S , WA 4n 4

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework P.rces.s .Building Deactivation.(cont'd)

.y', ;H

S 3-..

.-ProcessBt lidig .Deactivation .(cont'd).

a.^q;,.

o; . . -. ; -,. -.. * *-

o *A areas of Pl .r .....

6.bBiil!di ng'tO'bee.utted gProce ingtobe c h

,, -exceUf; A . <twalls, floors and 6eilings

- Chemical Process Cell ;2. C, CPrane Room',

Systems and -services L required for contamition

, .contro

. and HLW canisr s-m:

,Stofag6; Co aniejm oval I niSCEL I- XI Pi~

'A A "

5

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework r~,tI Build' bo'/Fcility', Reim~oval -:::.--.-

.:. -'.Cooperatbngilnvolved Agn iedated March 9:2004,.;

Identf istetf eix'cels budidings that will e reme in the .

l<,*-t' Contt 'copeof WokŽ: .^;,- ' ,

iifieithe~prbposed NE A-coverage4 .&I 9..-, indicates that building'footp'r-ints'will,be 6ceaned up to meet-LTR

> $-<nresriced

< releas6eDCGLs,,,E*.. ^8';'5'*

.o mTh'esefacility b'utside the scope of rbvl'ativities~are

, ,the,cbmmissioning EIS nda 5 a 's'd oto r'. '

?'

L' -9 6

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Building/Facility Removal (cont'd) 01-14 luildhig,jcirculation .nt SystEm ulding, Hittman auliding, Laun-ry f _  :-

02 u1Wuing, Testi and toragai Bu Vit Teai Facilty,.

oaintt"Akc°..$op f" -v ' I Tpi Buildig t r, ST Building, Vit Facility, Cold Chemical, HLW Tianasf XInc, r Con 1lding RHWF, Lag Storage Buildig ag Storaie AddtWin (LSA) 3, LSA 4, CPC WSA, H,-ardoJs WaAst Storage Locker8 Oi,,ld Warhouse, bat-Qi&hd PetrolieuiH anks, Coolhig Site Diagram

,= f< --

ALO To be removed during deactivation

  • OM Within Scope of DP 7

CII)

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

..-Site . hoto .. .... .

S. .,.,t ,,

S 41I Cr '

Reg ulatory. Framework for WVDP ttb-s~gcmnissljoning ^-#'.-'.'~~~~I -

,QWVDP ACt i 2- .,.<..- -;

E DOEANRCjMOU~t>7t .-

'oNRC Irplemieo'aonPlan.w -;

-A; .,. ,

,' ' ,rS X . . , , - ( ;we' *' $,A'. . S, .c 1 \

8

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

-iDOE/N C O

uSection ion TheD.epartment hasn

. {iresponsibility for:the public health and sfet shis prqje 7 7,-~ V. V:

9

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

^ 11FG:~mpemetqtion :Plan-:

-.<7' i.-'t'is':imp'o6rtanit to note-that DOEtis not-a R.6 L..;

' ';;^. iiensettvhe6i

-' 'va'il -.site -D .DE s- .'} Ii"

. '.:6.-, -:eommissio ring eacti es' f6'r the V&D WVP.are~ .'-

ii'; T;onducte'-UdUner..-th'e',.M .t:,-,as 'opp'o'sed ..o the'A

w.'in'formnatio~n pormrallytontdihned,-n'h-a.'stbandard D..<--.

->+:^ oevr,.the-DOE Calrfr.oitrilDOE  :

r>@.@re'g'ultioris'nahd DOE-OrpefsA6 p6Mie~some' of thb ..t:, *

'-i,'i-,inftrmaio t4, uitrei'ed,-bY"NRC to',6eIn4aD~ At ag- T-

- , tatement:¢ :-iZ*^- z;:

>; '".-.-..nder'th'a'uth~otitysf.the'VDP.'A~cS'-the Commissos

>'.:.'.:~, precrii'n NC'sLTRas'hedecommlissioninqgcrtiafrhe.:

i;!'.f Undertih6euthornty'pthie wbP.4.,twthe C omiso§issuisd~-,-

';cri -,'5' iteria fo-rthe cla3ssificeation-of,rep~roce~ssinjWastes, itatnhMlklikely-',w

- ; emai ;n he tnks-tite steafter the HLW is vitrified Te."t "

\ Commisvsion criteri'a that'shiould -b'eaapplied';toinciderptal w.-a'se. -;.

f<<iR etrirnin'tion'5a're.^L.(1?'.ailate p boce'ssed ud~ tr env'ek'ey- ....

>-'iradio'nudlide.sto the'-maxirnu.rp.~xen'htl e~i.ial.ad' .'

.. :,~.

z,,.;.: '.economically pratic~al;- and'(2j,.w~as'te.s~hou' be rraaeds ha'>

S',-'.>' ety -sarequ'irernents c'6rompa'rbefo thepe'rfo~rma'n'c6'e',obj'ectives of ';

,,64 R-

'S ',^.@" ',p 6rt ar e' Iia.t sii e'-

C ar;?t i6<T,`;p 1

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

.-AppIicab1e Sexctionspof Standard DP-- -

.- o The fundarmental purpose of the W\/DP DP is to "provide the basis6for.NRC's.'determirination 6ofwhethe'the

'>' preferredatternativewi!I meet thedecotmmissioning .

6<5 criteria irn'accordaic&With theWDPAct.'; -

'-o.The'reforei 0, nm'Ph'a is'wilibeI.placed orn'.those.sectiorisof f

'--NU REG-14757'that -cotain' inf6rritil6n thatlis .r6Ieva' t t6<>^

.asses'sng wheth er.,'h6'LTR has been met " ELF .;

b < . -Aivities (End-State)

-Plarnned:Decommissioning Aadio6Ig-ic.al Statusibacir t-_, .

.- loge Modeing - -.. -

P~~' ~2iaI Saus Survey:(FSS) ,Q**

-e k 5 11

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Non.-A'pplcable Sections ofStandard DP

-o Pammaticsection.tatae under DOE, atory

~authob ityt ..

.'alt' -and'Safetj g 'ring Decommsonin

.. uogrmD

- ; Environmenia1'Mdhit6rng-andControl Program' - '..,o-5 -

' Radioactive WastMag entaProgra,'.'

, a i yPAss'rrodgram ?.a.*-" (Erxceptnis FSS) .i '

.. Project Management and Organization (Exception isFSS)- -

<1ni6'De r'd ata'-ronsaid

'6 -fotrde'rmsfwillbe W .

refereriid `ip7,hd attemptoiII bbad6 -'

I ~. .. gVrmnaece~

>.>:informationhNotlNormallyContained in a..DR..7

'.' add toress thie.aais of iride'ntal .waste' es -- -aY O ihdei6

-' vL~4 -J 1.12 12

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

.;  ;-'- ' W. '-'*.'-

A.

i .o The starting point WVDP Dis Aforthe morethane-

,- four.years In rthe future and d'e':not include, i'-near-trfcilitydeciation/remoaand '-..'.

-wastermanagement activities ,

-The:stbandard DPs checklisthiNUREG-' 7R5

i)nee-d A61~mdified f6o-ref1&btt'tha't,;hbe>'¢¢ PDemr istratiow'

_rqojehct`isz.be-,deco U'h~e _DP, dqoiheAEA.

13

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning r ,. - ' ', , I ; ' .-. .

.. The West Valley Demonstration'Project Decommissioning Plan,,:,-.

iecommissioning

'A opprach-.and S ope;

- >  ; A.e. .

  • l to y -*~ -'

iA Bqefing for the US NuclearARegulatory s 'n`ss.on Fr6 6 &

  • .~.4f:~March 23- 2004;

,Objectiv~e-. .* . .-..- -.,,---~

' .. To -generally.describe the .WVDP. decommissioning approach and s'cop'ethat will implement.,DOE's'..'Yl:,,'

' preferred alternativeforsthe'Decommissioning EIS The presentaon will cover.;

Radiological status

-ecommrisslonin'gPlan content r - .

. The per ormance assessmnent':.'

'.', ' These il be address separately. y . .,

1. .* .. .1- .- /,- *,;_'.-. ZM;.;;; *- .

1

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Key points -.

A'phased decommissioning approach tailored to the complex site o The Decommissioning Plan will provide for a phased decommissioning approach "- -.

o Phase 1 will maintain the deactivated Process Building capable to safely store and remove the HLW canisters and will decommission the:'

':remainder of the WVDP'facilities.,

o 'Phase 2 wil safelyse the HLW canisters in the deactivated process unildn

-.. until

-building*

the~ such thatha the they'cancanyma be maintained bygovFemment agenc .;

the repository isav'aliabletod ivrethe'> '-'

.o 'Phase 3 will remove and ship HLW,canisters, decontaminate and decommissiohcth Proce'Building and support areas and complete firal status surveys and final'preparations of 'WVDP project premises

' 'forsurrender to'NYSERDA'under NRC license such that LTR can be m et. ......

7 ,,

~. -,.,s..i.

.~t ¢i...... ,.-,. ......,

s ew. .. . -,.- _-.......t<r Key points

. - A iecommissioning approach that meets NRC's LTR

'o The becommissioning Plan Will decommission faciities used in 'the WVDP to achieve residual radioactivity

':criteria prescribed by NRC's Lic'ense-Temination Rule

'for retri6t6 d release . . - .,

o A performance. assessment wilibe used to predict.

' potential future radiation expos'ure from residual <-'-K>

radioaty ..

o 'DCGLs will be established for decontamination fctera o inal status surveys using MARSSiM protocols will confirm th'at decontaminati'onhas been successful to

meet the LTR "

2

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Key points Adecommissioning approach that will reflect changes in deactivation and inthe EIS o The Decommissioning Plan will be maintained as a living document with NRC approval of canges as appropriate, such as.

- Changes related to completin ofdeacivation activities Changes related to the EIS Record of Decision The DP will be "goverinent neutral" -

Where responsibility-for adtivities underth pln is tyt resolved, the DP assunes thatresponsibity wil liewith the Conceptual schedule Re- ecing te genral sequencefotdecommissloning approach I I Deactivation Phase (not covered by DP)----

WtMStabilize k heelsduringDeactivation Phase (if practicable)

.- *--~ EiS Record of Decision Scheduledetail to be worked out Phase I (to start after EIS ROD)

Repositry available for WVDP HLW -

Phase 2- SAFSTOR

-_t _ rS4JIMM hase'3 t

3 c11uz:

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 __

o Phase I activities under the DP fall within

  • WMA tProcs.ts8udifg Ptateau South
  • WMA 2 LLWTF/lagoons Pl./teau WMA 3HLW tanks
  • WMA 7.NDA .stabilizationf--
  • WMA 11testswelts _DA .0
  • WMA12and 12~

A Phase1-WMAI1

o The deactivated process building will be: maintained.

capable to safely store and rem-ove the HL-W caniser o Remaining operational until Phase 3 V

  • Plant Office Building
  • Fire Pump House and Water Storage Tank
  • Electrical Substation \ \

a Other systems required for ' Tank HLW canister storage/remo'al u House -%

and contamination control .OUNj >

C ' ';

4

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 - WMA 1 Phase 1 - WMA 2

o Lagoonstoi be
deontamina and decommissionWd*

oi Facikies to be removed

> LLW2,Building

  • Neutralizer Pit
  • Interceptors
  • After stabilizing the NDA as discussd in WMA 7 5

CoLr

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 - WMA 2 H Lagoons 2,3,4, and 5will be pumped dry. The lineri will be removed from Lagoons 'i and 5(2 and 3 are unlinea)., Residual radioctivity will .

be exhumed ind the soil In'th'e areas-i remediated to DCGLs, surveys pformned and

, .,,_ _S3}_1 *.' indeipendently verified, and the ca'ities fied

-ith earth;!t' , i.

Lagoon a I contains contaminated". J  :

, ,debnis -.asphalt trees, stumpsta'n~d _~iC

.weeds- covered with'clay and' earth.* ._,-

'N> The~radioactive~debnisynllbe .+'t ,,j ,,

.-removed and the soil remediated to .. ~ a =i ,

, .DCGIssurveys performed and ;.^ ;; E~

';independently venified, and the cavity'.: ,

.nfilledwith earth M B ., .' -' .. Lagdbo4

- >.7,*- 7 .Z Phase 1 WMA 2 .-

_t The Interceptors and the

.'l Neutralizer Pit will be

____ removed and any contaminated soil Intheir:-.

footpnints remediated to soil. .

DCG~s,-surveys'pe6rformed_

Z iandindependentlyvenified

-' - CA-. and the cavte filled with The Inecposwereused to ~ol~kia~ste Vtefo, sapigbfor transfer to Lagoon 2 The Old Interdeptoriwas an open unlined concrete.

tank; the 2 New Interceptors'are lined with stainless steel. £. ..

,':-,The Neutralizer Pit is'a smnaller concrete tank used to colled waste from '

proessareas . - " r

  • pUoc i as 6

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning o The HLW tanks will be closed inplace

  • Tanks and vaults filled with reducing grout and sorbents 24 Topped with high strength

'grout intrusion barriers Capped with fill and a C

multilayer cap

  • Surrounded bya HLW tank closure concept l Grade level, 101-ft elevation IMulti-ayer cap I I I, .. >,, . .1 "I. I  ; I-8ft Intrusion barrier (strong grout)

_~iwe11 ws.l,,xn. If -u~~xEu 7

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning

' Phase 1- WMA 7 Stabilkiation of NDA to allow decommissioning of WMA 2 o Interceptor Trench to be InterceptorTrendh Liquid Pretreatment System grouted o3 Liquid, Perament,

. System to b; re'moved '

o Leachate Transfer' Line to '-. Lachate Lne be groute'd oND tobsrruie by

-aslu'rryv",ia1land coVer-ed', '-.

with ageomembrane cap DA.

.N Phase -WMA 1 rN o Hydrofracture test well area - -

.to b groutede f - 4 --

ORNL nslidthese 5 wfelfiki1969 hi connectbonwlhi ipilot studyZ,95 was seusas a tracer.

. -- >>. . > et~ls

,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J,4.-'.

',,'..,':'.-',.,9'.

/'

8

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase I - WMA 12

-. : .  ;. , z , .- 4 .............

o To be'surveyed and eft in

-,-p'lac'e ","_ -* v,,.',';

,, * -,xSchool;House4f .. , t Choof-SchoolhousL O,radioactivecontaminatlon ...:r'

.-- Phase 1---all-areas....

Contaminated subs'urface and embedded piping

'Co ~ i -te.*.i "' .-- :6 u  : eii'W lb 0 oCohtanminated underground piping and equipment will be.

re'moved, except ln cases where source terms were  :

considered'in the perfor~rnanc assessfi ent-and found to.

'.,thbe u earup criteria Subsurface Uo piping .a rid....

'evaluated

  • ecommissioning Pan wilireflect dethails *
4 9

a DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning At the end of Phase I LLW lagonsSIDA (not in DP scopey~=x deconned and decommissioned NDA HLWtanks NAsurrounded by closWed slurry wall, covered

-~ with geomembrane itProcess Building deactivated and ~ Romairding after deactivation capable to sately store Decommissioned inPhase I HLW canisters

/AZ Phase 2 - SAFSTOR AfterPhas 1, nd during Phase.2, the, 277 HLW canisters will reminIn heCPO until the repository becomes available

~Systemns required for saf stoage and contamlnaolon control to remain operational.

10 CO(9

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase-3

. - Final phase will include removal and shipping HLW and

.--preparing facilities for surrender to'NYSERDA

-o Removing HLW canisters and shipping them to repository.

-o Deco'ntaminating and decommissioning processbuilding o Decommissioning remaining support areas

o Comnleting r~emaining final status 'surveys to confirm LTR J'o Fooatuhver,o6f.WVDP projct premises t6oNYSERDA;
  • ~~ ,. .,,..,... ,_ .. t-k . . . . . . .. -.

.Phase 3

Transporting the HLW canisters to the repository ou The canisters will be Moved thru the EDR into the Load-In/Load-Out Area-
  • Placed in their transport containers - ' ,
  • And transported to the repository, by rail or by truck
  • - -j- 7 -1 N- :i.....

w Q wUEr^ , o^ , . o^ .tt _

r i5 1 11

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 3 - WMA 1 o Remaining Process Building rocs Buldn systems will be removed Q ProcessBuilding will be decontaminated,'Sbtto decommissioned and left O Also to be decommissioned Fire Pump House

, +Jandleft standing are Fire Pump.House and Water-,- \

Storage Tankh i

Phase 3 - WMA I -S.

Reun~ ontaminatedl piping Fuel Pool Process Building interior surfaces, including the fuel pools, are to bedecontaminated to DCGLs based on performance l

. assessment

_ - 111 40 p i p m "oeln#for mlantewnc worker occupancy under restrictioes and foi intruder if institutional controls w~ereto fail' 12

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Process Building Areas where significant decontamination will be necessary In the CPC:

19i94` flordse rates averaged 2

.83R~/hlbefore final decon and

-,sumps were reading 4.6 R/h and

- 155R/h 4~ ~

  • Contamination was painted over*,

L' before canister racks were instalelnped...

  • There has been no personnel access'  ;

9 - he Tin't CC s.ince te plant g6 -- -

er he last deotaninatira effortsradiation ,-, 74 f e s neaohe a ' tYia were iy in heK&3=5OmR hirane,'~with';1 ~5R/h. in"the um"'

-:.,Process Building--,

-*,>L.;

.Load ln/Load Out Area to be removed

13

,:'fj~~~ 'S i;;

Plant

  • Equalization Basin-:
  • Equalization Tank -

RalSur aX~~~ -' g XN' ~ ~-~ ..- -- -' ~ ' , Phase 3-WMA IO I a: To be surveyed and left, in -place dAdmin Bldg .dm*inisti Buildin Gate House Gate House o To be removed

  • the Meteorological Tower WMA 14 C-n%

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 3 - WMA 12 o To be left in place .-- .; ." 'LieFire Range' ,.' -'Dams and reservoirs ' .: K. e .- ' -r~ \ No rdocvecon'tamfi-nabtion-~ 'In thee facilities Iis eect .v  :, .a *%.!, ',..s -T ia- .Final status surveys . .. Wll be o__=lined in the Decommissioning Plan

o Surveys will follow MARSSIM protocols

.. I ,:.  : -;  ; -d ;oA phased approah; is planned - Final characterization surveys performed at the end of. -'--,,'.'. - deactivation will be considered forendorsemient' er ra ar o rn ' Where areasarconpeteil'dec'ontaminated and can be .,'t effectively isolated, surveysywill be done area b'y area "- -..* .lConfiratioin surveys byan iridependent DOE subcontractor wili be include oSurveys will ensure DCGLshave beenachieved aand q .-.that residual raaiodtivityineetsV.LTR requirementS for', ' liense' termination cunder restriction in DOE ia'reas- !Xs- j.,2.s' ,,'a > a',' */~~**. * -g -'.*z,b<-, Vr 15 DOEs Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning At the end of Phase 3 LLWTFlgoons dnand$ 4 deommmone lHL~nb1X 1S;A e INDAsflmde W by l 0 ~DOCOMamissond In~Ilgse I

'OW", -m Io nPhase 3 In summary The major poits that have been addressed o The DPRwill describe how DOE's prerr altemative for the Dicommissioning EIS will be implemntetd o The PF will prvide,for a phased decommisioing approach oheDP will ~enable~q mintenalc of high level waste canisters during SAFSTOR by an appropriate government agency o The DP will assure NRC's LTR for restricted release is met O The.DP will enable eventual surrender of the project premises to NYSERDA for maintenance under NRC license with LTR met o The DP will be maintained as a lving documn with appropriate NRCpproval changes and will tan a from deactivaton andtheaEIS.

1 6 C00(

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML040930488&oldid=2624036"