ML040930488

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
West Valley Presentation - Slides
ML040930488
Person / Time
Site: West Valley Demonstration Project, P00M-032
Issue date: 03/23/2004
From: Glenn C
NRC/NMSS/DWM
To:
Shared Package
ML040960593 List:
References
+KBR1SISP20050613
Download: ML040930488 (34)
v • d • e


Text

I AFAR REG&L 0

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Decommissioning Process for the U.S. Department of Energy under the West Valley Demonstration Project Act Chad Glenn NRC West Valley Project Manager 301-415-6722 CJG1 @nrc.gov March 23, 2004

NRC Decomnmissioning Process for DOE under WVDP Act

  • NRC prescribes decommissioning criteria
  • DOE submits decommissioning plan (DP)
  • NRC performs acceptance review if information not sufficient, inform DOE if information sufficient, publish Federal Register Notice (FRN) to:

(1) acknowledge receipt of DP for review (2) request public comment on DP March 23, 2004 1

Decommissioning Plan Review

  • NRC performs detailed review of DP approve as submitted, or identify requests for additional information (RAIs), consider DOE responses, and determine if RAIs resolved
  • NRC completes safety and environmental review March 23, 2004 2

Steps After NRC Approval of DP

  • DOE conducts remediation per approved DP
  • NRC conducts in-process monitoring inspections
  • DOE submits Final Status Survey Report (FSSR) to show Derived Concentration Guideline Levels met
  • NRC reviews FSSR and conducts confirmatory survey, if needed
  • NYSERDA follows decommissioning process/license termination under the Atomic Energy Act March 23, 2004 3

Opportunities for Public Participation

  • During development of the DP
  • Upon NRC receipt of the DP
  • During public NRC meetings regarding the DP
  • Upon publication of the Draft Decommissioning Environmental Impact Statement
  • During NYSERDA's decommissioning process March 23, 2004 4

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Qverview PI.6.'bP-)',

g:,;

Pin tQ-Dcomnmissioning Plant

--. Coordination with Decormmissioning EIS..-;.

, o

.Regulatr-Fraew~rafor.VWVDP. Decomnmissioning.

.WVDP Act% zi-g

-^:

DE/NRC MOU XiCmpie,,entatio'n Plan 2'

- ppidbiiity ofNUREG-1757 -guidance s C

446~~1:6~~'eelpigthe,WVDPDP

~t 1 I

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

-NRG Rqquest.forDOE DP-I!-

4.":.

o NRC letr rom-LrrCampertoAiceWilliam;s.date F.ebrua'iy:3,'20Q3%->@);$

4s

1i9>

,';,'.':'.iam.writing'to request that DOE submit a Decommissionig

,.;', TheDP.wi'prov'ide the basis for NRC'sdetermination of M

.;hether. the-p'r'eferred aite'ri'dve wi mIe'i't the decormi sioning

' *.~: '

critera naccor~dance~with the WVDPA~ct~._. -+,,

RC requ'ests that the DPIbesubmnted ata'pproximately the -,-

-,sameimeas the:Draft EIS forDecommissioningcandor l6o

, ' T erm Stewardpshi 'attie West i Deyemonstration Project and

  • ~ ~

4-Wster Ne Yrk'Nqdea~rService'CUntet..5-his will allow --

-7*

,;2..paralele treview of the nor'atio icneth~e EIS~ anT,,d DePM~l I,~o, ; g X

!i<

M

. 4Y 4

1 1F1IIEWAnl ------

Decommissioning 5445

  • ~Process-I

..,ifst* I 445 5

iF

.UnderWVDPAct f5gEim u,'irYs1 2

9 ax

-t

'L~

NYSUP9)C5

11.

3 >i

_*,,.r Alfl MOO I Df IA5141. 1 I

44,W4 I

NrtI4 MV ILT~1+/-

_ 11 51( 45p 14(

Lr.

"A-

*A

-i-in-'



2

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

^-/V'se arag'eme~n'A tvte st

.1/4 i t'._,;l

'o DOE issued theWVDP Waste' Management FEIS in

- -'The pre eredalteative' es hipping osite fdisposal all

> :..;LLW. nd TRU wasteI'storage as well as waste that will b T:

, -gene6ate durin n6qg pdi!ity deat iation`., -.

A f thee ageentactivities areoute the-P..

scbpeof the 'eommissionibgBElS-'and are assumedd to.-

3

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

-!,`Facility Deactivation 4Y.

4 A

o Th-eProess>fluilnitnad ithVitrificaion Faie6.ityar cuue ntl' bWdeati'ated by removing'eXCess..' t i>'-s'radioactive'piping;^n'dtequipme'nt

-s.;

,. oTh'ewast& ',genatedgfrorig Qtinfacli;ty'cels/roomsS

jS...

U.

.,nlb eshipŽed b~ftiite~fodi~sp'Ioals part of the WasteHi-

>8 i

° t

e gj ayo~vte a

9,',s~opof the D~eco'mm oin 1ES~andhareasuried to-

.'~

.occur porio'tdecomtnissioning r

ocr, 6G un

?lr~ocess Bufl~ding ;Dea~ctivation,

6.

1 1

H Py S

WA 4n 4

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework P.rces.s.Building Deactivation.(cont'd)

.y', ;H 3-..

S

.-ProcessBt lid ig.Deactivation.(cont'd).

a.^q;,.

o; o *A areas of Pl

.r 6.bBiil!di ng'tO'bee.utted gProce ingtobe c h

,, -e xceUf; A

< twalls, floors and 6eilings Chemical Process Cell

2.

C, CP rane Room',

Systems and -services L required for contamition Co I

niSCEL

.contro and HLW canisr s-m:

,Stofag6; aniejm oval XI I-Pi~

'A A

5

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework r~,tI Build' bo'/Fcility', Reim~oval -:::.--.- ---

-'.Cooperatbngilnvolved Agn iedated March 9:2004,.;

Identf istetf ei x'cels budidings that will e reme in the l<,*- t' Contt 'copeof WokŽ:

.^;,-

i -

ifieithe~prbposed NE A-coverage4.&I 9..-, indicates that building'footp'r-ints'will,be 6ceaned up to meet-LTR

$-<nresriced releas6eDCGLs,,,E*..

^8';'5'*

.o mTh'esefacility rbvl'ativities~are b'utside the scope of

,,the, cbmmissioning EIS nda 5 a

's'd oto r'.

L'

-9

?'

6

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Building/Facility Removal (cont'd) 01-14 luildhig, jcirculation.nt SystEm ulding, Hittman auliding, Laun-ry f 02 u1 Wuing, Testi and toragai Bu Vit Teai Facilty,.

oaintt"Akc°.. $op f "

v I

Tpi Buildig t

r, ST Building, Vit Facility, Cold Chemical, HLW Tianasf r XInc, Con 1lding RHWF, Lag Storage Buildig ag Storaie AddtWin (LSA) 3, LSA 4, CPC WSA, H,-ardoJs WaAst Storage Locker8 Oi,,ld Warhouse, bat-Qi&hd PetrolieuiH anks, Coolhig Site Diagram ALO

,=

f<

To be removed during deactivation

  • OM Within Scope of DP 7

CII)

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

..-Site. hoto.......

S.

.,.,t Cr S

41I Reg ulatory. Framework for WVDP ttb-s~gcmnissljoning

^-#'.-'.'~~~~I -

,QWVDP ACt i

2-

--E DOEANRCjMOU~t>7t.-

'oNRC Irplemieo'aonPlan.w

-A;

,rS

( we X

$,A'.

.c 1

S,

\\

8

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

-iDOE/N C O

uSection ion TheD.epartment hasn

.{iresponsibility for:the public health and sfet shis prqje 7 7,-~

V. V:

9

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

^ 11 FG:~mpemetqtion :Plan-:

-. 7' i.-'t'is':imp'o6rtanit to note-that DOEtis not-a R.6 L..;

' ';;^. -'

iiensettvhe6i 'va'il -.site -D

.DE s-

.'}

Ii"

. '.:6.-,

-:eommissio ring eacti V&D es' f6'r the WVP.are~.'-

T;

'; ii onducte'-Ud Uner..-th'e',.M

.t:,-,as 'opp'o'sed..o the'A

w.'in'formnatio~n pormrallytontdihned,-n'h-a.'stbandard D..<--.

->+:^

oevr,.the -DOE Calrfr.oitrilDOE r>@.@re'g'ultioris'nahd DOE-OrpefsA6 p6Mie~some' of thb.. t:, *

'-i,'i-,

t4, inftrmaio uitrei'ed,-bY"NRC to',6eIn4aD~

At T

ag-

-, tatement:¢ :-iZ*^- z;:

>; '".-.-..nder'th'a'uth~otitysf.the'V DP.'A~cS'-the Commissos

>'.:.'.:~, precrii'n NC'sLTRas'hedecommlissioninqgcrtiafrhe.:

i;!'.f Undertih6euthornty'pthie wbP.4.,twthe C omiso§ issuisd~-,-

-,'5'

';cri iteria fo-rthe cla3ssificeation -of,rep~roce~ssinjWastes, itatnhMlklikely-',w

- ; emai

n he tnks-tite steafter the HLW is vitrified Te. "t
\\

Commisvsion criteri'a that'shiould -b'eaapplied';toinciderptal w.-a'se.

f<<iR etrirnin'tion'5a're.^L.(1?'.ailate ud~

b p

oce'ssed t r env'e k'ey-....

..- >-'iradio'nudlide.sto the'-maxirnu.rp.~xen'htl e~i.ial.ad'

.. :,~.

z,,.;.: '.economically pratic~al;- and'(2j,.w~as'te.s~hou' be rraaeds ha'>

S',-'.>'

-sa ety requ'irernents c'6rompa'rbe fo the pe'rfo~rma'n'c6'e',obj'ectives of ';

R-

',^.

,,64

'S

',p 6rt ar e' Iia.t sii e'-

C ar; ?t i6<T,`;p 1

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework

.-AppIicab1e Sexctionspof Standard DP-- -

.- o The fundarmental purpose of the W\\/DP DP is to "provide the basis6for.NRC's.'determirination 6ofwhethe'the preferredatternativewi!I meet thedecotmmissioning 6< 5 criteria irn'accordaic&With theWDPAct.'; -

0,

'-o.The'reforei nm'Ph'a is'wilibeI.placed orn'.those.sectiorisof f

'--NU REG-14757'that -cotain' inf6rritil6n thatlis.r6Ieva' t t6<>^

.asses'sng wheth er.,'h6'LTR has been met "

ELF b

-Plarnned:Decommissioning Aivities (End-State)

Aadio6Ig-ic.al Statusi bacir t-_,

loge Modeing -

P~~' ~2iaI Saus Survey:(FSS),Q**

-e k

5 11

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework Non.-A'pplcable Sections ofStandard DP

-o Pammaticsection.tatae under DOE, atory

~authob ityt

.'alt' -and'Safetj g

..uogrmD

'ring Decommsonin

Environmenia1'Mdhit6rng-andControl Program' -

'..,o-5

' Radioactive WastMag entaProgra,'.'

a i yPAss'rrodgram (Erxceptnis FSS)

.i

?.a.*-"

Project Management and Organization (Exception is FSS)-

<1ni6'D e r'd ata'-

'6 ronsaid

-fotrde'rmsfwillbe W

refereriid hd attemptoiII bbad6

`ip7, I ~.

.. gVrmnaece~

>.>:inform ationhNotlNormallyContained in a..DR..7

'.' to add ress thie.aais of iride'ntal.waste' 1.12 es

-aY O

ihdei6 4

-J vL~

1 2

WVDP Decommissioning Regulatory Framework W.

A.

i.o The starting point Aforthe WVDP Dis morethane-

,- four.years In rthe future and d'e':not include, i'-near-trfcilitydeciation/remoaand

-wastermanagement activities

-The:stbandard DPs checklisthiNUREG-'

7R5

i)nee-d A61~mdified f6o-ref1&btt'tha't,;hbe>'¢¢ PDemr istratiow'

_rqojehct`isz.be-,deco U'h~e _DP, dqoiheAEA.

13

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning r,.

I ; ' -

.. The West Valley Demonstration'Project Decommissioning Plan,,:,-.

iecommissioning

'A opprach -.and S ope; A.e.

l to y

-*~ -'

iA Bqefing for the US NuclearARegulatory s 'n`ss.on F r6 6

.~.4f:~March 23-2004;

,Objectiv~e-.

-., -~

'.. To -generally. describe the.WVDP. decommissioning approach and s'cop'ethat will implement.,DOE's'..'Yl:,,'

' preferred alternativeforsthe'Decommissioning EIS The presentaon will cover.;

Radiological status

-ecommrisslonin'g Plan content r

The per ormance assessmnent':.'

These il be address separately. y

1..*

.1-.- /,- *,;_'.-.

ZM;.;;; *-

1

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Key points A'phased decommissioning approach tailored to the complex site o The Decommissioning Plan will provide for a phased decommissioning approach o Phase 1 will maintain the deactivated Process Building capable to safely store and remove the HLW canisters and will decommission the:'

':remainder of the WVDP'facilities.,

o 'Phase 2 wil safely se the HLW canisters in the deactivated process

-building*

such that the canyma

-.. unildn the~ ha they'can be maintained bygovFemment agenc until the repository isav'aliabletod ivrethe'> '-'

.o 'Phase 3 will remove and ship HLW,canisters, decontaminate and decommissiohcth Proce'Building and support areas and complete firal status surveys and final'preparations of 'WVDP project premises

' 'forsurrender to'NYSERDA'under NRC license such that LTR can be m et.

7

~.

-,.,s..i.

.~ t ¢i......

s ew.

.......t<r Key points A

iecommissioning approach that meets NRC's LTR

'o The becommissioning Plan Will decommission faciities used in 'the WVDP to achieve residual radioactivity

':criteria prescribed by NRC's Lic'ense-Temination Rule

'for retri6t6 d release o A performance. assessment wilibe used to predict.

' potential future radiation expos'ure from residual

<-'-K>

radioaty o 'DCGLs will be established for decontamination fctera o inal status surveys using MARSSiM protocols will confirm th'at decontaminati'onhas been successful to

meet the LTR 2

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Key points A decommissioning approach that will reflect changes in deactivation and in the EIS o The Decommissioning Plan will be maintained as a living document with NRC approval of canges as appropriate, such as.

Changes related to completin ofdeacivation activities Changes related to the EIS Record of Decision The DP will be "goverinent neutral" -

Where responsibility-for adtivities underth pln is tyt resolved, the DP assunes thatresponsibity wil liewith the Conceptual schedule Re-ecing te genral sequencefotdecommissloning approach I

I Deactivation Phase (not covered by DP)----

W MStabilize k

t heelsduringDeactivation Phase (if practicable)

.- *--~ EiS Record of Decision Scheduledetail to be worked out Phase I (to start after EIS ROD)

Repositry available for WVDP HLW Phase 2-SAFSTOR

-_t rS4JIMM t

hase'3 3

c11uz:

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 o Phase I activities under the DP fall within

  • WMA tProcs.ts8udifg Ptateau South
  • WMA 2 LLWTF/lagoons Pl./teau WMA 3HLW tanks
  • WMA 7.NDA.stabilizationf--
  • WMA 1 1 testswelts

.0

_DA

  • WMA12and 12~

A Phase1-WMAI1

o The deactivated process building will be: maintained.

capable to safely store and rem-ove the HL-W caniser o Remaining operational until V

Phase 3

  • Plant Office Building
  • Fire Pump House and Water Storage Tank
  • Electrical Substation

\\

\\

a Other systems required for Tank HLW canister storage/remo'al u House and contamination control

.OUNj 4

C

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 - WMA 1 Phase 1 - WMA 2

o Lagoonsto i

be

deontamina and decommissionWd*

oi Facikies to be removed

> LLW2,Building

  • Neutralizer Pit
  • Interceptors
  • After stabilizing the NDA as discussd in WMA 7 5

CoLr

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 1 - WMA 2 H Lagoons 2,3,4, and 5 will be pumped dry. The lineri will be removed from Lagoons 'i and 5(2 and 3 are unlinea)., Residual radioctivity will.

be exhumed ind the soil In'th'e areas-i remediated to DCGLs, surveys pformned and

,.,, _S3} 1

  • .' indeipendently verified, and the ca'ities fied

-ith earth;!t',

i.

a Lagoon I contains contaminated".

J

,,debnis -.asphalt trees, stumpsta'n~d

_~iC

.weeds-covered with'clay and' earth.*._,-

'N> The~radioactive~debnisynllbe.+'t,,j,,

.-removed and the soil remediated to..~ a

=i

,.DCG Issurveys performed and ;.^ ;;

E~

';independently venified, and the cavity'.:

.nfilledwith earth M B Lagdbo4 7

>.7,*-

.Z Phase 1 WMA 2.-

_t The Interceptors and the

.'l Neutralizer Pit will be removed and any contaminated soil In their:-.

footpnints remediated to soil..

DCG~s,-surveys'pe6rformed_

Z iandindependentlyvenified CA-.

and the cavte filled with The Inecposwereused to ~ol~kia ~ste Vtefo, sapigbfor transfer to Lagoon 2 The Old Interdeptoriwas an open unlined concrete.

tank; the 2 New Interceptors'are lined with stainless steel. £.

,':-,The Neutralizer Pit is'a smnaller concrete tank used to colled waste from proessareas r

pUoc i as 6

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning o The HLW tanks will be closed in place

  • Tanks and vaults filled with reducing grout and sorbents 24 Topped with high strength

'grout intrusion barriers C

Capped with fill and a multilayer cap

  • Surrounded bya HLW tank closure concept l Grade level, 1 01-ft elevation IMulti-ayer cap I

I I,

.1 "I. I ;

I -

8 ft Intrusion barrier (strong grout)

_~iwe11 ws.l,,xn.

If -u~~xEu 7

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning

' Phase 1-WMA 7 Stabilkiation of NDA to allow decommissioning of WMA 2 o Interceptor Trench to be InterceptorTrendh Liquid Pretreatment System grouted o3 Liquid, Perament,

. System to b; re'moved '

o Leachate Transfer' Line to '-.

Lachate Lne be groute'd oND tobsrruie by

-a slu'rryv",ia1 land coVe r-ed', '-.

with a geomembrane cap DA.

.N Phase

-WMA 1

rN o Hydrofracture test well area

.to b e

grouted 4

f ORNL nslid these 5 wfelfik i1969 hi connectbon wlhi ipilot studyZ,95 was seus as a tracer.

et~ls

,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

J,4.-'.

',,'..,':'.-',.,9'.

/'

8

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase I - WMA 12 z,

4 o To be'surveyed and eft in

-,-p'lac'e v,,.',';

-,xSchool;House4f t Choof-SchoolhousL O,radioactivecontaminatlon...:r'

.--Phase 1---all-areas....

Contaminated subs'urface and embedded piping

'Co ~

i

-te.*.i

6 u

eii'W lb 0 oCohtanminated underground piping and equipment will be.

re'moved, except ln cases where source terms were considered'in the perfor~rnanc assessfi ent-and found to.

'.,thbe u

earup criteria Uo Subsurface piping.a rid....

'evaluated

  • ecommissioning Pan wilireflect dethails
4 9

a DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning At the end of Phase I LLW lagonsSIDA (not in DP scopey~=x deconned and decommissioned NDA HLWtanks NAsurrounded by closWed slurry wall, covered

-~

with geomembrane itProcess Building deactivated and

~

Romairding after deactivation capable to sately store Decommissioned inPhase I HLW canisters

/AZ Phase 2 - SAFSTOR AfterPhas 1, nd during Phase.2, the, 277 HLW canisters will reminIn heCPO until the repository becomes available

~Systemns required for saf stoage and contamlnaolon control to remain operational.

1 0 CO(9

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase-3

. - Final phase will include removal and shipping HLW and

.--preparing facilities for surrender to'NYSERDA

-o Removing HLW canisters and shipping them to repository.

-o Deco'ntaminating and decommissioning processbuilding o Decommissioning remaining support areas

o Comnleting r~emaining final status 'surveys to confirm LTR J'o Fooatuhver,o6f.WVDP projct premises t6oNYSERDA;

~~

t-k

.Phase 3

Transporting the HLW canisters to the repository ou The canisters will be Moved thru the EDR into the Load-In/Load-Out Area-
  • Placed in their transport containers - '
  • And transported to the repository, by rail or by truck

-j-7 -1 N-

i.....

r Q w

^

^

i w UE r, o,.

5 1 o^.t t _

11

i DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 3 - WMA 1 o Remaining Process Building rocs Buldn systems will be removed Q ProcessBuilding will be decontaminated,'Sbtto decommissioned and left O Also to be decommissioned Fire Pump House

, +Jand left standing are Fire Pump.House and Water-,- \\

Storage Tankh Phase 3 -WMA I Reun~ ontaminatedl piping

-S.

Fuel Pool Process Building interior surfaces, including the fuel pools, are to bedecontaminated to DCGLs based on performance assessment "oeln# for mlantewnc worker occupancy under restrictioes and foi intruder if institutional controls w~ereto fail' 1 2 l

- 111 40 p

i p

m

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Process Building Areas where significant decontamination will be necessary In the CPC:

19i 94` flordse rates averaged 2

.83R~/hlbefore final decon and

-,sumps were reading 4.6 R/h a nd

- 155R/h 4 ~

~

  • Contamination was painted over*,

L' before canister racks were instalelnped...

  • There has been no personnel access' 9

he Tin't CC s.ince te plant g6 er he last deotaninatira effortsradiation 74 f

a e s neaohe were tYia iy in heK&3

=5OmR hirane,'~with';1 ~5R/h. in"the um"'

-:.,Process Building--,

-*,>L.;

.Load ln/Load Out Area to be removed

13

,:'fj~~~

'S i;;<p

I DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 3 - WMA 6 5

l PM

'BOUNDARY o To be surveyed and left: in I

place

  • Rail Spur w

I V

I cask shipment)

-'K

, Sewage Treatment Plant

\\

Sewage Treatment Plant

  • Equalization Basin-:
  • Equalization Tank RalSur aX~~~

~ ~ -~..-

~

g XN' Phase 3 -WMA IO I

a: To be surveyed and left, in

-place dAdmin Bldg

.dm* inisti Buildin Gate House Gate House o To be removed

  • the Meteorological Tower WMA 14 C-n%

DOE's Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning Phase 3 - WMA 12 o To be left in place

." 'LieFire Range',.'

-'Dams and reservoirs '

K.

e

-r~

\\ No rdocvecon'tamfi-nabtion -~

'In thee facilities Iis eect v

.a *%.!,

',..s

-T ia-

.Final status surveys.

Wll be o__=lined in the Decommissioning Plan

o Surveys will follow MARSSIM protocols I

-d ;oA phased approah; is planned

- Final characterization surveys performed at the end of. -'--,, '.'.

deactivation will be considered forendorsemient' er ra ar o

rn

' Where areasarconpeteil'dec'ontaminated and can be

.,'t effectively isolated, surveysywill be done area b'y area "-

-..*.lConfiratioin surveys byan iridependent DOE subcontractor wili be include oSurveys will ensure DCGLshave beenachieved q

aand

.-.that residual raaiodtivityineetsV.LTR requirementS for',

' liense' termination cunder restriction in DOE ia'reas- !X s-j.,2.s'

,,'a a','

  • /~~**.

-g

-'.*z,b<-,

V r 15

DOEs Approach (Preferred EIS Alternative) for the WVDP Decommissioning At the end of Phase 3 LLWTFlgoons dn and$

4 deommmone lHL~nb1X 1S;A e INDAsflmde W

by l 0

~DOCOMamissond In~Ilgse I

'OW",

-m Io n Phase 3 In summary The major poits that have been addressed o The DP Rwill describe how DOE's prerr altemative for the Dicommissioning EIS will be implemntetd o The PF will prvide, for a phased decommisioing approach o heDP will ~

enable~q mintenalc of high level waste canisters during SAFSTOR by an appropriate government agency o The DP will assure NRC's LTR for restricted release is met O The.DP will enable eventual surrender of the project premises to NYSERDA for maintenance under NRC license with LTR met o The DP will be maintained as a lving documn with appropriate NRCpproval changes and will tan a

from deactivaton andtheaEIS.

1 6 C00(

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML040930488&oldid=5403839"