Regulatory Guide 1.27

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:52, 10 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ultimate Heat Sink for Nuclear Power Plants
ML13038A084
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/31/1974
From:
US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
To:
References
RG-1.027, Rev. 1
Download: ML13038A084 (4)


- REGULATORYýGUIDE:1.27

_UT1MA~TE'H EAT S!NK

A. ;NTOUT~

-General -De ,Iec

"~Cooling 'Water" of Appendix A,"1~ na.'"to l'O:CFR'Part' "unJt

50, M'IJicensing tiization Facilotns," 'acc

.requires, in part i'dancyimn*features-be *the e:.:to assure -that sits it:equIesý I: .pan, LlUnIsIT*u tures, *snuiaiown cc Ind; ,co onenLs _important to safety ibe ,one untW :the IWithst Ithe:,effects ?of 'natural 'phenomena that accidei

)ss , of pability 'to -perform their "safety *shutdowni .a

"describes~>a basis acceptable to t'he .ma'intaini'all'

Thej.cara*o or.'the sink- sho

-itiy

,p'ovide'ýe66liitabot hafor the pefio'

nts. The Advisory -Cuminittee on R~.eactor oevaluateithce sjtuatinand for, the p has been consulited concelrnginghis guide and to take' corrective actio

n. A pej

-ed imithe fegulatory~position. considered- to be adequate -.or

'addition:-. roceCur es shoild 'be-avai]

RB

lter -s,ýstenvz1s Mnat compiex' oi ~waLT .':Sources',

i]l necessary retainiing 'ýstiuctures (e.g.,, a "pond cnai -a -lu-cdy. suvvly'M w t'cl -IýSeeabd m4; or -a river- with its'idam) - and the canals.or design bisis 'temperatuires of "safet/y-rel nnecting the sources not including,

,with.but' 'are not exceeded.-FoT heat sinks where water system intak-structure& 'for -a -nuclear' ,be timited anid/or 'thelen peyrat'uireof'I

tL, f coolinrg towersor '*ortions tfereof -are "from 'the sink bcrjcitic;abje~j becmy

'capability 'of the'

ions. -tAing into accoL

ecuiniment and li

'hesinik safety ziyflda on "mybetpfovided by ',Where -'ti'rf ru iaural or ýman made 'features More functions~~~~ b

  • han one water .

he-anIs my or'cndiuits ~ are require;aIprt ,bflhe sinkrat-east Two should,'ýb-e]*provided,ýeienif only one source -may be involved, in the ultimate, ýheat sinki source of water has been demonstrated'to-be ade'quate;

'complex,;in performfingithese functions unde*rdifferentm -However, -iisingle canal may be-acceptable ift.s.....isfies.......

conditions, Because of* the"ýimportance 'of ýthe sinkto- The four conditions above. Where the sink i clu~des; -or safz*,y, these functions should be asured during and than ýone source of water he*

  • ndividmuaatefi:so-rc -. es'

foillowingAhe-mnostsevere natural phenomnaempostulated may have -different des'ign requiremen'ts.',Mulitipwater'w Sfor,.te :siteýi(e~g the'-.safe ýshutdown, earthquake, ,design - sources, including their associated x iretaining sui6 urs

'basis-'totnado 'hurifiane,,flood, or diought?ý). ln addition' - - and'required canals ýand' conduits, shoul~d~bese' _'rated, ~'

thc~sifk safety functions ýshould'be assured,ýuriing ot~her -and-protected so-thatfailure of-any-one--wýillntndc applicable stread vnsta my-b-cue'by failure -n.zany 'other 'that woudld- pred~udeitauoomphishing natural phenom'na such as river blockage;. river the safdctfunctions of the sink.* The;ccompiex 1(ibut not divex'ýsion or'rreservoli depletion, or if applicable, other - necessarily its individialj/ea-tiuý.S) :rust Jberca0Able of accidents such a.s'transportation-accidentsrinvolving ship. withstandii eac -of th 'm~'e iat iral, phenmena

'collisions. airplane. crashes, or - oil .spills .-and fires. -'expected, otlher s-ite-rielat-ed .evenrts, reasonable

6 R, *a. combntieoo-s -of :less sever6;_atura1 ý'anL- ions of rnaturalj nomena.and /ior.ýste-.relatd.etI.,l

-:coibina

.acn ,or -. e nts;, :nd- a .bu le failure' of ; ,man ae stmact.ural-. .... *.* -,

  • .onider-d extent,needed fora-consistent, vel'of' $features i*thout y'ossof 0 capability of -the sirik 'to -

-,

conservitism; for ýexaniple, -such- coijibinat-jons should be. - accompilish -its.,- safety -functions.-'The. rmostl isevere- evlntý ~iics~ilee1e'rbbiro-hieitn at -*he,_same4'imecand 'haiing -ignifcariit consequences is- phenomena .may be' considered rto occur undepen dently and -not simultaneouslyv.lnaddition the minglefafilure&of - .

, comparabie to that associated wi -the most --severe . -.man-made st'r-uctural features need not be c'onsidCeedALo -

phenomena..- occur-sirnuiltaneously with severe natural phenomena or

Th fe;h tld'bea -high 'level ~o~fýassurance 1that:the--sieeledvnt, - -

.. waterces< of thesink* Willbe'availableht hen'needed, . For -example, it,-would be acceptabeif Water'Soure"'....

For 'natural ,sources.historical experienrceindicates'that -. No. I-. (say a man-made pond with a dam) and

'river blockage or :diversion may -be',possible, as well as connecting conduit -were capable.of withstanding thc ,.*.

changes'in -,ocean ior lake levels as -a result -of -severe safeeshutdown earthquake, tornado, and drought and -'

inalural :.events. For 'man-made .portions, par.ticularly 'Water ,SourdceNo..22(say -3river-With an: existing dam)

structures 'above 'ground, failures -are -not uncommon. and its-connecting conduit were ýcapable-,oof:withstznlding ,ýtý

ýBecause of ýthese fatos cosdrto'hudb~ie the 'probable. maximium flood -,How Ahe tlecomiplex~as

,

4theksjiiik 6cmprisi1g-t ' *aaewhoue r 'mustachalso -,be cpable:, of hsandiii; an

0,igtteast.ýtwoý,a- asucee wwieinut. tc d-fny':-

kcJ fp fonk~fn fnls it -a-reasobf probable" zorfiibination ~ofntir]o

',,can 'bdemonstrated'-hit there is an ictremelyi lowv accidental* phenomena .without loss of the sinik

'probability of losing ~ the capabilitiy :of a sinle source functions.

-For 'thotse -cases in:-whichlan aplic*in believes a single S, waiter source -may be acceptable it should be The ultimate heat sink, as a -comp]ex, should be demostated that the source can withstand, without shown to be highly reliable' ,tshig nnh tger S- -- lo~ss ~ofrthe ssink~ safety functions -the following -events: -'conditions -are satisfied. 'For-.example, x onsideritWater- s¢:vere, e~fai atura mhenomiena .efaected,ta.ken, ,Source satbove Noa- nig*: 'Suchcon'difionsewo*and'included

howi gufcnlyt haý,Crtii) .. .:

~~~~ ~~.site-,Teiated eins' at~hve . thie river canLnotbdvetdo4lke 7

-ocd ;ibed or-tht.-i ocunayuigt ep ,tlfa ,' affect the availability ofv-water at the connecting reasonably -Probable, combinations of less severe ýnatural conduits; (2) no, serious ýtransportation -accidents, have

- pheno mena :and/or sile-related events, and"(4)--a single occurred-or canbe reasonably expected-, and (3) the dam -

failuieof, man-made Struct-ural features. -Inapplying this- a designed to appropriately conservative"s requirements.

"single ýfailure, various mechanistic failure modes 'has functioned properly over, it-s lifetimrel, and (balsed oln

. h - be-hpostulated -One may choose 'to* assume a oprojectn te b will fnction o ee'colb !bnt-:tsAsoi :eme*he!sa i.-' properly -for the Aifetimeonof- the ~nncleori.powero its.. it

' "

rev qir
  • ... i~e-asum86i iiw owveosa h..neuneso s, but ths sntnecessaf! ~otua eu r~e:,l* ,...... _serves.

Phe. -Compliance with~'these, tt suceconditions

-ohnp~iayo. wouldý

,.ae,*e1 ino r-

'ma4~~ratue o-~- d 6diin i -hixeitd ioever,-remo-61th'neediforf another sour oloIng ce D

.- - ffect of forces in~mne :tthe ti e of riip'ture) should water if a' sigefiueotedmcudr'lýi'oiv

-be assurnedý however, 'it is notr-'ecessar-ily. required that the coln 'iait fti, uco wt el one. assume th dan iitgrates instant'aneously with- constructed-features, not ~required to ýbe desingedt A

'total>-Is offnto---s-nte eapethe withstand 'the safe' shutdown earthquake or the -Probable' --

consequences of a postulated slide of earthen canal walls maximum -flood ,shotild at -least,'be designed- and- ':

should' be assuredL; however, it is not necessarily constructed to withstand;,the effects of the maximum rrequxe!ire at~ba neý assume wate~r~fow ceases ,completely, , .earthquake'deterri-mined~oti -the basis of historic seisnCity-~

1'. 7-

'*d*£ .&

,' : * b  : ." ,: :.A , ; . gf.= , "5: " " . ; , *)  :: f  : '"' =  : , ': , ,r: ,*  ;* -*}r .j

a- iea&WtTfo bsdon~'everehiistorical

-fi'7 events in4ihe ýregicn. i speeds 'occurring' sirmltaneously results in the in:~

-maximum-amourjt -f-evaporafio nand drift loss.

Ihe :importance of -the sink to safety-is such that, if, rduring plant operation, the -cappability ok the si . -is b. -Analysis-of-the temperature problem should use -

" ,iiretened,: as- for example 4t6 permit riecessary the ýworst I--day and -w'orst- 30-day .'periods of maintenance or as a result of damage, restrictions should meteorological record in -the region . :ulting tre in

-be -lLaced p rniriimum '-heat'transfer to .the- atmosphere"and maximum on plant operation.- The -technidal

'specificafio'ns'-should statae'Thea-c ti ons Io-b etakeni inthe plant intake -temiperature. .. urthe',. 'thewos l-y

  • event ,-.thc-,.,required capability -of -tfie--srik is -temporarily -period ofrecod-Soud~hld- be assumred'tb Te-the fiksday CI f unavailable during ;plant ;operation. For example, the -the worst .30-day :period -of ',record. For'transient temperature -analysis, diurnal variations intemperature -.

Atechnical s pecifications. should require-, that (1) the

ýClommission 'be -notified-Af the sinkd does -not should :be used fo6r the 1-day and 30-day periods' of satisfy -the analysis. These -variations are readily- estimated: from liniiting conditioni for -opetation-and,(2)-if its capability cannot be restoredto- this condition,.within z reasonable 'local-,weather;,-r~ecord~s. App~tlicants -should-1be ;assufredthat either a-normal-oreniergency shutdown during theý worst

.period oftime, all-units- served:by the sink -L -hut down

{7
-....and--emainshut -1-day and 30-day period -;of -record will not iresult in

,a;

donunfil:this ctap~biliti: is-,x es tore d.- -

plant intake water temperatures-'exceeding Aesin basis temperatures.--

C. REGULATORY POSITION

-

- -The above -analysis related .to 'the,30-day cooling -

1. The ualtimate bheat sink should -ýbe capable 'of -supply .and .the excess,* tempnerature should 'include

.providing' sufficient -cooling for at, least :30 days to -- sufficient 'information

'(a)

permit simultaneous safe shutdown and cooldown of all ',to 'substantiate t'he- assumrpt'ions- and-analytical -methods used- hismnformation should, nuclea-reactor units that it Serves and to maintain'them in, aý'.ife:shutdown -condition and- (b)-ntd*vnt Of an-; -include' actual, erformance ýdata -for a'siiriil4),coiluing K

- mnethod:operating 'under-load ýnear rthe specifi:deSg "...

accdent, imnc'uie, uii~t:;tolimit tbe -e'ffectý oftha-ajccidu~nf y,,to 'errhiit simultarcous and safeshutdown ofe ~conditions,-or justification, that-- conserva-tive -drift 'loss

-ri:d'" heat transfer viues'h ,,'eb'eniused. , - -:

remaining -units, sand to maintain them in a safe shutdown.aondition-.-procedures .for:assuringa continued,

- A co6ling capacity. of less than 30 days may be

  • capabiity*-after 30.days should~beavailabl

e. acceptable

=e if-it -can' be:.demonstrated :that,, replenisiiment: .

.*r n" -~f O LL~1~gLm W '* 4Lr,I .:.u.pp1y. -can oe,-" 'erJrecr5o-to, - -'*:*'

-""

..... c.ent 'conservatism shouldbe provided to assure assure the 'continuous~capabili' *f the- *in

'that a 30-day- cooling supily is -available and that design . its ,s- et-y-functi ito -perfor'..

iiinto, *nofg theont;t avabilit e y

£baJs-* te-mperat uresr't* f'sfety--'elated,:equipment are -not - of replenishi ent.equipment'and 'limitations that may be

" exceeed.'

' -l-Fr "heat, sinks where -the iipply Vmay',

be -imposed on Treedom .followng of--,.movement"

limited and/or the 'temperature of plant intake -water

-

  • an accident or-the occurrence of severenatural phenomena. -

from the sink may eventually become- critical (. -..

ponds,*,lak-es, -cooling -towers, - or --other' sinks -where 2. 'The ultimate'heat-sink complex, -whether

-

composed Srecirculation between 1lant .cooling wa*teidischarge and ' -.ofsingbeTormultiple water.,-sources, shouldbe catpaileo*o intake -can occur), transient analyses -of.supply-and/or withstanding, without loss of *fthe sink-, saet functpnof :" -~ I- -'

te:

emperature should be-performed. using the folowing: specified in regulatory . position C I, the following - -

'- - - " ' ,events'. -

at., A~nalysis sup-porting

-vailabi.ity 'the a,. of a 30-day -

cool ing.ýsuppl* should be: based. oii historical'region*al a. The most severe natural phenomena expected measurements combining the -worst irecorded 30-day takei individually, aprib:per'ý*30-day average) of maxlinumrdifference -between dry

- "

temperature

, and .dewpoint ..temerature,. AT,-- -b. -The -site-related- events' .(eg:,

.and .the..ihest wind speeds recorded during the same transportation -  !

accident, river-diversion) *that historically have ocdutrredý,2.

30-day ~period ýsuch-Ahat the combination of IoT and, orhat may'occurduring the-plant-lifetime, . ..

........

,smallsallo*w,:eli'TC . .. . .eas .. na.ly nds,..&. se' r naturalphenomena 'able --combinationsevents,

2ndfor-site-related 'of less, Mayi"be-madc, or-*-the analytical -techniques andicomputer S-' prgams ",Contained iq "Generic Emergency- Cooling Pond . "

, Analy'sis,--"COO

  • 2224-1 May'1972 -October 1972,preparedfor -- d.. -A single -failure of man-made struct ural -'

the' USAEC by :Uni'ersity of Pennsylvainia, School of features.

. Engiee-in.and App-lited Science, Civil Engineering, Philadelphia,

- - J*.Pennsylvania 719I04- For sinks other than-small shallow nooling - 3.* The -ultimate iheat .sink.should consist of a least two' --

ýýde ion Dmnuaransien.

  • - .analyses, should.,:be performed to sources of.water,, including-their--retaining st~uctures1 -

d/ortm'imor,

' "u mrnintakewater. -,eacl-,w th the',cp~abiity -to perform the safety fn ct-ions -'

-I.

spcfe-i reuator~yposition- C.-l. above, rýitcT

-' - p,. - -


31 -

DC GcmtM 0 Sta ed that thicm is an extremcly 'low failure of any one1will not inducefaihiueof.t ptobability of losbig -,ie capabilhtytof -i single source.

fci'her should be a lattwo aqueducts connecting the SOurce('s)4.'ith thc intake structures of the-nuclear power 4. The technical.:specifjica;tiofs u.nts, unless. it cqan be demonstrated that 'Ihere ..is an include ,provisions for actions :to c~treme~ly'ow probabilityvthat'a ,singleaqueduct can faIil :tha. conditions 4hrea~ten: pýt i~dgil entirelv-'ýs a'T6 Wi of natra peioea.1,Iwae Ibe- Wi-niate, heat..sink or -IllieI'

sorces and their Lassuyciated aqueductSs hiouldbb-highfly 'satisfy reg ulat ory. posit ionsi:C..f- diaiendsholdbc separ-ated and pro tected~such' that operation.'

~';' p'.

.

i,%5 * :

I

-. ~ A,

'?i!

I': -