ML14017A077

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:52, 5 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRR E-mail Capture - Brunswick 1 and 2, Crystal River Unit 3, Harris Unit 1, and Robinson Unit 2 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request for Cyber Security Plan Implementaion Milestone 8 (TAC Nos. MF3263 - MF3267)
ML14017A077
Person / Time
Site: Harris, Brunswick, Crystal River, Robinson  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/16/2014
From: Farideh Saba
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Murray W
Duke Energy Corp
References
MF3263, MF3264, MF3265, MF3266, MF3267
Download: ML14017A077 (3)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Saba, Farideh Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:30 PM To: Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com); Caves, John (John.Caves@duke-energy.com); Hightower, Richard (Richard.Hightower@duke-energy.com); Daniel Westcott Cc: Hon, Andrew; Lingam, Siva; Gratton, Christopher

Subject:

BRUNSWICK 1 AND 2, CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3, HARRIS UNIT 1, AND ROBINSON UNIT 2 - ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR CYBER SECURITY PLAN IMPLEMENTAION MILESTONE 8 (TAC NOS. MF3263 - MF3267)

Importance: High Bill (Brunswick), John (Harris), Richard (Robinson) and Dan (Crystal River):

By letter dated December 19, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML13357A189), Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request pertaining to the Cyber Security Plan implementation schedule, including a proposed revision to the existing Physical Protection license condition for: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant, Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1, and H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of 10 CFR, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me, at (301) 415-1447.

Sincerely, Farideh E. Saba, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-325, 50-324, 50-302, 50-400, 1

and 50-261 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1027 Mail Envelope Properties (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20140116143000)

Subject:

BRUNSWICK 1 AND 2, CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3, HARRIS UNIT 1, AND ROBINSON UNIT 2 - ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR CYBER SECURITY PLAN IMPLEMENTAION MILESTONE 8 (TAC NOS. MF3263 - MF3267)

Sent Date: 1/16/2014 2:30:02 PM Received Date: 1/16/2014 2:30:00 PM From: Saba, Farideh Created By: Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Hon, Andrew" <Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Lingam, Siva" <Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Gratton, Christopher" <Christopher.Gratton@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)" <Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Caves, John (John.Caves@duke-energy.com)" <John.Caves@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Hightower, Richard (Richard.Hightower@duke-energy.com)" <Richard.Hightower@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Daniel Westcott" <Daniel.Westcott@pgnmail.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2942 1/16/2014 2:30:00 PM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: ZZZ