ML052430755

Various Checklists for the Clinton Initial Examination - July 2005

ML052430755
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	07/18/2005
From:	Charles Phillips NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	AmerGen Energy Co
Shared Package
ML052430228	List: ML052430747 ML052430750 ML052430754 ML052430755 ML052430756 ML052430758 ML052430760 ML052430761
References
50-461/05-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-461/05-301
Download: ML052430755 (13)

Text

VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE CLINTON INITIAL EXAMINATION -JULY 2005

~

ES-201,Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Clinton Date of Examination: 7/18-22/2005 Examinations Developed by: (-Fa& / NRC (circle one)

.-

Task Description (Reference)

(-70) I I

(7. Examinationoutline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))

, Y

(-45) 8. Proposedexaminations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3,ES-301-4,ES-301-5. ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e. f. g and h; C.3.d)

-30 I

I

9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202)

I I

v Y

-14 I O . Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4prepared (C.l .I; C.2.i:

ES-202)

-14 11. Examinationapproved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 I 12. Examinationsreviewedwith facility licensee (C.1.i; C.2.f and h; C.3.9) I &

i' ~ I 13. Written examinationsand operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i: C.3.h)

-7 14 Final applicat;ons reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >IO) applications audited lo confirm qualifications/ eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2 I: Altachrent 4; ES-202,C.2.e; ES-204)

-7 I 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 I 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures,and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) lh Y

Target dates are generally based on lacility-prepared examinations and are neyed to tne examinallon date idenhl.ed in the corporate notil cation letter They are for piannnng wrposes and may be adiLsted on a caseov-case basis .n coordinationwith the facility licensee

[Applies onty] [Does not apply) ro examinationsprepared hy the NRC

c ES-201

?*

Examination Security Agreement Form ES-2013 I. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7 date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and I authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e, I did not divulge to any unauthorued persons any informatin concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week@)0f7118; &I<. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE ZIGNATUREV) DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

&&

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement FOII ES-2013 I authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. Iwill immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or To the best of my know1 e, I di p o t divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of $&,l\6&rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

(2) DATE NOTE rc T I ( h d !L > at^

IC& C.l.fLrM%mI.d I~.N/LL/IP 12I.7 7 4 ~ d . /&7Q @ /4r&4d

-Fir S K N A T U P E ( Z )sa,- LnCs.2,y,Or*a 13.

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

r

/

c ES-201 Examination Security Agreement FOII ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination 7Fb-I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7 I I 6 , k / as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide Performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my know1 d e, I 'd not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of .f;&<$%m the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, Idid not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE IRESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

/

1. hpbn+.r /?e ucO,aPz,&

2. ', TAP<& / /=//red

--

S/@

Y/prMaOWS'Z 5 . h WL. u h  %*.G fie Y

6. h b kk&m 4Rf'

7. 2h.,7 d-

6. 4 & 7 & .

fe//&-

9.

10. FaM'-- 3 &

• W Y $70

11. Jew P.M C M . L , . f A hl L O

12. H L J I * /Paad A/L 6

13. .-kuf CR QD.2ic. I C

14. &%T ' 9- r 'ZLr ciu"trs

15. 141 15Riley C P Tmnina #hp? nUsQr NOTES: I ES-201, Page 26 of 27

i G4%&-

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7/18,7/25;6ras of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancsllation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indicaticris or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any informationconcerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of7/16 :&fl. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

6.

9. ____

10. _- ____

11. -- .~ __

12. __ -___

13. __ __.

14. _____

15.

NOTES:

__ -~

ES-201, Pa: -6 of 27

m-301 Operatino Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

'auliw. Clinton

_ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~~

Date of Examination711 1/05 Operabng Test Number 04-1 initial!

1. GENRAL CRITERIA

~______ ~

1. The operating 1-1 wnbrms with the previousiyappmvedoutline; changes are consistent vith sampling requirements(e.g.. 10 CFR 55.45. operatlonal importance, safAyhmction distribution).

1. There is no dayic-day repetition betnaen this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

.;

The operating test shall not duplicate items fom the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l .a).

j. Overlap with the rmitten examination and beiveen different par& of the operating test is wthin acceptable limits.

3. It appears that the operating test vill differentiate hewn wmpetent and less-than-wmpetent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA 1.

.

Each JPM indudes the bllowing. as applicable:

initial conditions initiatingares references and tools. including associated pmcedunts reasonable and validated time limits [average time allow4 for wmpletion) and s p d f c designation If deemed to be time uitical bythe facility licensee operationally Importantspecitc performance uiterla that indude:

- detailed emected actions dth exact dtetia and nomenclature

- system res.ponse and other emniner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made b m e applicant

- uitmla for sucwssk~icompletion of the task

. Identification of uiBcal steps and their associated pdrmanca standards

- restrictions on the sequence ofsteps. if applicable

a. Ensure that anychanges from the previouslyappmvedsystems and administrative valk-thmugh outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviatelbm any of the acceptance uiteria (e.9.. item distribution. bank use. repetition b m the last 2 NRC emminations) soeci6ed on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. SIMUATOR CRlTERlA The associated simuiatoroperatingtests (scenario sets) have been r e v i d In accordance vith Form ES-301-4 and a copyis attached.

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:

• The faciiltyslgnatureis not applicable b r NRCdevelopedtests

1. Independent NRC r e v l m r initial items in Column 'c"; chiefexaminer wncumence is required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 F o ES-3014

~

Facilitv: Clinton Dateof Exam: 7/11/05 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 / 3 Operating Test Number: 04-1 initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

1. The initial conditions are realistic. in that some equipment and/or instlumentationma@eout of service. but it does not cue the operators Into epected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostiyof related events.

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s)that are entered to initiate the event the symptomshes that Hill be visible to the crew the ewected operator actions (byshlff position) the event termination point (ifapplicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanisticBilure (e.g.. pipe break) is incorporated into the Scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5. The events are valid dth regard to physics and thermodylamics.

6. Sequendng and timing ofevents is reasonable. and all- the examination team to obtain comrdete evaluation results commensurate vim the scenario objectives.

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summawlearlyso indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carryout evected activities nithout undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to IOCFR55.4qd). anppen simulator performance ddciencies or deviations fom the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that Clnctionalfidelitv is maintained Hhlle NnninD the planned scenarios.

IO. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one newor significantly modified scenario.

All athar scenarios have been altered in acmrdance vlth Section D.5 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verikd using Form ES-301-6 (submit the brm along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant Hill be significantiyinvolved In the minimum number oftransients and events soscified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the brm with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficultyis appropriate to support licensingdecisions br each uew Position.

Target Puantltatlu AWbuter (Per Scenario; See S a d o n Ll5.d) Actual Attributes

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5 / 5 / 5

2. Malfunctions aflar EOP enbvll-21 1 / 1 / 1

3. Abnormal events (24) 31414

4. Major transients (1-2) 2 / 2 / 1

5. EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 2 / 1

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) O / l / l

7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2/2/2 ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist F o ES-301-5

~

L-

acility: CI Date of Exam: 7/1i/05 Operating Test Number: ILTO401-1 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

t0 iRO-l SRO-U

RBI iR0-U 30 jR0-I jR0-U L 30 jR0-I SRO-U nstructionr

1. Cirde the applicanllwd and enter the operahng test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbersdr each event We:

TS are not applicable br RO applicants. ROP must SBNO In both the 'at-the-wntr0.s (ATC)' ana 'balance-dplant (B0P)'posibons' Instant SRQ must dp one scenario, lnduding at least tu0 .nstrument or wmponent (I/C) malfundons and one major translent. m me ATC position.

2. Reactivily manlpulatlonsma be conducted under normal.or controlledabnormal wnditlons (rekr to Section D 5.d) but must be signilcantper &lion C.2.a olAppmdlx D. Reactiviiyandnormal evolutions maybe replaced Mth additional instrument M mmponent maltnctions on a 1-br-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical. both Instrument nent rnalfinctlons should be included: onlythose that require verifiable actions that pmWe insight cant's wmpetence count towd the minimum requlrement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

~

ES301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Clinton Date of Examination: 7/11/05 Operating Test No.: 04-1 I APPL ANTS Competencies I SRO-I RO - ATC RO - BOP I I

SRO-U SCENARIO 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1121314 SCENARIO Interpret/ Diagnose 1-10 10 1-9 Events and Conditions NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specificationcompliancefor an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicants license type and enter one o event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable conpeten Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

~~

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist F o m ~ES-401-6 Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 7/11/05 Exam Level: ROlSRO 1.

Item Desdption Questions and ansueIE are technicailyacwrateand applicable to the kdity.

I T Initial

2. a. NRC WAS are & r e n d for ail questions.

b. Fadlitvleaminooblectives are r e b r e n d as available.

5. Ouestion dupllcatlon fom the l i m s e sueening/audit emm was conlrolled as indicated below(check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

1( the audit emm was systematicallyand randomlydeve(oped the audit emm was mmpieted bebre the licensa emm was started the examinationswre developed independently 3 the licensee cerWes that there is no duplication other (emlain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent n q and the rest new or modified): enter the actual RO/ SROoniy auestion disbibulionbl at riaht.

7. Behveen 50 and 80 percent of the questions on the RO exam are milten at the comprehension /analpis level:

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent iftha randomly selected KAs wppat the higher cognitive levels: enter the actual RO/ SROauesUondistribuUon(slat rioht.

8. Referencesthandoutsprovided do not give a w y a n m t s i or aid in the ellmlnatlon ofdistactors.

with specific WAstatements In the previouslyapproved appropriate b r the Tier lo Hhich they are assigned:

A n n & N h e ISignature Date

a. Author

b. Fadlity Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)tho.&

d. NRC Regional SuperviSM Note:

• The f a c i i i t y r e v i ~ InitiaWsignature s are not applicable br NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviensr initial items In Column 'c': chiefexaminer concurrence required.

. ES-401, Page 29 of 33

-.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist F o ES-401-6

~

Item Desaiption

1. Cluestionsand anwets are technically accurate and applicable to the hdlity.

2. a. NRC WAS are r e k e n m i for all questions.

b. Fadlityleamingobjedves are rebrenced as available.

3. SRO ouestions arw aooroDnate in a m d a n c e uith Section D.2.d.ofES-401

4. If more than bur RO and two SRO questions are r6peated tom the last hw NRC licensing exam, the fadlity llwnsee's sampling process HBS random and sytematic.

5 Ouesbon duplication torn the license sueeninglaudit emm was controlled as indicated below(check the item that applies) and appears appropnate'

/ the audit exam was srjternabcallyandrandomlydeveloped 2 the a m t e m n was wmpleted Debre the license e m n was started

- the examinations ware developed independently

~

the licensee Wies that there is no duplication

- other (eplain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new and the rest new or modifled); enter the actual RO/ SROonly 74125 question distribution(s) at tight. I I I I

7. Between 50 and 80 percant ofthe questions on the RO Memory I CIA I,@

exam are witten at the mmprehension /analpis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter 32/6 43/19 the actual RO/ SROquesUondisbibutlon(s) at right.

t give amy answers Dat

a. Author

b. FacilityReviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist I

l

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

ES-403. Page 5 of 5