ML052430755
| ML052430755 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 07/18/2005 |
| From: | Charles Phillips NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | AmerGen Energy Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML052430228 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461/05-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-461/05-301 | |
| Download: ML052430755 (13) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE CLINTON INITIAL EXAMINATION -JULY 2005
~
ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1
-14 Facility:
Clinton Date of Examination:
7/18-22/2005 Examinations Developed by:
(-Fa&
/
NRC (circle one)
I O. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.l.I; C.2.i:
Task Description (Reference)
-14
(-70) I (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
I Y
(-45)
-30
- 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5. ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e. f. g and h; C.3.d)
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202) v
- 9.
I I
Y I
I
-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.i; C.2.f and h; C.3.9)
I &
- i' ~ I 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i: C.3.h)
-7 14 Final applicat;ons reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >IO) applications audited lo confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2 I: Altachrent 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
- 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed
-7 I
with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7 I 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) lh Y
Target dates are generally based on lacility-prepared examinations and are neyed to tne examinallon date idenhl.ed in the corporate notil cation letter They are for piannnng wrposes and may be adiLsted on a caseov-case basis.n coordination with the facility licensee
[Applies onty] [Does not apply) ro examinations prepared hy the NRC
?*
c ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-2013 I.
Pre-Examination date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7 by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e, I did not divulge to any unauthorued persons any informatin concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week@) 0f7118; &I<.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
I PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE ZIGNATUREV)
DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27
FOIIII ES-2013 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or I
To the best of my know1 e, I di pot divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of $&,l\\6&rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
(2)
DATE NOTE T I ( h d !
L > at^
I C & C.l.fLrM%mI.d I~.N/LL/IPI
- 12. 7 7 4 ~ d. /
&7Q
@ /4r&4d
-Fir SKNATUPE(Z) sa,- LnCs.2,y,Or*a 13.
rc ES-201, Page 26 of 27
/
r c
Examination Security Agreement FOIIII ES-201-3 ES-201 Pre-Examination 7 F b -
- 1.
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7 I I 6, k / as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide Performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my know1 d e, I 'd not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of.f;&<$%m the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
/
- 1.
hpbn+.r
/?e ucO,aPz,,&
- 2. ', T A P < & /
/=//red 5
h WL.uh
%*.G f i e Y
- 7. 2h.,7 d-
- 9. --
- 10. FaM'--
3 &*WY
$7 0
- 12. HLJ I *
/Paad A/L 6 S/@
Y/pr MaOWS'Z
- 6. h b kk&m 4Rf'
- 6. 4&7&.-
fe//&
- 11. Jew P.
M C M. L,. f A
- 13..-kuf
- 14. &%'T 9-
- 15. 141 15 Riley C P Tmnina #hp? n U s Q r NOTES:
I hl LO CR QD.2ic. I C
r
' Z L r ciu"trs ES-201, Page 26 of 27
i Form ES-201-3 G4%&-
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7/18,7/25;6ras of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancsllation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indicaticris or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of7 / 16 :&fl.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 6.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
NOTES:
.~
-~
ES-201, Pa: -6 of 27
m-301 Operatino Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3
'auliw Clinton Date of Examination 711 1/05 Operabng Test Number 04-1
. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
~~
- 1. GENRAL CRITERIA
~ _ _ _ _ _ _
~
- 1.
- 1.
The operating 1-1 wnbrms with the previousiyappmved outline; changes are consistent vith sampling requirements (e.g.. 10 CFR 55.45. operatlonal importance, safAyhmction distribution).
There is no dayic-day repetition betnaen this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
The operating test shall not duplicate items fom the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l.a).
Overlap with the rmitten examination and beiveen different par& of the operating test is wthin acceptable limits.
It appears that the operating test vill differentiate hewn wmpetent and less-than-wmpetent applicants at the designated license level.
- j.
- 3.
- 2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
- 1.
Each JPM indudes the bllowing. as applicable:
. initial conditions initiatingares references and tools. including associated pmcedunts reasonable and validated time limits [average time allow4 for wmpletion) and s p d f c designation If deemed to be time uitical bythe facility licensee operationally Important specitc performance uiterla that indude:
detailed emected actions dth exact dtetia and nomenclature system res.ponse and other emniner cues statements describing important observations to be made bme applicant uitmla for sucwssk~i completion of the task Identification of uiBcal steps and their associated pdrmanca standards restrictions on the sequence ofsteps. if applicable
- a.
Ensure that anychanges from the previouslyappmved systems and administrative valk-thmugh outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviatelbm any of the acceptance uiteria (e.9.. item distribution. bank use. repetition b m the last 2 NRC emminations) soeci6ed on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. SIMUATOR CRlTERlA The associated simuiatoroperating tests (scenario sets) have been r e v i d In accordance vith Form ES-301-4 and a copyis attached.
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer r)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor initial!
NOTE:
- The faciiltyslgnature is not applicable br NRCdeveloped tests
- Independent NRC revlmr initial items in Column 'c"; chiefexaminer wncumence is required.
ES-301, Page 24 of 27
ES-301 F
o
~
ES-3014 Facilitv: Clinton Dateof Exam: 7/11/05 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 / 3 Operating Test Number: 04-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic. in that some equipment and/or instlumentation ma@e out of service. but it does not cue the operators Into epected events.
- 2.
- 3.
The scenarios consist mostiyof related events.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomshes that Hill be visible to the crew the ewected operator actions (byshlff position) the event termination point (ifapplicable)
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
No more than one non-mechanistic Bilure (e.g.. pipe break) is incorporated into the Scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
The events are valid dth regard to physics and thermodylamics.
Sequendng and timing ofevents is reasonable. and all-the examination team to obtain comrdete evaluation results commensurate vim the scenario objectives.
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summawlearlyso indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carryout evected activities nithout undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to IOCFR55.4qd). anppen simulator performance ddciencies or deviations fom the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that Clnctional fidelitv is maintained Hhlle NnninD the planned scenarios.
- 8.
- 9.
IO.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one newor significantly modified scenario.
All athar scenarios have been altered in acmrdance vlth Section D.5 of ES-301.
- 11.
- 12.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verikd using Form ES-301-6 (submit the brm along with the simulator scenarios).
Each applicant Hill be significantiy involved In the minimum number oftransients and events soscified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the brm with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions br each uew Position.
Target Puantltatlu AWbuter (Per Scenario; See Sadon Ll5.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) 5 / 5 / 5
- 2.
Malfunctions aflar EOP enbvll-21 1 / 1 / 1
- 3.
Abnormal events (24) 3 1 4 1 4
- 4.
Major transients (1-2) 2 / 2 / 1
- 5.
EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 2 / 1
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
O / l / l
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 2 / 2 / 2 initials ES-301, Page 25 of 27
L-L ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist F
o
~
- acility: CI A
P P
L I
C A
N T
t0 iRO-l SRO-U
- RBI iR0-U 3 0 jR0-I jR0-U 30 jR0-I SRO-U nstructionr Date of Exam
- 7/1i/05 Operating Test Number: ILTO401-1
- 1.
Cirde the applicanl lwd and enter the operahng test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbersdr each event We:
TS are not applicable br RO applicants. ROP must SBNO In both the 'at-the-wntr0.s (ATC)' ana 'balance-dplant (B0P)'posibons' Instant SRQ must dp one scenario, lnduding at least tu0.nstrument or wmponent (I/C) malfundons and one major translent. m me ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivily manlpulatlons ma be conducted under normal.or controlled abnormal wnditlons (rekr to Section D 5.d) but must be signilcantper &lion C.2.a olAppmdlx D.
additional instrument M mmponent maltnctions on a 1-br-1 basis.
Reactiviiyand normal evolutions maybe replaced Mth
- 3.
Whenever practical. both Instrument verifiable actions that pmWe insight nent rnalfinctlons should be included: onlythose that require cant's wmpetence count towd the minimum requlrement.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
~
ES301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Clinton Date of Examination: 7/11/05 Operating Test No.: 04-1 I
APPL ANTS I
I SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1-10 1 0 1-9 Interpret/ Diagnose Events and Conditions RO - ATC SCENARIO 1121314 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Notes:
(1)
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
SRO-U Instructions:
Circle the applicants license type and enter one o to evaluate every applicable conpeten Author:
NRC Reviewer:
event numbers that will allow the examiners ES-301, Page 27 of 27
i
~~
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Fom~
ES-401-6 Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 7/11/05 Exam Level: ROlSRO Item Desdption Initial I
T
- 1.
- 2.
Questions and ansueIE are technicailyacwrate and applicable to the kdity.
- a. NRC WAS are &rend for ail questions.
- b. Fadlitvleamino oblectives are rebrend as available.
- 5.
Ouestion dupllcatlon fom the limse sueening/audit emm was conlrolled as indicated below(check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
1( the audit emm was systematicallyand randomlydeve(oped the audit emm was mmpieted bebre the licensa emm was started the examinations wre developed independently 3
the licensee cerWes that there is no duplication other (emlain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent n q and the rest new or modified): enter the actual RO/ SROoniy auestion disbibulionbl at riaht.
- 7.
Behveen 50 and 80 percent of the questions on the RO exam are milten at the comprehension /analpis level:
the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent iftha randomly selected KAs wppat the higher cognitive levels: enter the actual RO/ SROauesUon distribuUon(sl at rioht.
- 8.
Referencesthandouts provided do not give awy a n m t s or aid in the ellmlnatlon ofdistactors.
with specific WAstatements In the previouslyapproved appropriate br the Tier lo Hhich they are assigned:
A n n & N h e I Signature Date
- a. Author
- b. Fadlity Reviewer r)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)tho.&
- d. NRC Regional SuperviSM Note:
- The f a c i i i t y r e v i ~ s InitiaWsignature are not applicable br NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviensr initial items In Column 'c': chiefexaminer concurrence required.
ES-401, Page 29 of 33
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist F
o
~
ES-401-6 Item Desaiption
- 1.
- 2.
Cluestions and anwets are technically accurate and applicable to the hdlity.
- a. NRC WAS are rekenmi for all questions.
- b. Fadlityleaming objedves are rebrenced as available.
SRO ouestions arw aooroDnate in amdance uith Section D.2.d.ofES-401
- 3.
- 4.
If more than bur RO and two SRO questions are r6peated tom the last hw NRC licensing exam, the fadlity llwnsee's sampling process HBS random and sytematic.
5 Ouesbon duplication torn the license sueeninglaudit emm was controlled as indicated below(check the item that applies) and appears appropnate'
/ the audit exam was srjternabcallyand randomlydeveloped 2 the a m t emn was wmpleted Debre the license emn was started
~ -
the examinations ware developed independently the licensee Wies that there is no duplication other (eplain)
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new and the rest new or modifled); enter the actual RO/ SROonly question distribution(s) at tight.
Between 50 and 80 percant ofthe questions on the RO exam are witten at the mmprehension /analpis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO/ SROquesUon disbibutlon(s) at right.
- 6.
- 7.
74125 I
I I
Memory I
CIA 32/6 I 43/19 I,@
t give amy answers
- a. Author Dat
- b. Facility Reviewer r)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
ES-401, Page 29 of 33
Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 ES-403 Quality Checklist I
l
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
ES-403. Page 5 of 5