ML052430750
| ML052430750 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 07/18/2005 |
| From: | Charles Phillips NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | AmerGen Energy Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML052430228 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461/05-301 50-461/05-301 | |
| Download: ML052430750 (3) | |
Text
NRC COMMENTS TO THE EXAMINATION OUTLINE SUBMITTAL AND EXAMINATION OUTLINE QUALITY CHECKLIST, ES-201-2 FOR THE CLINTON INITIAL EXAMINATION -JULY 2005
April 18, 2005 To: C. Phillips
Subject:
Review of Examination outline for the July 2005 Clinton Examination.
u I reviewed the subject examination outline and found it to be acceptable with the following two exceptions. The following two comments were discussed with Gary Setser the examination author on April 18, 2005 by phone. The preliminary resolutions are as indicated below.
- 1) SRO Administrative JPM, Determine Actions Reauired For a Securitv Threat Comment: This JPM has been classified as a Conduct of Operation JPM, the title of the JPM would suggest that it would be better classified as an Emergency Plan JPM.
Resolution: The site has re-review this JPM and believe it is correctly classified as a Conduct of Operation JPM per ES-301 B. 1. Security (awareness and familiarity).
When the actual examination is received the NRC will confirm this JPM has been correctly classified. F
- 2) Scenario 3, Event 1, SLC PumD A Packino Problem Comment: This Event is a given in the scenario shift turnover. Therefore the evaluation of the Tech Spec call by the SRO will not be observable by the examiners in a normal control room setting. This event will need to be changed so the SRO does not have knowledge of the equipment problem prior to assuming command of the shift.
Resolution: The scenario will be modified to address this problem.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2
- ad11 tan -
- 1.
W R I T
T E
N -
- 2.
S I M
U L
A T
0 R
- 3.
W
/
T
- 4.
0 E
N E
R A
L -
Data of Examination: 711 1/05
- linton Task Descriptlon I
- a.
- b.
Verify that the outline(s) It@) the appropriate model, in accordance nith ES401.
Assess hether the outllne vas systematically and randomiyprepared in aOOOrdance Mth S d n D.l ofES-401 and hather ail WA categories are appropriateiysampled.
Assess hether the outline over-emphasias any systems. evolutions, or generic topics.
@I
- c.
- d.
Assess dwther thajusUlcaUons for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate.
1 &?
a Using Form ES-301-5. veri(/that the proposed scenario sets wver the required number of normal evolutions, lmbument and component bilures. technical speulcations.
and maior bansients.
- b.
Assass helher them are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mixof applicants in BaOrdancenith the e-crew composition and rotation schedule WlmOUt compmmlsing earn lnt@ry, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one n w o r signHlcantly modified scenario. that no scenarios are duplicated fmm the applicants audn tesUs). and scenarios VYI not be repeated on subsequent das.
- c.
To the e*mt possible. asses Hhether the outline@) conbrm(s) with the qualitative and quantitative dterla spedfed on Form ES-301-4 and described in AppendixD.
Verily that the s@ms walk-through outline meets the criteria speufed on Form ES-301-2 (1) the outline@) amtain(s) the required number ofmntml mom and in-plant tasks distributed among the sahhlfunclions as s p d e d on the form (2) task r6petiUm tom the last tno NRC emminations is Whin the limits spedied on the form (3) no tasks are dupllcated tom the applicants audit tesW (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or e h
s the minimums speciied on the form (5) the number of alternate path. lowpower. emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form Vmify that the administrative outline meets the dterla speckxi on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as s p
a on the form (2) at least one task is newor significantly modified (3) no more than me task is repeated fom the last tno NRC licensing emminations Determine Hthere are enough different outlines to tast the projected number and mix of applicants and m u r e that no items are duplicated on subsequent dap.
Assess helher plant-sped(c priorities (induding PRA and IPE insights) are mvered
- a.
[ I
- b.
- c.
- a.
iitiais
- a. Author
- b. Fadlily Reviewer ()
- c. NRC Chief Emminer (#)
- d. NRCSupeivisor NOTE:
- independent NRC Rsvirmsr initial items in Column c; chiefemminer wnwrrence required.
ES-201, Page 25 of 27