SBK-L-10037, Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report

Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report

ML100570172
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/19/2010
From:	O'Keefe M NextEra Energy Seabrook
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SBK-L-10037
Download: ML100570172 (6)

Text

SNxTera ENERGY S;SEABROOK February 19, 2010 Docket No. 50-443 SBK-L-10037 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Seabrook Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.717(e), enclosed is the NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report for 2009.

Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed report, please contact me at (603) 773-7745.

Respectfully, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Michael O'Keefe Licensing Manager cc: S. J. Collins, NRC Region I Administrator D. Egan, NRC Project Manager W. J. Raymond, NRC Senior Resident Inspector NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874

ENCLOSUE to SBK-L-10037 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC 2009 Company Annual Reporting Period Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) & Alcohol (% BAC)

X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.103 and 26.163 Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor

_____

_____ _____Person nel Average number with Unescorted Access 710 787 Total: 1497 ategories - Tested Tested.Pot Follow-Up 22 0 51 0 For Cause -

Observed Behavior For Cause- 1 0 9 0 Post Event Pre-Access 44 0 1697 17 Random 396 0 405 2 Total 463 0 2165 19

• One (1) test was for odor of alcohol, only alcohol test conducted.

During the reporting period of 2009, NextEra Energy Resources Seabrook Station conducted 2628 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:

Reporting Period POOLS 2009 Seabrook Station 53.5%

BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS SAmphe- Phency- Refusal Site Location Marijuana Cocaine Opiates tamines clidine Alcohol to Test Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contractors 1 5 1 6 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 6 1 1 Total 1 5 6 0 1 0 6 j 1 Management Actions For the reporting period of 2009, nineteen (19) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type seventeen (17) pre-access tests were positive, and one random test was positive. In addition, one random test was a refusal to test.

Pre-Access Positive Tests There were a total of seventeen (17) pre-access positive tests. Eleven (11) Initial, three (3)

Update, and three (3) Reinstatement contractor employees tested positive for drugs or alcohol.

They were all denied access.

Random Positive Tests One (1) contractor employee tested positive for alcohol, and one (1) contractor refused to test after being notified of a random test. Both individuals were denied access. The individual who refused to test was a permanent denial.

Additional Comments

1. There were no subversion attempts during the 2009 reporting period.

2. For the 2009 reporting period, one blind specimen submitted to Seabrook Station's HHS-certified laboratory yielded un-expected results. One PCP blind came back as an Opiate.

Upon discovery, the blind was submitted to a second lab and the PCP came back as an Opiate. After investigation it was determined that the provider of the specimen had an administrative error with their paperwork. All other blind specimens sent to the HHS-certified lab yielded expected results.

3. One for cause test for observed behavior was for the odor alcohol, and only an alcohol test was performed.

Reportable Events Seabrook Station had no reportable event as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period.

Facility Name Report Period 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Seabrook Summary of Waiver Issuance - 26.203(e)(1 )(i-ii)

Number of Waivers Issued (Note: At least one of the cells in this table should have a non-negative value)

Operating or on-site Performing health physics Performing duties of a fire Performing maintenance or Performing security'Y directing of the operations or chemistry duties as brigade member, as duties as described Operating Outage o Work Hour Controls of systems as described in oestrybduties(as bri be r, as maintenance, as described 26.4(a)(1) described 26 4(a)(2) described in 26.4(a)(3)

• in 26.4(a)(4) 26.4(a)(5) Total Total Operating Outage, Operating Outage Operating .. Outage, Operating Outage Operating Outage Exceed 16 work hrs in any 24hr period 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 HDailyWork Exceed 26 work hrs in any 265d()48 hr period 0 0 0~- 0 0 0 0- 0 .0 0 '0 Exceeded 72 work hrs in any 7Tday "

period 0 0 0 010 0 0 0:00 0 0 Less than 10 hr break 1/t successive work periods (for 8 hr Rest Breaks break accommodating scheduled 26.205(d)(2) transition b/t shifts) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

• 1, Less than 34 hr break in any g day period 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q0 0 Avg of less than 1 day off per week for 8-ho.ur shifts while operating 0 0 0 0 0 Avg of less than 2 days off per week Minimum for 10-hour. shifts while operating 0 0 0 0 0 Days Off Per Avg of less than 2.5.days off per.

Shift Cycle week for 12-hour shifts While .

26.205(d)(3) operating 0 0 0 0

• 0 Avg of less than 2 days off per week fr1-hour maintenance shifts00 0 Avg of less than 3.days off per week for 12-hour security shifts 00o" 0 Less than 3 days off per successive Minimum 15-day period .0 0l 00.

Days Off for Outage Activities- N " *

• Actvtges Less than 1 day off per 7-day period 26.205(d)(4) for maintenance personnel - 0 *- .

and g 26.205(d)(5) Less than 4 days off per successive r 2_.20_d)_5 15-day period for security personnel TOTAL 0 01 0 -0 11 0 0;% 0 0 0 1 0 NOTE: For individuals performing fire brigade duties and other duties, please count them only under the fire brigade column. Do not double count these individuals.

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Facility Name Report Period Seabrook I 12oI -I Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1 )(iii) Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2)

Number of Employees Issued Waivers Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:

One waiver was required during the reporting period. On 12/18/2009 one waiver was requested and approved for an Operations Fire Brigade Leader (FBL) needed to cover the shift for an ill FBL. The waiver was for a less than 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> break between shifts. The break Operating or on- Performing Performing Performing between shifts was 8.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> in duration. The worker was on online hours.

site directing of health physics dutieso maintenance or Performing Number of Waivers the operations or chemistry brigade member onsite directing security duties of systems, as duties as as described in of maintenance as described in escribed in d escribed in as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(3)* 26.4(a)4)

_________1_____1

____!___: ... .. "  ! :.i Analysis of Fatioue Assessment Data:

An assessment of fatigue was conducted for the waiver for less than 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> break for a Fire Brigade Leader prior to assuming the shift on 12/18/2009. The individual had opportunity to rest prior to the shift and exhibited no outward signs of fatigue. Worker performed satisfactorily.

6 . . ..

10 ______

11-20 More than 20

Conclusions:

Total Number of One waiver was required during the reporting period. No corrective actions are required.

Employees Issued Waivers 0 Most Waivers Provided to a Single Individual . 1 .' _ !_ _

Note. For ind-dut peormti the fire bigde dteies,. please cett the, otly underf brigade cclumn. Do nWtdmhblecoent these indivieuals.

Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:

There are no corrective actions required based on waiver usage or fatigue assessments.