ML17298B353
| ML17298B353 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 10/03/1984 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| ANPP-30736-EEVB, NUDOCS 8410170269 | |
| Download: ML17298B353 (6) | |
Text
REGULATOR INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION S 'TEtl (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR: Stl10170269 DOC ~ DATE: 80/10/03 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET P.
..FACIL:STA 50 528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station~ Unit 1~ Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station~ Unit 2~ Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station~ Unit 3~ Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH ~ NAhlE, AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNTiE,E. Arizona Public Service Co.
RECIP ~ NAME REC IP IENT AFFILIATION KNIGHTONp G ~ Licensing Branch 3
SUBJECT:
Pr ovides clarification of Justification of 800607 request for par tial exemption from GDC-tt Request r estricted to
~
portion of GDC-0 r equir ing protection against ef fects r e postulated RCS main loop piping.
DISTRIBUTION CODE e B001D COPIES RECEIVED-'LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: Licensing Submittal: PSAR/FSAR Amdts L Related Correspondence NOTES!Standardized plant ~ 05000528 Standardized plant, OS000529 Standardized plant ~ 05000530 REC IP IENT COPIES REC IP IENT COPIES ID CODE/NAtlE LTTR ENC ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENC NRR/DL/ADL 1 NRR LB3 BC 1 NRR LB3 L'A 1 LICITRAgE 01 1 INTERNAL: ADM/I.FMB ELD/HDS3 IE FILE IE/DEPER/EPB 36 IE/DEPER/IRB 35 IE/DQASIP/QAB21 NRR ROEgM,L NRR/DE/AEAB NRR/DE/CEB 11 NRR/DE/EHEB NRR/DE/EQB 13 NRR/DE/GB 28 NRR/DE/MEB 18 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SAB 2Q NRR/DE/SGEB 25 NRR/DHFS/HFEBIl0 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 NRR/DHFS/PSRB NRR/DL/SSPB NRR/DSI/AEB 26 NRR/DS I/ASB NRR/DS I/CP8 10 NRR/DS I/CSB 09 NRR/DS I /ICSB 16 NRR/DSI/METB 12 NRR/DSI/PSB 19 N R I/RAB 22 NRR/DS I/RSB 23 REG FIL 04 RGN5 R /MIB EXTERNAL: ACRS LPDR NSIC
'3 DMB/DSS (AhlDTS) tl1 05 6
1 1
1 1
1 BNL(AMDTS ONLY)
FEMA"REP DIV 39 NRC PDR NTIS 02 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 55 ENCL
ll~
I 4 e ff 4I 4 ff II c 4 'f 4
I" If 4
~I 4I II
Arizona Public Service Company October 3, 1984 ANPP-30736 EEVBJr/MAR/dh Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. George Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN-50-528/529/530 Request for Partial Exemption to GDC4 File: 84-056-026'.l.01.10
References:
(A) Letter ANPP 29684-EEVB/WFQ, E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
to G. Knighton, Request for Partial Exemption to GDC4, dated June 7, 1984 (B) Letter ANPP 30440WFH/MAR, E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
to G. Knighton, dated September 5, 1984 (C) Letter LD-83-108, A. E. Scherer to D. G. Eisenhut, Basis for Design of Plant Without Pipe Whip Restraints, dated December 23, 1983
Dear Mr. Knighton:
In our Reference (A) and (B) letters, Arizona Public Service (APS) submitted justification for partial exemption from General Design Criteria 4 (GDC4). In response to a verbal request by NRC staff, APS provides the following clarification to our Reference (A) and (B) submittals.
Reference (A) cites a fracture mechanics analysis, submitted by Combustion Engineering (CE) in Reference (C), which validates the "leak before break" failure scenario for the System 80 design. The analysis was performed on the PVNGS design (as the prototypical System 80 plant) using pertinent PVNGS parameters, therefore, the Reference (C) submittal envelopes PVNGS with respect to such parameters as loads, material properties, postulated crack leakage and size, sei.smicity, and leak detection system capabilities.
We emphasize that our exemption request is restricted at this time to that portion of GDC4 which requires protection against the effects associated with postulated RCS main loop piping. We do not intend to change the RCS component support design.
8410170269 84i003 PDR *DOCK 05000528
.PDR
I I
It
Page 2 In Reference (A) we indicated this exemption pertains to all postulated breaks specified in Section 3.6 of CESSAR, which would eliminate the need for 22 main loop whip restraints per unit (66 for 3 units). We indicated the exemption would result in an estimated 560 man-rem per unit reduction in radiation exposure over the life of the plant. This estimate is based on the following assumptions:
a) A radiation level of 100 mRem/hr. This is slightly conservative with respect to the CESSAR estimate of 70-250 mRem/hr next to the RCS piping.
b) 400 man-hours to remove and reinstall a pipe whip restraint for Inservice Inspection. This estimate is based on construction and pre-operational testing records.
c) 14 of the 22 restraints would, at some time during the life of the plant, be removed to eliminate interference with Inservice Inspection (ISI). Considering the evolutionary nature of ISI, an estimate of 14 interferences over a 40 year life is considered conservative.
As indicated in our previous submittals, an expeditious review of our exemption request will result in substantial saving to APS. Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Very truly yours, CU~
E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
APS Vice President Nuclear Production ANPP Project Director EEVBJr/HAR/dh cc: E. A. Licitra A. C. Gehr
0 ' ~ l II+
j p
1