NRC Generic Letter 1999-02

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:19, 14 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Generic Letter 1999-002: (Errata): Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal
ML031110094
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Washington Public Power Supply System, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Clinch River, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/23/1999
From: Matthews D
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
To:
References
GL-99-002, NUDOCS 9908060152
Download: ML031110094 (5)
v • d • e


-ERRATA -UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.David B. Matthews, Dire Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR T +9 J jQ 301-415-2020

cAc r .Internet:

blm~nrc.gov

99080 osoewOo 99ZA

-ERRATA -: -/n (',,A t UNITED STATES INUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSIUrs

{> -/OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIO9 P /WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." ';If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. NAerry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpslnrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

blm~nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\ws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy OFFICE REXB i Tch Ed SPL C:REXB DiD NAME JShapaker

_____annonMarsh D1_ _DATE c/ 'I99 1 Y99 .I'99 ,liv99 N g*9 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152

{k 4on l

-ERRATA -UNITED STATES iNUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. Nberry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl @nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

blm@nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy OFFICE I EETech Ed SPLB lC:REXB l D:PXPZ NAME JShapaker

_annon IMarsh _1_6___th__

DATE J199 '7/c'd999

//(W9 kv99 s X 9 9 j OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152

-ERRATA -UNITED STATES-NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 12, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except thos who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has bee ermanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3 A999 that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence apppWrs in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0/203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the fa velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than II9i percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this Patter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuiclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./ David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contpct: John P. Segala, NRR 1f 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl@nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

blmenrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy OFFICE REXB l lITech Ed l PL C RE 'd lNAME JShapakeAlj i CA a <JHan no'l _________

DMatthewsl DATE -/6/99 M mJ,/9 9 ' h1/Iw99 / 199 J v !OFFICIAL

RECORD COPY 9908060152

-ERRATA-UNITED STATES N-UCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSkI.O

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, *Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. wtberry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl @nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

bIm~nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document.

indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N No copyllOFFICE lREXB l lTech Ed I l: PPBllCRX NAME JShapaker SMannonLarsh D IIIl DATE / I'/99 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I_ __ __9 _ ___9 0'19-OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152

Template:GL-Nav

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NRC_Generic_Letter_1999-02&oldid=1854398"