ML101260200

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:38, 9 February 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, E-mail Response to RAI Regarding Financial Qualifications for the RPI Reactor License Renewal
ML101260200
Person / Time
Site: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Issue date: 09/03/2008
From: Winters G C
Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch
To: Kennedy W B
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
Kennedy W, NRR/ADRA/DPR/PRT, 415-2784
References
TAC ME1591
Download: ML101260200 (1)


Text

From:Glenn Winters [gwinter2@nycap.rr.com]Sent:Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:29 PM To:Kennedy, William

Subject:

Fw: Supplemental information for RAIs regarding RCF license

renewal Hi Duke, Here is part of the response that you asked for. Since the request came by e-mail. I assume an

e-mail response is acceptable. Please let me know otherwise. Basil is

working on the second

question.Glenn----- Original Message -----

From: "Caracappa, Peter F." <caracp3@rpi.edu>

To: "Glenn Winters" <gwinter2@nycap.rr.com>

Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 8:55 PM

Subject:

RE: Supplemental information for RAIs regarding RCF license

renewal I looked at our response and we did say that we would update the values annually based upon

current rates. Looking at the OSU response, I am guessing that they

want just a little more

detail. I suggest the following by way of response.


Our decommissioning cost estimate consists of four elements:

(1) Labor costs

(2) Disposal costs

(3) Equipment and supplies

(4) Contingency Labor costs are determined by estimating hours required of each category of worker (supervisor, technician, etc) and the prevailing labor rate for that category of

worker. Characterization and

decommissioning times are included in this estimate.

Disposal costs are determined by estimating total disposal volume multiplied by the volumetric

cost.Equipment and supplies costs are determined from current retail prices.

A 25% contingency is added to the sum of the first three cost estimates to account for

uncertainties in cost estimates and other miscellaneous costs.

The decommissioning cost estimate will be reviewed annually. The labor costs will be adjusted

by inflating the labor rate for each category of worker based upon

changes in the local prevailing

wages. Disposal costs will be adjusted based upon current volumetric

cost rates. Costs for

equipment and supplies will be inflated by changes in the consumer price index.--------

Hope that will take care of it.

--Peter


Original Message-----

From: Glenn Winters [1]

Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 6:20 PM

To: Caracappa, Peter F.

Cc: Stewart, Basil A.

Subject:

Fw: Supplemental information for RAIs regarding RCF license

renewal Peter, I think the item on updating the decommissioning costs is yours.

Glenn----- Original Message -----

From: "William Kennedy" <William.Kennedy@nrc.gov>

To: <stewab2@rpi.edu>

Cc: "Glenn Winters" <gwinter2@nycap.rr.com>; "Ronald Uleck"

<Ronald.Uleck@nrc.gov>; "Daniel Hughes" <Daniel.Hughes@nrc.gov>

Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 3:11 PM

Subject:

Supplemental information for RAIs regarding RCF license renewal Mr. Stewart, We have finished reviewing your response to the RAIs regarding financial qualifications

and decommissioning. Your response to RAI

4.(c) did not include an example of how the decommissioning cost estimate will

be updated

periodically. Please supplement your response dated July 21, 2008, with

an example of how the

decommissioning cost estimate will be updated periodically. Pages 1 and 2 of the enclosure to Ohio State University's

response to RAIs provide an example (ADAMS Accession No. ML080650352).

Your response to RAI 5 also requires supplementation. The

response mentioned self-

liquidity, which is not a means for assuring decommissioning funding.

The financial reviewer

suggested that you read 10 CFR Part 30, Appendix E for information about

the self-guarantee

test, and NUREG-1757, Appendix A.14 for information regarding self-

guarantees and the

documentation that needs to be provided.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any

questions regarding this matter.

Additionally, Mr. Ronald Uleck (Ronald.Uleck@nrc.gov

<mailto:Ronald.Uleck@nrc.gov> or

(301) 415-3741) may be able to better answer questions regarding the

specifics of your response.Thank you.

Duke Kennedy

William B. Kennedy Project Engineer

U.S. NRC (301) 415-2784

E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (085ED4CA15B84ED1BB295E1F6151B89E)

Subject:

Fw: Supplemental information for RAIs regarding RCF license renewal Sent Date:5/3/2010 9:51:04 AM Received Date:9/3/2008 1:29:15 PM From:Glenn WintersCreated By: gwinter2@nycap.rr.com

Recipients:

William.Kennedy@nrc.gov (Kennedy, William)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

acerad993ba82bFilesSizeDate & TimeMESSAGE32535/3/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority:olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:True Return Notification:False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: