ML053500007

2005/12/23-G20050360 - Federal Register Notice Final Director'S Decision - Raymond Shadis 2.206 Petition - Degraded Fire Protection Systems at Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee

ML053500007
Person / Time
Site:	Vermont Yankee
Issue date:	12/23/2005
From:	Borchardt R W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Bailey S N , NRR/DLPM,415-1321
Shared Package
ML053500015	List: ML053500005 ML053500007 ML053500012
References
%dam200601, 2.206, 7590-01-P, G20050360, TAC MC6958
Download: ML053500007 (3)

Text

7590-01-PU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONDOCKET NO. 50-271LICENSE NO. DPR-28ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLCAND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2.206Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, hasissued a Director's Decision with regard to a petition dated May 3, 2005, filed pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 2.206, by Mr. Raymond Shadis onbehalf of the New England Coalition (NEC), hereinafter referred to as the "Petitioner." The petition was supplemented on May 17, 2005. The petition concerns the use of the Hemyc electric raceway fire barrier system (EFRBS) at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Generating Station (Vermont Yankee).NRC Information Notice 2005-07, "Results of Hemyc Electrical Raceway Fire BarrierSystem [ERFBS] Full Scale Fire Testing," dated April 1, 2005, informed the operators of nuclear power plants that the Hemyc ERFBS did not perform for one hour as designed. The NRC listed Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (Vermont Yankee) among the sites that had installed Hemyc ERFBS. The NEC petition requested that the NRC promptly restore reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety with regard to the fire barriers in electrical cable protection systems at Vermont Yankee, or otherwise to order a derate of Vermont Yankee until such time as the operability of the fire barriers can be assured.

Specifically, the petition requested that the Commission take the following actions: (1) require Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee (ENVY) to promptly conduct a review at Vermont Yankee to determine the extent of condition, including a full inventory of the type, amount, application, and placement of Hemyc, and an assessment of the safety significance of each application;(2) require ENVY to promptly provide justification for operation in nonconformance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R; and (3) upon finding that Vermont Yankee is operating in an unanalyzed condition and/or that assurance of public health and safety is degraded, promptly order a power reduction (derate) of Vermont Yankee until such time as it can be demonstrated that ENVY is operating in conformance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, and all other applicable regulations.Mr. Raymond Shadis, in his capacity as the petitioner's Staff Technical Advisor,participated in a telephone conference call with the NRC's Petition Review Board (PRB) on May 17, 2005, to discuss the petition. The results of that discussion were considered in the PRB's determination regarding the Petitioner's request for action and in establishing the schedule for the review of the petition. During the May 17, 2005, PRB conference call, the Petitioner requested that the licensee review fire barriers beyond the Hemyc electric raceway fire barrier system. This request was not accepted under the 2.206 process because the petitioner did not provide adequate information to justify expanding the scope of the review. In an acknowledgment letter dated June 15, 2005, the NRC informed the Petitioner thatthe petition was accepted, in part, for review under 10 CFR 2.206 and had been referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation for appropriate action. The NRC staff sent a copy of the proposed Director's Decision to the Petitioner forcomment on October 11, 2005. The NRC staff did not receive any comments.The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has determined that the NRChas in effect granted the Petitioner's request. The reasons for this decision are explained in the Director's Decision pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 (DD-05-07). The Petitioner's concerns regarding the use of Hemyc at Vermont Yankee have been adequately resolved such that no further action is needed. The licensee has replaced the Hemyc on all equipment that is relied upon forcompliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R. The documents cited in this Director's Decision are available for inspection at theCommission's Public Document Room (PDR) at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland and from the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have accessto ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR reference staff at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. A copy of the Director's Decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission forthe Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission's regulations.

As provided for by this regulation, the Director's Decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision, unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Director's Decision in that time. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of December 2005.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/R. W. Borchardt, Acting DirectorOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation