ML070730361

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:06, 24 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2007/03/14-Comment (37) Submitted by Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, Nancy Burton on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-51-10 - Environmental Impacts of Spent Reactor Fuel Pool Storage
ML070730361
Person / Time
Site: Millstone  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/14/2007
From: Burton N
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
71FR64169 00037, PRM-51-10
Download: ML070730361 (2)


Text

PRM-51-10 DOCKETED 03/14/07 (71FR64169)

Comment No. 37 From: <NancyBurtonCT@aol.com> To: <secy@nrc.gov> Date: Wed, Mar 14, 2007 6:16 AM

Subject:

Docket No. PRM-51-10 Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.

_SECY@nrc.gov_ (mailto:SECY@nrc.gov) .

RE: Docket No. PRM-51 Support The Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition for Rulemaking- Spent Fuel

The Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone supports the Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition for Rulemaking.

Specifically we support the Attorney General's position that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission should: (a) Consider new and significant information showing that NRC incorrectly characterized the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage as insignificant,

(b) Revoke the regulations which codify that incorrect conclusion and excuse the NRC's failure to consider spent fuel storage impacts in the licensing process, (c) Issue a generic determination that the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel are significant, and (d) Order that any NRC licensing decision that approves high-density pool storage of spent fuel at a nuclear power plant or any other facility must be accompanied by an EIS that addresses (i) the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel at that nuclear plant and (ii) a reasonable array of alternatives for avoiding or mitigating those impacts.

We know that this rule change is important to better protect the Commonwealth

's public health and safety and that new and significant information, e.g.,

the events of 9/11 and the President's statement that nuclear power plants are on terrorist's lists, has evolved since the rule was written. Sincerely, Nancy Burton Director Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone 147 Cross Highway Redding Ridge CT 06876 Tel. 203-938-3952




**************************************
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.

CC: NancyBurtonCT@aol.com

Mail Envelope Properties (45F7CB8B.0C8 : 5 : 45256)

Subject:

Docket No. PRM-51-10 Creation Date Wed, Mar 14, 2007 6:16 AM From: <NancyBurtonCT@aol.com>

Created By: NancyBurtonCT@aol.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01

SECY (SECY)

Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1975 Wednesday, March 14, 2007 6:16 AM TEXT.htm 7932 Mime.822 12033

Options Expiration Date:

None Priority:

Standard ReplyRequested:

No Return Notification:

None Concealed

Subject:

No Security:

Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled