05000461/FIN-2016002-08
From kanterella
Revision as of 13:26, 1 October 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Failure to Update the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) Peak Suppression Pool Temperature |
| Description | The inspectors identified a Severity Level IV NCV of 10 CFR 50.71(e), Periodic Update of the [Final Safety Analysis Report] FSAR, for the licensees failure to update the USAR after updating a Safety Analysis Calculation. Specifically, the licensee did not update the USAR Section A3.8.3.1 and Table 15.2.91 to coincide with the most recent updates to the accident analysis of record. The licensee initiated AR 2664276 to document the discrepancy in the peak suppression pool temperature throughout the USAR and initiated actions to revise FSAR Section A3.8.3.1 and Table 15.2.91 to coincide with the most recent revision to EPUT0400. The inspectors determined that the failure to update the USAR in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e), Periodic Update of the FSAR, with the most accurate version of calculated peak suppression pool temperature during an accident was a performance deficiency. The performance deficiency was determined to be minor in accordance with IMC 0612, Power Reactor Inspection Reports, Appendix B, Issue Screening, dated September 7, 2012; however, the reactor oversite programs significance determination process does not specifically consider the regulatory process impact in its assessment of licensee performance, therefore, it was necessary to address this violation which impeded the NRCs ability to regulate using traditional enforcement to adequately deter non-compliance. The inspectors reviewed this issue in accordance with IMC 0612 and the NRC Enforcement Policy. Violations of 10 CFR 50.71(e) are dispositioned using the traditional enforcement process because they are considered to be violations that potentially impede or impact the regulatory process. The inspectors reviewed Section 6.1.d.3 of the NRC Enforcement Policy and determined this violation was Severity Level IV because the licensees failure to update the USAR as required by 10 CFR 50.71(e) had not yet resulted in any unacceptable change to the facility or procedures. No cross cutting aspect was assigned because traditional enforcement violations are not assessed for cross cutting aspects. |
| Site: | Clinton  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000461/2016002 Section 1R18 |
| Date counted | Jun 30, 2016 (2016Q2) |
| Type: | TEV: Severity level IV |
| cornerstone | Miscellaneous |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.18 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | C Phillips E Sanchez -Santiago G Edwards J Wojewoda K Stoedter L Smith S Bell S Mischke T Bilik W Schau |
| Violation of: | 10 CFR 50.71(e) |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |
Finding - Clinton - IR 05000461/2016002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Clinton) @ 2016Q2
Self-Identified List (Clinton)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||