|
---|
Category:2.206 Director Decision
MONTHYEARML19303B7932019-11-25025 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Federal Register Notice with Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Director'S Decision 2.206 Petition Regarding Current Licensing Basis for Flooding ML19303C3042019-11-25025 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Director'S Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206 Current Licensing Basis for Flooding ML19303C3972019-11-25025 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Letter to Petitioner Concerning David Lochbaum, Et Al, 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding (EPID L-2015-CRS-0002) ML17167A4172019-10-0808 October 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Proposed Director'S Decision, David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Flood Current Licensing Basis ML17167A4192019-10-0808 October 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Letter to Petitioner, Proposed Director'S Decision, David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Flood Current Licensing Basis ML17167A4182019-10-0808 October 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Letter to Licensee, Proposed Director'S Decision, David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Flood Current Licensing Basis ML16091A4872016-03-31031 March 2016 E-mail from R.Guzman to M. Lampert 2.206 Petition - Pilgrim Emergency Planning, Petition Review Board Initial Recommendation (MF6462) ML15265A0622015-09-18018 September 2015 LTR-15-0470 Charlie Donaldson, Assistant Attorney General, State of New York, Letter Concerns About NRC Enforcement Proceeding No. 2013-0192 Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, Dockets 50-333, 50-271, and 50-293 ML15162A6902015-08-27027 August 2015 G20130211 - Transmittal Letter to Petitioner Judson Regarding Final Director'S Decision for James A. FitzPatrick Power Plant, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station ML15162A7632015-08-27027 August 2015 G20130211 - Final Director'S Decision ML12215A3142015-04-17017 April 2015 Proposed Director'S Decision - 2.206 Petition Re Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II Containment Designs ML13018A2392015-04-0808 April 2015 G20110171 - Letter to Petitioner Saporito on Proposed Director'S Decision Regarding 2.206 Petition Dated: March 12, 2011 ML15040A1612015-03-27027 March 2015 G20130211 - Proposed Director'S Decision ML14337A2432015-01-15015 January 2015 G20110262 - Final Director'S Decision - Paul Gunter and Kevin Kamps Letter 2.206 - Immediately Suspend the Operating License of General Electric Boiling Water Reactors Mark I Units ML14335A6302015-01-15015 January 2015 G20110262 - Final Response to Paul Gunter and Kevin Kamps Letter 2.206 - Immediately Suspend the Operating License of General Electric Boiling Water Reactors Mark I Units ML13338A6122014-03-26026 March 2014 G20130229 - 2.206 Petition Closure Letter Re Revoke Operating License for General Electric Mark I and Mark II Boiling Water Reactors ML13255A1892013-09-26026 September 2013 G20100454 Final Director'S Decision 2.206 (Pilgrim Watch) - Non-EQ Inaccessible Cables and Wiring at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML13255A1912013-09-26026 September 2013 G20100454 - Transmittal Letter 2.206 Petition (Pilgrim Watch)-Non-EQ Inaccessible Cables and Wiring at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML13115A2192013-04-19019 April 2013 G20100454 - Mary Lampert Ltr. Re Pilgrim Watch Reply to Proposed Director'S Proposed Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206 (7590-01-P) ML13018A4552013-03-20020 March 2013 Letter to Licensee Proposed Director'S Decision - Entergy'S Management of Non-Environmentally Qualified Inaccessible Cables & Wiring at Pilgrim ML13018A4572013-03-20020 March 2013 Proposed Director'S Decision - Entergy'S Management of Non-Environmentally Qualified Inaccessible Cables & Wiring at Pilgrim ML13018A4542013-03-20020 March 2013 Letter to Petitioner Proposed Director'S Decision - Entergy'S Management of Non-Environmentally Qualified Inaccessible Cables & Wiring at Pilgrim CY-92-223, G20110523/LTR-11-0411/EDATS: SECY-2011-0411 - Ltr. from Rep. E.J. Markey to Chairman Jaczko NRC Safety Requirements for Reactors Granted Construction Permits Prior to 19712011-07-14014 July 2011 G20110523/LTR-11-0411/EDATS: SECY-2011-0411 - Ltr. from Rep. E.J. Markey to Chairman Jaczko NRC Safety Requirements for Reactors Granted Construction Permits Prior to 1971 ML0809205582008-03-28028 March 2008 E-mail from Johanna Thibault Re Questions About Exhibits 2019-11-25
[Table view] Category:Legal-Exhibit
MONTHYEARML1116406212011-06-13013 June 2011 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Supplemental Attachment to the Declaration of Dr. Gordon R. Thompson ML1115304492011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 12 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304462011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 3C in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115303392011-06-0101 June 2011 New and Significant Information from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident in the Context of Future Operation of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML1115303452011-06-0101 June 2011 Declaration of Dr. Gordon R. Thompson in Support of Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Contention and Related Petitions and Motions ML1115304432011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 3B in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304452011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 11 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304442011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 3A in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304412011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 5 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1113905652011-05-12012 May 2011 Fukushima Fallout Regulatory Loopholes at U.S. Nuclear Plants ML1113905712011-04-28028 April 2011 Transcript of Briefing on the Status of NRC Response to Events in Japan and Briefing on Station Blackout ML1106009342011-02-0202 February 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000015-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of James V. Ramsdell Jr., Concerning the Impact of Specific Meteorological Conditions on the Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis ML1106009352011-02-0202 February 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000016-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Rebuttal Testimony of S. Tina Ghosh Concerning Pilgrim Watch'S Application of NUREG-1150 and NUREG-1465 ML1106009322011-02-0202 February 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000014-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of Nathan E. Bixler and S. Tina Ghosh Concerning the Impact of Alternative Meteorological Models on the Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis ML1106008802011-02-0101 February 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000013-00-BD01 - Rebuttal Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula and Dr. Steven R. Hanna on Meteorological Matters Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106008822011-02-0101 February 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000014-00-BD01 - Rebuttal Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula on Source Term Used in the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station SAMA Analysis ML1106008782011-01-31031 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000011-00-BD01 - URS-TR-10-0003, Rev. 1, ENT-Exposure Index Calculation - Exposure Index Analysis Using MACCS2 and Calmet: Sensitivity Study Supporting the Pilgrim Station SAMA Analysis. ML1106009382011-01-30030 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000023-00-BD01 - Statement by Bruce A. Egan, Sc.D., Cmm, in the Matter of Entergy Corporation, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application ML1106009372011-01-30030 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000022-00-BD01 - Declaration of Bruce A. Egan, Sc.D., Cmm, in Support of Pilgrim Watch'S Response Opposing Entergy'S Initial Statement of Position on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106008982011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000016-00-BD01 - NUREG/CR-6853, Comparison of Average Transport and Dispersion Among a Gaussian, a Two-Dimensional, and a Three-Dimensional Model ML1106008972011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000015-00-BD01 - Revisiting Goiania - 1987 Radiological Accident in Goiania, Brazil ML1106009282011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000011-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for Nathan E. Bixler ML1106008962011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000014-00-BD01 - Kamiar Jamali, Use of Risk Measures in Design and Licensing of Future Reactors ML1106009102011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000001-00-BD01 - Applicant'S Environmental Report, Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis. ML1106008792011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000012-00-BD01 - Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula on Source Term Used in the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analysis ML1106008722011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000006-00-BD01 - Er Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis ML1106008712011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000005-00-BD01 - LRA Er Section 4.21 ML1106009002011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000018-00-BD01 - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to State of New York'S Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of NYS Contention 16/16A ML1106009292011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000012-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for S. Tina Ghosh ML1106008662011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000001-00-BD01 - Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula and Dr. Steven R. Hanna on Meteorological Matters Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106009302011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000013-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for James V. Ramsdell, Jr ML1106008692010-12-31031 December 2010 Official Exhibit - ENT000004-00-BD01 - Analysis of Annual Wind Roses and Precipitation within About 50 Miles of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, and Use of Calmet to Calculate the Annual Distribution of Trajectories from the Pilgrim Stati ML1106008672010-12-30030 December 2010 Official Exhibit - ENT000002-00-BD01 - Declaration of Kevin R. O'Kula in Support of Entergy'S Pre-filed Testimony on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106008682010-12-22022 December 2010 Official Exhibit - ENT000003-00-BD01 - Declaration of Steven R. Hanna in Support of Entergy'S Pre-filed Testimony on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1013304352010-05-12012 May 2010 NRC Staff'S Initial Brief in Response to the Board'S Order (Regarding Deadlines for Submission of Parties) ML1106009022009-12-31031 December 2009 Official Exhibit - PWA000019-00-BD01 - What'S in the Black Box Known as Emergency Dose Assessment ML1106008912009-05-31031 May 2009 Official Exhibit - PWA000010-00-BD01 - Jennifer E. Thorp, the Eastern Massachusetts Sea Breeze Study ML1106009262009-05-31031 May 2009 Official Exhibit - NRC000010-00-BD01 - the Eastern Massachusetts Sea Breeze Study NRC-2007-0019, FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking2008-08-0808 August 2008 FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking ML1112203542008-08-0808 August 2008 FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking ML0810904402008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 11, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.3.1.13 Water Chemistry Control BWR Program ML0810904752008-04-15015 April 2008 2008/04/15-Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 8, License Renewal Application, Appendix B.0.3 ML0810905332008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 14, Amendment No. 176 Excerpt (3/4.5-7 - 3/4.5-8) ML0810902922008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 17, Bptip: NUREG-1891, Rev. 1, X I M32, 3.0.3.2.1, Buried Pipes and Tanks Inspection Program, 3-35 to 3-38 ML0810902462008-04-15015 April 2008 2008/04/15-Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 2, Pilgrim License Renewal Application, Pages from Appendix B ML0811202612008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 23, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.2 Staff'S Review Process ML0810904382008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 9, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.3.2.16 Service Water Integrity Program ML0810905242008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 8, Nureg/Cr 6876, Risk Informed Assessment of Degraded Buried Piping Systems in Nuclear Power Plants; Brookhaven National Laboratory; Us NRC, June 2005. from Sections.. ML0810906152008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 28, NRC Region III Report Excerpt - Service Water (SX) System ML0810906162008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 53, 2-Photographs of Corrosion on Pipes at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 2011-06-13
[Table view] |
Text
DOCKETED USNRC Rebecca Glitter March 31,2008 (10:27am) __---- _.............
From: Johanna Thibault OFFICE OF SECRETARY Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:27 AM RULEMAKINGS AND To: Mary Lampert ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Cc: Ann Young; David Lewis; David Roth; James Adler; Kevin Nord; Kimberly Sexton; 'Mark Sylvia'; OCAAMAIL Resource; Paul Abramson; Paul Gaukler; Richard Cole; Richard MacDonald; Hearing Docket; Sheila Hollis(PlyAttorney); Susan Uttal; Zachary Kahn
Subject:
RE: Questions about Exhibits Ms. Lampert, At the hearing, the Board will assign an "official exhibit #" to every exhibit filed by each of the parties; therefore, the type of numbering system used by each party is only critical in the respect that each individual exhibit is identified with a number or letter that is unique to each exhibit and may be linked to that party's exhibit list.
Please note that the Statement of Position and Rebuttal documents should not be numbered and submitted as an exhibit at the hearing. These are legal briefings, but are not evidentiary documents. Although these documents are not exhibits, they will become part of the record and they will be considered by the Board at the hearing. However, just to clarify, any exhibits filed as attachments to the Statement of Position and Rebuttal or other exhibits properly filed and accepted by the Board, as well as any pre-filed testimony or declaration, ARE exhibits and should be filed as such.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions regarding the submittal and marking of exhibits.
Johanna Thibault (301) 415-5833 Law Clerk, ASLBP From: Mary Lampert [1]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:19 AM To: Johanna Thibault Cc: Ann Young; David Lewis; David Roth; James Adler; Kevin Nord; Kimberly Sexton; 'Mark Sylvia'; OCAAMAIL Resource; Paul Abramson; Paul Gaukler; Richard Cole; Richard MacDonald; Hearing Docket; Sheila Hollis(PlyAttorney); Susan Uttal; Zachary Kahn
Subject:
Questions about Exhibits March 28, 2008
Dear Ms. Thibault:
Per Judge Young's instructions, I am submitting my questions by email with copies to the Board and all parties.
The materials submitted by Pilgrim Watch fall, generally, into three categories:
- a. Pilgrim Watch's Statement of Position that was resubmitted following the procedure recommended below, and its Rebuttal that followed the same procedure;
- b. Separate numbered exhibits (Exhibits 1-26 submitted with the Statement of Position and Exhibits27-52B (submitted recently as late filed); and T -LS1__ -6d--&) c
- c. Expert declarations (two of which are labeled Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Statement of Position, and a third declaration of which was submitted with Pilgrim Watch's rebuttal but is not marked as a numbered exhibit).
The resubmitted Statement of Position refers to numbered exhibits (including Expert declaration Exhibits 1 and 2). It also includes citations, by document and page number, to documents that themselves are not one of the numbered exhibits.
I assume that the previously numbered exhibits themselves should not be renumbered. Thus, I plan to mark the other required exhibits, i.e., the Statement of Position, Rebuttal, and the third Expert declaration, as respectively Exhibits A, B and C.
Is this acceptable to the Board, or would you prefer that I follow some other procedure?
Thank you and have a nice week-end, Mary Lampert 781-934-0389 Attachment Email from Z. Kahn 02.26.'08 1:31PM
Dear Ms. Lampert:
I think that the confusion may be that you consider your "Statement of Position" to be your "Prefiled Testimony." However, testimony on technical matters must be by experts qualified to talk about the issues addressed, but your Statement of Position is signed by you, not by your experts, so that the only actual testimony that you have submitted is that provided in the declarations of your various experts. Your Statement of Position, because it is not testimony or evidence, may not be considered as such, except to the extent that there are specific references therein to actual testimony or evidence. In order for the board to consider the matters addressed in your Statement of Position as anything other than argument on how it should interpret the actual evidence, you must make specific references to actual evidence - testimony of experts or specific documents - that supports statements made in your Statement of Position.
Therefore, after consulting with the Board, the following is recommended: Pilgrim Watch should modify its Statement of Position (i.e., the 99-page document entitled "Pilgrim Watch Presents Statements of Position, Direct Testimony ... Under 10 CFR 2.12108") by adding a reference or footnote for each statement or assertion made. In the reference (which may be done by hand if you wish) or footnote, you should provide a 2
precise citation (document and page number) that supports the statement or assertion in question. You have done this in some places -- for example, on page 36 you cite the Gunderson Declaration providing paragraph numbers -- but not in others. All portions of the document that you wish to have considered as evidence by the Board in making its decision should be cited in the same manner as you cite the Gunderson Declaration on Page 36, or as a footnote. If you decide to use footnotes, you may add handwritten footnote numbers in the appropriate places in the document, and then create a new document containing the actual footnotes, or, more accurately, the numbered endnotes.
Please resubmit your modified 99-page "Statement of Position . . . "with, or preferably prior to, your submission of your rebuttal testimony. Provide copies to the Board and all parties, and file as you would any filing. In addition, all future filings should contain similar citations as described above.
Again, while you may not consider this as legal advice, I hope that it is helpful and clarifies the matters in question for you.
Sincerely, Zachary S. Kahn Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: (301) 415-6754 E-Mail: ZacharV.Kahn@nrc.gov 3