IR 07200201/1990001
| ML19273B133 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07200201, 03031172 |
| Issue date: | 09/19/2019 |
| From: | Deborah Piskura NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Peters T Mannik & Smith Group |
| References | |
| IR 2019001 | |
| Download: ML19273B133 (2) | |
Text
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (07-2012)
1ocFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRC/REGIONAL OFFICE The Mannik & Smith Group, In Region III 1800 Indian Wood Circle U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Maumee, OH 43537 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 030-35072 34-26110-02 Sep I q , 2019 LICENSEE:
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:
~ Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identifie b 2: Previous violation(s) close D The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations. are not being cited because they were self-identified, non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise discretion, were satisfie Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):
D During this inspection, certain of your activities. as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance with 10 CFR 19.1 (Violations and Corrective Actions)
Statement of Corrective Actions I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 1O CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken, date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requeste TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE LICENSEE'S REPRESENTATIVE NRC INSPECTOR Deborah A. Piskura, Senior Health Physicist BRANCH CHIEF Aaron T. McCraw, Chief, MIB NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012) I
NRC FORM 591M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (07-2012)
10 CFR2.201 Docket File Information SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE The Mannik & Smith Group, In Region III 1800 Indian Wood Circle U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Maumee, OH 43537 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 030-35072 34-26110-02 Sept. 19, 2019 6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS 87124 03.01 - 03.07 SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER 03121 5 Thomas Peters, RSO (734) 397-3100 D Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: Sept. 19, 2024
[l] Field Office Inspection Canton and Monroe, Michigan field offices
[l] Temporary Job Site Inspection sidewalk & road replacement, Monroe, Michigan PROGRAM SCOPE This was a routine inspection of a large private engineering and consulting firm based in suburban Toledo, Ohio. The company was authorized to operate four field offices located in Michigan; at the time of this inspection, two of these four locations possessed portable gauges. The licensee owned numerous moisture/density gauges which were used frequently for DOT road projects and other construction projects during the construction season. These gauge units were primarily stored at the Monroe and Canton field offices and dispatched to field job sites as needed to support the local construction project. Forty-five individuals were authorized to use the gauges. Gauge users must attend an 8-hour training course conducted by the Michigan DOT, a service provider, or the device manufacturer. The licensee maintained copies of all gauge user's training certificates and a list of approved gauge users on file. The licensee did not perform any service or maintenance on its gauges; these services were performed by a service the device manufacture During this inspection, the inspector toured the gauge storage areas and noted the controls used by the licensee to comply with the security requirements in 10 CFR 30.34(i); performed radiation surveys around the devices; reviewed selected records; and interviewed selected licensee personnel. The inspector conducted a field inspection of an authorized gauge user at Front Street sidewalk replacement and road resurfacing project in Monroe, Michigan. The gauge user demonstrated that the shipping papers were visible and within reach during transport. The gauge user demonstrated how the device was secured with two independent physical controls (10 CFR 30.34(i)). The gauge user confirmed that the transport case was blocked and braced in the rear of the vehicle and confirmed that the devices were not transported within the passenger compartment. The gauge was not in use at the time of the field inspection, No violations ofNRC requirements were identified during this inspectio NRC FORM 591 M PART 3 (07-2012)