ML17213A498

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:41, 29 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Technical Evaluation of Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Sys Voltages for St Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1.
ML17213A498
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/05/1981
From: SELAN J C
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17213A497 List:
References
CON-FIN-A-0250, CON-FIN-A-250 UCID-19110, NUDOCS 8209280487
Download: ML17213A498 (14)


Text

  • ,'~,*=~lPTECHNICAL EVALUATION OFTHEADEQUACY.

OFSTATIONELECTRICDISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVOLTAGES:

"':..FORTHEST;LUCIENUCLEARPOWERPLANT,UNITl-':.'.'"~'...-'<<'.,'e1ectedIssuesProgram,-,'."

JakesC.Selan'"~"\PJ'DocketNo.50-335):..'

-~4YI-~~,e.i.'<<\~~P~'"'I~C.~~I-A7ThisGaninformaf rep'ortintendedpriman1yforinterrial orlimitedexteinaldlitribuihn':,

'.<<j'>pr~gg~

">"~>~~>"<<rr)>>gee"-"~j'.

,Theopinionsandeondusions statedarethoseoftheauthoiandmayormaynotbethose;",.:

"';~5~~y~~:

",.-~~j:-.'ja'.~~+"

<'g~~~4<<'TMsworkwiisupported bytheUnitedStatesNudearRegulatory Commission under@";.

~".~>",.~."-'.g,,aMemoranduni ofUnderstanding withtheUnitedStatesDepartment ofEnergy.":;,'~,.'

-",4:g'-'".",-'r;<+.

8209280487 820902PDRADOCK05000335...,'*~,PPDR 0"l Thisdocnmentwaspreparedasaniccouiitofworksponsored byanagency'ftheUnitedStatesGovernment.

Neither.'theUnitedStatesGovernment norinyagencythereof,noranyoftheiremployees, makesanywarranty, expressed

.*'orimplied,orassumesanyleg~iliability orresponsibility fortheaccuracy,'ompleteness,"or usefulness ofanyinformation, apparatus, product,'r processdisclosed, orrepresents thatitsusewouldnotinfringeprivately owned:rights.Reference hereintoanyspeciliccommercial product',

procesi;orservicebytradename,trademark; manufac-'urer,orotherIwise, doesnotnecessarily constitute orimplyitsendorsement, recommendation, orfavoringbytheUnitedStatesGovernment oranyagencythereof.Theviewsandopinionsofauthorsexpressed hereindonotnecessarily stateorrellectthoseoftbeUnitedStatesGovernment oranyagencythereof;..-

'-.','-I~I)~O'J'I)II)Ih0'<A'%I~~II~'I~~')I*~~~c~~1I~'trIr,',~~i11A)I,).~.).=I~~I~,\Itr."I=l'.~'I't~>'."',~Ig',,~,~~)f.*~II'-~',.'~'.".;,".,

.~>'.'..'..-",."

Arnilable from:;)Vnrlonat Technical lnfonnstloii Service',US.Department ofCornrncre'e-:..q~

').,'.'.'.'.'-'.~'.'..(.

';.-~":;;.5285PortRoyalRoad"'.Sprin'gAeld, VA2216l-~$5,00-'ercopy'"-(Mlerotiehe

$X50)',r'l,'..

-~.:~".'-'~".'."-..'<<,.'~'r~uI) a'h1"'<o~4'4'cfear~'avidI4<<t',,i'~s'>>'w'-~m'ws"st%.a"'t,'c~)i's4't~'>~aaa~5iw~rs.

ivS~*'aABSTRACTThisreportdocuments thetechnical evaluation oftheadequacyofthestationelectric'istribution systemvoltagesfortheSt.LucieNuclearPowerPlant,Unit.1..Theevaluation istodetermine if,theonsitedistribution system,inconjunction withtheoffsitepower.sources, hassufficient capacitytoautomatically startandoperateallClasslEloadswithintheequipment voltageratingsundercertainconditions established bytheNuclearRegulatory Commission.

Thevoltageanalysissubmirted hasadequately demonstrated thecapacityandcapability oftheelectrical distribution systemtosupplyadequatevoltagetotheClass1Eequipment underworstcaseoperating conditions.

FOREWORDThisreportissuppliedaspartoftheSelectedElectrical, Instrumentation, andControlSystemsIssuesProgrambeingconducted fortheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission,'ffice ofNuclearReactorRegulation, DivisionofOperating

Reactors, byLawrenceLivermore National'aboratory.

TheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission fundedtheworkundertheauthorization entitled"Electrical, Instrumentation andControlSystemSupport",

BGR201904031,FINA-0250.-111-TABLEOFCONTENTS~pael.INTRODUCTION

..~...o~~..~~~.12.DESIGNBASISCRITERIAo..o~.~~.~~~13.SYSTEHDESCRIPTION

......~.~...~24ANALYSIS4.14.24'.14'.243AnalysisConditions

.AnalysisResultsOvervoltage Undervoltage AnalysisVerification

~~~4~4~4~4~465~EVALUATION 66~CONCLUSION 7REFERENCES

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i8ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE1St.Lucie-Unit1Electrical One-LineDiagram~~~~Pae~~3TABLE1St.Lucie-Unit1Class1EEquipment VoltageRatings'andAnalyzedHorstCaseTerminalVoltages~~.~..~~5 TECHNICAL EVALUATION OFTHEADEQUACYOFSTATIONELECTRICDISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVOLTAGESFORTHEST.LUCIENUCLEARPOWERPLANTUNIT1(DocketNo.50-335)JamesC.SelanLawrenceLivermore NationalLaboratory, Nevada1~INTRODUCTION TheNuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC)byaletterdatedAugust8,1979[Ref.1],expandeditsgenericreviewoftheadequacyofthestationelectricdistribution systemsforalloperating nuclearpowerfacilities.

Thisreviewistodetermine iftheonsitedistribution system,inconjunction withtheoffsitepowersources,hassufficient capacityandcapability toautomatically startandoperateallrequiredsafetyloadswithintheequipment voltageratings.Inaddition, theNRCrequested eachlicenseetofollowsuggested guidelines andtomeetcertainrequirements intheanalysis.

Theserequirements aredetailedinSection5ofthisreport.BylettersdatedNovember9,1979[Ref.2],September 12,1980[Ref.3],February10,1981[Ref.4],andJuLy23,1981[Ref.5],FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL),thelicensee, submitted theiranalysisandconclusion regarding theadequacyoftheelectrical distribution system'svoltagesatSt.Lucie,Unit1.Thepurposeofthisreportistoevaluatethelicensee's submittal withrespecttotheNRCcriteriaandpresentthereviewer's conclusion ontheadequacyofthestationelectricdistribution systemstomaintainthevoltagewithinthedesignlimitsoftherequiredClass1Eequipment fortheworstcasestartingandloadconditions'.

DESIGNBASISCRITERIAThedesignbasiscriteriathatwereappliedindetermining theadequacyofstationelectricdistribution systemvoltagestostartandoperateallrequiredsafetyloadswithintheirrequiredvoltageratingsareasfollows:

(1)GeneralDesignCriterion 17(GDC17),"Electric PowerSystems,"

ofAppendixA,"GeneralDesignCriteriaforNuclearPowerPlants,"intheCodeofFederalRegulations, Title10,Part50(10CFR50)[Ref.6]~(2)GeneralDesignCriterion 13(GDC13),"Instrumentation andControl,"

ofAppendixA,"GeneralDesignCriteriaforNuclearPowerPlants,"intheCodeofFederalReulations, Title10,Part50(10CFR50)Ref.6(3)ANSIC84.1-1977, "VoltageRatingsforElectricPowerSystemsandEquipment"

[Ref.7].(4)IEEEStd308-1974, "Class1EPowerSystemsforNuclearPowerGenerating Stations"

[Ref.8]~(5)"Guidelines forVoltageDropCalculations,"

Enclosure 2,toNRCletterdatedAugust8,1979[Ref.1].3.SYSTEMDESCRIPTION Anelectrical one-linediagramofSt.Lucie,Unit1,isshowninFigure1.Theelectrical distribution systemisdesignedsuchthatduringnormalstartupandshutdownconditions, theauxiliary loadsaresuppliedbythestartuptransformer.

Whentheunitisabove170MWepoweroutput,theauxiliary loadsaresuppliedbytheunitauxiliary transformer.

Thetwostartuptransformers aresuppliedfroma240KVswitchyard wheretheoutputoftheunitgenerator isconnected throughamaintransformer bank.Thetwostartuptransformers havenoelectrical intertieconnections betweenthemwitheachtransformer supplying itsowntrainofauxiliary loads.Aunittriporasafetyinjection signal(SIS)willinitiateautomatic transferoftheonsitedistributon systemfromtheunitauxiliary transformer tothes'tartuptransformer.

Boththestartuptransformers andunitauxiliary trans-formershavetwosecondary

windings, withoneat6.9KVandthesecondat4160volts.Therearethree4160-volt andthree480-voltClass1Ebuses.TheClass1Eequipment isprotected fromundervoltage conditions byanundervoltage relaylocatedoneach4160-volt Class'lEbus.Theinversetimerelayhasavoltagesetpointof88.34Xof4160volts(3675volts)withatimedialsettingof1.Therelaywillactuateat79.5Xof4160voltsin'pproximately 3seconds.=

Thevoltagesetpointatthe4160-volt levelisequiva-lentto83%of480voltsattheClass1E480-voltmotorcontrolcenterbuses.Thelicenseestatesthatadesignmodification isplannedtoaddundervoltage relaysonthe480-voltClass1Ebuses[Ref.2].Thelicenseehasnotprovidedanyfurtherdesigninformation ontheplannedmodification.

~)~~~~~I&8I~~~~IoIoIi~IoI~I~~~,I~oIoo~,I~~I~oI~I~~

4~ANALYSIS4.1ANALYSISCONDITIONS FPLanalyzedtheonsitedistribution systemvoltageswiththestartuptransformer asthesupplying sourceunderminimumandmaximumexpectedgridvoltagesof230KVand244KV,respectively.

Inconjunction withtheaboveconditions, threeloadingcaseswereanalyzedtodetermine thevoltageattheterminals oftheClasslEequipment.

InCase1,thenormalrunningloadsweretransferred tothestartuptransformer following aunittripfromfullloadcoincident withaminimumexpectedgridvoltage.Theloadingconditions ofCase2arethesameasCase1,butwiththeadditionofloadsassociated withanaccident.

FinallyinCase3,theloadingconditions werethesameasCase1exceptthegridwasatthemaximumexpectedvalue.Inadditiontotheaboveconditions, thefollowing assumptions werealsomade:(1)Normalloadsusedweremeasuredvalueswiththep~antatfullload.(2)Powerfactorofrunningloadswasassumedas0.85.(3)HeasurednormalrunningloadsincludedseveralClasslEloads.(4)Startingpowerfactorforthe4KVmotorswasassumedas0.22.Startingcurrentwastakenfromnameplate data.(5)Startingpowerfactorforthe480-voltmotoroperatedvalveswasassumedtobe0.60.Thestartingcurrentwastakenfromplantstartuptestdata.(6)Allcurrentswereassumedtoremainconstant.

4.2ANALYSISRESULTSTheworstcaseClasslEequipment terminalvoltagesfromtheanalysessubmitted occurunderthefollowing conditions:

Normalrunningloadsbeingsupplied.bythestartuptransformer (unittripwithloadtransfertothestartuptransformer) andgridatthemaximumexpectedvoltageof244KV.4.2'Undervolta eUnittripfromfullloadwithtransferofthenormalrunningloadstothestartuptransformer concurrent withanaccidentcondition andthegridattheminimumexpectedvoltage,of230KV.TheaboveworstcaseClass1Eequipment terminalvoltagesareshowninTablel.

TABLE1ST.LUCIE-UNIT1CLASSlEEQUIPMENT VOLTAGERATINGSANDANALYZEDWORSTCASETERMINALVOLTAGES(inXofEquipment NominalVoltageRating)MinimumRatedAnalyzedRatedAnalyzedEuipmentNominalVoltageRating(100X)SteadyStateSteady-StateTransient Motors4000StartOperate1101065759099.493~5460(')StartOperate110104.3759092.982Starters(

PickupDropoutOperate12062'(c)11079'(c)81.18589OtherEquipment(d)

(a)460-voltmotorscanoperateat75Xterminalvoltageforoneminutewithoutdamage.Also,460-voltMOV'.scanoperateindefinitely at80Xterminalvoltage.(b)Motorcontrolcentercontactors aresuppliedfrom480/120-volt transformers.

Startersizes1-2and3-4aresuppliedby50VAand500VAsizetransformers, respectively.

(c)Thesevaluesobtainedfromtestsperformed.

(d)ClasslEinstruments arefedfrominverters.

4~3ANALYSISVERIFICATION FPLobtainedtestdatabyusingstandardplanttestmethodologies'his includedusingvoltmeters tomeasurethesecondary voltagesofthepotential transformers forthe4160-volt switchgear and480-voltloadcenters.Thebusamperesandthe480-voltMCCvoltageswerereadfromthecabinet's panelboardmeters.Thereadingstakenwereonaperphasebasis.Thesereadingswerethenaveragedandtheirrespective transformer ratioswereusedtocalculate actualbusvoltagesandamperes.Theverification resultsshowsthattheanalytical valueswerewithin2Xoftheactualplantdataobtained[Ref.4).5~EVALUATION TheNRCgenericletter[Ref.1}statedseveralrequirements thattheplantmustmeetinthevoltageanalysis.

Theserequirements andanevaluation ofthelicensee's submittals areasfollows:(1)Withtheminimumexpectedgridvoltageandmaximumloadcondition, eachoffsitesourceanddistribution systemconnection mustbecapableofstartingandcontinuously operating allClasslEequipment withintheequipment's voltageratings.Thevoltageanalysisresultssubmitted byFPLdemonstrate thattheoffsitesources,incon)unction withtheonsitedistribution system,havethecapacityandcapability toautomatically startandcontinuously operatetheClasslEequipment withthedesignratingsfortheworstcaseconditions.

(2)Withthemaximumexpectedoffsitegridvoltageandminimumloadcondition, eachoffsitesourceanddistribution systemconnection mustbecapableofcontinuously operating therequiredClasslEequipment withoutexceeding theequip-ment'svoltageratings.Thevoltageanalysisresultssubmitted, byFPLdemonstrate thatthe:Class 1Eequipment uppervoltagedesignratingwillnotbeexceeded.

(3)Theanalysismustshowthattherewillbenospurioussepara-tionfromtheoffsitepowersourcetotheClass1Ebusesbythevoltageprotection relayswhenthegridiswithinthenormalexpectedlimitsandtheloadingconditions established bytheNRCarebeingmet.

~.~LLNLwillverifyinaseparatereport(TACNo.10052)thattherequirements ofthispositionaremet.FinaldesignandTechnical Specifications areforthcoming.

FPLdidnotsubmitanalytical dataonstartingalargenon-Class 1EloadaftertheClass1EbusesOrefullyloaded.Thelicenseestatesthatstartingalargenon-Class lEloadwouldactuatetheunder-voltageprotection relayundertheworstcasecondition.

Thelargestnon-Class 1Emotoristhecondensate.

pumpwhichwouldbenormallyoperating.

Thepumpwouldhavetobemanuallytripped.Thelicenseestatesthatananalysisoftheplant'scondition wouldbemadebeforeanattempted restartofthepump.FPLdidnotsubmitanywrittenplantprocedures addressing thepumprestart.(4)Testresultsarerequiredtoverifythevoltageanalysescalculations submitted.

FPLverifiedtheirvoltageanalysisbytestandthepercenterrordifference of2Xconfirmtheanalytical resultsareacceptable.

(5)Reviewtheplant'selectrical powersystemstodetermine ifanyeventsorconditions couldresultinthesimultaneous lossofbothoffsitecircuitstotheonsitedistribution system.(compliance withGDC17.)FPLreviewedtheelectricpowersystemsandfoundthatnosingleeventorcondition couldresultinthesimultaneous orconsequential lossofbothrequiredcircuitstotheonsitedistribution system,thusnoviolation ofGDC17exists.6~CONCLUSIONS Basedontheinformation providedbyFloridaPowerandLightCompanyonSt.Lucie,Unit1'selectrical distribution system,itisconcluded that:(1)Voltageswithinthedesignratingsofthe.Class1Eequipment aresuppliedfromtheoffsitesourcesunderworstcasecondi-tions.(2)Theverification testperformed verifiestheanalysisresults.(3)AseparatereportwillbemadebyLLNL(TACNo.10052-DegradedGrid)toverifythatspurioustripswillnotoccurduringvoltagetransients uponfinaldesignandTechnical Specification submittal.,

fortheproposedundervoltage protection scheme.

(4),FPLhasdetermined thatnopotential foreitherasimul-taneousorconsequential lossoftheoffsitesourcesexists.(5)Addtional detailsoftheplantprocedures forassessing plantconditions priortotherestartofthecondensate pumpshouldbesubmitted.

REFERENCES 1.NRCletter(W.Gammill)toallPowerReactorLicensees, datedAugust8,1979.2.FPLletter(R.E.Uhrig)toNRC(W.Gammill),

datedNovember9,1979.3.FPLletter(R.E.Uhrig)toNRC(D.G.Eisenhut),

datedSeptember 12,1980.4.FPLletter(R.E.Uhrig)toNRC(D.G.Eisenhut),

datedFebruary10,1981.5.FPLletter(R.E.Uhrig)toNRC(D.G.Eisenhut),

datedJuly23,1981.6.CodeofFederalReulations, Title10,Part50(10CFR50),GeneralDesignCriterion 13and17ofAppendixAforNuclearPowerPlants.7.ANSI'C84.1-1977, "VoltageRatingsforElectricPowerSystemsandEquipment."

8.IEEESTD.308-1971, "Class1EPowerSystemforNuclearPowerGenerating Stations."

KI~I'III,'ILI..w.~"~...-...-';....-:--.'..-.:-'."

-..:..':-

..~.':CIt'*',~~'~,I:~'.~leO'II*I7~~~~