ML14204A623

Enclosure 3, Attachment - Response to the Us NRC Request for Additional Information Relative to the Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Accoustic/Structural Ananlyses Set #7

ML14204A623
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	07/18/2014
From:	Westinghouse
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML14204A618	List: L-MT-14-060, Extended Power Uprate: Replacement Steam Dryer - Response to NRC Requests for Additional Information, Revised Limit Curves and Supporting Information ML14204A623
References
LMT-14-060, TAC MF3330 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP
Download: ML14204A623 (29)

Text

L-MT-14-060 ENCLOSURE 3 WESTINGHOUSE LETTER ATTACHMENT, LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP RESPONSES TO THE US NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATIVE TO THE MONTICELLO REPLACEMENT STEAM DRYER ACOUSTIC/STRUCTURAL ANALYSES SET #7 27 pages follow Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP Responses to the US NRC Request for Additional Information Relative to the Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Acoustic/Structural Analyses Set #7 July 18, 2014 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 USA© 2014 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MECHANICAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING BRANCH (EMCB) OF THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REGARDING MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT EXTENDED POWER UPRATE POWER ASCENSION DATA TREND EVALUATION NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY -MINNESOTA MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-263 (TAC NO. MF3330)MNGP EPU-EMCB-RSD-RAI-120 During a review of power ascension data in March and April 2014, Xcel Energy discovered mislabeling of the main steam line (MSL)-C leads at the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP). In a conference call on April 9, 2014, the NRC staff were informed that the leads from the upper and lower strain gauges on MSL-C were confirmed to be erroneously reversed in 2011. Xcel Energy indicated during the conference call that the impact would be small. However, this issue could potentially impact the bias errors and uncertainties provided in the end-to-end benchmarking report for Acoustic Circuit Model Enhanced (ACE) 2.0 (Reference 1).The NRC staff requests the following additional information:

1. Please provide a detailed technical explanation for why the changes in bias errors and uncertainties were small; when the upper and lower strain gauge signals for MNGP MSL-C were interchanged due to mislabeling, compared to the correct case. The explanation should address the entire frequency range, since the dominant dryer excitation is frequency dependent.

2. Also, provide plots of the MSL-C monopole and dipole sources for the two cases, and a plot of overlaid or super-imposed Power Spectral Densities (PSDs) of MSL-C strain gauge signals to compare the similarities and the differences.

Reference 1. Letter L-MT-13-091 from Mark Schimmel, Xcel Energy, to U.S. Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk, dated August 29, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.ML13248A343):

Enclosure 6 (proprietary) and Enclosure 14 (non-proprietary), Westinghouse WCAP-17716-P(NP), Revision 1, "Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project," dated August 2013 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML13248A353 (proprietary) and ML13248A349 (non-proprietary), respectively).

I Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BVWR-ENG-14-010-NP RESPONSE Background In April 2014, Xcel Energy identified that the main steam line (MSL)C strain gauge cable switching performed during the 2011 refuel outage, as a corrective action in response to a cable labeling issue, appeared to have resulted in erroneous reversal of the upstream and downstream strain gauge cables. Numerous methods were employed to validate that the MSLC cables were incorrectly switched.

A revised replacement steam dryer (RSD) acoustic-structural analysis has consequently been performed and is documented in this response.

The revised analysis addresses the impact to the MSLC strain gauge signals due to the switched cables.Additionally, this response provides brief descriptions of the revisions that will be made to the previously submitted RSD reports as a result of the revised acoustic-structural analysis.The MSL strain gauge signals are []a,c Figure RAI-120-1 summarizes the steps in the process which are affected by the correcting of the signals. In both cases (MSLC-2011 and MSLC-Corrected), the methods used in each step are identical; however, changing the input MSL signals [ ]a,c Figure RAI-120-1 Summary of the Acoustic-Structural Analysis Process a,c 2 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP Response to Request 1 ACE Revision 2.0 was benchmarked against]a,c Table RAI-120-1 Bias and Uncertainty a,b,c Table RAI-120-2 MNGP Total Uncertainty a,b,c In the frequency ranges for which the MSLC upstream and downstream signals differ (see Figure RAI-120-1), a,b,c 3 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP Response to Request 2 Plots of the MSLC monopole and dipole sources for the two cases are presented in Figure RAI-120-8 and Figure RAI-120-9.

A plot of the MSLC upstream and downstream signal Power Spectral Densities (PSDs) is provided in Figure RAI-120-2.

Detailed Results This RAI response documents the portions of the acoustic-structural analysis that are affected by switching the MSLC signals. Revisions to the previously submitted reports will be updated to include the changes documented herein due to the MSLC signal correction.

The proprietary and non-proprietary versions of the following reports will be updated and submitted along with the final EPU report after power ascension to EPU is complete: WCAP-17716, Rev 1, "Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project." WCAP-17252, Rev 4, "Acoustic Loads Definition for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project." WCAP-1 7549, Rev 2, "Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Structural Evaluation for High-Cycle Acoustic Loads Using ACE." SES09-127, Rev 2, "Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement

-Structural Verification of Steam Dryer." The ASME qualification for the RSD will be updated to include the FIV stresses resulting from the correction of the MSLC signals. All ASME Section III, Subsection NG requirements are met with the updated FIV stress values.Signal Processing Digital signal processing is performed to]a.c The signal processing techniques used for the CLTP and EPU signal generation were identical to those documented and accepted in WCAP-17716-P Rev. 1.Any plots of MSL signals for MSLA, MSLB, and MSLD are unchanged.

For MSLC, any plot previously labeled as "upstream" will now be "downstream" and vice-versa.

]a,c 4 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP a,b,c Figure RAI-120-2 CLTP Signal (after signal processing)

-MSLC 5 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP Figure RAI-120-3 Predicted EPU Signal -MSLC a,b,c 6 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP ACE Revision 2.0.1 Benchmarkinq The ACE Revision 2.0 model was benchmarked

]ac Table RAI-120-3

[I a,c 7]a,b,c I]ac 7 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP-]a,b,c Figure RAI-120-4

[Figure RAI-120-5

[I ax a,b,c]a,c 8 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Table RAI-120-4 Predicted RMS Strains LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP a,b,c]ac a,c I I Ia,c I I a,c Based on the above measurements, predictions, and calculations, the biases/uncertainties and total uncertainties for ACE Revision 2.0.1 are presented in Table RAI-120-1 and Table RAI-120-2.9 Westinghouse Non-Proprietaty Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP]a,c a,b,c Figure RAI-120-6

[I a,c 10 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP Iaxc a,b,c Figure RAI-120-7

[11 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP Application of ACE Revision 2.0.1 -Acoustic Load Definition of Monticello Steam Dryer at EPU Using Corrected MSLC Signals I a,c Figure RAI-120-8 ACE Dipole Signal -EPU -MSL C a,b,c 12 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-B WR-ENG- 14-010-NP a,b,c Figure RAI-120-9 ACE Monopole Signal -EPU -MSL C Application of r la -Acoustic Load Definition of Monticello Steam Dryer at EPU Usina Corrected MSLC Sicnals I 13 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP]a,c a,b,c Figure RAI-120-10

[]a Dipole Signal -EPU -MSLC 14 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP a,b,c Figure RAI-120-11

[]a Monopole Signal -EPU -MSLC 15 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP Structural Evaluation for High-cycle Acoustic Loads A high-cycle fatigue evaluation of the MNGP RSD was completed with acoustic loads generated using ACE Revision 2.0.1 [ ]a. The methods and techniques used in the evaluation are identical to those submitted in WCAP-17549-P Revision 2. The finite element model was identical to what was previously used.]a,c Summary of Results I]ac 16 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP Table RAI-120-5 Summary of Results at EPU: [ ]a,c a,b,c Table RAI-120-6 Summary of Results at EPU: [a,c a,b,c 17 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP a,b,c axc Figure RAI-120-12 Limiting High-Stress Locations

[18 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP a,c Figure RAI-120-13 Limiting High-Stress Locations

[Iac 19 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP I a,b,c F Figure RAI-120-14 MASR [Figure RAI-120-15 MASR[]a,c. MSLC 2011 -Stress PSD a,b,c]a,c. MSLC Corrected

-Stress PSD 20 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-B WR-ENG- 14-01 0-NP I a,b,c Figure RAI-120-16 MASR [Figure RAI-120-17 MASR []a,c. MSLC 2011 -Stress PSD a,b,c]a,c -MSLC Corrected

-Stress PSD 21 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP I a,c a,b,c Ja,c Submodel Maximum Detailed View (Acoustic Stress)Figure RAI-120-18

[22 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-1 4-010-NP I]a,c a,c Figure RAI-120-19

[]a,c Weld Evaluation Location 23 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP MSL Limit Curves The method and technique used to develop the limit curves for the MNGP EPU power ascension are identical to those previously submitted in LTR-A&SA-09-32, Revision 8. For MSL A, B, and D, the shape of the upstream and downstream limit curves will be identical to those submitted in LTR-A&SA-09-32, Revision 8. []a,b,c. For MSLC, the same is true except the figures previously labeled upstream will now be labeled as downstream and vice versa. Figure RAI-120-20 through Figure RAI-120-23 present the updated MSL limit curves for the MNGP RSD. Level 1 limit curves ensure that the ASME allowable alternating stress value on the RSD is not exceeded.

Level 2 limit curves ensure that 80% of the allowable alternating stress value on the RSD is not exceeded.

During power ascension, the plant will be monitored and the PSDs will be compared to the limit curves at each power level test condition in the EPU Power Ascension Test. The situations presented in Table RAI-120-7 may occur depending on the magnitude of the pressure load. This process will be repeated until the EPU power level is achieved.Table RAI-120-7 EPU Power Ascension Condition Action Pressure Load < Level 2 Increase power to the next level Perform a stress analysis at the current power Level 2 < Pressure Load < Level 1 level Reduce power to the previous step, engineering evaluation, and consideration of Pressure Load > Level 1 mitigation actions 24 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-01 0-NP a,b,c Figure RAI-120-20 Limit Curves -MSLA a,b,c Figure RAI-120-21 Limit Curves -MSLB 25 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-BWR-ENG-14-010-NP a,b,c Figure RAI-120-22 Limit Curves -MSLC a,b,c Figure RAI-120-23 Limit Curves -MSLD 26 QF0212, Revision 5 (FP-SC-RSI-04)

Page 1 of 1 XcelEnergy° SHIPPING DOCUMENT NORTHERN STATES POWER -MN D/B/A Xcel Energy Monticello Nuclear Plant, 2807 W Hwy. 75, Monticello, MN 55362 Date: 7-22-14 Shipping Document Tracking Number: 15'4-Ship To: USNRC 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Attention Of: Document Control Desk Carrier: UPS -Standard Overnight RMA No: Pro I Tracking No: PO / Contract No: Packaging:

Number of Packages:

I Weight: Dangerous Goods/ UN/NA No: Insurance Est. Value Hazardous Materials?

Required?Reason for Shipment:

Overnight Shipment to USNRC DeNae Sievers -Please ensure tracking number is communicated to me -denae.sievers@xenuclear.com Item No. Qty. Unit Description Catalog IDIQ 1 Envelop Submittal to NRC e Requestor:

Date: By signing this shipping document you are declaring, to the best of your knowledge, that the material being shippeds in compliance with Xcel Energy Corporate Policies.

Please print and sign your name legibly.SWIP Making Shipment:

6 Date: Z7 Received By: Date: For will-call use only Use of this form as a procedural aid does not require retention as a quality record.