ML15188A089: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001//,77/)C)ý71CIOSUNSI Review CompleteTemplate | ||
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03 | |||
~rg | ~rg | ||
==Dear NRC:== | ==Dear NRC:== | ||
June 17, 2015Typed comments and concerns submitted at public hearing at the Janesville RotaryGardens ref. Shine Technology's request for a building permit and NRC approval of such.Why would the NRC allow the use of uranium based processes to produce Molly 99within the city limits of a city with excess of 63,000 inhabitants. It was my | June 17, 2015Typed comments and concerns submitted at public hearing at the Janesville RotaryGardens ref. Shine Technology's request for a building permit and NRC approval of such.Why would the NRC allow the use of uranium based processes to produce Molly 99within the city limits of a city with excess of 63,000 inhabitants. | ||
It was my understanding that the NRC once said that they prefer any uranium used in production or use should bebeyond 10 miles from, densely populated areas or cities.Why would the NRC allow this at this time when there are much safer production methods without using the kind of uranium that Shine proposes, Such as North Star inBeloit, 10 miles away. There are other modem methods to meet the demand for Molly 99without the dangers of contamination and accidents within our city limits. I thought theNRC was interested in safety and reducing the amount of uranium being used around thecountry instead of expanding the dangers everywhere by allowing it all over amongpopulated areas.Our ground water is precious and our high quality land and dairy use is very important aswell as the safety of our citizens. | |||
One of you sub- environmental agencies reported that itwas not their duty to rule on the building permit process. | |||
That means the environmental component didn't even investigate fully any of our concerns apparently. | |||
There are also many remote, somewhat useless land site available elsewhere. | |||
like formermining sites, etc. I feel that the location is not protected by sufficient safeguards when itis placed within the city limit of a city with 63,000 inhabitants, to say nothing about thedangers to our land and resources and so close to a busy airport and highways. | |||
Shine evenadmits that they need much more money to move forward. | |||
Any building permit shouldbe delayed until much, much later to really determine the need for Shines production, especially at this site. It is the worst possible site for such an outdated dangerous process.Also no permits should be issued until Shine has the money in hand before even movingan inch forward on this process. | |||
Any building permit would be premature. | |||
The NRCshould face the facts and ask itself if this facility and location is really needed considering the modem advancement of technology that has been tested and has been proven toproduce of Molly 99 by a much safer method.As a resident of this city, I therefore request that the NRC deny any building permitrequested by Shine at this time and at this proposed location within the Janesville citylimits. Especially because in my opinion this site is a very poor location and there are waytoo many all-around safety issues that have not been properly investigated or resolved andconcerning the environment. | |||
It seemingly also lacks a great many safeguards at thislocation and because of outdated processes. | |||
Sincerely, Al ed Lembrich 541 Miller Ave. Janesville, WI. 53548}} | |||
Revision as of 23:18, 30 June 2018
| ML15188A089 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | SHINE Medical Technologies |
| Issue date: | 06/17/2015 |
| From: | Lembrich A - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 80FR27710 00004 | |
| Download: ML15188A089 (2) | |
Text
UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001//,77/)C)ý71CIOSUNSI Review CompleteTemplate
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03
~rg
Dear NRC:
June 17, 2015Typed comments and concerns submitted at public hearing at the Janesville RotaryGardens ref. Shine Technology's request for a building permit and NRC approval of such.Why would the NRC allow the use of uranium based processes to produce Molly 99within the city limits of a city with excess of 63,000 inhabitants.
It was my understanding that the NRC once said that they prefer any uranium used in production or use should bebeyond 10 miles from, densely populated areas or cities.Why would the NRC allow this at this time when there are much safer production methods without using the kind of uranium that Shine proposes, Such as North Star inBeloit, 10 miles away. There are other modem methods to meet the demand for Molly 99without the dangers of contamination and accidents within our city limits. I thought theNRC was interested in safety and reducing the amount of uranium being used around thecountry instead of expanding the dangers everywhere by allowing it all over amongpopulated areas.Our ground water is precious and our high quality land and dairy use is very important aswell as the safety of our citizens.
One of you sub- environmental agencies reported that itwas not their duty to rule on the building permit process.
That means the environmental component didn't even investigate fully any of our concerns apparently.
There are also many remote, somewhat useless land site available elsewhere.
like formermining sites, etc. I feel that the location is not protected by sufficient safeguards when itis placed within the city limit of a city with 63,000 inhabitants, to say nothing about thedangers to our land and resources and so close to a busy airport and highways.
Shine evenadmits that they need much more money to move forward.
Any building permit shouldbe delayed until much, much later to really determine the need for Shines production, especially at this site. It is the worst possible site for such an outdated dangerous process.Also no permits should be issued until Shine has the money in hand before even movingan inch forward on this process.
Any building permit would be premature.
The NRCshould face the facts and ask itself if this facility and location is really needed considering the modem advancement of technology that has been tested and has been proven toproduce of Molly 99 by a much safer method.As a resident of this city, I therefore request that the NRC deny any building permitrequested by Shine at this time and at this proposed location within the Janesville citylimits. Especially because in my opinion this site is a very poor location and there are waytoo many all-around safety issues that have not been properly investigated or resolved andconcerning the environment.
It seemingly also lacks a great many safeguards at thislocation and because of outdated processes.
Sincerely, Al ed Lembrich 541 Miller Ave. Janesville, WI. 53548