ML12164A832: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
                                                UNITE D S TATE S
                                NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON
Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI.  When separated from enclosure, this
                                                  RE G IO N I V
transmittal document is decontrolled.
                                              1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
                                        AR L INGTON , TEXAS 7 60 11 - 4511
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
                                            June 11, 2012
June 11, 2012  
EA-12-083
EA-11-067
EA-12-083
Mr. Peter Dietrich
EA-11-067  
Senior Vice President and
   Chief Nuclear Officer
Mr. Peter Dietrich  
Southern California Edison Company
Senior Vice President and
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
   Chief Nuclear Officer  
P. O. Box 128
Southern California Edison Company  
San Clemente, CA 92674-0128
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station  
SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -
P. O. Box 128  
              NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403;
San Clemente, CA 92674-0128  
              PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING
Dear Mr. Dietrich:
SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -
On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security
baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The
NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403;
enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on
May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members
PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING  
of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and
Dear Mr. Dietrich:  
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed
On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security  
personnel.
baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The  
The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater
enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on  
than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the
May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members  
need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional
of your staff.  
  Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI. When separated from enclosure, this
                            transmittal document is decontrolled.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and  
        OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.  
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed  
personnel.  
The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater  
than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the  
need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional  
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
RE GIO N I V
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511


        OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
NRC action. The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report. The finding was
assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance
Determination Process (PPSDP). The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated
for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security
requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site. The
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated
enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the
NRC action. The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report. The finding was  
NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.
assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance  
In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our
Determination Process (PPSDP). The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated  
evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security
for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security  
significance within 90 days of the date of this letter. The significance determination process
requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site. The  
encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue
finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated  
should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination.
enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the  
Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to
NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.  
(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the
facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or
In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our  
(2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a Regulatory
evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security  
Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you
significance within 90 days of the date of this letter. The significance determination process  
to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to
encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue  
make the conference more efficient and effective. If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not
should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination.  
be open for public observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal
should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request
Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to  
a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the
(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the  
final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements
facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or  
stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.
(2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a Regulatory  
Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety,
Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you  
at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the
to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to  
NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue
make the conference more efficient and effective. If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not  
with our significance determination and enforcement decision. The final resolution of this matter
be open for public observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal  
will be conveyed in separate correspondence.
should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request  
Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is
a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the  
being issued for this inspection finding at this time. In addition, please be advised that the
final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements  
number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection
stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.  
report may change as a result of further NRC review.
Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as
Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety,  
determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection. The deficiency was promptly
at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the  
corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical
NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue  
        OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
with our significance determination and enforcement decision. The final resolution of this matter  
will be conveyed in separate correspondence.  
Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is  
being issued for this inspection finding at this time. In addition, please be advised that the  
number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection  
report may change as a result of further NRC review.
Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as  
determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection. The deficiency was promptly  
corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical


        OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors
arrived on site.
This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements.
You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis
for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk,
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear
protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors  
Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the
arrived on site.  
This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements.  
You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis  
for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk,  
Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear  
Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the  
Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-
Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-
0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.  
One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding. The cross-cutting aspects were both
related to human performance. The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which
One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding. The cross-cutting aspects were both  
addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for
related to human performance. The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which  
Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow
addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for  
procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively. If you disagree with a cross-cutting
Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow  
aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of
procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively. If you disagree with a cross-cutting  
this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator,
aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of  
Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator,  
Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the
Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
failure to maintain complete and accurate information. Specifically, a licensee employee failed
to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information
Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the  
required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007). This violation would normally be
failure to maintain complete and accurate information. Specifically, a licensee employee failed  
categorized at Severity Level IV. However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement
to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information  
Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation.
required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007). This violation would normally be  
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the
categorized at Severity Level IV. However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement  
enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the
Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation.  
NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the  
enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the  
NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management  
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with
10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security
However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with  
vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically
10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security  
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible
vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically  
from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Because this issue
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible  
involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made
from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Because this issue  
available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS. If
involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made  
Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the
available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS. If  
        OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the


        OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-
Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for
withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is
waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.
                                                Sincerely,
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
                                                /RA/
level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-
                                                Thomas Blount, Acting Director
Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for  
                                                Division of Reactor Safety
withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is  
Docket: 50-361, 50-362
waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.  
License: NPF-10, NPF-15
Nonpublic Enclosure:
Sincerely,  
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403;
  05000362/2012403 w/attachments
Distribution made electronically
        OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
/RA/  
Thomas Blount, Acting Director  
Division of Reactor Safety  
Docket: 50-361, 50-362  
License: NPF-10, NPF-15  
Nonpublic Enclosure:  
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403;  
  05000362/2012403 w/attachments  
Distribution made electronically  


      OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
Distribution w/enclosure:
Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch
Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M
Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43
Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)
Distribution w/enclosure:  
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov
Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch  
Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)
Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M  
Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)
Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43  
Electronic distribution by RIV:
Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6  
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)  
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov  
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)  
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)  
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)
Electronic distribution by RIV:  
Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)  
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)  
SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)  
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)  
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)  
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)  
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)  
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)  
Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)
SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)  
Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)  
Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)  
Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)  
Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)  
RidsOeMailCenter
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)  
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)  
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov)  
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov)  
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov)  
OEMail Resource
RidsOeMailCenter  
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)  
      OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)  
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)  
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)  
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)  
OEMail Resource  
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)  


      OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
Security Related Complete Report - OUO:
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB         ADAMS: : Yes Initials: MKB
: Non-Publicly Available : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required
Letter Only:
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB ADAMS: : Yes             Initials: MKB
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
: Publicly Available       : Non-Sensitive
ADAMS No. ML12164A832
Security Related Complete Report - OUO:                      
      PSI:PSB1       PSI:PSB1             C:PSB1               C:PBB
SUNSI Review Completed:   MKB  
      MBrooks         JCherubini           MHay                 RLantz
    ADAMS:   : Yes  
      /RA/           /RA/ E               /RA/                 /RA
Initials: MKB
        05/31/12       5 /29/12             06/11/12             06/04/12
:   Non-Publicly Available     : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required  
      ACES           C: ACES             C: PSB1               AD: DRS
      CMaier         HGepford             MHay                 TBlount
Letter Only:  
      /RA/           /RA/                 /RA/                 /RA/
SUNSI Review Completed:   MKB ADAMS: : Yes  
      06/11/2012     06/11/2012           06/11/2012           06/11/2012
Initials:   MKB
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                             T=Telephone       E=E-mail   F=Fax
:   Publicly Available    
      OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
:   Non-Sensitive  
ADAMS No. ML12164A832  
PSI:PSB1  
PSI:PSB1  
C:PSB1  
C:PBB  
MBrooks  
JCherubini  
MHay  
RLantz  
/RA/  
/RA/ E  
/RA/
/RA  
05/31/12  
5 /29/12  
06/11/12  
06/04/12  
ACES  
C: ACES  
C: PSB1  
AD: DRS  
CMaier  
HGepford  
MHay  
TBlount  
/RA/  
/RA/  
/RA/
/RA/  
06/11/2012  
06/11/2012  
06/11/2012  
06/11/2012  
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                         T=Telephone           E=E-mail       F=Fax
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 01:38, 12 January 2025

IR 05000361-12-403 and 05000362-12-403, 5/16/2012, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3, NRC Special Inspection Report, Preliminary Greater than Green Finding
ML12164A832
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/2012
From: Blount T
Division of Reactor Safety IV
To: Peter Dietrich
Southern California Edison Co
dah/vlmBrooks M
References
EA-11-067, EA-12-083 IR-12-403
Download: ML12164A832 (6)


See also: IR 05000361/2012403

Text

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI. When separated from enclosure, this

transmittal document is decontrolled.

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

June 11, 2012

EA-12-083

EA-11-067

Mr. Peter Dietrich

Senior Vice President and

Chief Nuclear Officer

Southern California Edison Company

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

P. O. Box 128

San Clemente, CA 92674-0128

SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403;

PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING

Dear Mr. Dietrich:

On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security

baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The

enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on

May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members

of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and

compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed

personnel.

The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater

than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the

need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

RE GIO N I V

1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD

ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

NRC action. The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report. The finding was

assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance

Determination Process (PPSDP). The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated

for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security

requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site. The

finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated

enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the

NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.

In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our

evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security

significance within 90 days of the date of this letter. The significance determination process

encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue

should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination.

Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to

(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the

facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or

(2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a Regulatory

Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you

to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to

make the conference more efficient and effective. If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not

be open for public observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal

should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request

a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the

final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements

stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.

Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety,

at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the

NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue

with our significance determination and enforcement decision. The final resolution of this matter

will be conveyed in separate correspondence.

Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is

being issued for this inspection finding at this time. In addition, please be advised that the

number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection

report may change as a result of further NRC review.

Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as

determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection. The deficiency was promptly

corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors

arrived on site.

This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements.

You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis

for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk,

Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the

Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-

0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding. The cross-cutting aspects were both

related to human performance. The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which

addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for

Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow

procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively. If you disagree with a cross-cutting

aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of

this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator,

Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the

failure to maintain complete and accurate information. Specifically, a licensee employee failed

to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information

required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007). This violation would normally be

categorized at Severity Level IV. However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement

Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the

enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management

System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with

10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security

vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically

for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible

from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Because this issue

involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made

available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS. If

Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-

Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for

withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is

waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Thomas Blount, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-361, 50-362

License: NPF-10, NPF-15

Nonpublic Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403;

05000362/2012403 w/attachments

Distribution made electronically

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

Distribution w/enclosure:

Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch

Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M

Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43

Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6

Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov

Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)

Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)

DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)

Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)

Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)

SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)

Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)

Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov)

Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov)

Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov)

Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov)

RidsOeMailCenter

Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)

RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)

Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)

Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)

OEMail Resource

RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

Security Related Complete Report - OUO:

SUNSI Review Completed: MKB

ADAMS:  : Yes

Initials: MKB

Non-Publicly Available  : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required

Letter Only:

SUNSI Review Completed: MKB ADAMS:  : Yes

Initials: MKB

Publicly Available
Non-Sensitive

ADAMS No. ML12164A832

PSI:PSB1

PSI:PSB1

C:PSB1

C:PBB

MBrooks

JCherubini

MHay

RLantz

/RA/

/RA/ E

/RA/

/RA

05/31/12

5 /29/12

06/11/12

06/04/12

ACES

C: ACES

C: PSB1

AD: DRS

CMaier

HGepford

MHay

TBlount

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

06/11/2012

06/11/2012

06/11/2012

06/11/2012

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax