ML19210B387: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19210B387
| number = ML19210B387
| issue date = 02/01/1974
| issue date = 02/01/1974
| title = Responds to 740111 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Integrity Test of Reactor Bldg for TMI-1.Forwards Comparison of Structural Integrity Test W/Aec Reg Guide 1.18.
| title = Responds to 740111 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Integrity Test of Reactor Bldg for TMI-1.Forwards Comparison of Structural Integrity Test W/Aec Reg Guide 1.18
| author name = Miller J
| author name = Miller J
| author affiliation = METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
| author affiliation = METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:AEC DIE   3UTICN FOR PART 50 DOCKET MAT' ,         ..
{{#Wiki_filter:AEC DIE 3UTICN FOR PART 50 DOCKET MAT',
                                                                                      ~
~
          .    .                              (TDiPORARY FCRM)                               CONTROL NO:          1033 FILE:
CONTROL NO:
FROM:                                       DATE OF DOC       DATE REC'D       LTR     MD10       RPT       OTIER
1033 (TDiPORARY FCRM)
        '!etropolitan Edison Cocpany Reading, Pa.       19603 J. G. !! iller                           2-1-74           2-7-74             X TO:                                           ORIG             CC     OTIER             SENT AEC PDR
FILE:
                                                                                                                            ^
FROM:
Mr. Gia.busso                       1 siened CLASS       UNCLASS           PROP INFO       INPUT         NO CYS REC'D               DOCKET NO:
DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR MD10 RPT OTIER
:CCC<                                                 1                   50-239 DESCRIPTION:                                                 ENCLCSURES:
'!etropolitan Edison Cocpany Reading, Pa.
Ltr re our 1-11-74 ltr.......trans the follow-                   ADDL INFO - Com1arison of Structural in:;:                                                           Integrity Test with USAEC Re:;ulatory Guide 1.13 DIST PER 3ERSERO x; 9t
19603 J. G. !! iller 2-1-74 2-7-74 X
( l cy rec,d)               ,3     it .
TO:
PLANT NAME:         Three Mile Island Unit No. 1                                               -
ORIG CC OTIER SENT AEC PDR
FOR ACTION /INFCE 'ATION                   2-11-74             A *i BUTLER (L)           P SCITJENCER(L)           ZIEd. ANN (L)             REGAN(E)
^
W/ Copies               W/ 2 Copies           W/ Copies               W/ Copies CLARK (L)               STOLZ(L)               DICKER (E)                                                                 -
Mr. Gia.busso 1 siened CLASS UNCLASS PROP INFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO:
W/ Copies               W/ Copies             W/ Copies               W/ Copies GOLLER(L)               VASSALLO(L)           KNIGHION(E)
:CCC<
W/ Copies               W/ Copies               J/ Copies               W/ Copies KNIEL(L)               SCHDIEL(L)             YOUNGBLOOD(E)
1 50-239 DESCRIPTION:
W/ Copies               W/ Copies             W/ Copies               W/ Copies                                         ,
ENCLCSURES:
7                            INTER';AL DISTRIBUTION VREG FIL g                     TECH REVIE1       DENTON LIC ASST A / T I"D var.v tud                   /HENDRIE             GRIMES                                           BRAID!AN OGC, ROOM P-506A           SCHROEDER         CAMMILL             DIGGS (L)                   SALTO!AN MUNTZING/ STAFF           AACCARY               KASTNER             GEARIN (L)                 B. IIURT CASE                       KNIGHT             BALLARD         /GOULBOURNE (L)               pg;3 GIAMBUSSO                   PAWLICKI           SPANGLER           LEE (L)                   MCDONALD BOYD                     /SHA0                                     MAIGRET (L)                 DUB : w/ Input y M00RE (L)(EWR)               STELLO             ENVIRO             SERVICE (L)
Ltr re our 1-11-74 ltr.......trans the follow-ADDL INFO - Com1arison of Structural in:;:
DEYOUtiG(L)(l'4R)           HOUSTON           MULLER             SHEPPARD (E)               INEJ SKOVHOLT (L)               NOVAK             DICKER             SMITH (L)                   C. MILES P. COLLINS                 ROSS               KNIGliTON           TEETS (L)                 B. KING DENISE                     IPPOLITO           YOUI;GELOOD         WADE (E)
Integrity Test with USAEC Re:;ulatory Guide 1.13 DIST PER 3ERSERO x; 9t
REG sPR                     TEDESCO           REGAN               WILLIAMS (E) s/ FILE IREGION(3)             LONG               PROJECT LDR         WILSON (L)               1584 334 MORRIS                       LAlliAS                               S. REED (L)
( l cy rec,d)
STEELE                     BCIAROYA           HARLESS VOLIFER EXTER'IAL DISTRIEUTICN                                                     /A
,3 it.
/ 1 - LCCAL PDR           Marrisbur , Pa.
PLANT NAME:
1 - DTIE(ABERNATHY)                       (1)(2)(10)-NATIO iAL LAD'S                         1-IDR-SAN /LA/NY l - NSIC(BUCHA'1A:;)                               1- ASL3P(E/W Bid;:,R::: 329)             1-GERALD LELLCUC:2 1 - ASLB(YORE /SAYRE/                               1-U. P::,:;INGTON, n= E-201 Cf         BRCOGIAVEN NAT. LAB WOODARD/"li" ST.                           1-CONSULTA:!T' S                       1-AGMID( Ruth Guss=an) 6 - CYS ACRS tiot32cct SENT TO LIC ASST.               NEWiARK/DLDtE/AC3ABIAN                     Ri- B- 12 7, GT.
Three Mile Island Unit No. 1 FOR ACTION /INFCE 'ATION 2-11-74 A *i BUTLER (L)
E. COUL30CRNE ON 2-11-74           1-GERALD ULRIKSCN...CRNL               1-RD.. MULLER..F-309 GT 1911070 7/ O                           g
P SCITJENCER(L)
ZIEd. ANN (L)
REGAN(E)
W/ Copies W/ 2 Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L)
STOLZ(L)
DICKER (E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies GOLLER(L)
VASSALLO(L)
KNIGHION(E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies J/ Copies W/ Copies KNIEL(L)
SCHDIEL(L)
YOUNGBLOOD(E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies 7
INTER';AL DISTRIBUTION VREG FIL g TECH REVIE1 DENTON A / T I"D LIC ASST var.v tud
/HENDRIE GRIMES BRAID!AN OGC, ROOM P-506A SCHROEDER CAMMILL DIGGS (L)
SALTO!AN MUNTZING/ STAFF AACCARY KASTNER GEARIN (L)
B. IIURT CASE KNIGHT BALLARD
/GOULBOURNE (L) pg;3 GIAMBUSSO PAWLICKI SPANGLER LEE (L)
MCDONALD BOYD
/SHA0 MAIGRET (L)
DUB : w/ Input M00RE (L)(EWR)
STELLO ENVIRO SERVICE (L) y DEYOUtiG(L)(l'4R)
HOUSTON MULLER SHEPPARD (E)
INEJ SKOVHOLT (L)
NOVAK DICKER SMITH (L)
C. MILES P. COLLINS ROSS KNIGliTON TEETS (L)
B. KING DENISE IPPOLITO YOUI;GELOOD WADE (E)
REG sPR TEDESCO REGAN WILLIAMS (E) s/ FILE IREGION(3)
LONG PROJECT LDR WILSON (L) 1584 334 MORRIS LAlliAS S. REED (L)
STEELE BCIAROYA HARLESS VOLIFER EXTER'IAL DISTRIEUTICN
/A
/ 1 - LCCAL PDR Marrisbur, Pa.
1 - DTIE(ABERNATHY)
(1)(2)(10)-NATIO iAL LAD'S 1-IDR-SAN /LA/NY l - NSIC(BUCHA'1A:;)
1-ASL3P(E/W Bid;:,R::: 329) 1-GERALD LELLCUC:2 1 - ASLB(YORE /SAYRE/
1-U. P::,:;INGTON, n= E-201 Cf BRCOGIAVEN NAT. LAB WOODARD/"li" ST.
1-CONSULTA:!T' S 1-AGMID( Ruth Guss=an) 6 - CYS ACRS tiot32cct SENT TO LIC ASST.
NEWiARK/DLDtE/AC3ABIAN Ri-B- 12 7, GT.
E. COUL30CRNE ON 2-11-74 1-GERALD ULRIKSCN...CRNL 1-RD.. MULLER..F-309 GT 1911070 7/ O g


A-._
A-._
                        ?*guIattrT       F" C'r.
?*guIattrT F"
g -,ffA METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY POST OFFICE BOX 542 READING, PENNSYLVANI A 19603                                         TELEPHONE 215 - 929 3 01 February 1,1974 M" . .
C'r.
p         -m'O f Mr. A. Gia=busso Deputy Director for Reactor Projects (h[Q7,@hh M
g -,ffA METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY POST OFFICE BOX 542 READING, PENNSYLVANI A 19603 TELEPHONE 215 - 929 3 01 February 1,1974 M"..
k',5 Directorate of Licensing                                                        #
p
atg-('... [:]#
-m'O f (h[Q7,@hh k',5 Mr. A. Gia=busso M at.. [:]#
ast   %
Deputy Director for Reactor Projects g-('.
of fice of Regulation U. S. Atomic Energy Commission 4   4.j',48 ,
ast Directorate of Licensing of fice of Regulation 4
s j'
4.j',48 j'
Washington, D. C. 20545                                                                   C3         ,    7 Subject : Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-289
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission s
7 Washington, D. C.
20545 C3 Subject : Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-289


==Dear Mr. Giambusso :==
==Dear Mr. Giambusso :==
In your recent letter of January 11, 1974, you requested additional information concerning the Structural Integrity Test of the Reactor Building for Unit #1 as follows:
In your recent letter of January 11, 1974, you requested additional information concerning the Structural Integrity Test of the Reactor Building for Unit #1 as follows:
: 1.     Describe the procedure which will be used to observe the behavior of the girder during the Reactor Building Integrity Test; this procedure should cover at leas t the observation of deformations, stresses and cracking patterns.
1.
: 2.     Confirm or clarify your intent to provide a comparison with predicted deformations, stress ar.d/or strain values before pre-stressing, during prestressing, and during and after the Integrity Test along with a discussion of any discrepancies between the predicted and observed values.
Describe the procedure which will be used to observe the behavior of the girder during the Reactor Building Integrity Test; this procedure should cover at leas t the observation of deformations, stresses and cracking patterns.
In response to your first request, we have previously submitted to you Appendix SE (Arundment 44) to the FSAR entitled " Structural Integrity Testing of the Reactor Building Structure." Appendix SE describes the deformation measurements, strain gage readings and crack observations, which include the ring girder surveillance additions, that will be made during the Integrity Test. This data N lg                 will be analyzed and documented in a report as described in Section
2.
/                         9 of Appendix SE. With specific regard to ring girder surveillance ta f   DC h           Q
Confirm or clarify your intent to provide a comparison with predicted deformations, stress ar.d/or strain values before pre-stressing, during prestressing, and during and after the Integrity Test along with a discussion of any discrepancies between the predicted and observed values.
              .o p r a ~
In response to your first request, we have previously submitted to you Appendix SE (Arundment 44) to the FSAR entitled " Structural Integrity Testing of the Reactor Building Structure." Appendix SE describes the deformation measurements, strain gage readings and crack observations, which include the ring girder surveillance additions, that will be made during the Integrity Test. This data N lg will be analyzed and documented in a report as described in Section
1633 qsp                     -
/
.y;1 g62                                                                                      iss4 sss
9 of Appendix SE.
With specific regard to ring girder surveillance ta f
DC h Q
.o p r a 1633
~
qsp g62 iss4 sss
.y;1


Mr. A. Giambusso                                             Feb rua ry 1, 19 74 during the Integrity Test, we fully intend to meet previous commit-ments to you. Commitments f rom the following documents have been included in Appendix SE.
Mr. A. Giambusso Feb rua ry 1, 19 74 during the Integrity Test, we fully intend to meet previous commit-ments to you.
: a. Report on Containment Building Ring Girder Construction and Repair, December 1,1971; Section 6 :02
Commitments f rom the following documents have been included in Appendix SE.
: b. Addendum to Report on Containment Building Ring Girder Con-         .x_
a.
struction and Repair, January 21, 1972; Sections 1.0.2.0 and             ,
Report on Containment Building Ring Girder Construction and Repair, December 1,1971; Section 6 :02 b.
3.0
Addendum to Report on Containment Building Ring Girder Con-
: c. Letter dated May 31, 1972, Metropolitan Edison Company to Mr. A. Giambusso of the Atomic Energy Commissior,, Directorate of Licensing; Reply to Question 4 on page 3.
.x_
Concerning your second request, we confirm that we intend to provide a complete evaluation of the data taken during the Structural Integrity Test comparing it with predicted values. Included in the Integrity Test report will be specific discussion on the ring girder.       Data accumulated during ring girder surveillance carried out prior to prestressing, during pre-stressing and during and af ter the Integrity Test will be evaluated. Any discrepancies with predicted values will be discussed in the report. The basic format for the Structural Integrity Test has not changed from the original submittal of Appendix 5E. Appendix 5E has been discussed with members of the DRL staff in detail.
struction and Repair, January 21, 1972; Sections 1.0.2.0 and 3.0 c.
In addition to the information requested in the January 11, 1974 letter, we were asked to provide a Comparison of our proposed Structural Integrity Test and Regulatory Guide 1.18. This request was made by Mr. Robert Be rnero of your staf f during a January 15, 1974 meeting held at the Three FEle Island site. The Comparison is included as Attachment No. 1.
Letter dated May 31, 1972, Metropolitan Edison Company to Mr. A. Giambusso of the Atomic Energy Commissior,, Directorate of Licensing; Reply to Question 4 on page 3.
Very truly yours ,
Concerning your second request, we confirm that we intend to provide a complete evaluation of the data taken during the Structural Integrity Test comparing it with predicted values.
                                                  ' J. G. Mille r Vice President mp Attachment
Included in the Integrity Test report will be specific discussion on the ring girder.
Data accumulated during ring girder surveillance carried out prior to prestressing, during pre-stressing and during and af ter the Integrity Test will be evaluated. Any discrepancies with predicted values will be discussed in the report.
The basic format for the Structural Integrity Test has not changed from the original submittal of Appendix 5E.
Appendix 5E has been discussed with members of the DRL staff in detail.
In addition to the information requested in the {{letter dated|date=January 11, 1974|text=January 11, 1974 letter}}, we were asked to provide a Comparison of our proposed Structural Integrity Test and Regulatory Guide 1.18.
This request was made by Mr. Robert Be rnero of your staf f during a January 15, 1974 meeting held at the Three FEle Island site.
The Comparison is included as Attachment No. 1.
Very truly yours,
' J. G. Mille r Vice President mp Attachment
/
/
.                                                                  1584 336}}
1584 336}}

Latest revision as of 22:07, 4 January 2025

Responds to 740111 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Integrity Test of Reactor Bldg for TMI-1.Forwards Comparison of Structural Integrity Test W/Aec Reg Guide 1.18
ML19210B387
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 02/01/1974
From: John Miller
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To: Anthony Giambusso
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19210B388 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-01.018, RTR-REGGD-1.018 NUDOCS 7911070710
Download: ML19210B387 (3)


Text

AEC DIE 3UTICN FOR PART 50 DOCKET MAT',

~

CONTROL NO:

1033 (TDiPORARY FCRM)

FILE:

FROM:

DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR MD10 RPT OTIER

'!etropolitan Edison Cocpany Reading, Pa.

19603 J. G. !! iller 2-1-74 2-7-74 X

TO:

ORIG CC OTIER SENT AEC PDR

^

Mr. Gia.busso 1 siened CLASS UNCLASS PROP INFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO:

CCC<

1 50-239 DESCRIPTION:

ENCLCSURES:

Ltr re our 1-11-74 ltr.......trans the follow-ADDL INFO - Com1arison of Structural in:;:

Integrity Test with USAEC Re:;ulatory Guide 1.13 DIST PER 3ERSERO x; 9t

( l cy rec,d)

,3 it.

PLANT NAME:

Three Mile Island Unit No. 1 FOR ACTION /INFCE 'ATION 2-11-74 A *i BUTLER (L)

P SCITJENCER(L)

ZIEd. ANN (L)

REGAN(E)

W/ Copies W/ 2 Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L)

STOLZ(L)

DICKER (E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies GOLLER(L)

VASSALLO(L)

KNIGHION(E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies J/ Copies W/ Copies KNIEL(L)

SCHDIEL(L)

YOUNGBLOOD(E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies 7

INTER';AL DISTRIBUTION VREG FIL g TECH REVIE1 DENTON A / T I"D LIC ASST var.v tud

/HENDRIE GRIMES BRAID!AN OGC, ROOM P-506A SCHROEDER CAMMILL DIGGS (L)

SALTO!AN MUNTZING/ STAFF AACCARY KASTNER GEARIN (L)

B. IIURT CASE KNIGHT BALLARD

/GOULBOURNE (L) pg;3 GIAMBUSSO PAWLICKI SPANGLER LEE (L)

MCDONALD BOYD

/SHA0 MAIGRET (L)

DUB : w/ Input M00RE (L)(EWR)

STELLO ENVIRO SERVICE (L) y DEYOUtiG(L)(l'4R)

HOUSTON MULLER SHEPPARD (E)

INEJ SKOVHOLT (L)

NOVAK DICKER SMITH (L)

C. MILES P. COLLINS ROSS KNIGliTON TEETS (L)

B. KING DENISE IPPOLITO YOUI;GELOOD WADE (E)

REG sPR TEDESCO REGAN WILLIAMS (E) s/ FILE IREGION(3)

LONG PROJECT LDR WILSON (L) 1584 334 MORRIS LAlliAS S. REED (L)

STEELE BCIAROYA HARLESS VOLIFER EXTER'IAL DISTRIEUTICN

/A

/ 1 - LCCAL PDR Marrisbur, Pa.

1 - DTIE(ABERNATHY)

(1)(2)(10)-NATIO iAL LAD'S 1-IDR-SAN /LA/NY l - NSIC(BUCHA'1A:;)

1-ASL3P(E/W Bid;:,R::: 329) 1-GERALD LELLCUC:2 1 - ASLB(YORE /SAYRE/

1-U. P::,:;INGTON, n= E-201 Cf BRCOGIAVEN NAT. LAB WOODARD/"li" ST.

1-CONSULTA:!T' S 1-AGMID( Ruth Guss=an) 6 - CYS ACRS tiot32cct SENT TO LIC ASST.

NEWiARK/DLDtE/AC3ABIAN Ri-B- 12 7, GT.

E. COUL30CRNE ON 2-11-74 1-GERALD ULRIKSCN...CRNL 1-RD.. MULLER..F-309 GT 1911070 7/ O g

A-._

?*guIattrT F"

C'r.

g -,ffA METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY POST OFFICE BOX 542 READING, PENNSYLVANI A 19603 TELEPHONE 215 - 929 3 01 February 1,1974 M"..

p

-m'O f (h[Q7,@hh k',5 Mr. A. Gia=busso M at.. [:]#

Deputy Director for Reactor Projects g-('.

ast Directorate of Licensing of fice of Regulation 4

4.j',48 j'

U. S. Atomic Energy Commission s

7 Washington, D. C.

20545 C3 Subject : Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-289

Dear Mr. Giambusso :

In your recent letter of January 11, 1974, you requested additional information concerning the Structural Integrity Test of the Reactor Building for Unit #1 as follows:

1.

Describe the procedure which will be used to observe the behavior of the girder during the Reactor Building Integrity Test; this procedure should cover at leas t the observation of deformations, stresses and cracking patterns.

2.

Confirm or clarify your intent to provide a comparison with predicted deformations, stress ar.d/or strain values before pre-stressing, during prestressing, and during and after the Integrity Test along with a discussion of any discrepancies between the predicted and observed values.

In response to your first request, we have previously submitted to you Appendix SE (Arundment 44) to the FSAR entitled " Structural Integrity Testing of the Reactor Building Structure." Appendix SE describes the deformation measurements, strain gage readings and crack observations, which include the ring girder surveillance additions, that will be made during the Integrity Test. This data N lg will be analyzed and documented in a report as described in Section

/

9 of Appendix SE.

With specific regard to ring girder surveillance ta f

DC h Q

.o p r a 1633

~

qsp g62 iss4 sss

.y;1

Mr. A. Giambusso Feb rua ry 1, 19 74 during the Integrity Test, we fully intend to meet previous commit-ments to you.

Commitments f rom the following documents have been included in Appendix SE.

a.

Report on Containment Building Ring Girder Construction and Repair, December 1,1971; Section 6 :02 b.

Addendum to Report on Containment Building Ring Girder Con-

.x_

struction and Repair, January 21, 1972; Sections 1.0.2.0 and 3.0 c.

Letter dated May 31, 1972, Metropolitan Edison Company to Mr. A. Giambusso of the Atomic Energy Commissior,, Directorate of Licensing; Reply to Question 4 on page 3.

Concerning your second request, we confirm that we intend to provide a complete evaluation of the data taken during the Structural Integrity Test comparing it with predicted values.

Included in the Integrity Test report will be specific discussion on the ring girder.

Data accumulated during ring girder surveillance carried out prior to prestressing, during pre-stressing and during and af ter the Integrity Test will be evaluated. Any discrepancies with predicted values will be discussed in the report.

The basic format for the Structural Integrity Test has not changed from the original submittal of Appendix 5E.

Appendix 5E has been discussed with members of the DRL staff in detail.

In addition to the information requested in the January 11, 1974 letter, we were asked to provide a Comparison of our proposed Structural Integrity Test and Regulatory Guide 1.18.

This request was made by Mr. Robert Be rnero of your staf f during a January 15, 1974 meeting held at the Three FEle Island site.

The Comparison is included as Attachment No. 1.

Very truly yours,

' J. G. Mille r Vice President mp Attachment

/

1584 336