ML19270H752: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19270H752
| number = ML19270H752
| issue date = 11/23/1979
| issue date = 11/23/1979
| title = Responds to NRC 791017 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-334/79-20.Corrective Actions:Checklist to Aid in Tracking Maint Surveillance Test Records Developed & Put Into Use
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-334/79-20.Corrective Actions:Checklist to Aid in Tracking Maint Surveillance Test Records Developed & Put Into Use
| author name = Dunn C
| author name = Dunn C
| author affiliation = DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8001030058
| document report number = NUDOCS 8001030058
| title reference date = 10-17-1979
| package number = ML19270H747
| package number = ML19270H747
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
Line 17: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*      *
{{#Wiki_filter:*
. s- .
. s-
      'Af stri 4se-soco
'Af stri 4se-soco
          ==
 
November 23, 1979 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:     Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
==
November 23, 1979 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
Line 27: Line 30:


==Dear Mr. Brunner:==
==Dear Mr. Brunner:==
In response to your letter of October 17, 1979, this reply addresses the deviation which was discussed in the referenced Inspection Report. The noted deviation was identified with respect to a previous lice-1see commitment to the NRC.
In response to your letter of October 17, 1979, this reply addresses the deviation which was discussed in the referenced Inspection Report. The noted deviation was identified with respect to a previous lice-1see commitment to the NRC.
This commitment was made in our reply, dated April 4, 1979, to a noncompliance identified in IE Inspection Report 79-04 (failure to maintain records of maintenance surveillance testing). The reply had stated, under
This commitment was made in our reply, dated April 4, 1979, to a noncompliance identified in IE Inspection Report 79-04 (failure to maintain records of maintenance surveillance testing). The reply had stated, under
          " action taken to prevent recurrence", that a checklist for document transmittal to aid in the tracking of maintenance surveillance test records would be developed.
" action taken to prevent recurrence", that a checklist for document transmittal to aid in the tracking of maintenance surveillance test records would be developed.
A similar commitment regarding the tracking of maintenance work request documents was made in response to an internal QA audit finding during this same period. A checklist was developed for the tracking of maintenance work requests, however, due to some misunderstanding on the part of station personnel, the checklist was not also incorporated for the maintenance surveillance test records. The similarity of these commitments also led to the erroneous listing of this item as completed on the Station's status of NRC open items.
A similar commitment regarding the tracking of maintenance work request documents was made in response to an internal QA audit finding during this same period. A checklist was developed for the tracking of maintenance work requests, however, due to some misunderstanding on the part of station personnel, the checklist was not also incorporated for the maintenance surveillance test records.
1678 110 soo1oso             .
The similarity of these commitments also led to the erroneous listing of this item as completed on the Station's status of NRC open items.
058
1678 110 soo1oso
. 058


Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Reply To IE Inspection Report No. 79-20 Page 2 The checklist is presently being used for the maintenance surveillance test records as well as maintenance work requests. This action should correct the deviation and permit the close-out of the noncompliance item.
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Reply To IE Inspection Report No. 79-20 Page 2 The checklist is presently being used for the maintenance surveillance test records as well as maintenance work requests.
This action should correct the deviation and permit the close-out of the noncompliance item.
If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact my office.
If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact my office.
Very truly yours, C l\ Aw C. N. Dunn Vice President, Operations 1678 111}}
Very truly yours, C l\\ Aw C. N. Dunn Vice President, Operations 1678 111}}

Latest revision as of 05:42, 3 January 2025

Responds to NRC Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-334/79-20.Corrective Actions:Checklist to Aid in Tracking Maint Surveillance Test Records Developed & Put Into Use
ML19270H752
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 11/23/1979
From: Dunn C
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Brunner E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19270H747 List:
References
NUDOCS 8001030058
Download: ML19270H752 (2)


Text

. s-

'Af stri 4se-soco

==

November 23, 1979 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Reference:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334 License No. DPR-66 IE Inspection Report No. 79-20

Dear Mr. Brunner:

In response to your letter of October 17, 1979, this reply addresses the deviation which was discussed in the referenced Inspection Report. The noted deviation was identified with respect to a previous lice-1see commitment to the NRC.

This commitment was made in our reply, dated April 4, 1979, to a noncompliance identified in IE Inspection Report 79-04 (failure to maintain records of maintenance surveillance testing). The reply had stated, under

" action taken to prevent recurrence", that a checklist for document transmittal to aid in the tracking of maintenance surveillance test records would be developed.

A similar commitment regarding the tracking of maintenance work request documents was made in response to an internal QA audit finding during this same period. A checklist was developed for the tracking of maintenance work requests, however, due to some misunderstanding on the part of station personnel, the checklist was not also incorporated for the maintenance surveillance test records.

The similarity of these commitments also led to the erroneous listing of this item as completed on the Station's status of NRC open items.

1678 110 soo1oso

. 058

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Reply To IE Inspection Report No. 79-20 Page 2 The checklist is presently being used for the maintenance surveillance test records as well as maintenance work requests.

This action should correct the deviation and permit the close-out of the noncompliance item.

If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact my office.

Very truly yours, C l\\ Aw C. N. Dunn Vice President, Operations 1678 111