ML19345E954: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
            .w, ..
.w, i
Public service company e cecmde 16805 Weld County Road 19 1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651
Public service company e cecmde 16805 Weld County Road 19 1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651
            ..  ..J January 30, 1981 Fort St. Vrain Unit No.1 P-81030 Mr. Jim Miller Special Projects Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washginton, D. C. 20555 Docket No. 50-26T
..J January 30, 1981 Fort St. Vrain Unit No.1 P-81030 Mr. Jim Miller Special Projects Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washginton, D. C.
20555 Docket No. 50-26T


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 26: Line 27:


==Dear Mr. Miller:==
==Dear Mr. Miller:==
Per our discussion on site during the ACRS Meeting, I indicated that we would research the establishment of the 70% power restraint with regard to the moisture monitor response tests as we felt that the test at 70% was established based on a PSC request.
Per our discussion on site during the ACRS Meeting, I indicated that we would research the establishment of the 70% power restraint with regard to the moisture monitor response tests as we felt that the test at 70% was established based on a PSC request.
We have researched the matter, and in fact it appears that the test which was originally scheduled to be done at 100% power was moved to 70% power based on a PSC request. This request (P-78092) was forwarded to Mr. R. P. Denise on June 2,1978, and provided justification for conducting the tests at 70% power rather than 1005 power.
We have researched the matter, and in fact it appears that the test which was originally scheduled to be done at 100% power was moved to 70% power based on a PSC request. This request (P-78092) was forwarded to Mr. R. P. Denise on June 2,1978, and provided justification for conducting the tests at 70% power rather than 1005 power.
Our request was subsequently approved in a July 25, 1978 letter forwarded by Thenis P. Spies.
Our request was subsequently approved in a {{letter dated|date=July 25, 1978|text=July 25, 1978 letter}} forwarded by Thenis P. Spies.
On the basis of this correspondence, we do not feel that this should have been established as a 70% restraint as such.
On the basis of this correspondence, we do not feel that this should have been established as a 70% restraint as such.
We would request , therefore, that this time be removed as a 70%
We would request, therefore, that this time be removed as a 70%
restraint. It is still our intent to conduct this test as soon as reactor conditions per=1t, and if possible we would hope to conduct the test prior to the rise to power above 70%. If this cannot be accomplished we would intend to conduct the test at some convenient power level on the rise to power assuming that we obtain a release to test above 70% power.
restraint.
k (7' '\ t S102060L7J       '
It is still our intent to conduct this test as soon as reactor conditions per=1t, and if possible we would hope to conduct the test prior to the rise to power above 70%. If this cannot be accomplished we would intend to conduct the test at some convenient power level on the rise to power assuming that we obtain a release to test above 70% power.
k (7' '\\ t S102060L7J>
1s 1
1s 1


Mr. Jim Miller                                       P-8230 Although we feel that we vill be in a position to conduct the test in the immediate future, removal of the item as 70% restraint would alleviate the various submittals and administrative matters that may be associated with the release to test above 70% power.
Mr. Jim Miller P-8230 Although we feel that we vill be in a position to conduct the test in the immediate future, removal of the item as 70% restraint would alleviate the various submittals and administrative matters that may be associated with the release to test above 70% power.
Very truly yours, s$ 7Y W Don W. Warembourg Manager, Nuclear Production Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station DW/dkm Attachments:
Very truly yours, s$ 7Y W Don W. Warembourg Manager, Nuclear Production Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station DW/dkm Attachments:
PSC Letter - P-78092 tac Letter - G-78080 cc:   G. Kuzmyez o
PSC Letter - P-78092 tac Letter - G-78080 cc:
G. Kuzmyez o
I i
I i
4 i
4 i
i
i t
* t 5
5 I
I i}}
i a}}

Latest revision as of 09:13, 24 December 2024

Requests Removal of 70% Power Restraint to Perform Moisture Monitor Injection Tests,Originally Scheduled at 100% Power. Test Will Be Performed as Soon as Reactor Conditions Permit & Prior to Rise Above 70% Power
ML19345E954
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain 
Issue date: 01/30/1981
From: Warembourg D
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO
To: John Miller
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19345E955 List:
References
P-81030, NUDOCS 8102060471
Download: ML19345E954 (2)


Text

.

.w, i

Public service company e cecmde 16805 Weld County Road 19 1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651

..J January 30, 1981 Fort St. Vrain Unit No.1 P-81030 Mr. Jim Miller Special Projects Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washginton, D. C.

20555 Docket No.50-26T

Subject:

Fort Saint Vrain Unit No.1 Moisture Monitor Injection Tests

Dear Mr. Miller:

Per our discussion on site during the ACRS Meeting, I indicated that we would research the establishment of the 70% power restraint with regard to the moisture monitor response tests as we felt that the test at 70% was established based on a PSC request.

We have researched the matter, and in fact it appears that the test which was originally scheduled to be done at 100% power was moved to 70% power based on a PSC request. This request (P-78092) was forwarded to Mr. R. P. Denise on June 2,1978, and provided justification for conducting the tests at 70% power rather than 1005 power.

Our request was subsequently approved in a July 25, 1978 letter forwarded by Thenis P. Spies.

On the basis of this correspondence, we do not feel that this should have been established as a 70% restraint as such.

We would request, therefore, that this time be removed as a 70%

restraint.

It is still our intent to conduct this test as soon as reactor conditions per=1t, and if possible we would hope to conduct the test prior to the rise to power above 70%. If this cannot be accomplished we would intend to conduct the test at some convenient power level on the rise to power assuming that we obtain a release to test above 70% power.

k (7' '\\ t S102060L7J>

1s 1

Mr. Jim Miller P-8230 Although we feel that we vill be in a position to conduct the test in the immediate future, removal of the item as 70% restraint would alleviate the various submittals and administrative matters that may be associated with the release to test above 70% power.

Very truly yours, s$ 7Y W Don W. Warembourg Manager, Nuclear Production Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station DW/dkm Attachments:

PSC Letter - P-78092 tac Letter - G-78080 cc:

G. Kuzmyez o

I i

4 i

i t

5 I

i a