ML19345E954: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
.w, i | |||
Public service company e cecmde 16805 Weld County Road 19 1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 | |||
..J January 30, 1981 Fort St. Vrain Unit No.1 P-81030 Mr. Jim Miller Special Projects Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washginton, D. C. | |||
20555 Docket No. 50-26T | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
==Dear Mr. Miller:== | ==Dear Mr. Miller:== | ||
Per our discussion on site during the ACRS Meeting, I indicated that we would research the establishment of the 70% power restraint with regard to the moisture monitor response tests as we felt that the test at 70% was established based on a PSC request. | Per our discussion on site during the ACRS Meeting, I indicated that we would research the establishment of the 70% power restraint with regard to the moisture monitor response tests as we felt that the test at 70% was established based on a PSC request. | ||
We have researched the matter, and in fact it appears that the test which was originally scheduled to be done at 100% power was moved to 70% power based on a PSC request. This request (P-78092) was forwarded to Mr. R. P. Denise on June 2,1978, and provided justification for conducting the tests at 70% power rather than 1005 power. | We have researched the matter, and in fact it appears that the test which was originally scheduled to be done at 100% power was moved to 70% power based on a PSC request. This request (P-78092) was forwarded to Mr. R. P. Denise on June 2,1978, and provided justification for conducting the tests at 70% power rather than 1005 power. | ||
Our request was subsequently approved in a July 25, 1978 letter forwarded by Thenis P. Spies. | Our request was subsequently approved in a {{letter dated|date=July 25, 1978|text=July 25, 1978 letter}} forwarded by Thenis P. Spies. | ||
On the basis of this correspondence, we do not feel that this should have been established as a 70% restraint as such. | On the basis of this correspondence, we do not feel that this should have been established as a 70% restraint as such. | ||
We would request , therefore, that this time be removed as a 70% | We would request, therefore, that this time be removed as a 70% | ||
restraint. It is still our intent to conduct this test as soon as reactor conditions per=1t, and if possible we would hope to conduct the test prior to the rise to power above 70%. If this cannot be accomplished we would intend to conduct the test at some convenient power level on the rise to power assuming that we obtain a release to test above 70% power. | restraint. | ||
k (7' '\ t S102060L7J | It is still our intent to conduct this test as soon as reactor conditions per=1t, and if possible we would hope to conduct the test prior to the rise to power above 70%. If this cannot be accomplished we would intend to conduct the test at some convenient power level on the rise to power assuming that we obtain a release to test above 70% power. | ||
k (7' '\\ t S102060L7J> | |||
1s 1 | 1s 1 | ||
Mr. Jim Miller | Mr. Jim Miller P-8230 Although we feel that we vill be in a position to conduct the test in the immediate future, removal of the item as 70% restraint would alleviate the various submittals and administrative matters that may be associated with the release to test above 70% power. | ||
Very truly yours, s$ 7Y W Don W. Warembourg Manager, Nuclear Production Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station DW/dkm Attachments: | Very truly yours, s$ 7Y W Don W. Warembourg Manager, Nuclear Production Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station DW/dkm Attachments: | ||
PSC Letter - P-78092 tac Letter - G-78080 cc: | PSC Letter - P-78092 tac Letter - G-78080 cc: | ||
G. Kuzmyez o | |||
I i | I i | ||
4 i | 4 i | ||
i | i t | ||
5 I | |||
i a}} | |||
Latest revision as of 09:13, 24 December 2024
| ML19345E954 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain |
| Issue date: | 01/30/1981 |
| From: | Warembourg D PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | John Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345E955 | List: |
| References | |
| P-81030, NUDOCS 8102060471 | |
| Download: ML19345E954 (2) | |
Text
.
.w, i
Public service company e cecmde 16805 Weld County Road 19 1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651
..J January 30, 1981 Fort St. Vrain Unit No.1 P-81030 Mr. Jim Miller Special Projects Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washginton, D. C.
20555 Docket No.50-26T
Subject:
Fort Saint Vrain Unit No.1 Moisture Monitor Injection Tests
Dear Mr. Miller:
Per our discussion on site during the ACRS Meeting, I indicated that we would research the establishment of the 70% power restraint with regard to the moisture monitor response tests as we felt that the test at 70% was established based on a PSC request.
We have researched the matter, and in fact it appears that the test which was originally scheduled to be done at 100% power was moved to 70% power based on a PSC request. This request (P-78092) was forwarded to Mr. R. P. Denise on June 2,1978, and provided justification for conducting the tests at 70% power rather than 1005 power.
Our request was subsequently approved in a July 25, 1978 letter forwarded by Thenis P. Spies.
On the basis of this correspondence, we do not feel that this should have been established as a 70% restraint as such.
We would request, therefore, that this time be removed as a 70%
restraint.
It is still our intent to conduct this test as soon as reactor conditions per=1t, and if possible we would hope to conduct the test prior to the rise to power above 70%. If this cannot be accomplished we would intend to conduct the test at some convenient power level on the rise to power assuming that we obtain a release to test above 70% power.
k (7' '\\ t S102060L7J>
1s 1
Mr. Jim Miller P-8230 Although we feel that we vill be in a position to conduct the test in the immediate future, removal of the item as 70% restraint would alleviate the various submittals and administrative matters that may be associated with the release to test above 70% power.
Very truly yours, s$ 7Y W Don W. Warembourg Manager, Nuclear Production Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station DW/dkm Attachments:
PSC Letter - P-78092 tac Letter - G-78080 cc:
G. Kuzmyez o
I i
4 i
i t
5 I
i a