ML20040H524: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20040H524 | | number = ML20040H524 | ||
| issue date = 01/19/1982 | | issue date = 01/19/1982 | ||
| title = Responds to NRC | | title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-508/81-08 & 50-509/81-08.Corrective Actions: Determined That Worst Case Heat Input Used for Weld Procedures Qualification Test Meets Temp Requirements | ||
| author name = Leddick R | | author name = Leddick R | ||
| author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | | author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = GO3-82-046, GO3-82-46, NUDOCS 8202180339 | | document report number = GO3-82-046, GO3-82-46, NUDOCS 8202180339 | ||
| title reference date = 11-09-1981 | |||
| package number = ML20040H519 | | package number = ML20040H519 | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . | {{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. | ||
S' | |||
~ | |||
, T4SICI.iT3 CalClHAli ' | |||
Cert 1tiet 2,7 fth b d'$f h p i p h Washington Public Power Supply System | |||
[ | |||
6 Docket Numbers 50-508 and 50-509 | Box 1223 Elma, Washington 98541 (206)482-4428 | ||
_,6 Docket Numbers 50-508 and 50-509 | |||
[ | |||
ES Si m | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Region V Office of Inspection and Enforcement 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 260 Walnut Creek, California | .M O | ||
N January 19, 1982 | |||
' ). | |||
;3,y G03-82-046 e. | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Region V Office of Inspection and Enforcement 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 260 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. B. H. Faulkenberry Chief, Reactor Construction Projects Branch | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 41: | ||
Faulkenberry to R. S. Leddick, same subject. | Faulkenberry to R. S. Leddick, same subject. | ||
The referenced letter requested the Supply System ascertain whether the " worst case" heat input was used for the weld proced'ure qualifi-cation testing perfonned in conjunction with the corrective action for item of noncompliance A (81-10/01). | The referenced letter requested the Supply System ascertain whether the " worst case" heat input was used for the weld proced'ure qualifi-cation testing perfonned in conjunction with the corrective action for item of noncompliance A (81-10/01). | ||
The weld procedure, PXS-WPS-8A, Rev. 5, was qualified to the " worst case" heat input permitted by the WPS. It should be noted that the definition of"" worst case" includes the Sumer 1980 addendum change to ASME Code Section IX. This allows the specified interpass tem-perature to be 100 F higher than experienced during the procedure qualification tests. | The weld procedure, PXS-WPS-8A, Rev. 5, was qualified to the " worst case" heat input permitted by the WPS. | ||
It should be noted that the definition of"" worst case" includes the Sumer 1980 addendum change to ASME Code Section IX. This allows the specified interpass tem-perature to be 100 F higher than experienced during the procedure qualification tests. | |||
subject. | It is our belief that this definition of " worst | ||
~ | |||
case" meets the intent of your previously stated position on this subject. | |||
Should you have any questions or desire further information, please contact me directly. | Should you have any questions or desire further information, please contact me directly. | ||
t R. S. Leddick 1000) | t R. S. Leddick 1000) | ||
Program Director, WNP-3/5 DRC/tt cc: J. Adams - IIESCO D. Smithpeter - BPA Ebasco - New York WNP-3/5 Files - Richland 8202180339 820211 PDR ADOCK 05000508 0 | Program Director, WNP-3/5 DRC/tt cc: | ||
J. Adams - IIESCO D. Smithpeter - BPA Ebasco - New York WNP-3/5 Files - Richland 8202180339 820211 PDR ADOCK 05000508 0 | |||
PDR ga-CQ}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:37, 19 December 2024
| ML20040H524 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 01/19/1982 |
| From: | Leddick R WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | Faulkenberry B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20040H519 | List: |
| References | |
| GO3-82-046, GO3-82-46, NUDOCS 8202180339 | |
| Download: ML20040H524 (1) | |
Text
_ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
S'
~
, T4SICI.iT3 CalClHAli '
Cert 1tiet 2,7 fth b d'$f h p i p h Washington Public Power Supply System
[
Box 1223 Elma, Washington 98541 (206)482-4428
_,6 Docket Numbers 50-508 and 50-509
[
ES Si m
.M O
N January 19, 1982
' ).
- 3,y G03-82-046 e.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Region V Office of Inspection and Enforcement 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 260 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. B. H. Faulkenberry Chief, Reactor Construction Projects Branch
Subject:
WASHINGTON NUCLEAR PROJECTS NOS. 3 AND 5 NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-508/81-08 and 50-509/81-08 ITEM 0F NONCOMPLIANCE A (81-10/01)
Reference:
NRC, Region V Letter, dated November 9,1981, B. H.
Faulkenberry to R. S. Leddick, same subject.
The referenced letter requested the Supply System ascertain whether the " worst case" heat input was used for the weld proced'ure qualifi-cation testing perfonned in conjunction with the corrective action for item of noncompliance A (81-10/01).
The weld procedure, PXS-WPS-8A, Rev. 5, was qualified to the " worst case" heat input permitted by the WPS.
It should be noted that the definition of"" worst case" includes the Sumer 1980 addendum change to ASME Code Section IX. This allows the specified interpass tem-perature to be 100 F higher than experienced during the procedure qualification tests.
It is our belief that this definition of " worst
~
case" meets the intent of your previously stated position on this subject.
Should you have any questions or desire further information, please contact me directly.
t R. S. Leddick 1000)
Program Director, WNP-3/5 DRC/tt cc:
J. Adams - IIESCO D. Smithpeter - BPA Ebasco - New York WNP-3/5 Files - Richland 8202180339 820211 PDR ADOCK 05000508 0
PDR ga-CQ