ML20093D390: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
t        W..
W..
                                                                                          $3 : ' ~.:... W lcg.y DUKE POWElt Gourm twl.n"=Lyta.s.                               '"'"""              "        tMm' otwis r. cA. sa.                             P. O. Box act80 ES'='o"eIA**"oSN."s a.                     CHARLOTTE. N. G. 2a242                               . m. 2570
t
        "''Ji'"An"L73*"s..
$3 : ' ~.:... W lcg.y DUKE POWElt Gourm twl.n"=Lyta.s.
        #,"" *f."Z".4                                                         84 J113 N159
tMm' otwis r. cA.
        *t,c,o,=^ao gc sa-                               July 11, 1984                           ,            ,
sa.
ALS E RT V CARR, JR.                                                  ..
P. O. Box act80 ES'='o"eIA**"oSN."s a.
L A    .' S WM AN, J R.                                                   "
CHARLOTTE. N. G. 2a242 m.
asuAto u.a,esou                                                      '* '. g: J b.,wcH James L. Kelley, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Paul W. Purdom 235 Columbia Drive
2570
,                        Decatur, Georgia 30030 Dr. Richard F. Foster Post Office Box 4263 Sunriver, Oregon 97702 Re: Duke Power Company, et al.
"''Ji'"An"L73*"s..
#,"" *f."Z".4 84 J113 N159
*t,c,o,=^ao gc sa-July 11, 1984 ALS E RT V CARR, JR.
.' S WM AN, J R.
'* '. g: J b.,wcH L A asuAto u.a,esou James L. Kelley, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Paul W. Purdom 235 Columbia Drive Decatur, Georgia 30030 Dr. Richard F. Foster Post Office Box 4263 Sunriver, Oregon 97702 Re: Duke Power Company, et al.
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 U cket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 gL__
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 U cket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 gL__
Gentlemen:
Gentlemen:
By letter of June 25, 1984, the Board was sent copies of Applicants' June         1, 1984 report to the NRC Staff regarding the Catawba TDI diesel generators.           That   report addressed more ,than         76% of Applicants'         inspection plan,     includir.g about 4200         separate inspections. As noted in the report, the remaining inspections were to be performed prior to or following reassembly of the 1A diesel engine, and the results of those inspections would be provided in a follow-up report.
By letter of June 25, 1984, the Board was sent copies of Applicants' June 1, 1984 report to the NRC Staff regarding the Catawba TDI diesel generators.
On June 29,         1984, Applicants provided that follow-up report to the NRC Staff. As the June 29 report states, inspection of the 1A diesel is now complete except for a few inspections that must be og           performed during or following engine reassembly. The June 29 report U n.           replaces the June 1 report and addresses more than 99% of the
That report addressed more,than 76% of Applicants' inspection plan, includir.g about 4200 separate inspections. As noted in the report, the remaining inspections were to be performed prior to or following reassembly of the 1A diesel engine, and the results of those inspections would be provided in a follow-up report.
        *Sg              inspection _ plan, which includes about 4800 separate inspections.                           i The results of the few remaining inspections to be conducted during                         ^
On June 29, 1984, Applicants provided that follow-up report to the NRC Staff. As the June 29 report states, inspection of the 1A diesel is now complete except for a few inspections that must be og performed during or following engine reassembly.
        'O               engine reassembly will be documented in the TDI Owners Group Phase                           )
The June 29 report U n.
N                II program.                                                                                 '
replaces the June 1 report and addresses more than 99% of the S*g inspection _ plan, which includes about 4800 separate inspections.
88 og             It should be specifically noted, to place the representations in Mr.                         4 l
i The results of the few remaining inspections to be conducted during
R                Gray's letter to the Board of July 6,1984 in their proper context,                           '
^
gg               that the June 1, 1984 report discusses and resolves all TDI generic ma.o             and Catawba specific problems               identified during the extended operations test and the teardown and inspection program for Diesel IA. .The June 29 report adds no substantive infcimation on those 9563     I
'O engine reassembly will be documented in the TDI Owners Group Phase N
II program.
88 og It should be specifically noted, to place the representations in Mr.
4 R
Gray's letter to the Board of July 6,1984 in their proper context, gg that the June 1, 1984 report discusses and resolves all TDI generic ma.o and Catawba specific problems identified during the extended operations test and the teardown and inspection program for Diesel IA..The June 29 report adds no substantive infcimation on those 9563


t...
t...
matters.               Moreover, the June 1, 1984 report discusses all major components of the engine; the additional information contained in the June 29 report deals with relatively minor systems not critical to operation of the diesels.
matters.
Copies of the June 29 report are enclosed for the Board.                                     The parties were served with copies on June 29, 1984.                                         ,
Moreover, the June 1, 1984 report discusses all major components of the engine; the additional information contained in the June 29 report deals with relatively minor systems not critical to operation of the diesels.
Sincerely, Albert V.                         rr, Jr.
Copies of the June 29 report are enclosed for the Board.
The parties were served with copies on June 29, 1984.
Sincerely, Albert V.
rr, Jr.
bjh cc: All Parties (w/o attach.)
bjh cc: All Parties (w/o attach.)
i f
i f
i
i
                          ,- .                        ._            . - - - - - - - _                              ~     - - . - -}}
~
- -. - -}}

Latest revision as of 10:36, 13 December 2024

Forwards Util 840629 Followup Rept Re Tdi Diesel Generators. Insp of Diesel 1A Complete Except for Insps That Must Be Performed During or Following Engine Reassembly.W/O Encl. Related Correspondence
ML20093D390
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  
Issue date: 07/11/1984
From: Carr A
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Foster R, Kelley J, Purdom P
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
OL, NUDOCS 8407160277
Download: ML20093D390 (2)


Text

.

W..

t

$3 : ' ~.:... W lcg.y DUKE POWElt Gourm twl.n"=Lyta.s.

tMm' otwis r. cA.

sa.

P. O. Box act80 ES'='o"eIA**"oSN."s a.

CHARLOTTE. N. G. 2a242 m.

2570

"Ji'"An"L73*"s..

  1. ,"" *f."Z".4 84 J113 N159
  • t,c,o,=^ao gc sa-July 11, 1984 ALS E RT V CARR, JR.

.' S WM AN, J R.

'* '. g: J b.,wcH L A asuAto u.a,esou James L. Kelley, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Dr. Paul W. Purdom 235 Columbia Drive Decatur, Georgia 30030 Dr. Richard F. Foster Post Office Box 4263 Sunriver, Oregon 97702 Re: Duke Power Company, et al.

Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 U cket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 gL__

Gentlemen:

By letter of June 25, 1984, the Board was sent copies of Applicants' June 1, 1984 report to the NRC Staff regarding the Catawba TDI diesel generators.

That report addressed more,than 76% of Applicants' inspection plan, includir.g about 4200 separate inspections. As noted in the report, the remaining inspections were to be performed prior to or following reassembly of the 1A diesel engine, and the results of those inspections would be provided in a follow-up report.

On June 29, 1984, Applicants provided that follow-up report to the NRC Staff. As the June 29 report states, inspection of the 1A diesel is now complete except for a few inspections that must be og performed during or following engine reassembly.

The June 29 report U n.

replaces the June 1 report and addresses more than 99% of the S*g inspection _ plan, which includes about 4800 separate inspections.

i The results of the few remaining inspections to be conducted during

^

'O engine reassembly will be documented in the TDI Owners Group Phase N

II program.

88 og It should be specifically noted, to place the representations in Mr.

4 R

Gray's letter to the Board of July 6,1984 in their proper context, gg that the June 1, 1984 report discusses and resolves all TDI generic ma.o and Catawba specific problems identified during the extended operations test and the teardown and inspection program for Diesel IA..The June 29 report adds no substantive infcimation on those 9563

t...

matters.

Moreover, the June 1, 1984 report discusses all major components of the engine; the additional information contained in the June 29 report deals with relatively minor systems not critical to operation of the diesels.

Copies of the June 29 report are enclosed for the Board.

The parties were served with copies on June 29, 1984.

Sincerely, Albert V.

rr, Jr.

bjh cc: All Parties (w/o attach.)

i f

i

~

- -. - -