ML20093D390
| ML20093D390 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/1984 |
| From: | Carr A DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Foster R, Kelley J, Purdom P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8407160277 | |
| Download: ML20093D390 (2) | |
Text
.
W..
t
$3 : ' ~.:... W lcg.y DUKE POWElt Gourm twl.n"=Lyta.s.
tMm' otwis r. cA.
sa.
P. O. Box act80 ES'='o"eIA**"oSN."s a.
CHARLOTTE. N. G. 2a242 m.
2570
"Ji'"An"L73*"s..
- ,"" *f."Z".4 84 J113 N159
- t,c,o,=^ao gc sa-July 11, 1984 ALS E RT V CARR, JR.
.' S WM AN, J R.
'* '. g: J b.,wcH L A asuAto u.a,esou James L. Kelley, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Paul W. Purdom 235 Columbia Drive Decatur, Georgia 30030 Dr. Richard F. Foster Post Office Box 4263 Sunriver, Oregon 97702 Re: Duke Power Company, et al.
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 U cket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 gL__
Gentlemen:
By letter of June 25, 1984, the Board was sent copies of Applicants' June 1, 1984 report to the NRC Staff regarding the Catawba TDI diesel generators.
That report addressed more,than 76% of Applicants' inspection plan, includir.g about 4200 separate inspections. As noted in the report, the remaining inspections were to be performed prior to or following reassembly of the 1A diesel engine, and the results of those inspections would be provided in a follow-up report.
On June 29, 1984, Applicants provided that follow-up report to the NRC Staff. As the June 29 report states, inspection of the 1A diesel is now complete except for a few inspections that must be og performed during or following engine reassembly.
The June 29 report U n.
replaces the June 1 report and addresses more than 99% of the S*g inspection _ plan, which includes about 4800 separate inspections.
i The results of the few remaining inspections to be conducted during
^
'O engine reassembly will be documented in the TDI Owners Group Phase N
II program.
88 og It should be specifically noted, to place the representations in Mr.
4 R
Gray's letter to the Board of July 6,1984 in their proper context, gg that the June 1, 1984 report discusses and resolves all TDI generic ma.o and Catawba specific problems identified during the extended operations test and the teardown and inspection program for Diesel IA..The June 29 report adds no substantive infcimation on those 9563
t...
matters.
Moreover, the June 1, 1984 report discusses all major components of the engine; the additional information contained in the June 29 report deals with relatively minor systems not critical to operation of the diesels.
Copies of the June 29 report are enclosed for the Board.
The parties were served with copies on June 29, 1984.
Sincerely, Albert V.
rr, Jr.
bjh cc: All Parties (w/o attach.)
i f
i
~
- -. - -