ML20098A721: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:r GPU Nuclesr Corporation Nuclear | {{#Wiki_filter:r GPU Nuclesr Corporation | ||
. Nuclear | |||
:: g = = 388 Forked River New Jersey 08731-0388 609 971 4000 W< | |||
')irect Dial Number: | |||
September 18, 1984 Mr. Walter A. Paulson, Acting Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555 | September 18, 1984 Mr. Walter A. Paulson, Acting Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555 | ||
==Dear Mr. Paulson:== | ==Dear Mr. Paulson:== | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 NUREG-0737, Item II.B.2 In accordance with your letter of December 7,1983, which requested additional information relative to NUREG-0737, Item II.B.2 " Design Review of Plant Shielding", GPU Nuclear Corporation provided a response on June 21, 1984. By telephone conversation on August 28, 1984 your staff i:Aicated that the NRC's evaluation of SEP Topic XV-19 " Radiological Consequences of a LOCA" had not considered charcoal filter loading during the course of an accident. Thus, the cancellation of the Standby Gas Treaticant System (SGTS) Tie-in modification could not be granted based on the above evaluatioi. | Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 NUREG-0737, Item II.B.2 In accordance with your letter of December 7,1983, which requested additional information relative to NUREG-0737, Item II.B.2 " Design Review of Plant Shielding", GPU Nuclear Corporation provided a response on June 21, 1984. By telephone conversation on August 28, 1984 your staff i:Aicated that the NRC's evaluation of SEP Topic XV-19 " Radiological Consequences of a LOCA" had not considered charcoal filter loading during the course of an accident. Thus, the cancellation of the Standby Gas Treaticant System (SGTS) Tie-in modification could not be granted based on the above evaluatioi. | ||
As a result, GPUN contracted United Enginee s & Constructors Inc. (UE&C) to analyze post-LOCA iodine loading for the SGTS charcoal filter. On September 11, 1984, a meeting was held at UE&C between GPUN personnel and Mr. G. Kelly of NRC Region I to review the results of the analysis. The analysis demonstrates that post-LOCA iodine loading for the SGTS charcoal f!1ter will not reach the Regulatory Guide 1.52 limit of 2.5 mg per gram of charcoal until the end of 30 days after a LOCA. | As a result, GPUN contracted United Enginee s & Constructors Inc. (UE&C) to analyze post-LOCA iodine loading for the SGTS charcoal filter. On September 11, 1984, a meeting was held at UE&C between GPUN personnel and Mr. G. Kelly of NRC Region I to review the results of the analysis. The analysis demonstrates that post-LOCA iodine loading for the SGTS charcoal f!1ter will not reach the Regulatory Guide 1.52 limit of 2.5 mg per gram of charcoal until the end of 30 days after a LOCA. | ||
These results, sumarized in Table I, have been obtained by conservatively assuming that primary containment leaks at the design value of 0.5% per day, for the entire 30 day duration. The design leakage is determined at the Primary containment design pressure of 62 psig. However, thermo-hydraulic analyses (reference G.E. Primary Containment Design Report), show that the post-LOCA peak pressure is only 33 psig, and the pressure drops to atmospheric level in 24 hours due to operation of the Containment Spray System. Therefore, for all practical purposes, the leakages from primary containment will be reduced to negligible levels within the first 24 hours and the actual post-LOCA 84c9250230 840918 DR ADOCK 05000 go GFU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Public Utilities Corporation | These results, sumarized in Table I, have been obtained by conservatively assuming that primary containment leaks at the design value of 0.5% per day, for the entire 30 day duration. The design leakage is determined at the Primary containment design pressure of 62 psig. However, thermo-hydraulic analyses (reference G.E. Primary Containment Design Report), show that the post-LOCA peak pressure is only 33 psig, and the pressure drops to atmospheric level in 24 hours due to operation of the Containment Spray System. Therefore, for all practical purposes, the leakages from primary containment will be reduced to negligible levels within the first 24 hours and the actual post-LOCA 84c9250230 840918 DR ADOCK 05000 go GFU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Public Utilities Corporation | ||
) | |||
R | R - | ||
iodine loading will be well below the values presentea in Table I. The | iodine loading will be well below the values presentea in Table I. | ||
analy:is also conservatively assumes that all the iodines will be accumulated in one SGTS filter train (one out of two redundant filter | The | ||
trains). | ) | ||
analy:is also conservatively assumes that all the iodines will be accumulated in one SGTS filter train (one out of two redundant filter trains). | |||
The post-LOCA iodine loading should not cause any significant change in filter efficiency for the duration of tha accident. Therefore, | The post-LOCA iodine loading should not cause any significant change in filter efficiency for the duration of tha accident. Therefore, | ||
- cancellation of the SGTS tie-in modificati?;n is justified. | |||
The results of the shielding analysis indicate that the maximum post-LOCA dose rate on the floor, directly above the filters, is only approximately 1.3 mr/hr. The SGTS filters are well shielded, below grade and inside a concrete pipe tunnel. Therefore, they do not pose any post-LOCA access restrictions to any vital areas. | The results of the shielding analysis indicate that the maximum post-LOCA dose rate on the floor, directly above the filters, is only approximately 1.3 mr/hr. The SGTS filters are well shielded, below grade and inside a concrete pipe tunnel. | ||
Therefore, they do not pose any post-LOCA access restrictions to any vital areas. | |||
Should you require any further information on this subject, please contact Mr. Michael Laggart, Manager BWR Licensing at (201) 299-2341. | Should you require any further information on this subject, please contact Mr. Michael Laggart, Manager BWR Licensing at (201) 299-2341. | ||
Very truly yours, Vice Presiden'. and Director Oyster Creek 1r:0394e Enclosure cc: Mr. G. Kelly U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I ti31 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, N.J. 08731 | Very truly yours, Vice Presiden'. and Director Oyster Creek 1r:0394e Enclosure cc: Mr. G. Kelly U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I ti31 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, N.J. | ||
08731 | |||
ef . | ef. | ||
ENCEOSURE 1~ | |||
TABLE 1 | TABLE 1 | ||
*.~ | |||
Post-LOCA Iodine Loading for SGTS Charcoal Filter b | Post-LOCA Iodine Loading for SGTS Charcoal Filter b | ||
Iodine Loading (mg of iodines per gram of charcoal) | Iodine Loading (mg of iodines per gram of charcoal) | ||
Time | Time | ||
- Stable Iodines Radioactive Iodines Total r | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
12 hours 1.8 x 10-2 2.1 x 10-3 2.0 x 10-2 | |||
-24 hours | |||
'5.5 x 10-2 4.6 x 10-3 5.9 x 10-2 | |||
.3 days: | |||
0.24 1.0 x 10-2 0.25 10 days-0.88 1.8 x 10-2 o,90 20 days 1.8 1.5 x 10-2 1.8 30 days. | |||
2.6 9.5 x 10-3 2.6 4 | |||
S 9 | S 9 | ||
O O 4 | |||
w | w y. | ||
y. | |||
e F | e F | ||
S | S | ||
-5 f | |||
I *.* | |||
I.- | |||
-m-1.----*- | |||
*}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:15, 13 December 2024
| ML20098A721 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 09/18/1984 |
| From: | Fiedler P GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | Paulson W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.B.2, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8409250230 | |
| Download: ML20098A721 (3) | |
Text
r GPU Nuclesr Corporation
. Nuclear
- g = = 388 Forked River New Jersey 08731-0388 609 971 4000 W<
')irect Dial Number:
September 18, 1984 Mr. Walter A. Paulson, Acting Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Paulson:
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 NUREG-0737, Item II.B.2 In accordance with your letter of December 7,1983, which requested additional information relative to NUREG-0737, Item II.B.2 " Design Review of Plant Shielding", GPU Nuclear Corporation provided a response on June 21, 1984. By telephone conversation on August 28, 1984 your staff i:Aicated that the NRC's evaluation of SEP Topic XV-19 " Radiological Consequences of a LOCA" had not considered charcoal filter loading during the course of an accident. Thus, the cancellation of the Standby Gas Treaticant System (SGTS) Tie-in modification could not be granted based on the above evaluatioi.
As a result, GPUN contracted United Enginee s & Constructors Inc. (UE&C) to analyze post-LOCA iodine loading for the SGTS charcoal filter. On September 11, 1984, a meeting was held at UE&C between GPUN personnel and Mr. G. Kelly of NRC Region I to review the results of the analysis. The analysis demonstrates that post-LOCA iodine loading for the SGTS charcoal f!1ter will not reach the Regulatory Guide 1.52 limit of 2.5 mg per gram of charcoal until the end of 30 days after a LOCA.
These results, sumarized in Table I, have been obtained by conservatively assuming that primary containment leaks at the design value of 0.5% per day, for the entire 30 day duration. The design leakage is determined at the Primary containment design pressure of 62 psig. However, thermo-hydraulic analyses (reference G.E. Primary Containment Design Report), show that the post-LOCA peak pressure is only 33 psig, and the pressure drops to atmospheric level in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> due to operation of the Containment Spray System. Therefore, for all practical purposes, the leakages from primary containment will be reduced to negligible levels within the first 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and the actual post-LOCA 84c9250230 840918 DR ADOCK 05000 go GFU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Public Utilities Corporation
)
R -
iodine loading will be well below the values presentea in Table I.
The
)
analy:is also conservatively assumes that all the iodines will be accumulated in one SGTS filter train (one out of two redundant filter trains).
The post-LOCA iodine loading should not cause any significant change in filter efficiency for the duration of tha accident. Therefore,
- cancellation of the SGTS tie-in modificati?;n is justified.
The results of the shielding analysis indicate that the maximum post-LOCA dose rate on the floor, directly above the filters, is only approximately 1.3 mr/hr. The SGTS filters are well shielded, below grade and inside a concrete pipe tunnel.
Therefore, they do not pose any post-LOCA access restrictions to any vital areas.
Should you require any further information on this subject, please contact Mr. Michael Laggart, Manager BWR Licensing at (201) 299-2341.
Very truly yours, Vice Presiden'. and Director Oyster Creek 1r:0394e Enclosure cc: Mr. G. Kelly U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I ti31 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, N.J.
08731
ef.
ENCEOSURE 1~
TABLE 1
- .~
Post-LOCA Iodine Loading for SGTS Charcoal Filter b
Iodine Loading (mg of iodines per gram of charcoal)
Time
- Stable Iodines Radioactive Iodines Total r
0 0
0 0
12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> 1.8 x 10-2 2.1 x 10-3 2.0 x 10-2
-24 hours
'5.5 x 10-2 4.6 x 10-3 5.9 x 10-2
.3 days:
0.24 1.0 x 10-2 0.25 10 days-0.88 1.8 x 10-2 o,90 20 days 1.8 1.5 x 10-2 1.8 30 days.
2.6 9.5 x 10-3 2.6 4
S 9
O O 4
w y.
e F
S
-5 f
I *.*
I.-
-m-1.----*-